sexta-feira, 21 de novembro de 2025

Poul Thorsen’s Arrest & The Fragile Foundation of Pharma’s Autism Narrative



Patrick Layton
 
September 16, 2025  

For more than two decades, the pharmaceutical industry and its defenders in government have leaned heavily on a handful of studies to dismiss the link between vaccines and autism. At the center of that body of work stands recently-arrested federal fugitive Poul Thorsen, a Danish scientist whose research is still repeatedly cited in courtrooms, media reports, and even last week in a government hearing as evidence that vaccines are “safe.”

But Thorsen’s story reveals a disturbing truth: one of the most prominent figures used to silence vaccine concerns is himself a disgraced fugitive accused of defrauding U.S. taxpayers and falsifying documents.

The CDC Connection

From approximately 2004 to 2010, Thorsen was deeply involved in CDC-funded studies exploring autism, cerebral palsy, genetic disorders, and fetal alcohol syndrome. While working as a visiting scientist at the CDC’s Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, he helped secure multimillion-dollar grants funneled through Danish institutions such as Aarhus University and Odense University Hospital.

These studies—particularly those examining a possible link between vaccines and autism—became cornerstones of the pro-vaccine argument. When parents raised alarms about adverse reactions, when congressional hearings grew heated, and when lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers mounted, officials frequently pointed to Thorsen’s work in Denmark to declare the science “settled.”

The Fraud

According to U.S. authorities, during this very period, Thorsen was engaged in an elaborate scheme to steal CDC grant money for personal gain. By submitting fraudulent invoices on CDC letterhead and directing payments into his own bank account, he allegedly siphoned off more than $1 million.

The invoices gave the appearance that the CDC itself was requesting funds from Danish institutions, but the money was funneled directly to Thorsen. The charges read like a playbook of corruption: abuse of position, falsified documents, and brazen theft from a public health agency entrusted with safeguarding American children. Not once, not twice… but 22 counts.

The Significance

Thorsen’s alleged criminal behavior should raise serious questions about the credibility of the research he conducted and the system that continues to rely on it. How can studies produced under the shadow of financial fraud still serve as the bedrock of government claims about vaccine safety?

Even beyond Thorsen’s personal misconduct, his scandal illustrates a deeper issue: the public is asked to place blind trust in scientists and institutions whose incentives and oversight are deeply compromised. If the very researchers tasked with disproving harm from vaccines are also defrauding taxpayers, how can parents have confidence in the conclusions?

A New Chapter: An Inconvenient Study

As the credibility of past research crumbles, a newly uncovered study has rocked the debate even further. Conducted by Henry Ford Health—a staunchly pro-vaccine organization—the study set out to disprove journalist Del Bigtree’s suspicions that America’s chronic disease epidemic might be linked to vaccines.

But the results were so shocking that the institution buried them, hiding the findings from public view for years. The data suggested a powerful connection between vaccination and skyrocketing rates of chronic illness, a revelation that threatened to upend the very narrative used to assure the public of vaccine safety.

This hidden research has now come to light. The Henry Ford study is finally available to the public, and it forms the centerpiece of a groundbreaking new documentary, An Inconvenient Study. The film, set to premiere on October 3rd, exposes shocking data, and the lengths to which powerful institutions will go to hide that data, regardless of the cost to public health.

Why This Matters Now

Today, millions of parents worldwide are calling for more independent research on vaccines and autism—studies free from financial conflicts and political agendas. Instead, government agencies double down on citing work like Thorsen’s while suppressing damning evidence such as the Henry Ford study.

Poul Thorsen’s arrest is more than a personal disgrace. Combined with the revelations in An Inconvenient Study, as well as independent studies showing an association with harm,  it reveals a deeper crisis: the so-called “settled science” of vaccine safety rests not on transparency and integrity, but on a fragile foundation of fraud, suppression, and corruption.

The time has come to demand better—for our children, for our health, and for the future.

 

Source: https://thehighwire.com/editorial/poul-thorsens-arrest-the-fragile-foundation-of-pharmas-autism-narrative/

2 comentários:

  1. Re: "An Inconvenient Study"

    What's presented in this documentary on "an inconvenient study" about the NON-safety of vaccines has long been CLEARLY shown with similar studies and other lines of evidence. Such as the fact that the US vaccine courts have paid out SEVERAL BILLIONS of dollars for children's injuries by vaccines (read the book 'Plague of Corruption' by Heckenlively and Mikovits).

    And WHO seriously harms or kills kids (and adults) in droves?

    The most obvious answer, too, has long been in plain sight for everyone --- psychopaths (read the free report 'The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room' at https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html).

    "We’ll sit on the edge of our seats watching made-up tales about psychopathic killers while psychopathic killers rule the world." --- Caitlin Johnstone, Independent Journalist

    Therefore, we do NOT need more studies (such as a randomized controlled study as Bigtree and cohorts advocate) to show, once more, the OBVIOUS REALITY in front of everyone's face!

    What we MUST do is assemble in a collective uprising (revolution) against these criminal psychopaths in power!

    The inconvenient study authors' refusal to publish their data proves their immense selfishness and their lack of character and morality having resulted in the unnecessary great pain and suffering (and, in many cases, early death) of tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of children!

    Very similarly, Bigtree and cohort's call for more studies is irresponsible, naive, reckless, immoral, and highly destructive because during the years such a "high quality" study will be completed (if ever conducted in the first place) hundreds of thousands of children will be seriously harmed when the MOST URGENT and RIGHT ACTION taken by everyone is to remove these psychopaths from power and jail them for life NOW!

    These predatory psychopaths in power have been exploiting, harming and killing us at an ever increasing rate in multiple ways. WHEN will it dawn on all the collective "awake" people of the masses that they need to get rid of them before THEY end up being their next "victim"???!!!

    "If we have learned anything in the past six years, it is that vaccinologists, doctors, and the government in general do not have good intentions and never did. The clear intention of everyone concerned was and is to make as much dirty money as possible, letting any amount of collateral damage slide, including a genocide and mass poisoning." --- Miles Mathis, American author, in 2025

    "Becoming an “antivaxxer” means you are smart enough to say NO to being poisoned." ---Ana Maria Mihalcea, M.D., Ph.D., 2024 (https://substack.com/@anamihalceamdphd/p-149191470)

    "I don’t need any more studies or conferences on social issues whose truths have been long apparent. How many details are necessary to grasp the obvious once you are acquainted with the principle?" --- Edward Curtin, American sociologist

    “A slave is one who waits for someone to come and free him.” --- Ezra Pound

    ResponderExcluir
    Respostas
    1. All great points, and thanks for the references. With regards to the call for "more studies", i understand Del Bigtree as operating within a certain social space. He's trying to reach as many "normies" as he can, and that entails going through legal channels and proving his case to the scientific community. Yes, it looks naive, and yes, the scientific community is guided more by economic incentives than by any search for truth, but this is one arena of struggle amongst many others, and rigorous control studies *have* brought numerous scientists over to our side. So each person fights in his or her own way. Nothing is in vain.

      Excluir