Syria, ruled by a spy according to Robert Ford

Naram.Serjoonn
November 8, 2025 

In wartime military operations rooms, commanders and generals meet to discuss ways to defend their positions when they anticipate an enemy attack. The Chief of Staff is tasked with thinking like the enemy and devising a plan to storm the army's positions—in other words, he must think like the enemy.

If I were able to plant a spy in the Israeli Prime Minister's office instead of Benjamin Netanyahu, I would task this agent with the following: dismantling the Israeli army; destroying all of the Israeli army's weapons and arsenal; instigating strife between Sephardim, Ashkenazim, and Haredim; concluding a peace agreement with the Arabs, relinquishing Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, and withdrawing from the Golan Heights and the West Bank; and facilitating emigration and encouraging residents to leave in order to empty the region of its Israeli inhabitants.

Today, let's gather in an operations room and ask ourselves the opposite question: What would the Israeli enemy do if it managed to plant a spy in the Syrian government? And how would this spy-president, controlled by the intelligence station in Tel Aviv, behave?

The legitimate question will lead to the following results: the dismantling of the Syrian army; the dismantling of all security and social stability systems in Syria; the destruction of all Syrian army equipment; the dismantling of the Syrian social fabric through massacres against everyone to create a violent psychological and social rift leading to the separation of Syria's constituent parts; the signing of a peace agreement with Israel; allowing Israel a military and security presence throughout Syria, especially in the south; the complete abandonment of the Golan Heights and Mount Hermon; the impoverishment of the Syrian people to render them incapable of resisting this devastation and destruction; and then emptying the region through voluntary migration due to declining living standards, thus paving the way for settlers to replace the population in the coming decades.

Everything that al-Julani (named Ahmed al-Sharaa) and the current Syrian regime are doing indicates that we are dealing with a professional spy, and that we are facing the largest espionage operation in history and the largest disinformation campaign in which so many participated, especially given that Robert Ford came out and told us that he met with the terrorist al-Julani and convinced him to work for the Americans. 

Robert Ford's announcement and the talk about Jonathan Powell's involvement in the training operation with Claire Hajjaj are a smokescreen. It's bizarre that Robert Ford would tell people he met al-Julani and convinced him to change his ways. Now the world parrots this, seeing genius in transforming a terrorist into a statesman.

This defies logic. Sound analytical reasoning suggests that Robert Ford and his British entourage are complicit in a deception, concealing the truth: the man is a dangerous and heavily protected spy. The story of the terrorist they supposedly persuaded to be peaceful and charming is a smokescreen to divert attention from his true identity as a spy who isn't even Syrian. 

It's strange that Ford would stage this ridiculous charade of transforming a killer into a peacemaker. It was equally strange that Robert Ford would reveal this secret—which should logically be embarrassing both for Islamists and for al-Julani—that he was secretly dealing with the Americans, despite his public pronouncements and meetings attacking them and the Arab rulers who cooperate with them. The sudden eagerness of the Americans to talk about this operation was a reason to doubt its credibility. It's a smokescreen, designed to convince people that the story of the wolf (i.e. terrorist) who turned into Little Red Riding Hood (Ahmed al-Sharaa) is true. This is intended to distract them from the questions many have begun asking about the identity of this mysterious figure, about his birth certificate, and his enigmatic movements across several countries during his childhood, which was attributed to the Al-Sharaa family. 

These questions began to unravel the mystery, creating holes in the narrative and leading to one inevitable conclusion: this man came from Tel Aviv. Western intelligence agencies quickly concocted the story of genetic modification—behavior modification, taming the hyena. His reputation as an Islamic jihadist was sacrificed because saving him from exposure as a spy was more important.

Everything this dangerous spy does only strengthens our conviction that he is an Israeli agent. There are significant missing pieces regarding his birth and upbringing, and the lack of resemblance between him, his alleged brothers, and his father only adds to the suspicions. The father's appearance further fuels these doubts. 

The suspicion arises because he was acting as an analyst, not a father. Based on my knowledge of these individuals, I wouldn't rule out the possibility that secret deals and a highly complex intelligence operation came together in the most important project in the world of espionage, in which this man, who claimed to be al-Julani's father, was implicated.

When the spy arrived, the certainty that he was a spy only grew stronger, because all around the world, the doors opened for him, as if he were Netanyahu himself. The courts dropped all charges against him, just like Netanyahu, and the Security Council worked in his service. The process of eliminating Syria required the Security Council's intervention to legitimize it. 

Al-Sharaa would go on to enter the White House and donate Syria's vital organs to Israel and America: the heart, liver, lungs—everything. Even its teeth, hair, and nails would be transferred to other entities. Only spies would do such a thing.

In our Syrian home, there is a spy, and anyone who supports him confirms the rule of spies. I challenge anyone to produce conclusive proof that he is a son of the Shar'a family. I will only trust a DNA test, and that the test be conducted in neutral laboratories, beyond the control of Mossad or the CIA. Otherwise, he is a spy—the son of a spy. 

 

Source: Naram Serjoon