domingo, 31 de outubro de 2021

Echoes of a near future



Hi there, how are you?

Yes, you who are reading this disdainfully.

The doctor has told you that nothing can be done. The effects are irreversible, aren't they...?

But you already knew that, once taken, it would work as an internal tattoo and its effects would be permanent. It was not like a simple drug for which, most of the time, it's enough to adjust the dose or go through a withdrawal so that the immunological and/or biochemical parameters return to normal.

How many times in your life have you broken open a package you bought at the supermarket? You know that after opening the casing, after breaking the seal, its contents are irrevocably compromised. It's an irreversible phenomenon, there's nothing to be done. The clock starts its countdown to the imminent and inexorable end.

You tacitly accepted all the intrinsic conditions when you proceeded with the self-scheduling. How are you going to look at your daughter now and tell her that she is going to unexpectedly and prematurely lose her father, that she will be without her mother?

Wait, please don't tell me you allowed your daughter to be jabbed as well? What went through your head, honestly? Was it laziness? Ignorance? Did you blindly believe what they told you without making any counterpoint?

Whoa…I don't even know what to say. Did you educate yourself? Did you bother to study the matter well, to find out, to question the authorities who were foisting something on you as they struggled almost shamelessly to hide its disastrous effects, all the while refusing to allow informed consent?

Did that never seem suspicious to you? What about the pharmaceutical immunity to liability? And what about the compensation that governments promised them if something went awry? Did you think it was normal for them to put on the table the collective estate, which belongs to all of us (even those who didn't believe for one minute in the so-called miracle cure) ?

Didn't you find it strange that they first told you that the efficacy was 95% and then, after a few months, they recanted, claiming that after all they didn't prevent transmission and only eliminated — supposedly — some of the more serious symptoms?

Well, this fallacy was easy to detect…the effectiveness of these prophylactic measures is always measured by the ability to prevent the transmission of the pathogen, by the proportional reduction in the frequency of the disease. Didn't you suspect that something wasn't right when the rules were changed and the percentage of population needed to obtain group immunity inadvertently went from 70% to 90%? Didn't it irritate you that even with the two doses you still had to wear a mask and do everything you did before your were inoculated? Did you not become suspicious when two thirds of hospitalisations were among those injected when out here only half had taken the injection? Or when did they told you about the third injection? Or when they suggested that for the rest of your days, every six months, you would have to be inoculated repeatedly and permanently?

I also found it bizarre that several people at the inoculation centers remained undaunted in line after watching a flurry of fainting and convulsions after intramuscular administration of this licor, as if the unusually adverse reactions could only happen to the unfortunate folks who get pulled out of there on stretchers.

I was also surprised to see thousands dying all over the world at the mercy of this prophylactic measure, when, in the not-so-distant past, half a dozen deaths were enough for all the appropriate control and monitoring systems to have ordered an immediate suspension of the process. I ask myself: what became of common sense? In other times, Carmo and Trindade would have fallen… It is no wonder that clinical trials of these globally administered products take more than a decade to be completed. It is essential to properly assess their efficacy and safety.

If you think about it properly, you know you're being lied to. They lied through their teeth. You weren't tired of the pandemic. You were tired of lies. And thanks to the repression of that anger, in a symptom of petty covert aggression, you decided to unload on the only ones who were fighting for freedom, for your health, for the health of your family: the "weirdos", the "crazies" who gave up almost everything, their professions, their reputation, for the sake of truth. Have you never wondered why they were so decisively opposed to all these measures that defied logic? Did you really think it was because they had pumped-up egos or that were they were simply cowards, soaked with fear over being jabbed?  

You can't really blame anyone. To be inoculated with an experimental gene therapy, totally innovative and with surreptitious excipients, is extraordinarily frightening, particularly for those who have a clear perception of what is going on behind the scenes.

The truth is that, to the general public, its safety has never been properly demonstrated. All documents (very sparse and omitted) revealed were — after all — published by the manufacturers themselves. A very suspicious attitude, don't you agree? 

Were you...hypnotised?

All right, but… simply by nodding, by standing idly by, you let the reluctant people be totally obliterated by a brutal machine of oppression. The only ones that could have been of use to you after all, except for your own skin… You were an accomplice to a heinous crime — probably the most terrible in history — and you violated the most basic principles on which you founded your very existence — freedom.

You knew perfectly well that forcing someone to do something they didn't want was morally wrong, and yet you did nothing. So…where are your values? Your principles? Sincerely…

And what about censorship then? And preventing anyone from expressing their opinion, even if it is contrary to ours? Where is your moral compass?

Damn…whenever you watched the post-match comments of a football match, did you never notice that the questions were always directed at both coaches, at the two opposing clubs? And if it was a political debate, wouldn't you have to listen to the opinions of all candidates, regardless of your beliefs, ideas and convictions? Didn't you find it strange that the media — in relation to this topic — only reflected the official narrative, decimating any and all opposition? A behavior that shames the most basic concept of journalism.

Why did you act like a complete imbecile over something this crucial? Did you think the censorship machine was right just because, this time, it was apparently on “your side”, against the things that you didn't feel like listening to?

Sorry, but I have to tell you this: you didn't have a democratic spirit, you weren't aligned with your purpose of existence, you showed no character and allowed a dictatorship to gradually set itself up. A sanitary dictatorship. You didn't leave your comfort zone and you let yourself get caught up in the ego of the “experts” and the greed of the leaders.

And now, my dear, it is too late!


Ricardo Novais,

July, 2021

                                                            ***

Versão original: https://www.aliancapelasaudeportugal.com/2021/07/31/ecos-de-um-futuro-proximo/

Translation: David Montoute

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário