quarta-feira, 28 de setembro de 2022

Apparent Sabotage Disables Nord Stream 1 and 2, Cutting Off All Direct Gas Supply to Germany from Russia

 


Anonymous German officials appear to acknowledge the strong possibility of American or NATO involvement


eugyppius
September 27th

Yesterday evening, pressure in the undersea Nord Stream 2 pipeline suddenly collapsed, and gas could be seen bubbling to the surface of the Baltic Sea near the Danish island of Bornholm. Shortly afterwards, reports came of a total collapse in the pressure of our other major undersea pipeline connection to Russia, Nord Stream 1, indicating a further rupture.

Government officials assume that the damage is intentional, and the result of an attack by foreign forces:

Due to the timing, the fact that three separate pipelines were affected1, and the severe pressure losses in Nord Stream 1, officials expect the worst. “We can no longer imagine any scenario other than a targeted attack,” said a person privy to the assessment by the federal government and federal authorities. They added: “Everything speaks against a coincidence.”

Such an attack on the seabed would be anything but trivial; it would have to be carried out with special forces – for example, by navy divers or a submarine, people informed of initial assessments said.

With regard to responsibility for the alleged attacks, two possibilities are being discussed. First, according to initial speculation, Ukrainian or Ukrainian-affiliated forces could be responsible. With the temporary shutdown of the Nord Stream pipelines, gas deliveries from Russia to Germany and Central Europe would only be possible via the Yamal pipelinje running through Poland or the Ukrainian pipeline network.

The piece that I’ve bolded is of course a lightly disguised reference to the United States or NATO. This should surprise nobody: President Biden said in early February that in the event of a Russian invasion of Ukraine, “there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2, we will bring an end to it.” It’s well within the realm of possibility that such an attack would’ve been carried out with the tacit approval (or even upon the request) of the Scholz government, to relieve them of political pressure to open Nord Stream 2 or seek terms for a restoration of supply to Nord Stream 1 as the economy continues to circle the drain. The Greens are in government here, and Green-adjacent journalists have gone so far as to demand the dismantling of the pipelines to hurt Putin, so this too is far from crazy.

The second scenario investigators are contemplating, according to the linked Tagesspiegel report, is of course a “‘false flag’ operation by Russia,” carried out to “drive up the price of gas,” “exacerbate the European energy crisis” and “fuel additional uncertainty.” Russia will surely be blamed for the attack as soon as it is confirmed, I have no doubt of that.

The pipeline attacks come as a few prominent German politicians have demanded the opening of Nord Stream 2, and the subject has attracted a growing protest movement. Neither pipeline was currently transporting gas; Gazprom cut off supply to Nord Stream 1 at the end of August, citing maintenance issues exacerbated by EU sanctions, while the Scholz government refused to certify Nord Stream 2 following its completion in November 2021.

UPDATES: Gonzalo Lira argues that the Americans have declared war on Europe; Noah Carl draws attention to an older piece he wrote on the “Nord Stream 2 theory” of the Ukraine war; hints of a possible method and an earlier, aborted attack on the pipeline are found in these stories about an underwater drone armed with explosives recovered near the pipeline construction site in 2015. Two Nord Stream 1 leaks have now been identified; like the Nord Stream 2 rupture, they’re near Bornholm. There are three ruptures in total.

MOAR UPDATES: Danish armed forces have published a brief statement on the gas leaks, together with some photos. 

 


That circle of bubbling methane is apparently a kilometre in width. Nord Stream 1 was attacked in two places northeast of Bornholm, while one of the Nord Stream 2 pipes was breached off the southern tip of the island. This report from FAZ suggests the attacks happened at a depth of about 70 metres.

STILL MOAR: Swedish state media reports that Danish and Swedish monitoring stations recorded two substantial undersea explosions at the sites of the gas leaks, one at 2:03 am Monday morning, the other at 7:04 pm Monday evening. This is now a confirmed attack, if there was ever any doubt.

 

 

Nord Stream 1&2 SABOTAGED

Source: https://www.eugyppius.com/p/apparent-sabotage-disables-nord-stream

terça-feira, 20 de setembro de 2022

The Brazilian left’s fear and its dangerous play with fire


sábado, 17 de setembro de 2022

Health is not a state of war

 

Woodstock, 1969
 

Jesús García Blanca

23/02/2022 

The medical model that currently dominates the vast majority of the world's health systems is totally subject to a concept of disease devised more than a century ago and which, despite its false nature, was successfuly imposed by vested interests. This is a warmongering health model that sees disease as a fight between armies of invading pathogenic microbes and a defensive army that fights them.

For thirty years I have been critically analysing the problems of health and ecology —which means ultimately the health of the planet— focusing on the instruments of power at work in these fields. At present these instruments have reached an absolute crescendo, and are sustaining an authentic global health dictatorship. But already in those earlier years, whilst I was learning about Natural Hygiene from Dr. Enero Landaburu and the last survivors of traditional medicine (among whom Dr. Enric Costa stands out) it seemed clear to me that one of the pillars of modern medicine was the so-called Microbial Theory, a false theory proposed by Louis Pasteur that had turned medicine around some 180 degrees and which had been imposed in the interest of power.

Since then, I have held innumerable debates on the subject which all follow the same invariable process: my interlocutors always begin horrified that someone could question something so "obvious" and so absolutely "proven", even disqualifying those who dare to raise this question. And then finally, they end up acknowledging that they do not have evidence or simply withdrawing when they realise that this supposed "overwhelming evidence" does not appear anywhere.

I am going to pose a radical critique of this visibly paranoid conception of illness, and by extension, of health, from three different angles, so that it provokes readers to doubt, to ask questions, to look for other approaches and to form their own opinions about a pseudoscientific dogma that is impeding biology and medicine
from progressing towards new paradigms. First, I will show how the theory, based on plagiarism, manipulation and scientific fraud, was already refuted in its time, paradoxically by one of its principle defenders: the celebrated Robert Koch. Secondly, I will briefly explain how the opposite theory —Pleomorphism— has indeed been empirically and rigorously demonstrated; and lastly, we will see how biological research over the last fifty years is incontrovertibly showing that the Microbial Theory does not reflect the reality of how life functions.

ROBERT KOCH PROVED THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT HE INTENDED

Koch Postulates were developed by the German doctor as a method or protocol to verify or demonstrate that a particular microbe was the cause of a given disease. Essentially these postulates state the following: 

1. The causative organism must be found in sick people and not in healthy people.

2. The pathogen must be grown in an axenic (pure) culture outside of the infected animal.

3. If we inoculate that pure culture into a healthy animal, we should be able to reproduce the same disease.

4. The pathogen must be isolated from the inoculated and diseased animal

and found to be identical to the original microorganism.

When Koch began to apply these protocols, he realised that the second part of the first postulate was not fulfilled, as he found the microorganisms in both sick and healthy individuals. Later, in an international congress held in 1880, he said that it was not necessary for the third and fourth postulates to be fulfilled, and that with the first two —in fact with one and a half— the supposed causal relationship was fully proven [1]. Later, the epidemiologist Alfred Evans recognised that the postulates did not hold for numerous particles, but that Koch "felt that they were strongly implicated in the cause of the disease" [2].

For its part, the then-prestigious Lancet magazine dedicated an article [3] to the postulates in 1909 in which, among other things, it was claimed that the postulates "are rarely, if ever, met", that microbes "are found in healthy people” and that when inoculated “they cause a disease that bears no resemblance to the original”. In other words: the
theory was refuted. The rigorous postulates showed that the germ theory was false. What did Koch, Pasteur and the rest do? Would they perhaps abandon them and find another explanation? No. Since the postulates were not met, they changed them to make them fit and went ahead with the theory regardless...

If this sounds like a mockery of the scientific method, wait untill you see Pasteur. There are three rigorous and devastating analyses, carried out in 1923, 1940 and 1995, that reveal the man behind the myth of Louis Pasteur [4]. ​​These documents show how Pasteur plagiarised his predecessor, the biologist and professor of pharmacy Pierre Jacques Antoine Béchamp and other scientists and appropriated the work of his collaborators by personally taking full credit for their discoveries. Of course, he misrepresented and distorted their findings so that Béchamp's idea about the role of microbes in diseases and their changes in form and function went from being a consequence to being a cause. But even this idea was not Pasteur's, since a hundred years earlier, in 1762, Dr. M. A. Plenciz had already published a book entitled Germ Theory of Infectious Disease.

Furthermore, Pasteur "fixed" the results of his experiments to fit the mental jumble resulting from his borrowed ideas. All very scientific, as you can see. That would perhaps explain why, when he was 55 years old, he asked his family never to make his laboratory workbooks public. Why would someone who spent years feeding his own legend, who introduced all his works by quoting himself, who denied his collaborators all credit, who was considered a national hero to whom the French state stipulated a pension of 25,000 francs left to his offspring (paying for a research center that is still considered one of the finest in the world and even a luxury burial following the man's death) not want to show the most genuine testimony of his genius, the testimony of his legendary daily work for over forty years?

The work notes of other scientists, such as Michael Faraday or Claude Bernard, have served to admire and learn about his work in depth or to observe weaknesses that have inspired new research. However, we did not have the 102 notebooks with the notes that Pasteur kept for forty years until the death of his grandson in 1971. Four years later, a Princeton historian, Professor Gerald Geison, carried out an exhaustive study of the ten a thousand hidden pages for eight decades. In 1993, Geison submitted a report to the American Association for the Advancement of Science revealing that Pasteur published fraudulent information and was guilty of scientific misconduct by violating the rules of medicine, science, and ethics.

Perhaps for this reason, Dr. M. L. Leverson, during a conference in London on May 25, 1911, said the following words: «
The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth.» [5].

PLEOMORPHISM HAS BEEN AMPLY DEMONSTRATED

Contrary to what occurred with pasteurised Microbial Theory, the few scientists who continued the research on Pleomorphism – beginning around 1980 and followed by Bechamp – have not been placed on pedestals and can barely be found in the annals of science and medicine.

In the 1920s, Royal Raymond Rife designed and built a microscope capable of reaching sixty thousand magnifications while keeping cultures alive. Unlike the electron microscope that reaches half a million but kills with its radiation anything that comes under its lens, Rife's microscope could observe vital processes in vivo and this allowed Rife to observe microscopic elements in fungi and yeasts that could be the "microzymes" that eighty years earlier Bechamp had proposed as the smallest units of life. Gunter
Enderlein described the same thing in his 1925 book The Life Cycle of Bacteria, calling them "protids," which were the "bions" discovered  by Wilhelm Reich in the 1930s, and the "somatids" seen by Gaston Naessens in the 1960s [6].

The point is that the phenomenon that all these researchers theorised under different names and from different perspectives
has been rigorously experimentally tested. None of these perspectives consider microbes to be the cause of diseases but rather as biological elements that function when disease occurs. And these ideas include the ability of bacteria to change their form according to the conditions in which they are found and the functions they must perform.

In 1914, Dr. Edward C. Rosenow conducted a controlled experiment at the Mayo Biological Laboratory, Rochester, Minnesota, during which he observed streptococci transform into pneumococci by altering the medium with the introduction of dead organic matter. When this change was reversed, the bacteria returned to their original form. This experiment has been repeated on other occasions, confirming the transformation of cocci into bacilli or of coccus from pneumonia into typhus bacillus [7].

RESEARCH IN BIOLOGY EXPOSES THE FALSEHOODS

The biology that is studied in institutes and universities was conceived almost two centuries ago based on the ideas of the economist Thomas Malthus and the naturalist Herbert Spencer, two pillars of inequality, racism and the survival of the fittest, as well as the application of these ideas to all species by Charles Darwin who sought to explain evolution as a constant struggle in which the strongest survive.

These retrograde ideas were combined with a mechanistic view of nature that has nothing to do with the marvelous complexity of life that other researchers were revealing, and the ultimate meaning of the data and observations that the new biology has been accumulating For decades, it has been confirming that the origin of life, its evolution and the secret of its permanence lie in symbiosis, that is, in cooperation.

In fact, one of the key discoveries occurred in the middle of the 20th century [8] and little by little, it is gaining the respect of ever more professionals and academics. The biologist Lynn Margulis provided evidence that our cells are the result of a fusion of different microorganisms that continue to live in symbiosis, so that our DNA incooporates the genetic information of bacteria and viruses, and ancient bacteria continue to live in our cells, making it possible to obtain energy from oxygen. This is the function of the cellular mitochondria, which have their own DNA and are just as sensitive to antibiotics as any other bacteria in our microbiome.

The first description of the microbiome—which includes bacteria, archaea, yeasts, unicellular eukaryotes, helminths, fungi, and viruses—had earned microbiologist Joshua Lederberg a Nobel Prize, although the specific term was proposed in 2001 [9]. Now, many years later, we know that populations of microbes are transmitted from the mother to the fetus during its stay in the womb—bacteria have been found in the placenta, umbilical cord, amniotic fluid, fetal membranes, and meconium. O
thers come later during vaginal delivery and after the baby is born, through skin-to-skin contact and through the colostrum and breast milk containing 700 bacterial species, whose function is still unknown but which are most likely related to the coexistence and balancing mechanisms that are characteristic of symbiosis [10].

Moreover, the entire deterministic conception of genetics has been shattered by new discoveries and in particular by the so-called ENCODE Project [11] which has shown that what was called a «gene» has been conceptually hollowed out, as genetic information it is the result of the coordinated work of a multitude of elements scattered throughout the genome. Genes are subject to changes from different ecosystems, from the internal environment to the planetary ecosystem, and microbes play a key role, both current microbes and those that have evolved for billions of years, even integrated as parts of our cells, each of them with key regulatory functions for organic life and its development [12]. It is a vision that does not fit at all with the supposed pathogenic invaders and it forces us to question the meaning of so-called "immunity". I will answer this one in a future article.

I will end with a lesson learned in 27 years of research on power relations: the more "obvious" a claim seems, the less it seems to need any proof or data and evidence to support it because it seems so common sense that the mere fact of questioning it is presented as madness or even worse as irresponsibility. Thus, the more people defend a claim whilst barely understanding it, the more aggressively they react against those who question it and the more likely it is that it has little to do with the truth and a whole lot to do with the interests of power.

 

REFERENCES:

[1] Koch, R. “Acerca de la investigación bacteriológica”. En: Negociaciones del X Congreso Médico Internacional, Berlín 1890. Volumen I. Verlag August Hirschwald, Berlín 1891, p. 655. https://edoc.rki.de/bitstream/handle/176904/5173/650-660.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

[2] Evans, A. “The Henle-Koch Postulares Revisited”. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 49(2): 175-195, may 1976. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2595276/.

[3] “Bacteriology tested by Epidemiology”. Lancet, 173, 4464, 20 march 1909.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673600668538.

[4] Hume, Ethel Douglas. Béchamp or Pasteur? A lost chapter in the History of Biology, 1923; Pearson, R.B. Pasteur: Plagiarist, Impostor. The Germ Theory Exploded, 1942. Reeditados por Bechamp.org en 2006: http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/history/biographies/Bechamp-or-Pasteur.pdf. Geison, Gerald L. The private science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton University Press, 1995. Dos capítulos claves disponibles en la red: http://www.mini4stroke.tweakdsl.nl/Histmedsc/Geison.pdf

[5] Pearson, R.B. Pasteur: Plagiarist, Impostor. The Germ Theory Exploded, 1942.

[6] Blog La Ciencia Perdida, de Artur Sala: https://artursala.wordpress.com/

[7] Rosenow, E. “Transmutations within the streptococcus Pneumococcus group”.1914 J. Infect. Dis., 14,1.

https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/14/1/1/882100?redirectedFrom=fulltext

[8] Margulis, L. “Origin of Eukaryotic Cells”. Yale University Press, 1970.

[9] Ledenberg, J. Y McCray, AT. “Ome Sweet Omics. A Genealogical Treasury of Words”.

Scientist. 2001;15(7):8. https://lhncbc.nlm.nih.gov/LHC-publications/pubs/OmeSweetOmicsAGenealogicalTreasuryofWords.html

[10] Aagaard, K et al. “The placenta habors a unique microbiome”. Science Translational

Medicine, 21 May 2014: Vol. 6, Issue 237, pp. 237ra65.

Funkhouser, LJ. y Bordenstein, SR. “Mom Knows Best: The Universality of Maternal Microbial Transmisión”. PLoS Biol 11(8): e1001631: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001631.

Cabrera-Rubio, R. Et al. The human milk microbiome changes over lactation and is shaped by maternal weight and mode of delivery”. Am J Clin Nutr September 2012 vol. 96 no. 3 544-551: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/96/3/544.full.

[11] Sandin, M. “Qué son los genes?”. http://www.somosbacteriasyvirus.com/quesonlosgenes.pdf

[12] Sandín, M. “Una nueva biología para una nueva sociedad”. Política y Sociedad, vol. 39, nº 3, 2002.http://www.somosbacteriasyvirus.com/nuevasociedad.pdf.

 

Source (en castellano): https://diario16.com/la-salud-no-es-una-guerra/

Translation: David Montoute

sexta-feira, 16 de setembro de 2022

I got sick, therefore "IT" exists!

 


 

Addressing a major rift in the "Medical Freedom" movement, Part 1

 

Bill Huston

August 18th 

 

The Problem

As you are probably aware, there is a major rift in the so-called “Medical Freedom” movement, that between the Virus-Pushers (“Virus Believers” or “Virus Huggers”), and #TeamNoVirus (those who understand that SARS-CoV-2 does not exist).

However, there is also a similar split amongst people who associate themselves with #TeamNoVirus: Those who reject the entire narrative, vs. Those who believe that there is some “IT” (disease) which everyone “caught”, perhaps a lab-leaked, engineered bioweapon.

Yes, this exists even those who claim to reject the story of “The Virus”, or that COVID is a real disease!

I have had difficult conversations with some of my friends over this, including one person who is very prominent among the people who understand the “Viral Delusion”.

Donate to support my work! 🙏❤️😊🙇‍♂️

Accepting ANY PART of the COVID Hoax makes us VULNERABLE

When people accept ANY PART of the COVID story, it makes us vulnerable to psychological abuse, fear campaigns, even countermeasures: masks, lockdowns, social distancing, or worse, like “Insecticide Cures” (e.g., Ivermectin, or Hydroxychloroquine).

This Begins w/Unclear Thinking

The underlying problem here is fundamentally unclear thinking.

With logic, we can only form conclusions via a chain of sound reasoning, based on observable reality.

For example, If I observe that whenever I wash my car, it rains, then I might conclude that the act of washing my car causes the rain. However, this is a classic non-sequitur, “that does not follow”. It is faulty conclusion based on unsound reasoning.

If we accept either a false premise, or a prior false conclusion, any decisions or “knowledge” obtained from this false chain of logic is itself worthless. Garbage In, Garbage Out.

People Got Sick, therefore, “IT” Exists!

(Bioweapon, Parasite, Snake Venom, etc…)

Yes, there are people who understand the Fraud of Virology, and even those who understand the Fraud of Contagion Theory(*) who still make the leap that because someone got sick in Wuhan, China; another in Valencia, Italy; and another in NYC (could be 3 or 300, or 30,000), that these are all connected, and, these all are the same disease sharing a common cause, and therefore, that SOMETHING exists which is transmissible(†).

This line of thinking keeps us locked into the FEAR narrative, and largely, the bulk of the COVID Con.

* Contagion is really a hypothesis, not a theory, with absolutely no supporting evidence. A hypothesis is an assumption made before any research has been done. It is formed so that it can be tested to see if it might be true. A theory is a principle formed to explain the things already shown in data.

† Transmission implies a Contagion

The Ivermectin Trap

An example of how this unclear thinking can lead to trouble, is Ivermectin. IVERMECTIN IS INSECTICIDE. There is no reason for anyone to be eating insecticide, whether you have the sniffles, or score a (completely bogus) pos+ result from a PCR “test”.

I’ve met people who infer that “since Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic, is effective (a false premise), then maybe COVID is caused by a parasite.” While this may seem reasonable, this is jam packed with false premises, and non-sequiturs which deserves its own article. (coming soon, likely Part 3 in this series)

Separate — Do not Conflate

The problem is that people are conflating the observation, “Someone got sick”, with the COVID Narrative (full or partial), the Germ-Theory explanation of some pathogen, a contagious particle that spreads human-to-human, etc.

This is happening even amongst people who reject the bogus SARS-CoV-2 and/or Germ Theory!

We have to get clear on the basics, friends!

If someone gets sick, then to understand the cause, we need to examine all of the details of their life, diet, living conditions, emotional and spiritual health.

Naturopaths Amandha Dawn Vollmer, Tom Barnett, as well as Drs. Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Mark & Sam Bailey, and Dawn Lester & David Parker have done extraordinary work educating people about what really makes us sick.

Here’s a great new video on this topic, by Dawn Lester & David Parker:
https://odysee.com/@David_Parker_and_Dawn_Lester:5/Jerm-Warfare1:d

There is no “IT”!!!!

 

Stop saying you had "it".
Stop saying that you know someone who had "it".
There is no COVID!
This was a Huge PSYOP,
All the way FROM THE BEGINNING.

    -- Dr. Amandha Vollmer

Source: https://yummy.doctor/player-embed/id/5048/

I suggest that before we start asking why someone got sick with flu-like symptoms, that WE FIRST GET CLEAR ON COVID.

1: “COVID Syndrome” is not new, unique, or distinguishing.

According to the CDC, “clinical COVID” is indistinguishable from influenza! “Because some of the symptoms of flu and COVID-19 are similar, it may be hard to tell the difference between them based on symptoms alone, and testing may be needed to help confirm a diagnosis.” [Source], deleted and moved [here] 3/22/2022.

People often bring up “loss of taste or smell” as being a unique symptom of COVID, however this is untrue. As demonstrated by the famous Apple, Onion, Potato experiment many of us participated in high school science class, most of our sense of taste comes from our nose. So any “infection” (detox) where there is nasal congestion, almost always is accompanied by a loss of taste and smell. We just don’t notice it, because we naturally lose our appetite during the detox process.

2: There is no Virus.

SARS-CoV-2 is an in-silico phantom, never directly isolated from a biological sample, without contaminated by foreign DNA (Vero Cells, A549 cells, Fetal Bovine Serum, Viral Transport Medium, etc), as is STANDARD PROCEDURE for virologists!

3: There is No Meaningful test for the Phantom Virus

The PCR, even under the best conditions, is utterly unsuitable as a diagnostic for clinical disease. This according to its inventor, Kary Mullis.

This does not include the problem with the bogus primers, and lack of calibration with anything in the real-world, i.e., a patient sample

4: There is no proof that the Phantom Virus causes Clinical Disease

I could go on, but these four are the essential one’s for debunking CONVID.

“Everything you know is wrong”

 

                      Figure: Firesign Theater, “Everything you know is wrong.” (1974)

Look, I understand why this is happening. We have been so conditioned by Germ Theory programming, that it is hard to step outside of it and try to see a different perspective, without a sense of “Groundlessness”.

Yes, it is quite shocking and disturbing to realize that that much of what we have been told about “modern medicine” is based in faulty models and methods. But this is a leap that millions of people have taken since 2020, after having been educated by Drs. Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan, et. al.

In summary:

IMHO, we must REJECT the entire COVID narrative, from the beginning. When we get clear on “The Virus”, everything else falls into place. When we are clear on the fundamentals, we don’t get deceived by Lab Leaks, Bioweapons, Snake Venom, Parasites, and the Ivermectin Trap. 

 

Source: https://apocalypticyoga.substack.com/p/i-got-sick-therefore-it-exists

terça-feira, 13 de setembro de 2022

Things You Should Know about Traditional Vaccines


 

Dr. Vernon Coleman
September 11th

You should know these things about vaccination:

  1. No one else will tell you this, but some traditional vaccinations kill and maim more people than the diseases they are supposed to prevent. Historically, the evidence is clear (as I have shown in my books). American statistics also prove this. In some cases, illnesses were conquered by other means (e.g., better living conditions) before vaccines became available.
  2. Essential research into vaccine safety is not done. No tests are done to see how different vaccines inter-react – or may inter-react with prescription medicines or medicines bought from the pharmacy. No one knows just how much damage is done by vaccination programmes.
  3. Billions of dollars have been paid out to patients who have been injured by vaccines. And yet doctors and politicians claim that vaccines are perfectly safe.
  4. Many vaccines are woefully ineffective – in addition to producing side effects. When I was a GP I never met a doctor who had the annual flu jab.
  5. Every doctor I know of who has spoken out against vaccination has been struck off the medical register – usually for doubtful reasons. (I have not been struck off but I am retired.) There is nothing more likely to result in a doctor’s professional ruin than speaking out against vaccination. The profession will forgive doctors who sleep with their patients, who abuse alcohol or drugs or who prescribe in a dangerous way. But those who question vaccination (particularly childhood vaccination programmes) are never forgiven.
  6. The media (including the internet) has been instructed not to allow any debate or discussion of vaccination side effects, dangers or shortcomings. No one will debate vaccination with me anymore. The BBC refuses to allow any discussion of vaccination and will not allow anyone questioning vaccination onto its programmes ‘whether they are right or wrong’. On the internet, articles questioning the effectiveness or safety of vaccination are suppressed. I’m a Sunday Times bestselling author with over two million books sold in the UK and books translated into 25 languages. But when over 600 copies of my book on vaccination (Anyone who tells you vaccines are safe and effective is lying) were sent out to newspapers and magazines, not one review was ever published. Some publications were so terrified by the book that instead of selling it (as is customary with review copies) they sent it back to me.
  7. I have been threatened, lied about and fired because of my campaigning. My phones are tapped. My website has been hacked into on many occasions (one website alone is hacked over 3,000 times a month) and destroyed twice. I’ve been threatened with lawsuits more times than I can remember. I’ve had private detectives nosing into my life and process servers banging on my door. One writ server from drug companies brought so much paperwork he had to put it through the cat flap – it wouldn’t go through the letter box. And there was one threatened `hit’ which Interpol thought serious enough to merit investigation. There is an old Japanese saying: “The nail that sticks out gets pounded down” which seems appropriate.

Vernon Coleman’s book ‘Anyone who tells you vaccines are safe and effective is lying’ is available as a paperback and an eBook.

The Hidden Dangers of Vaccines: 

 

Source: https://expose-news.com/2022/09/11/things-you-should-know-about-traditional-vaccines/

segunda-feira, 12 de setembro de 2022

Chinese residents without PCR tests forced to sleep on the street



This is the final development of the social credit system with total compulsory control - just as the WEF and its accomplices dream of for Europe. In Shenzhen, some citizens did not manage to take their mandatory PCR tests in time. The result: the certificate showed “red” and the residential buildings refused entry.

A comment by Willi Huber
September 7th

Take a good look at the future that we are currently lurching towards in Europe. It is made possible by bought and paid for assets in politics and the media, and these individuals apparently dream of receiving more privileges in the coming “better world” and of belonging to the ruling caste. But there will be a rude awakening for them too.

Back to China. In Shenzen, many people had to sleep on the streets yesterday. The entry systems of their fully computerised residences would not open their doors because the residents did not have a valid PCR tests. This would have confirmed that they were not suffering from the terrible corona epidemic, which in the Omicron variant primarily leads to higher consumption of handkerchiefs. Perhaps this measure is also about climate protection. Who said anything about socialist dictatorship here? But, always show solidarity; you know you want it to!

Shenzhen is likely to be a primary testing ground for the new world order. The street lighting is also switched off there at night – “for reasons of environmental protection”. The timing of this measure is very interesting, because nobody in China suffers from energy or gas shortages. This madness is reserved for Europeans, who blindly follow their leaders in the EU unto their downfall. Shenzhen has also been repeatedly hit by full lockdowns. 

Another scene from Shenzhen shows a quarantine zone being barricaded with a special barbed wire to which sharp blades are attached at short intervals. Whoever wants conditions in Europe to be like in China is wishing precisely for scenes like these scenes, and in countries that had long been characterised by peace, democracy and security.

 

 FW:  It brings to mind this meme underscorinng the totalitarian reality of digital ID and digital currency. 

 

 

Source: https://report24.news/chinesen-ohne-pcr-test-schlafen-auf-der-strasse-ihre-wohnhaeuser-verweigerten-den-zutritt/