domingo, 19 de abril de 2026

CDC Reports Significant Drop In US Fertility Since 2021



Nicolas Hulscher, MPH on . 

A newly released CDC report confirms that the U.S. fertility rate has declined to the lowest level ever recorded in modern American history.

In 2025, the general fertility rate fell to just 53.1 births per 1,000 women aged 15–44, marking yet another historic low.

At the same time, total U.S. births declined to only 3.61 million nationwide in 2025.

U.S. fertility has now fallen approximately 23 percent since 2007. Even more concerning, fertility has dropped an additional 5.7 percent since 2021 alone.

 


While falling birth rates can be attributed to economic hardship, delayed marriage, cultural shifts, and changing lifestyle preferences, the scale and persistence of this decline suggest biological impairment driven by exposure to environmental toxins such as PFAS (“forever chemicals”), phthalates, BPA/plastics, pesticides, EMFs, heavy metals, air pollution, and most recently, mRNA injections.

Since 2021, 80 percent of Americans were injected with COVID-19 gene-transfer shots that damage the reproductive system. In animal models, they destroy over 60 percent of female’s non-renewable egg supply.

In human data (n=1.3 million), vaccinated women have ~33 percent fewer successful pregnancies.

A new study demonstrated that “vaccine” mRNA and spike protein invade the human placenta and fetal cells. 37 percent of placentas from vaccinated mothers contained spike protein.

The implications of this collapse are profound and far-reaching. America is no longer reproducing at replacement levels needed to sustain its population.

If these trends continue unchecked, the nation will face severe economic, demographic, and societal consequences in the decades ahead.

See more here thefocalpoints.com

Source: https://principia-scientific.com/cdc-reports-significant-drop-in-us-fertility-since-2021/ 

Mexico’s Central Bank, BIS, and BlackRock Discuss Phasing Out Cash and Future of Digital Money



Derrick Broze
March 20, 2026

As the 89th Banking Convention wraps up in Cancún today, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau share the stage with Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, and the BIS—amid a focus on ending cash that ties perfectly into Mexico’s ongoing biometric ID rollout.

On Wednesday, the 89th Banking Convention began in Cancún, Mexico, as representatives from the Mexican government and banking sector met to discuss the future of digital payments and the phasing out of cash in a country where more than three-fourths of the population depends on it.

The annual meeting brought together leaders from Mexico’s financial sector, including heads of banking, government economic authorities, and CEOs of major corporations. The convention is organized by the Association of Banks of Mexico (ABM) under the theme “Innovating Banking, Building the Future.”

On Thursday night, Mexican President Dr. Claudia Sheinbaum spoke on increasing productivity of small- and medium-sized businesses in Mexico. Former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is scheduled to give the closing presentation on Friday evening titled “Global Leadership and Transformation.”

Other speakers include representatives of Banorte, BBVA, Scotiabank, Santander, and HSBC. Also in attendance are Ryan McInerney, CEO of Visa, and Tim Murphy, Vice Chair of Mastercard.

International Banksters Seek to Control Mexico

One sign that the meeting is of vast importance to the international banking sector—and the overall push towards Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and stablecoins—is the presence of representatives of Mexico’s Central Bank, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), and BlackRock.

For example, on Wednesday, Fabrizio López Gallo, Director General of Financial Stability for Mexico’s Central Bank, participated in a panel titled “Sustainable Financing: Risks and Opportunities,” while Sergio Mendez, the Director of BlackRock Mexico, spoke on a panel called “Infrastructure Investment as a Catalyst for Growth.”

Multiple panels underscore the push to digitize money in Mexico, including “The Future of Money: What’s Next for Mexico and the World,” featuring BIS’s Alexandre Tombini, and “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Future of Digital Payments” with McInerney and HSBC Mexico’s Jorge Arce Gama.

Several statements by Emilio Romano, the head of the ABM, make it clear that the Mexican Central Bank and the international bankers are working diligently to shift Mexico away from cash and towards a track-and-trace society where dissidents have their financial resources turned off.

In an interview with Bloomberg, Romano stated, “The central bank is preparing to publish protocols to drive the adoption of payments sent by mobile phones.”

He noted, “Authorities are studying separate measures that could include eliminating cash payments for some services and products, such as gas stations and toll roads.” [emphasis added]

Romano also emphasized that these changes are being made because in Mexico, “roughly 85% of small transactions are done in cash,” largely due to Mexicans not trusting their government and seeking to avoid taxation. “Easing concerns about how the government assesses income will help,” he said.

President Sheinbaum reiterated the plan to end cash payments for gas stations and toll roads in her speech on Thursday night, stating, “Our goal is that this year we make it mandatory to pay for gasoline and toll booths digitally. This will allow us to promote accessible digital payments that allow us to advance the digitization of the country through many other schemes.”

Additionally, the day before the convention began, Juan Pablo de Botton, the Secretary of Administration and Finance of Mexico City, published an opinion piece with similar themes.

“The banking sector is anxiously awaiting these rules to be published again so that we can advance in optimizing the digital-payments ecosystem,” Botton wrote. [emphasis added] He also reiterated the focus on digitizing Mexico’s economy and building trust among the population.

“And at the same time we must continue to advance on a key issue for our city: the digitization of payments and financial services. This transition also requires confidence. Government and financial sector must promote cybersecurity training so that people have greater certainty in their transactions and can calmly adopt the tools of the digital world.”

Digital Money and Biometric ID

The recurring theme of digitizing financial transactions in Mexico aligns with the Sheinbaum administration’s efforts to require a biometric ID for phone and internet service, as well as other areas like healthcare, banking, and school enrollment.

In July 2025, several new laws took effect in Mexico that coerce the population into registering for a biometric program required to access many services. Known as the Biometric CURP (for Clave Única de Registro de Población or Unique Population Registry Code), the new laws require users to submit a photograph and scan a QR code that embeds biometric data, including fingerprint and iris scans.

The Mexican government claims these new laws aim to combat organized crime, drug trafficking, and aid with the search for missing people. The government has also argued that controversial changes to the nation’s telecommunications laws are designed to bridge the so-called “digital divide,” referring to the limited access to internet and cellular service in rural areas compared to urban environments.

However, critics worry that the biometric CURP system will increase opportunities for government surveillance.

In September 2025, José Flores, director of the local digital rights group Red en Defensa de los Derechos Digitales (Network in Defense of Digital Rights) (R3D), released a “concept note” about the laws and the dangers they pose. The organization has filed lawsuits against the package of laws.

“This unprecedented system of surveillance and social control is also an indirect restriction on freedom of expression and the right to association, as it implies the possibility of civil and military authorities accessing sensitive data, including the places where people are, who they meet or talk with, and all their daily activities, creating a hostile environment for the expression of political criticism and dissent,” the group writes.

Many questions remain about whether the biometric CURP will actually be mandatory for daily life. President Claudia Sheinbaum has repeatedly stated that it is voluntary, and some media reports have claimed the same. However, Mexicans and expats living in Mexico have already begun receiving notices from cellphone providers reminding them of the June 30 deadline. Users are told that their service will be ended if they fail to register their phone with their biometric CURP.



On Wednesday, Mexican journalist Ignacio Gómez Villaseñor stated that less than ten percent of Mexican phone lines have been registered. “It’s completely unfeasible for companies to cancel numbers not associated with CURP,” he posted. “They would be left without customers! The issue has escalated to the point where they’re analyzing campaigns to try to discredit the real concerns of experts.”

He concluded, “I insist: don’t register. We’re beating the government.”

When combined with the digitization of all financial payments and the elimination of cash, it’s not difficult to imagine how the Mexican government could utilize these technologies to limit the freedom of movement and economic exchange for the Mexican population.

 

Source: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/bis-blackrock-digital-mexico/

Federal Judge Blocks Kennedy’s Vaccine Reforms



Peter Gøtzsche

April 7, 2026
 

On 16 March, federal judge Brian Murphy blocked the U.S. government from making sweeping changes to the US childhood immunization schedule, “in a blow to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s agenda,” as the BBC expressed it.

The BBC calls them respected medical groups, which they are not, as illustrated by the hepatitis B vaccine controversy. On 5 December 2025, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ended the recommendation that all newborns in the United States receive a hepatitis B shot at birth. The birth dose was recommended only if the mother had tested positive for the virus or if her infection status was unknown.

The change was very rational, and, as in Western Europe, where only Portugal recommends a universal birth dose, it would seem difficult to argue against it. But the media did and failed us badly. Two days after the vote, I downloaded news stories from 14 major media outlets, and they were all very negative.

The media gave organizations undue prominence without ever considering if they were impartial. They urged people to look to “independent recommendations,” e.g. from the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, for “science-based advice.”

I argued that it was advice based on money. The Academy would continue to support the birth dose of the vaccine but all the journalists forgot to say that it receives many millions of dollars from vaccine manufacturers and other drug companies.

Judge Murphy also suspended Kennedy’s appointments to ACIP. The BBC argued that many of the panel members were vaccine sceptics and noted that “Kennedy was a longtime antivaccine activist before joining President Donald Trump’s administration.”

This is so typical of irresponsible journalists. They never investigate if Kennedy’s reforms are prudent and evidence-based but use ad hominem arguments to kill them. It is so low and does not further a rational healthcare; it impedes it. I have described in detail how the coverage of Kennedy’s vaccine reforms in the BMJ, a major medical journal, amounts to character assassination. It is just mind-blowing that a medical journal would do this in a consecutive sample of 33 articles.

It is also false that Kennedy’s new vaccine panel at the CDC are vaccine sceptics. I know several of them personally and they are highly qualified researchers who do not have the financial conflicts of interest that the old panel had, which I found was corrupt. They rubber-stamped any proposal that came forward, no matter how idiotic it was.

A spokesperson from the Department of Health and Human Services said the agency “looks forward to this judge’s decision being overturned just like his other attempts to keep the Trump administration from governing.”

The medical groups that brought the lawsuit lauded the decision, including the American Medical Association, the largest U.S. professional organization for doctors, which called it “an important step toward protecting the health of Americans, particularly children.”

Follow the money is the best advice I can give to anyone with an interest in healthcare and in the US, virtually everything has to do with money. The American Medical Association is heavily corrupted by industry money.

Why on earth could it be a problem that Kennedy reduced the huge number of recommended vaccines in the U.S. so that the vaccine schedule became similar to the one we have in my country, Denmark, and in many other European countries? As I have demonstrated, the reduced U.S. childhood vaccination schedule was systematically denigrated in the media although it was a rational and evidence-based decision.

It is possible that there are some technicalities, “procedural requirements,” that need to be addressed. Judge Murphy pointed these out in his ruling.

But to say, as the BBC did, that “Parents and doctors have been grappling with chaos and confusion since the changes were made and growing especially concerned about how insurance companies will cover immunizations long considered important to public health,” just reflects what people with vested interests have told the BBC journalist. I have seen these arguments before and found them invalid every time.

U.S. healthcare needs to rise above petty financial and guild interests; journalists need to start being real journalists and not just microphone holders for people with vested interests; and everyone, including journalists, needs to study the evidence instead of grabbing a megaphone and cry, every time reasonable changes to healthcare are proposed or introduced: “The wolves are coming to get us.”

Vaccines are not a religion and you are not blasphemous if you ask relevant questions about vaccines. Go ahead and ask and investigate and you will find that many things are not what they are purported to be. The book below is the best book I have ever read about vaccines and I have explained why I think it is a masterpiece.

“If you want the real truth about drugs, don’t ask doctors – ask lawyers.” This was his conclusion when drug policy researcher Alan Cassels from British Columbia reviewed my 2025 bookHow Merck and Drug Regulators Hid Serious Harms of the HPV Vaccines. And yes, you guessed it. Aaron Siri is a lawyer. And I could not have written my book if I had not been an expert witness in a lawsuit and had seen 112,452 pages of secret drug company documents.


This article was originally published by the Brownstone Institute. Dr. Peter Gøtzsche co-founded the Cochrane Collaboration, once considered the world’s preeminent independent medical research organization. In 2010 Gøtzsche was named Professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis at the University of Copenhagen. Gøtzsche has published more than 97 over 100 papers in the “big five” medical journals (JAMA, Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, British Medical Journal, and Annals of Internal Medicine). 

Source: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2026/04/federal-judge-blocks-kennedys-vaccine-reforms/

sexta-feira, 17 de abril de 2026

US Suffered Major Strategic Defeat in Failed Isfahan Operation



Information obtained by Press TV regarding the recent operation by the US-Israeli coalition in the central Isfahan province reveals a major strategic defeat for the enemy.

 

Press TV
April 7, 2026
 

US President Donald Trump’s frantic threats in the past few days to target Iran’s civilian infrastructure, including power plants and bridges, are a direct consequence of the heavy defeat suffered by the US forces in the Isfahan operation.

The failed raid was carried out after the enemy conducted extensive aerial reconnaissance operations in the days leading up to the attack, according to the exclusive information.

During those initial infiltration and reconnaissance missions, the US and possibly the Zionist regime lost a significant number of aircraft, including at least one A-10 Thunderbolt II and two Black Hawk helicopters.

The information obtained by Press TV reveals that “zero hour” for the failed Isfahan operation was set during a secret meeting at the White House under the direct supervision of the US president himself.

It has now become clear that this operation had no connection to the claimed rescue of a downed F-15 fighter pilot, a narrative initially pushed by American officials. Instead, evidence examined and confirmed by Press TV  indicates that the real objective was to infiltrate and attack one of Iran’s nuclear facilities in Isfahan.

The landing site for C-130 transport aircraft, chosen based on previous reconnaissance, was an abandoned airstrip located dangerously close to one of these nuclear sites.

 

The Americans miscalculated, believing that Iran’s air defense would be unable to confront the aircraft involved in the operation. However, Press TV learned that the deployment of numerous US aircraft occurred while the Iranian Armed Forces were in full alert, waiting for them. In fact, American special forces fell directly into a trap set by Iranian forces.

The Iranian Armed Forces, including the Army, Law Enforcement (Faraja), the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), and local popular forces, initially did not show a serious reaction to the landing of the first C-130, which was carrying dozens of special forces commandos. Evidence shows this aircraft veered somewhat off the runway while landing at the abandoned dirt airstrip.

Minutes later, a second C-130 aircraft approached, carrying specialized vehicles, several MH-6 Little Bird helicopters, and other support equipment. At that moment, Iranian forces on the scene targeted the second aircraft before it could land, turning its normal landing into an emergency one. Two Black Hawk helicopters also arrived shortly after.

It was at this moment that the aircraft, helicopters, and commandos who had disembarked from the first plane became perfect targets for the Iranian Armed Forces.

After the special forces realized they had fallen into the trap, the White House situation room made a critical decision: the main operation to infiltrate the nuclear site was changed into a desperate rescue operation for the dozens of US commandos trapped under Iranian fire.

The Americans immediately sent several smaller aircraft to extract their forces, barely managing to gather the individuals and withdraw them from the deadly situation.

The rescue operation was conducted so hastily that some soldiers and officers abandoned their equipment, including, according to the evidence possessed by Press TV, the identification document of an American officer left behind in the area, to save their lives.

After the commandos were evacuated, American fighter jets established a line of fire with a 5-kilometer radius to prevent Iranian forces from approaching the abandoned C-130s at the airstrip. The jets also carried out heavy bombing of their own equipment to prevent it from falling into Iranian hands.

In this failed operation, US special forces did not even have the chance to fly the special Little Bird helicopters; some were destroyed on the ground, while others were destroyed inside the second C-130 aircraft.

Following this disgraceful and heavy defeat, Trump hastily and chaotically held multiple press conferences to cover up the failure and falsely portray it as a pilot rescue operation.

The information obtained by Press TV describes these propaganda shows, led by Trump and his Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, as reminiscent of Hollywood films – lies that have not even been accepted by many American audiences.

The information available notes that Trump will continue to fabricate other “Hollywood-style” operations to falsely claim achievements and appease public opinion in the US.

However, his and Hegseth’s repeated storytelling and lying, which have reduced public confidence in him both in the US and across the world to the lowest possible level, have made his “Goebbels-style lies” very difficult to believe.

People in the US and across the world are asking a pointed question: “How is it that a country which supposedly has neither air defense left nor an army or armed forces has managed to shoot down and destroy so many fighter jets and various aircraft, and continues to add to its album of different types of destroyed fighter jets, planes, helicopters, and drones,” a highly-placed source in Tehran told Press TV.

The heavy defeat of the Isfahan operation, he noted, could be recorded in history as the worst and most disgraceful failure of the US military, even worse than the failed Tabas operation of 1980, which saw a botched rescue attempt end in disaster for Washington.

The information obtained by Press TV notes that the heavy aftershocks of this “great debacle” for Trump will affect not only the fate of the ongoing war against the Islamic Republic of Iran but also the political future of “America’s gambling and ignorant president,” his Republican party, and the American political scene for years to come.

How Iran defeated the Isfahan operation:  


Source: https://libya360.wordpress.com/2026/04/07/us-suffered-major-strategic-defeat-in-failed-isfahan-operation/

What actually is ‘civilisation’? The dark and loaded history behind Trump’s threat against Iran

 


Bruce Buchan
April 10th, 2026 

In the midst of a war of his own choosing, the president of the United States, Donald Trump, recently tried to threaten his way out of it. On April 7, he posted on Truth Social that unless Iran buckled to his will, “a whole civilization will die tonight”.

He presumably meant to amplify his earlier claim that he intended to bomb Iran back to “the stone age”.

Trump’s words are rarely to be taken at face value. Yet his recent incitement to war crimes proved shocking, even by his standards.

But what actually is “civilisation”? And why has Trump’s threat struck a nerve in even his most ardent loyalists?

Coined in an age of conquest and enslavement

The word “civilisation” is a creation of the age of Enlightenment in the 18th century. It was coined to describe a social order that European philosophers and writers then believed was coming into being in parts of Western Europe.

The word derived from older terms in Europe’s lexicon. To be “civil” denoted politeness, and “civility” a code of peaceful conduct essential to city life.

One of the first people to use the word was French political economist Victor de Riqueti, Marquis de Mirabeau (1715–89). In his work L'ami des Hommes, ou, Traité de la Population (The Friend of Man, or Treatise on Population) (1756), civilisation implied three things.

Mirabeau described the historical role of Christianity as the “primary driving force of civilisation”. What he meant was Christianity curbed human violence and turned Europeans by slow degrees over time toward amity and friendship. In other words, the civilised knew God and acted with divine purpose – or at the very least, were less violent and cruel than the “uncivilised”.

Mirabeau also employed the word to describe the “natural cycle of barbarism and […] civilisation”. Here, he implied all peoples were located somewhere along a pathway in time between the condition of mere barbarians, and the exalted heights occupied by the civilised. Not all may scale the heights, but those who do must take care to avoid falling.

The civilised could see more, know more and have more. That “more”, Mirabeau suggested, was the evidence of their civilisation. The barbarian by contrast, simply lacks.

Finally, Mirabeau used the word to warn of a “return of barbarism and oppression” that would destroy “civilisation and liberty”, endangering “humanity in general”. Civilisation needed defence, especially from the so-called “barbarians”, who he warned may be among us, rather than threatening hordes beyond the city gates.

Here then, at the very origin of the word, lies a deep-laid curse.

Civilisation’s curse is the monumental presumption of separation, of imagining oneself as different from all others, and privileged by that difference. That privilege has so often been expressed in the disdain for, or fear of, “the barbarians” who must be “civilised” – turned away from their presumed savagery, heathenism or mere animality.

A term wrapped up in identity

These connotations still reverberate in contemporary use of the term. It echoes in plural references to particular civilisations in time, such as the Romans, Babylonians, Inca or Mexica.

Although different in language and laws, these civilisations were capable of providing a reasonably refined way of life in flourishing cities, such as with running water, sanitation, roads and bridges. Useful as a teaching aid, this “bricks and mortar” approach reduced civilisation to something like a checklist.

In 1996 the American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington invoked this “bricks and mortar” view in The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order. In the post-Cold War era, he argued, global order would be riven not by ideological division so much as by conflicts between distinct civilisations. Huntington’s thesis has been widely discredited, but the idea of plural civilisations remains.

Today, however, the most potent meaning of the word is what we might call the civilisation of capital letters. Western Civilisation, for example, is still regularly invoked to convey a certain history that links Britain and Western Europe with their far-flung colonial offshoots (such as Australia).

Much more than just history, Western Civilisation also implies identity; as if the appellation encompasses who we are as a nation. In this identification lies that deeper curse.

Rarely is Western Civilisation invoked except in warnings that it is in imminent peril, careening toward the end.

Arrogant assumptions

Too frequently has the curse of civilisation inspired this recurrent nightmare. In his 1899 novel, Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad presented civilisation as a kind of madness – a derangement of humanity expressed in a nightmarish will to “exterminate all the brutes”.

Thanks to Trump’s threats, this is where we find ourselves now: on the cusp of that persistent curse. As long ago as 1767, one of the earliest adopters of the word, Scots philosopher Adam Ferguson (1723–1816), sought to trace humanity’s path “from rudeness to civilisation”.

Yet Ferguson also questioned the obtuse presumption spawned by the word, that “we are ourselves the supposed standards of politeness and civilisation”. From there it was but a short step to the arrogant assumption that “where our own features do not appear […] that there is nothing which deserves to be known”.

When President Trump says that Iran’s “civilisation” will be “taken out in one night”, we hear echoes of that presumption. His words have made barbarians of us all, equally at the mercy of a madman’s curse.

 

Source: https://theconversation.com/what-actually-is-civilisation-the-dark-and-loaded-history-behind-trumps-threat-against-iran-280268?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-gb

Israeli Army Takes Heaviest Tank Losses in Over 40 Years as Hezbollah Ambushes Destroy 21 Merkavas in One Day

 

 

March-26th-2026 

The Lebanese paramilitary group Hezbollah has reported on the results of multiple ambushes launched against Israeli forces in southern Lebanon, with 21 Israeli Merkava main battle tanks reported on March 26 to have been destroyed within a 24 hour period. Other consequences of engagements have included the firing of over 60 rockets at targets in the Galilee region that day, complementing much longer range strikes against Israeli targets launched by Hezbollah’s close strategic partner Iran. Hezbollah artillery units also targeted Israeli command positions in the Taybeh region, Rab Thalathin and Oudaiseh, while also firing on Israeli reinforcements that were dispatched to evacuate casualties. The paramilitary group reports regarding further strikes: “the headquarters of the Israeli Ministry of War (Kyria) in the center of Tel Aviv, and the Dolphin barracks belonging to the Military Intelligence Division north of Tel Aviv, with a number of special missiles.” 

 
Israeli Army Merkava IV Tank Near the Lebanese Border

The bulk of Israeli armour losses occurred in a single engagement between the towns of Taybeh and Qantara, after Israeli units reportedly “advanced to carry out a manoeuvre aiming to seize control of the area.” Hezbollah’s official statement observed that its personnel “monitored them and prepared to lure the enemy into a well-planned ambush,” with the result that its forces “succeeded in thwarting the enemy’s manoeuvre, inflicting losses including 10 Merkava tanks and D9 bulldozers.” The results of the successes reported to have been achieved by Hezbollah units represent the most extreme losses Israeli armour has suffered in over 40 years since the early stages of the Lebanon War when Merkavas and older U.S.-supplied tanks engaged newly operationalised Syrian Army T-72 tanks and anti-tank guided weapons. 

 
Hezbollah Radwan Force Personnel

After Israel and the United States initiated a full scale military assault against Iran on February 28, Hezbollah the following day opened a second front against Israel, to which Israel responded by launching a ground invasion of Southern Lebanon on March 2. Footage has from early March shown multiple strikes on Israeli tanks by Hezbollah units. While Israel armour has taken significant losses during engagements with Hezbollah in the past, most notably during a failed attempt to invade Southern Lebanon and forcefully disarm the paramilitary group in 2006, the intensity of current hostilities and losses remains wholly unprecedented. The fact that this is the first time Israel has launched an invasion while being at war with Iran, which raises the stakes for Hezbollah as it relies on Iranian support, may have been a factor ensuring it does not hold back from full counter-escalation. 

 
Destruction of Merkava Tank By Palestinian Paramilitary Groups in the Gaza Strip

The latest setbacks to Israeli operations follow reports that Hezbollah had deployed its Radwan special forces for counteroffensives against Israeli units. These forces were not previously deployed for engagements with Israeli forces, but observations of their counterinsurgency operations in Syria have led analysts to conclude that they are very considerably more capable than Hezbollah’s regular units. The presence of Radwan forces on the frontlines may be a primary contributor to the more intensive losses which Israeli armour has taken from mid-March. Merkava tanks notably previously took a number of losses during Israeli Army operations against Palestinian paramiltiary groups in the Gaza Strip from late 2023, although the much lower quantities of equipment, poorer fortifications, and inferior training standards in the theatre meant that losses were negligible by comparison to those seen during engagements with Hezbollah. 

 

Source: https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/israel-largest-tank-losses-40yrs-ambushes-21-merkava

quinta-feira, 19 de março de 2026

Meningitis Fear Grips UK But What Is Really Known About This Deadly Disease

 


 
John O'Sullivan CEO Principia Scientific 
March 18, 2026

An outbreak of meningitis in the UK is focusing public attention on one of the most feared medical emergencies: inflammation of the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. But what is the cause?

On March 17, 2026 the BBC reported that UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting has announced new measures to tackle what he calls the “unprecedented outbreak” of meningitis in Kent.

The BBC reports:

“Four of the meningitis cases have been confirmed as Meningitis B, or MenB – a serious bacterial form of the illness. Routine vaccination of babies for MenB was only rolled out in 2015, meaning teenagers and young adults are unlikely to have had a jab.

A targeted vaccination programme will be rolled out for students in halls of residence at the University of Kent – where one of those who died was a student – Streeting told the House of Commons.”

While health authorities emphasise infection (as per Germ Theory) as the primary cause, alternative perspectives—such as Terrain Theory—are gaining traction among independent experts, raising questions about how we understand disease itself.

As confidence in mainstream medicine has dropped since government mishandling of the COVID19 pandemic, serious questions have arisen about the true nature of such illnesses.

Below is a highly-informative video from Dr Sam Bailey, advocating for a fresh perspective on meningitis:


What Is Meningitis?

Meningitis refers to inflammation of the meninges, the protective layers around the brain and spinal cord. Symptoms can escalate rapidly and may include:

  • Severe headache

  • Neck stiffness

  • Sensitivity to light

  • Fever and confusion

  • In severe cases, seizures or death

Mainstream medicine classifies meningitis into several types, most commonly:

  • Bacterial meningitis (often linked to Neisseria meningitidis)

  • Viral meningitis

  • Less commonly, fungal or parasitic forms

Public health bodies such as the UK Health Security Agency and the World Health Organization stress that bacterial meningitis, though rare, can be life-threatening and requires urgent treatment.


Why the Current Concern?

Seasonal fluctuations, close-contact environments (schools, universities), and sporadic clusters can trigger heightened awareness. While overall case numbers remain relatively low in the UK, even isolated outbreaks receive significant attention due to the severity of the condition.

Health agencies continue to recommend:

  • Early recognition of symptoms

  • Rapid medical treatment

  • Vaccination for high-risk groups

The Terrain Theory Perspective

An alternative framework—often referred to as Terrain Theory—offers a very different interpretation.

Advocates argue that:

  • Meningitis is not a disease caused by microbes, but a response of the body to internal imbalance or toxicity

  • Microorganisms found in patients are secondary effects, not primary causes

  • Factors such as environmental toxins, pharmaceuticals, stress, or nutrition may be the true drivers of inflammation

This view challenges long-standing assumptions of germ theory, which links specific pathogens to specific diseases.


Points of Contention

The divide between these perspectives centres on several key issues:

1. Causation vs Association

Terrain Theory proponents argue that finding bacteria in patients does not prove causation.
Mainstream science responds that multiple lines of evidence—including epidemiology, laboratory studies, and treatment outcomes—support a causal role for pathogens.

2. Asymptomatic Carriers

It is well established that some people carry Neisseria meningitidis without illness.

  • Terrain view: This suggests microbes are harmless or opportunistic

  • Medical view: Carriage is normal, but under certain conditions bacteria can invade the bloodstream and cause disease

3. Effectiveness of Treatments

  • Conventional medicine: Antibiotics and supportive care reduce mortality in bacterial meningitis

  • Terrain perspective: Improvements may stem from anti-inflammatory effects rather than antimicrobial action

4. Vaccination

Health authorities state vaccines significantly reduce incidence of certain forms of meningitis.
Terrain advocates question both their necessity and underlying assumptions about causation.

What Does the Evidence Say?

The scientific consensus—supports the role of infectious agents in many cases of meningitis. This includes:

  • Identification of pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid

  • Reproducible disease patterns during outbreaks

  • Reduced incidence following vaccination programs

However, it is also true that:

  • Not all cases have a clearly identified pathogen

  • Individual susceptibility varies

  • Inflammation is central to disease severity

These points leave room for ongoing discussion about host factors, immune response, and environmental influences—areas where Terrain Theory places its emphasis.

A Broader View: Host and Environment

A more integrative perspective recognises that:

  • Disease often arises from interaction between pathogen and host condition

  • Factors such as nutrition, stress, co-existing illness, and environment can influence outcomes

  • Prevention may involve both public health measures and individual health resilience

Conclusion

Meningitis remains a serious but relatively rare condition in the UK. While mainstream medicine focuses on infectious causes and preventive strategies like vaccination, alternative viewpoints such as Terrain Theory highlight the role of internal health and environmental stressors. From my own perspective as a seasoned science writer who has grown cynical of mainstream science, which failed us all during the COVID19 pandemic, my analysis is better explained in the book, Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon’which broadens PSI’s critiques of mainstream medical group think and junk science. But for the general public looking for informed guidance, the key takeaway is practical rather than ideological:

  • Recognise symptoms early

  • Seek urgent medical care when needed

  • Stay informed—but also critically evaluate sources and claims

     

                                An example of the current hysterical coverage in the UK  


References

  1. UK Health Security Agency — Meningitis guidance and surveillance reports

  2. World Health OrganizationDefeating Meningitis by 2030: Global Road Map

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — Bacterial meningitis overview and transmission data

  4. van Deuren M, Brandtzaeg P, van der Meer JWM. (2000). Update on meningococcal disease with emphasis on pathogenesis and clinical management. Clinical Microbiology Reviews

  5. Stephens DS. (2007). Conquering the meningococcus. FEMS Microbiology Reviews

  6. Caugant DA, Maiden MCJ. (2009). Meningococcal carriage and disease—population biology and evolution. Vaccine

  7. World Health Organization (2019). Meningitis factsheets and global burden data

  8. Bailey S. — Public video commentary presenting Terrain Theory interpretation of meningitis (YouTube transcript provided)

About the author:  John O’Sullivan is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball among 45 scientists) of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  He is a seasoned science writer, retired teacher and legal analyst who assisted skeptic climatologist Dr Ball in defeating UN climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the multi-million-dollar ‘science trial of the century‘. From 2010 O’Sullivan led the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists who compiled the book ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory’ debunking alarmist lies about carbon dioxide plus their follow-up climate book. His most recent publication, ‘Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon’ broadens PSI’s critiques of mainstream medical group think and junk science.

 

Source: https://principia-scientific.com/meningitis-fear-grips-uk-but-what-is-really-known-about-this-deadly-disease/