segunda-feira, 25 de outubro de 2021

Arguments that don't help us

 

 

Jesús García Blanca

23rd October

The majority of the population is still "hypnotised, brainwashed, paralysed and manipulated." This is the usual assessment of that layer of the population that cannot be other than what it is due to conditioning. This is not the place or the time to analyse one's freedom to make such a determination. 

But I am afraid that amongst the "awakened" minority (not so minoritarian, as there are several hundred million of us) there is also a majority that cannot move on from the stage of passive "resistance" to taking the initiative. That is, by going on the attack, by accepting the crisis -in the right sense of the word- and setting about building a better world that we won't be embarrassed to explain when our children and grandchildren ask us about it...which they will.

If we want to radically change the health paradigm that dominates our society today, we cannot settle for those little arguments used to get us out of trouble, or, as some folks propose, "proceed one step at a time" and not scare "the people who are still asleep”. 

On the contrary, I believe that those people are in need of a big bucket of cold water. We should leave behind all foolishness because the satraps of the Masters of the Universe are coming at us with the entirety of their destructive arsenal, and we do not have time for niceties. So here are some examples of those arguments into whose traps we must not fall. I will comment very briefly and without the inconvenience of scientific references (which of course exist) in order to simplify the reading:

SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated as other viruses have...

—SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated and will never be isolated because it cannot be isolated. And the reason for this is that the entities that virology calls “viruses” do not exist. In some cases they are cell particles, transport vesicles or exosomes. In other cases, they are fragments of human DNA or RNA that serve their purposes in our internal environment, and in others they are virtual constructions made using computer programs with the express intention of passing them off as new “viruses”.

PCR is not 100% reliable as a diagnostic tool...

—PCR has 0% reliability as a diagnostic tool for diseases that are blamed on “viruses”. Without the existence of viruses, there can be no components of the virus, in this case DNA or RNA with which to design the PCR. What they use are fragments of the virtual genome that they build. As I said, zero percent reliability.

Studies shows that asymptomatic people are not infectious... 

But the symptomatic people are, right? Those who seek to liberate the asymptomatic people reinforce the idea of ​​contagion that is central to this story. A study shows that asymptomatic patients are not contagious...just as another study could perfectly well demonstrate that symptomatic patients are not contagious either. But who is going to carry out that study?

Most of those supposedly infected with COVID are really influenza infections...

The "contagion" idea again. Infected here, infected there... And what difference does it actually make? What difference does it make to them - I mean, to Them - the Covid cultists, whether it is the flu or the next super-pandemic? The point is simply to reinforce Germ Theory and the lies of its champions: Pasteur, Koch and company.

COVID mortality rate of is less than that of the flu... 

The mortality rate of what? Here the trap is different: it is to reinforce the idea that there is a new disease and of course to reinforce the idea that its culprit is a "virus": "COVID" =  "Corona Virus Disease". Two birds are felled with one stone because of the carelessness of the clueless.

The COVID death rate is much lower than what is officially claimed...

—Here the trap of the new disease is repeated but with an important addition: deaths. So although it is much lower than what is officially said, what counts is that there is "COVID" and above all, that there are deaths from COVID.

There are alternative non-toxic treatments for COVID... 

There is probably no need to repeat myself. But this is yet another reinforcement of "the new disease", which is treatable, of course.

Natural immunity confers better protection than the artificial immunity of vaccines...

—Here we deal with the complementary trap to that of "contagion" and Microbial Theory. And it is the one that the "microbe hunters" first invented - the invading armies and then, led by their own warmongering logic, the defending armies. So the trap in this case is to divert attention by confronting the natural with the artificial, but filtering out the core of the question which is the reinforcement of the idea of ​​"immunity." Aware that this requires further explanations (and I would like to refer those interested to the book that Dr. Enric Costa and I wrote: Vaccines, a critical reflection) I will limit myself to saying, as a kind of provocation, that no, there is no so-called "immune system" and that in fact "immunity" is incompatible with life.

These vaccines have not been tested and authorised like the previous ones have... 

Those who use this argument seem to have no idea of ​​something called "power relations" that manifest themselves in revolving doors, in bribes, in the influence or control of multinational pharmaceutical companies, in the permanent manipulation of the Lying Media (yes, the media's falsification of reality and the censorship of critical voices) and ultimately in the control of public institutions by the foremen of the Masters of the Universe. All vaccines...all of them...are both useless and dangerous, for the simple reason that they make no biological sense and can only produce, and have produced, deaths and illnesses for more than a century. This goes for Covid vaccines and non-Covid vaccines, those authorised for emergency use and those authorised by any other means that are ultimately the only route of corruption, lies and crime.

And so it goes...

We are not going to change the reigning paradigm if we do not change the language that we use. And while the scientific-medical debate advances even at a snail's pace, we can go ahead with a change in language, banishing the concepts that have marked the dogmas of the last century or so.

Let's stop talking about "infection", "contagion", "pathogens", "defenses", "immunity", even "disease". Let us begin to expand the culture of mutual support in our internal environment, between our cells and our bacteria, and we will gradually replace the illogical logic of the exterminating the microbes that are essential for life. We will then replace it with the vital logic of cooperation, the search for balance, the understanding of life processes which frees us from mechanisation and helps us recover the living flow of things.

                                                             ***

Source: https://saludypoder.blogspot.com/2021/10/argumentos-que-no-ayudan-por-mucho-que.html

Translation: David Montoute

Luís Marcelo Martínez: "The Spike Protein does not exist"

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário