sábado, 20 de junho de 2026

The Sahara Desert is Algeria's future breadbasket



mpr21 
26 January 2025

Until recently, agriculture in the Sahara Desert was confined to oases. This traditional farming owed its success to ancestral knowledge developed in the shade of palm trees.

Since the 1980s, it has been practiced in vast desert areas using sprinklers that allow for the irrigation of fields up to 40 hectares. To achieve this, Saharan agriculture faces enormous challenges: water availability, high temperatures, distance from consumer markets, energy costs, and financing.

Thanks to the southern climate, markets are now supplied year-round with tomatoes, peppers, zucchini, and other vegetables. This type of activity has attracted farmers from the north of the country and young people seeking employment. Investors like the Souakri Group have launched projects to produce cherry tomatoes on a large scale for export to Europe.

Among the successes of Saharan agriculture, potato production in the Oued Souf region, in the far southeast of Algeria, holds a special place. Initially an experiment, the development of one-hectare sprinkler irrigation systems has allowed for its expansion thanks to the participation of farmers with limited resources.

Today, the desert produces a large proportion of the potatoes consumed in Algeria. In February 2022, agricultural services estimated a potato production of 400,000 tons in Oued Souf.

The development of greenhouse horticulture is another aspect of the new desert farming that is rapidly expanding. In 2016, in the Biskra region, the total value of crop loans granted to farmers by seed traders was estimated at 530 million dinars, and the El Ghrous market in Biskra alone is frequented by more than 500 farmers and 120 wholesalers.

Sugar beet production in an arid zone

One of the successes of large-scale cultivation is the production of animal feed. With the production of maize to feed livestock, the Menia region has enabled Ghardaia to become a dairy hub.

Algeria has begun to rely on the Sahara to produce much of its milk. Last year, a project was launched to create a giant farm with 270,000 cows—the largest in the world—in the Adrar region.

The investment amounts to $3.5 billion to produce powdered milk, animal feed, meat, and grains. The money comes from both Algeria and the Qatari Baladna Group.

The same is true for wheat cultivation in Adrar, Menia, and Timimoun, in which the Italian BF Group is participating alongside the National Investment Fund with $400 million. Production reaches more than two million tons, including seeds used in cases of drought in the north. 

Sugarcane: From the Tropics to the Desert

Another project involves producing sugar from sugar beets and sugarcane in the desert. Sugarcane is already being cultivated in the south by small-scale farmers who sell sugarcane honey. There is also an Italian-Algerian sugarcane cultivation project in the Hassi El Gara region of Menia.

Regarding sugar beets, a private investor conducted initial trials in 2022 on several dozen hectares in Gassi Touil (Ouargla).

An Algerian private company will also produce sugar beets and operate a processing plant with a capacity of 500,000 tons per year in the provinces of Menia, Ouargla, and Ghardaia, covering a total area of ​​over 285,000 hectares.

Meanwhile, a state-owned company will produce sugar beets and processing beets, with a capacity of 60,000 tons, in the provinces of Ouargla and Touggourt, covering an area of ​​more than 20,000 hectares.

Sugar production in arid regions is not new. With the Canal sugar refinery, located 250 kilometers south of Cairo, Egypt is developing irrigated sugar beet cultivation. The country has extensive experience in agronomy and logistics.


Source: https://mpr21.info/el-desierto-del-sahara-es-la-futura-despensa-de-argelia/


sexta-feira, 19 de junho de 2026

Deuterium depletion, the microbiome and tropical sunlight

 


No Mind
June 18th, 2026

If carbohydrates are high in deuterium… And high deuterium damages mitochondrial nanomotors… Then why are super centenarians in the Nicoya Peninsula in Costa Rica eating rice and beans — and living past 100? This is the question Dr. Laszlo Boros — Hungarian medical doctor, retired professor at UCLA School of Medicine, author of 100+ peer-reviewed papers and one of the world's leading deuterium researchers — was asked by @thelightdiet if carbohydrates are high in deuterium…

And high deuterium damages mitochondrial nanomotors…

Then why are super centenarians in the Nicoya Peninsula in Costa Rica eating rice and beans — and living past 100? 
 
His answer reframes everything about longevity, diet, and deuterium depletion.

They're not avoiding deuterium through diet.

They're depleting it through biology.

Five synchronized mechanisms — all of which modern humans have largely destroyed.

1. Nutritional metabolic ketosis (via the microbiome)

These populations eat carbohydrates.

But their highly adapted microbiome ferments those carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids — butyrate, propionate — that are deuterium-depleted relative to the original substrate.

Their gut bacteria eat the high-deuterium carbohydrates and hand the human host low-deuterium ketone bodies.

They are operating in a state of nutritional ketosis — without eating a ketogenic diet.

The bacteria do the depletion for them.

2. The biological cost — stool volume and skin shedding.

The deuterium has to exit somewhere.

Boros: "You need to look at their stool. Their stool is probably larger, it's more volume, and it's more deuterium-packed."

The dead, deuterium-loaded bacteria leave through the gut.

These populations produce significantly larger stool volumes and have more frequent bowel movements than carnivore populations — who may only use the bathroom once or twice a week.

The stool is the primary exit route for the deuterium they consumed.

This is the biological cost of carbohydrate-based deuterium management.

But stool is not the only exit route.

Intense sunlight accelerates the rapid turnover and shedding of keratinocytes — skin cells.

The skin becomes another active deuterium excretion pathway.

Boros: "Your skin actually produces and depletes deuterium on a constant basis simply because you produce keratinocytes, especially when you're exposed to sunlight."

Which brings us to the next point.

3. Sunlight

Most of these super centenarian populations live close to the equator.

Intense red and near-infrared photon pressure penetrates tissue and reduces the viscosity of structured water inside the mitochondrial matrix — allowing nanomotors to keep spinning efficiently even when dietary deuterium is slightly elevated.

The light and the local food work as a synchronized package.

Boros: "You actually deplete deuterium very efficiently in your local environment once you encounter the appropriate microbiome for it."

4. Intergenerational microbiome sharing

The ancestral tribes often eat the exact same local foods their ancestors ate for generations.

They live in close physical contact — carrying adapted bacteria on their bodies, passing them to offspring through direct contact. 
 
Generation after generation of the same local food plus the same specialized deuterium-depleting microbiome.

Boros: "They give these bacteria to one another because they are in close contact with their offspring. They carry them on their body. They actually get in contact with their stool and everything. Practically they are very efficient in providing one another a deuterium-depleting microbiome."

5. Night-cycle plant biology — the plants themselves are depleted

This is the mechanism most people miss entirely.

The specific rice and beans these populations eat are locally grown, non-GMO plants — and those plants are naturally deuterium-depleted at specific carbon positions.

The mechanism: during the night cycle, plant chloroplasts act like mitochondria — producing sugars that are naturally depleted of deuterium at the 3rd and 5th carbon positions of the sugar molecule.

Boros: "If you look at some papers that discuss the deuterium content in carbohydrates — for example, the fifth and the third carbon of sugar in beans which are grown in a natural environment — they are actually pretty depleted of deuterium simply because they use the night cycle when they use their chloroplasts as mitochondria."

Modern industrially farmed GMO crops have been engineered to grow faster — destroying this natural night-cycle deuterium depletion mechanism entirely.

The carbohydrate looks the same. The deuterium content is not.

The modern contrast

You cannot copy the tribal diet without copying the tribal biology.

Glyphosate, antibiotics, and processed food have destroyed the first line of microbial deuterium defense.

Artificial blue light has replaced the equatorial photon pressure that compensates for dietary deuterium.

Industrial GMO food has replaced locally grown, seasonally consistent food sources.

Sterilized environments have broken intergenerational microbiome transfer.

A modern human eating rice and beans does not have the biological machinery these populations built over generations.

Boros's conclusion:

“If you're able to stay in your local environment and not ship in food with unknown deuterium content. You can actually be safe on a relatively carbohydrate-rich diet if the carbohydrate portion of your diet is deuterium-depleted — and that's the case with plants which are not GMO."

The Nicoya centenarians are not evidence that carbohydrates are uniformly safe for modern humans.

They are evidence that deuterium depletion is a whole-system biological problem — not a dietary one.

Fix the environment.

Not just the diet.

 

Source: https://x.com/the_no_mind/status/2067582797833789793

quinta-feira, 18 de junho de 2026

Is Post-Vaccine Fatigue Causing Mitochondrial Dysfunction?




Independent Medical Alliance
December 29, 2025

Since the dawn of COVID and the widespread rollout of the injections, chronic fatigue has surged in parallel. Millions have reported persistent exhaustion, exercise intolerance, and physical depletion long after recovery or vaccination

Yet despite the consistency of these reported symptoms, the condition remains under-researched and neglected.

This new article, co-authored by Independent Medical Alliance Director of Research Matthew Halma and IMA Co-Founder and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Joseph Varon, adds critical weight to the evidence.

Alongside recent studies published in Advances in Virology, Heliyon, and Frontiers in Medicine, it contributes to a growing body of research linking patient-reported fatigue to measurable biological dysfunction.

Together, these studies mark a pivotal year for research into Post-Acute COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS), a condition increasingly defined by both symptoms and science.

Fatigue is one of the most common (and most misunderstood) symptoms reported by patients with PACVS. But this isn’t just about feeling tired. It’s about a cellular-level energy collapse that leaves patients unable to perform basic activities without profound exhaustion.

This new review by Halma and Varon sheds light on why. Published in the Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy the article highlights research that used 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to peer inside muscle cells and found what many patients already knew: the energy just isn’t there.

About the Study

Fatigue has been one of the most common and frustrating symptoms reported by people with PACVS. But until now, it has been hard to explain exactly why it happens. This study offers new clarity.

It shows that patients reach their lactate threshold earlier and burn fat less efficiently during physical activity, both signs that their energy systems are under stress. These changes were directly linked to symptom severity and reduced exercise tolerance.

The takeaway? Fatigue in PACVS is not subjective. It’s measurable, biologically grounded, and increasingly understood.

Muscle Memory: What Mitochondrial Dysfunction Means

Mitochondria are the body’s energy producers. When they falter, muscles struggle to sustain activity and recover properly.

In this study, PACVS patients showed a lower lactate threshold, reduced fat oxidation, and diminished ATP production: clear signs of impaired energy metabolism. These disruptions align closely with patient reports of post-exertional crashes, cognitive fog, and a body that doesn’t bounce back.

One long COVID study offers a helpful visual model for how these mechanisms may function. The figure below illustrates contributing factors such as oxygen shortages, metabolic deconditioning, altered nervous system signaling, immune activation, and central fatigue. Together, they help make sense of what PACVS patients are experiencing.



Why This Changes the Game

By compiling evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction, this review points to a physiological target linked to the symptoms patients have long described.

That opens the door to focused therapeutics:

  • Mitochondrial support (e.g. CoQ10, L-carnitine, creatine, D-ribose, nicotinamide riboside, alpha-lipoic acid, and B-complex vitamins)
  • Targeted rehabilitation focused on restoring energy pathways
  • Biomarker tracking to monitor response

It also helps shift the conversation—from asking if the condition is real to understanding what drives it.

“The persistence of impaired muscle energetics suggests a need for targeted rehabilitation strategies aimed at restoring mitochondrial function.” — Study authors

IMA’s Mission: From Science to Care

This paper aligns with IMA’s commitment to accelerating recognition, diagnosis, and treatment for Post-Acute COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS). It complements recent research on:

It’s not just about proving Post-Acute COVID-19 Vaccination Syndrome (PACVS) exists—we’ve done that. It’s about building the path forward.

What Comes Next

As 2025 closes, momentum is building. We’re inviting clinicians and researchers to help move this conversation from the margins to the mainstream.

 

Source: https://principia-scientific.com/is-post-vaccine-fatigue-causing-mitochondrial-dysfunction/

quarta-feira, 17 de junho de 2026

The agreement between the United States and Iran will not be fulfilled.

 


mpr21
June 16, 2026 

 Whether it is signed or not, the agreement between the United States and Iran will not be fulfilled under any circumstances, leading to a permanent state of “low-intensity warfare.” The United States has not only lost the war but also its hegemony in a strategic region like the Middle East, a situation to which it will not resign itself.

Historical experience is conclusive on this point: after the Iran hostage crisis, the United States signed the Algiers Accords in 1981, which it never honored.

In that agreement, the United States committed to not interfering politically or militarily in Iran's internal affairs and to lifting the embargo on Iranian assets, as well as the sanctions.

Given this non-compliance, Iran has copied those agreements in the new ones, almost verbatim.

It is also doubtful that the sanctions will be lifted, although it is possible that some of them will be eased.

In any case, the memorandum of understanding confirms that the United States has not achieved any of the objectives it had in mind when it launched the war. Iran’s sovereign rights to continue uranium enrichment have been recognized, albeit with ambiguous wording: 30 days after the signing, 60 days of discussions on uranium will begin in exchange for the lifting of sanctions.

Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal will remain unrestricted. Its relations with Hezbollah and other forces of the “axis of resistance” have been strengthened and will continue. The Gulf Arab states are distancing themselves from their former protector and seeking to improve their relations with Iran.

Vice President J.D. Vance has confirmed that Iran will receive $300 billion for reconstruction. “It’s the kind of resources they could have access to, provided they fulfill their part of the obligation,” he commented.

More importantly, Iran has secured the right to jointly control the Strait of Hormuz with Oman through an addition to Article 5 of the memorandum.

In an attempt to sabotage the agreement, Israel launched an attack on Beirut, and Iran immediately withdrew from the memorandum of understanding and announced retaliatory attacks against Israeli territory.

In turn, Trump publicly condemned Netanyahu for the attack on Lebanon, and Iran called off its retaliatory strikes. Trump, who was extremely keen on the memorandum of understanding being signed, had to make additional concessions. One of these guaranteed “the sovereignty and respect for the territorial integrity of Lebanon,” which Trump had not accepted in previous versions.

The United Arab Emirates pays Iran $3 billion

In the final skirmishes of the Ramadan War, the United Arab Emirates, Israel’s most loyal pawn in the Gulf, had not suffered Iranian attacks, unlike Kuwait, Jordan, and Bahrain.

This was in exchange for a payment of $3 billion. The Gulf state had taken the most forceful stance against Iran, pressuring the United States to continue the war against Iran, but was simultaneously negotiating a price.

The payment could reach $10 billion, and some sources told Reuters that it will eventually pay $20 billion.

The disbursement illustrates the significant shift the Middle East war has brought about. The United Arab Emirates joined the United States and Israel in carrying out dozens of attacks against Iran. They also tried to prevent Pakistan from acting as a mediator to broker a ceasefire.

Saudi Arabia had to grant Islamabad a new loan after the UAE demanded repayment of its debt as a sanction for hosting the meetings.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard is Welcomed

Last week, the United Arab Emirates welcomed members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard for a meeting with Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE's national security advisor and deputy governor of Abu Dhabi.

This week, the UAE also sent diplomats to participate in face-to-face talks with senior Iranian officials to reduce tensions, according to Bloomberg. The meeting appears to have been held in Tehran to avert an attack on the UAE.

It is unclear whether the compensation paid to Iran came from accounts linked to Tehran, which Abu Dhabi had frozen, or from Emirati sovereign wealth funds. 

A Financial Hub for Iran

For decades, the UAE has been a financial hub for Iran, illustrating that business between the two countries transcended political rivalry. Iranians are major players in the UAE's real estate market.

After the start of the war against Iran, the United Arab Emirates threatened to freeze billions of dollars linked to Iran, but there was never any public confirmation that they carried out their threat.

The agreement between the two countries would allow Iran to secure the compensation it demanded in exchange for a ceasefire, while allowing Trump to pretend that he has not paid Iran a single cent.


Source: https://mpr21.info/el-acuerdo-entre-estados-unidos-e-iran-no-se-va-a-cumplir/

Iran-US MoU ‘great victory’ for Tehran as US failed to achieve war objectives: Former diplomat

 


Press TV Website Staff

15 June 2026 

 A former Iranian diplomat says the finalized memorandum of understanding (MoU) reached between Iran and the United States is a “great victory” for Tehran as Washington failed to achieve its war aims.

Speaking to the Press TV website on Monday, hours after the MoU was finalized, Seyyed Jalal Sadatian, a veteran Iranian diplomat, reflected on the agreement that brought an end to months of war following the unprovoked US-Israeli aggression on Iran.

"This is, in my view, a great victory, achieved through the unity of the people, their serious support, battlefield strength, and the alignment of diplomacy and media with that effort," said Sadatian.

The MoU, finalised in the early hours of Monday and set to be officially signed in Geneva on Friday, followed intensive negotiations in Islamabad mediated by Pakistan and Qatar.

It mandates an immediate and permanent halt to war on all fronts, including Lebanon, and also ends the illegal US naval blockade against Iran.

Sadatian noted that the document serves as a ledger of American failure in the face of indomitable Iranian resistance and resilience.

He outlined several dimensions of Iran's decisive win. Chief among them, Washington's core objective of using coordinated military aggression to engineer “regime change” and install a “puppet government” in Tehran, which failed to materialize.

"They were forced, under various pressures, to accept Iran's existing government and to agree not just to a ceasefire but to an end of war," the seasoned diplomat told the Press TV website.

Having been drawn into the war under Israeli pressure, Trump is now "ordering Israel not to make a wrong move," Sadatian noted, adding that this shift alone carries significant weight.

The former diplomat highlighted that the imposed war inflicted lasting damage on American “credibility, its global image and its posture as a superpower.”

He noted that Trump's domestic popularity had fallen sharply, and that US economic pressure had spread across multiple continents, from American households to South Korea, Japan, India, and European nations.

"Taken together," Sadatian said, "despite his contradictory and agitated statements, he has ultimately been compelled to submit and accept these realities."

Leverage of the Strait of Hormuz

On the question of the Strait of Hormuz, Sadatian dismissed American claims of having secured its reopening as a diplomatic achievement, pointing out that the Strait was open before the war began. The framing, he argued, reveals more than it conceals.

"It shows how much pressure the Strait's status exerted on the global economy and on Trump personally," he said, referring to the closure of the waterway to US and allied hostile vessels.

Trump had campaigned on economic recovery and an "America First" agenda, but the war against Iran produced the opposite: fuel and energy price spikes drove up the cost of food and consumer goods for ordinary Americans, while allied governments in Asia and Europe lodged formal protests over rising prices.

Sadatian credited Iran with a calibrated strategy. Rather than closing the Strait outright, Tehran “controlled” the waterway, releasing daily figures on ship transits to signal controlled authority.

He noted that Iran has consistently maintained that the strategic waterway between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman is not international waters but a shared waterway with Oman, and that its management going forward must follow defined rules.

"It appears the United States has implicitly accepted this," he said, describing the current understanding in plain terms.

Washington has tacitly agreed that, while sanctions are being lifted and negotiations come to a gradual end, Iran will allow increased vessel traffic, but not a return to the pre-war status quo of unchecked passage. Full Iranian control, Sadatian suggested, is now the implicit baseline.

Israel may try to undermine MoU

The question of whether Israel will attempt to derail the MoU drew a measured but cautious response. Sadatian said Israeli regime officials, both within Netanyahu's war cabinet and in the opposition, are “furious” over the end to the war of aggression against Iran, insisting no objectives were achieved and that resistance to any Iran-US deal must continue.

He pointed to a recent Israeli strike on the southern suburb of Beirut as evidence of this disruptive intent. "The probability that they will try to undermine and upend the process must always be accounted for," he noted.

Yet he assessed Israeli room for manoeuvre as limited. "Israel knows that if it makes a wrong move and it attacks Iran and does not have American backing in the face of Iran's response, it will not have the capacity to withstand it."

"Netanyahu tried to encourage all previous presidents to participate in an attack on Iran," he said, "but it was Trump who fell for it."

Trump, he added, has since grown visibly regretful, recognising the scale of the diplomatic and political damage done, and the absence of any meaningful gain.

The MoU brokered through Pakistani and Qatari mediation has been widely welcomed by world leaders, from the Arab world to Europe and beyond.

 

Source:  https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/06/15/770516/iran-us-mou-great-victory-Tehran-us-failed-achieve-war-objectives-diplomat

domingo, 14 de junho de 2026

Lebanon files UN complaints over Israeli herbicide use, army killing


Shells that appear to be white phosphorus from Israeli artillery explode over a road leading to Chamaa village, as it is seen from Tyre city, south Lebanon, Friday, March 27, 2026 (AP)


Lebanon has formally referred two Israeli violations to the UN Security Council: the spraying of glyphosate herbicide over southern border villages and the targeting of a Lebanese Army vehicle on June 6.


Al Mayadeen English
June 14th

Lebanon's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has sent two separate letters to the UN Security Council and Secretary-General António Guterres documenting recent Israeli violations, one addressing the spraying of the herbicide glyphosate over southern border villages and the other condemning the targeting of a Lebanese Army vehicle that led to the martyrdom of three servicemen.

In the first letter, dated June 10, 2026, the Ministry lodged a formal complaint based on a report prepared by the National Council for Scientific Research against the occupation army's spraying of glyphosate over several southern Lebanese border villages on February 1, 2026, noting that the Chemical Weapons Convention prohibits the use of herbicides as a method of warfare.

Laboratory tests and chemical analyses conducted on soil samples from Ayta al-Shaab, Ras al-Naqoura, and al-Dhayrah confirmed the presence of glyphosate at concentrations reaching up to 22,750 micrograms per gram, levels far exceeding those typically recorded in agricultural soil following direct use by farmers.

Attacks on the Lebanese Army

A second letter, sent on June 11, detailed the IOF's deliberate targeting of a Lebanese Army military vehicle on June 6, on the Kfar Tebnit–al-Khardali road. The attack led to the martyrdom of two officers, a brigadier general and a captain, and one soldier, while they were carrying out their national duty in southern Lebanon.

The Ministry called on the United Nations to condemn the attack and take immediate measures to halt repeated Israeli violations, urging full compliance with the UN Charter and relevant international resolutions, including Resolution 1701 (2006).

'Undermining the diplomatic track'

The Foreign Ministry noted that the attacks are occurring against the backdrop of ongoing talks between Lebanese authorities and the Israeli regime in Washington under US sponsorship, "aimed at consolidating a cessation of hostilities and laying the groundwork for a peaceful and sustainable solution."

The fifth round of negotiations between Lebanese and Israeli officials will begin in Washington on June 22, a Lebanese official source told Al Mayadeen, describing the upcoming discussions as "particularly significant" for resolving outstanding issues related to Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon.


Source: https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/lebanon-files-un-complaints-over-israeli-herbicide-use--army

"The Genetic Deception (2026)", a New Book by the Author of "Unbekoming" Substack

 


Sasha Latypova
June 5, 2026 (Leer en castellano)

Sasha Latypova's avatar

Dear Readers,

I am a fan of Unbekoming Substack, and recommend that you subscribe and follow this author. I have provided a written interview for their publication in the past. I would like to draw your attention to the recent book published by the author - “The Genetic Deception”. The book is kindly made available by the author to my subscribers as a free download:

Download "The Genetic Deception" pdf

Below is the introduction to the book and the Map of Work post which you can follow to learn about their other books and research articles.

Introduction to The Genetic Deception (2026)

The Genetic Deception is a book about the fifth and most formidable wall of modern medical extraction. The first four walls — vaccination, allopathic medicine, bacteriology, and virology — have all been seen through by some readers, some of the time. The genetics wall captures even those who have seen through the rest, because the genetics wall is the wall that wears your face. To question a genetic diagnosis can feel like questioning your own existence.

The book documents what the genetic framework conceals.

It examines what the Human Genome Project actually delivered after thirty years and billions of dollars: more than seven hundred genome-wide association studies across approximately eighty diseases, all converging on the same finding — the genetic contribution to common disease is at most five to ten percent of risk. The architects of the field have themselves abandoned the predictive ambitions that justified the original investment. Francis Collins, who led the Project, scanned his own genome and found his risk estimates for almost every disease were within population averages. The architect of the field looked at his own results and found them clinically useless.

It examines the foundations of the molecule itself. The iconic image of the double helix has never been directly observed. The 2001 announcement that the human genome had been “sequenced” was made on the basis of computer-assembled composites with eight to ten percent gaps. The first truly complete human genome was not published until 2023. Standard DNA extraction protocols applied to protein powder produce the same precipitate the protocols produce when applied to actual cells.

It examines forensic DNA testing. When NIST was finally forced to conduct a blinded study, only six percent of one hundred and eight accredited forensic laboratories reached the correct conclusion on a three-person mixture. Seventy percent incorrectly indicated that the test suspect “might be in the mix.” The technology has been used in courtrooms claiming 99.8 percent accuracy for decades and has put people in prison.

It examines specific conditions. Familial hypercholesterolemia, presented as a genetic death sentence requiring lifelong statin compliance, has been tracked across two centuries of Dutch mortality data showing no significant elevation in all-cause mortality compared with the general population. BRCA1, the foundation of an entire industry of preventive mastectomies, was launched on a 1994 paper that itself documented every studied family containing at least one woman with the “cancer-causing mutation” who lived to age 80 without cancer. Between thirty-five and fifty-five percent of those who test positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2 sequence differences never develop the disease. Down syndrome was linked in 1964 to parental radiation exposure — to excess X-rays given to pregnant women and to fathers working near radar — research that the establishment has chosen not to integrate into present screening protocols.

It examines the institutional lineage. Francis Galton published Hereditary Genius in 1869, the same year Friedrich Miescher scraped pus from surgical bandages and called the precipitate “nuclein.” The Rockefeller Foundation funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes through the 1920s and 1930s, the institutions whose researchers wrote the Nazi sterilisation laws. After the Second World War, “eugenics” became a dirty word; the institutions did not disappear but renamed themselves. The Eugenics Quarterly became Social Biology. The British Eugenics Society became the Galton Institute, then the Adelphi Genetics Forum. The American Eugenics Society moved its headquarters into the New York offices of John D. Rockefeller III’s Population Council. The personnel and the project continued under the new names. What has reached your doctor’s office is the descendant of this lineage.

The book follows the evidence across all of this and arrives at the same picture from every direction. The genetic framework, as currently constituted and applied, does not deserve the authority it has claimed.

The Appendices | Reference Material the Reader Returns To

The book closes with six appendices that function as reference material for paid subscribers.

The Vocabulary of Genetic Deception decodes the eighteen terms that perform the framework’s argumentative work in every medical conversation. Variant, mutation, carrier, predisposition, heritability, penetrance, de novo, polygenic. Each entry shows what the term sounds like, what conclusion it smuggles in before the argument begins, and what plain-language equivalent describes the same observation without preloading the verdict.

What to Say When the Doctor Says “It’s Genetic” is a plain-language script for the consultations the framework is not designed to accommodate. Eight common doctor statements — You have the BRCA mutation, Your child has a genetic disorder, This runs in families, There’s nothing we can do — it’s genetic — each paired with the questions that move the conversation toward the evidence the doctor’s framework rules out. Including, in each case, the documented data the patient is entitled to and rarely receives.

The Four Real Causes is a diagnostic checklist for any condition labelled genetic. The four categories of insult — toxic exposure, nutritional deficiency, electromagnetic radiation, chronic stress — broken into specific lines of inquiry. Pharmaceutical history, dental amalgams, water source, wireless density, sleep architecture, occupational exposures. What can be removed, what can be restored. The investigation the diagnosis forecloses.

The Conditions Currently Labelled “Genetic” is a field guide to seventeen conditions — cystic fibrosis, sickle cell, Huntington’s, BRCA, familial hypercholesterolemia, Down syndrome, Dravet, Alzheimer’s, autism, schizophrenia, type 1 diabetes, MS, lupus, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, Alpha-1, hereditary cancers, birth defects. For each: the genetic story, what the evidence shows, what is ignored.

The Eugenics Continuity traces the institutional lineage from Galton (1869) through Cold Spring Harbor (1904), Buck v. Bell (1927), the Rockefeller funding of the German programmes (1920s-1930s), Watson and Crick (1953), the post-war rebranding, the Human Genome Project (1990), and the present-day “personalised medicine” apparatus.

The Curated Resource Library is an annotated guide to the primary sources — Jonathan Latham and Allison Wilson, Dr. Marizelle, Jamie Andrews, Tom Cowan, Toby Rogers, Malcolm Kendrick, Lester and Parker, the Baileys, and the wider terrain medicine tradition. Where to begin with each, what to read first, and what each source is best for.

 

 

Source:  https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-genetic-deception-2026-new-book