.
30/11/2020
From the emailed press release provided by Reiner Füllmich. [1]
This
libel action is only part of a more comprehensive strategy: it is
essentially about exposing the incorrect and abusive use of the PCR
test. "We want to kill two birds with one stone," explained Göttingen
lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich. It was in his office that the complaint was
drawn up on the basis of the preliminary work of the Covid19 Committee
in Berlin. The common link is Wodarg, who also criticized the tests. [3]
The
PCR test has hung like a sword of Damocles over millions of Germans for
months. Depending on the result, there is a risk of massive
interruptions in daily life. But this test has now found its way to the
court, and a motion has been filed with the Berlin Regional Court.
The
main argument: the test is neither suitable nor intended for the
detection of infection. And that would make the chain: test positive -
infected - contagious - danger - this scheme is wrong.
First step: the libel suit
Overall, the 54-page complaint addresses the libel lawsuit against the "Volksverpetzer" website. Functioning
as "fact-checkers", the website has denigrated people who have spoken
out critically about anti-coronavirus measures, defaming them as liars,
idiots and right-wing extremists. The well-known lung specialist, Dr.
Wolfgang Wodarg, former head of a health service and member of the
Bundestag and the Council of Europe is involved here. You may recall
that with the swine flu, he exposed the machinations of the
pharmaceutical industry in 2010 and probably saved countless people from
harm. Unfortunately, hundreds of children vaccinated despite his
warning now suffer from narcolepsy [2]. In early 2020, Dr Wodarg
recognized worrying parallels between what happened then and Covid19
today.
The general strategy of the German lawyers
“The inadequate PCR test is the cornerstone of the whole coronavirus debacle. This stone must be broken so that the whole house of cards ultimately collapses,” said Füllmich, explaining the real purpose of the trial.
“The PCR test is unsuitable for determining infection” - this is the unanimous conclusion of several scientists in clinical practice and daily research.
In July, a group of lawyers made up of Viviane Fischer, Dr. Justus Hoffmann, Antonia Fischer and Dr. Füllmich
founded the Berlin “Covid Management Investigation Committee” and
subsequently invited an entire fleet of experts from various
specialisations to uncover the context of the crisis. The PCR test has
been discussed over and over again.
Experts have confirmed that the PCR test is [nd1] not suitable for
diagnosing Covid19. This critical judgment is upheld by the CDC -
America's highest health authority. The PCR test looks for virus
extracts.
The CDC said, "Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of
an infectious virus or that COVID-19 is the causative agent of clinical
symptoms." The agency concludes that a large proportion of heavy decisions are most likely based on incorrect test results.
Even
some in the pharmaceutical industry admit to the deception. Dr. Mike
Yeadon, former director and chief scientist at pharmaceutical giant
Pfizer, reportedly said: “This test is fatally flawed and should be
withdrawn immediately.” The tests are about 90% false positives. They would be 'used only to create fear.'
A similar assessment comes from Canada: Professor of medicine Roger
Hodgkinson recently said during a hearing in Parliament in Ottawa: “I
want to stress that I am active in the
COVID screening industry and that positive test results do not indicate
clinical infection. This only arouses public hysteria.”
The risk for those under 65 of dying from COVID-19 is less than one per
300,000 people.
“There is a totally unfounded public hysteria which is being carried
out by the media and politicians. It is the biggest fraud ever against
an unsuspecting public.”
The inventor of the PCR test, the Nobel laureate Kary Mullis, who died
in 2019, had repeatedly emphasized that the PCR test cannot diagnose a
viral infection.
Even the German chief virologist Christian Drosten, developer of the PCR
test for COVID-19, had declared in the “Wirtschaftswoche” in 2014 that
the PCR test would also return positives on healthy and non-contagious
people.
As of mid-January 2020, however, the “Drosten test” has been the tool
used to assess “infected people”. This is a flagrant contradiction.
Furthermore, the complaint makes it clear that during the development of
the Drosten PCR test, which has been sold millions of times in the
United States based on the WHO recommendation, glaring mistakes were
made.
A more comprehensive strategy
"This trial is only the first step towards an even broader strategy", explained lawyer Füllmich.
"All measures, from confinement - with devastating economic and
psychological consequences - to the decline of education, art and
culture and the obligation to wear a mask, are based on this unsuitable
test."
For the lawyer, the coronavirus crisis is a "multi-story pandemic" which
also constitutes a threat to democracy and freedom of expression. All
of this must be dealt with within the legal framework and those
responsible must be held to account.
Füllmich works closely with the other lawyers of the Corona committee
Viviane Fischer, Dr. Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer, their medical
advisers Prof. Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and their
legal advisor, Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab [4].
There is also close cooperation with renowned law firms in the United
States - including the group of lawyers led by Robert F. Kennedy, jr.
and its defense of children's health - [5] and Canada. The first trials
are expected there these days.
Austria is also in the starting blocks with a trial with the same
content. A Portuguese court recently lifted the quarantine measures due
to the inadequate PCR test, as it was "detention without a factual
basis". [6]
“Based on the data that we have meticulously collected, any lawyer can
now work here in Germany and abroad,” said Füllmich.
This applies both to an attack on PCR tests and to legal proceedings
against other media guilty of defaming critics. The litigation value of
the lawsuit against the "treacherous people" is 250,000 euros."
This press release was commented on in the press. We offer here some excerpts from an interview with Füllmich
in early November in the German language press. Note that the French
press has forgotten this very important step in the fight against the
manipulation of peoples through the practice of large-scale PCR tests
without the obligation of laboratories to communicate the number of
amplification cycles used (and even a ban on transmitting it. to
patients).
The French people must be informed about this scam which still leads them being banned from visiting retirement homes, to having their shops closed, to abandoning their students, to
being isolated by order of the Regional health Agency from whom we
still await legal papers allowing them to pursue so-called contact
cases...and all on the pretext of a case. In the process we forget that
a case in no way indicates that the person is sick, and we forget that
that the asymptomatic are not contagious, as admitted by a WHO
representative in June and recently confirmed in an article from Nature.
The interview with Dr. Reiner Füllmich took place in early November
2020. It was published on November 11, 2020 in the print edition of
Fuldaer Zeitung and also on November 11, 2020 in a slightly abridged
version online at fuldaerzeitung.de .
Excerpts from this interview appear below in free translation
"Severe criticism of the containment of covid19: lawyer Reiner Füllmich
attacks virologist Drosten and RKI boss Wieler by Volker Nies [7]
Class
action lawsuit in US and lawsuit in German courts: Göttingen lawyer Dr.
Reiner Füllmich (62) seeks damages for companies that have suffered
losses due to covid lockdown.
“We blame those who say the PCR test can diagnose infections. They are
above all the virologist Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten and Lothar Wieler,
President of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) ".
“The lawsuits also target politicians who relied on the advice of
Drosten and Wieler. In court, we'll ask why politicians haven't heard
from other experts as well - such as Nobel Prize winner and Stanford
professor John Ioannidis: he says the virus is far less dangerous than
Drosten and the RKI claim . He calculated that 0.14% of patients with
Corona die. This means that the coronavirus is no more dangerous than
the flu. "
The restrictions were ordered by the federal and state governments. Why don't you go after them?
“We want those responsible - civil and criminal law - to be responsible
in all cases. But we start where we are sure to succeed”.
What do you accuse the medical experts of?
“If
we can prove to MM. Drosten and Wieler in court that they deliberately
lied, then there are intentional moral damages according to Section 826
BGB. When taking evidence, politicians will of course also have to
respond.”
Even if Drosten and Wieler's advice was wrong, they are not responsible for the lockdown.
“Drosten and Wieler's Council lockdown policy is familiar. The two have
made two false claims: They say that if there is an asymptomatic
infection - people with no signs of illness - they could spread the
virus - and the infection can be detected by PCR tests.
The people who disseminate these false statements are responsible for
them. We are in court and prove that PCR tests are not appropriate for
detecting infection.”
The Robert Koch Institute explains that the accuracy of the PCR test is almost 100% if it is performed and evaluated correctly.
“But this is the correct use. In the process of PCR testing, traces of
the virus genome are reproduced - in many cycles. In Germany all tests
are obviously adjusted to high values over a large number of cycles in
order to produce as many positive results as possible.
However, a positive result does not mean that the affected person is
still contagious. Even the genetic components of a previous flu can lead
to a positive result.”
So the problem is the high number of cycles in the test?
“Among other things. The New York Times
reports that the majority of true "false positive" PCR results in the
United States are a result of such high cycle thresholds. There they
discussed generally rejecting tests with more than 30 cycles. The
Frankfurt health department is now correctly considering ignoring everything above 25 cycles.”
And that means ?
“If
the danger of the coronavirus is 0.14%, therefore at the level of the
flu, and the PCR tests are for the most part false positives, then Covid
is transformed into a very dangerous disease, which is not the truth.
PCR tests are obviously only a tool to generate panic.”
Again, RKI says PCR testing is extremely accurate when done correctly.
“So
why not do the tests correctly? Why is Drosten, against his own
judgment, running 45 cycles? Why, against all better judgment, is a
single gene sequence typically examined - rather than six, as the
Chinese have suggested? Their method is much more precise, but it is
obviously the aim in the Western world to produce as many positive cases
- but false positives - as possible. This pandemic is a testing
pandemic."
If
the positive results are mostly false and Coronavirus is as dangerous
as the flu, how are so many deaths occurring - in Italy, in Spain, in
the United States?
“Here
in Germany, there is no excess mortality over previous years. This is
also due to our good health system. As far as other countries are
concerned, the question of the causal link should in no case be
simplified.
Abuse in the health care system, excessive medical treatment prescribed
out of fear [8] and a particularly elderly population in Italy - you
cannot simply attribute everything to the danger of a virus without
examining the circumstances in more detail.
But obviously shocking photos were needed to keep the population in a
state of panic and prevent anyone from asking questions. These
horrifying images came from Bergamo and New York. I was in the United
States at the time. I live there partially and I'm licensed to practice
law in California,”
What did you see there?
“My friend Wolfgang Wodarg, a pulmonologist and former member of the
Bundestag SPD, has excellent relations with doctors in New York. Some
hospitals were not overcrowded at all. [9]
The 1,000-bed hospital ship sent in by the military was occupied by 20
or 30 patients. Affected hospitals suffer each year during the flu
season from conditions that Professor Ioannidis has called "a theater of
war".
So how did the high death toll come about?
“This question also has a complex backdrop. Because of the panic, people
rushed to hospitals who would otherwise have cured a small infection at
home. In the wards, they may have been infected with hospital germs, or
they have been treated with excessively high doses with agents such as
hydroxychloroquine, which may have increased mortality - especially in
people of colour who often suffer from favism and
therefore often cannot tolerate this drug.
Far too many patients in Italy and New York have also been hooked up to
ventilators at a very early stage, which can be fatal if used for long
periods of time.”
But there have been not only numerous corona deaths in New York City, but across the United States - 240,000 to date.
“330
million people live in the United States, of which approximately 7,300
die every day. This should not be forgotten. Of the 9.9 million people
who tested positive, about 0.2% died. However, it is not specified here
whether they died with or from Covid. The total number can seem frightening because it is not being related to other deaths.” [10]
When do you plan to take legal action?
“This week [11]. In the United States, our team works with lawyer Robert
F. Kennedy and his team. Bobby Kennedy and I met for the first time on
August 29 in Berlin, during the demonstration against the liberticidal
measures in Germany. There was not a word in the mainstream media as a
Kennedy attended! The media spoke of 30,000 to 40,000 participants, but
we know it was closer to a million.”
Why are you suing in the United States?
“In America, it is much easier for a large number of plaintiffs to pool
their interests in a class action suit. There is nothing like it in
Germany. The right of proof is also fairer in the United States when a
consumer sues a powerful corporation.”
Who are the plaintiffs?
“There are several class actions. The plaintiffs are mainly American
contractors seeking compensation for the damage suffered. During the
trial, the plaintiffs will state that there are millions of other
victims in the world. They will ask anyone aggrieved by testing and
confinement in the same way that they are admitted as a complainant.
German companies too.”
In which US court do you want to sue?
“It will be decided in a few weeks. But the first strike will be here in
Germany. The fact findings will then be used in the United States ”.
Where do you want to sue in Germany?
“We prosecute those responsible in court when possible. The prosecution
makes it possible to sue for damages in the 200 German courts, and it
will happen now. We represent companies that say, that's enough, I want
to know, and the costs don't matter.”
Do you want to seek compensation from the court or are you pursuing a political goal?
“For me, it's both: we're a group of over 100 lawyers. We originally
went for damages. But the question of political accountability is at
least as important. Regarding
the claim for damages, proceedings can take years. We believe the
course will be set from the start. The courts will consider the
evidence, regarding the question: What are these PCR tests really?"
We assume that things will move very quickly if, for example, the
connection between Christian Drosten and entrepreneur Olfert Landt is
discussed in public.”
On November 2, the Dortmund district court declared the Covid
restrictions invalid because they were based on a government ordinance
and not on a Bundestag law. How do you assess the judgment against which
the prosecutor has already lodged a complaint?
“It's very good judgment. It is on the same line as the Constitutional
court of Austria and many American courts.
The government can take emergency measures for a few days.
Longer terms, as we have done and are currently doing in Germany, can
only be decided by the legislature. There is public debate - even beyond
the immediate questions: What does a mask do, and what does a PCR test
show?
The Bundestag now wants to clarify the law on protection against
infections: the decisions that the State can order must be determined
more precisely. It comes too late, but at least there is now a
discussion of what the State can and cannot mandate.”
Will there really be an open discussion?
“What is apparent on the surface is not always what's really happening.
The second- and third-line political groups have a very different
vision. We have received signals from many members of the Bundestag for
the CDU / CSU and the SPD, including the Greens, and of course the AfD.
The deputies ask us, is there no alternative to lockdown? How great the power of the front row still is remains to be seen.”
***
This is a very interesting development to follow, if, as R. Füllmich hopes, the denunciation of the PCR scam on
which the lockdowns and freedom-killing measures are all based,
actually leads to the the house of cards collapsing. Let us get the
information out there, because fear needs to vanish along with the PCR
tests before the leaders in the service of the vaccine industry find a
way to replace them and continue their fear exercise. We thank the
lawyers of the German extra-parliamentary commission which initiated the
investigations among international experts with a view to a Nuremberg
of Covi-19 and who have pushed international jurists to highlight the
Covid testing deception and the dramatic measures resulting from it:
lost sleep and already thousands, even millions of lost lives around the
world. Let’s disseminate their work so that the hoax is no longer
hidden, and so that the citizens of the world can stop being afraid, and
recover their strength and their freedoms.
The video of lawyer Reiner Füllmich
(links in the first Nuremberg article of the YouTube Covid video) has
been censored by YouTube. His speech, in which he describes the Corona
measures as a "crime against humanity," has been shared 670,000 times on
YouTube - the English version still over a million times.
[1]
Our reference (always indicate) Date Z-99/20-rf / nw23.11.2020 Wodarg,
Dr Wolfgang./. Kreißel, Philip Complaint by Dr. med. Wolfgang Wodarg,
Wiesenweg 40, 24646 Guardian - Plaintiff - represented by: Rechtsanwälte
Dr. Fuellmich & Associates, Senderstrasse 37 at 37077 Göttingen
against Philip Kreißel, [address] - Defendant - for omission, revocation
and monetary compensation. Provisional amount of the dispute: € 250,000
We appoint ourselves as representatives of the plainfiff.
[2] In France at least 800 children whose families are struggling to obtain compensation.
[3] We reported in October the Nuremberg 2 project against those
responsible for this false pandemic and the tragic economic, psychic
social consequences.
Nuremberg-Covid: confinements were unnecessary, and remain so (3)
Nuremberg-Covid : les confinements furent inutiles, et le demeurent (3)
Nuremberg-Covid : un crime contre l'humanité qui doit être jugé !
Vers la mise en place d'un Nuremberg du Covid – site ripostelaique.com
[4] Kurzbericht_Corona-Ausschuss_14-09-2020-1-4.pdf see their information on their site
[5] Pandemic Exposes How Science Is Suppressed for Political, Financial Gain • Children's Health Defense
[7] „WERKZEUG ZUR PANIKMACHE“
Harsche Kritik an Corona-Lockdown: Anwalt Reiner Fullmich greift Virologen Drosten und RKI-Chef Wieler an
[8] Think of the deaths of Rivotril in nursing homes and the aberrant
ban on the use of hydroxychloroquine by the Minister of Health in
France. The death figure for Rivotril would be at least 10,000 deaths
and the deaths are also related to the abandonment of care for chronic
or undetected diseases during confinement and the weeks that followed
(heart attacks, strokes, untreated cancers and not screened etc.
No to deadly re-containments, even local ones! - Doctor Nicole Delépine
(nicoledelepine.fr)
[9]
Recall that in France despite the theatrical transfers by plane or TGV
of some patients, private clinics were empty throughout the country,
prohibited from normal care by the White Plan imposed by Edouard
Philippe a few days before confinement (reserved for emergencies deemed
such by the ARS and not the surgeon or the patient) and that no covid-19
patients were sent to them, except with a few exceptions. It should be
noted that currently private clinics have again had to cancel many
patients on the orders of the ARS while the pseudo second wave is over
and hospital services are not saturated.
[10] Note that the US CDC recently admitted that only 6% of patients
classified as dead from Covid actually died from Covid. In France
itself, the minister recently confessed to the Senate that it was
difficult to determine the proportion of deaths due to covid or
associated with Covid.
[11]
In fact the complaint was filed on November 23, 2020 Klage des Dr. med.
Wolfgang Wodarg, Wiesenweg 40, 24646 Warder - Kläger -
Prozessbevollmächtigte: Rechtsanwälte Dr. Fuellmich & Associates,
Senderstrasse 37 in 37077 Göttingen gegen Philip Kreißel, [Anschrift] -
Bekufälagter - wegen Unterdigeldung. Vorläufiger Streitwert: € 250,000
Wir bestellen uns zu Prozessbevollmächtigten des Klägers.
English translation: David Montoute
Original [via FranceSoir]: http://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/le-test-pcr-va-au-tribunal-au-portugal-mais-aussi-en-allemagne-et-dans-de-nombreux
