segunda-feira, 18 de maio de 2026

Cancer: Disorder and Energy



Oncological pathologists, looking at slices of a tumor, believe they can guess when the cells have an evil intention. However, biologists studying living cells find that cells can do only what they are allowed to do by their environment.


Ray Peat
2014

According to the World Health Organization, cancer is now the leading cause of death in the world. Although many "causes" are known, and despite the "War on Cancer," nothing practical has been done to reduce the incidence of cancer. Since Nixon started that war, the number of people dying annually in the US has increased faster than the population. In ancient Rome and Egypt, cancer was rare; cancer has been identified in only one Egyptian mummy. In the US and several other countries, between 2002 and 2005 there was an unprecedented decline (7% in the US) in the incidence of breast cancer, when the medical use of estrogen decreased following the Women's Health Initiative report showing that estrogen caused cancer, dementia, strokes and heart attacks. However, when the public was reassured about estrogen's safety, breast cancer incidence began increasing again each year. 

The cancer industry has been flexible and imaginative in ways of presenting "age standardized" death rates to show that they are making progress against cancer, but there are philosophical and scientific problems in "oncology" (i.e., the study or treatment of lumps) that should be considered by anyone who plans to do business with that profession. 

In the 19th century (in Johannes Muller's lab), cancers, like other animal tissues, were found to be made up of cells, and by 1858, all diseases were said to be caused by disturbances in cells (Rudolph Virchow). The atomic and molecular theory of matter was becoming accepted at the time that animals were found to be made up of cells, and in both cases the "elementary particles" seemed to have a special power to explain things. 

This idea of a cellular basis of disease gradually displaced the old idea that diseases were caused by an imbalance of the body fluids, or humors. In 1863, Virchow recognized that inflammation, involving leukocytes, was a common feature of cancer, but that aspect of his work was neglected for a long time.  

Recent medical textbooks reveal no major change in the understanding of cancer since Virchow's time, except that "genes" (which weren't known during Virchow's life) gradually became the most important aspect of cells. The typical modern textbook describes the cellular disturbance of cancer as the result of an "initiating" mutation in a gene, which gives it the potential to develop into a cancer, if it subsequently is exposed to a "promoter," which causes it to multiply. In some versions of the theory, a promoter is a second mutation that causes proliferation, but in other versions the promotion is caused by chemicals binding to receptors the way hormones do, to stimulate proliferation. Typically, textbooks (and reports of continuing research) describe subsequent changes in the genes that cause a cancer to progress from a simple excess of cells through stages of increasing malignancy: hyperplasia, dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, invasive cancer.  

One of the reasons that the medical understanding of cancer hasn't changed
significantly since Virchow's time is that blaming misbehaving cells for causing a tumor fits into the older medical tradition, that has existed at least since the time of Hippocrates, 400 BC, which treated tumors either by cutting them out, or by burning them off with caustics. Virchow's identification of misbehaving cells provided a clear mental image of exactly what the physician must try to destroy. And it's probably hard to get interested in something which could seriously limit your professional activities if it turned out to be true. 

The "cellular basis of cancer" was developed simultaneously with the germ theory of disease, and in the case of cancer, the deviant cells came to be considered an alien substance, "not-self," analogous to infective germs. Paul Ehrlich's search for poisons that were specific for bacterial pathogens was quickly extended to the idea of finding poisons that would distinguish between cancer cells and the patient's cells. 

Hippocrates' therapeutic approach to cancer may have survived for 2400 years, but the ideas of his younger contemporary, Plato, about order and causation have probably had a greater effect on medicine. Plato believed that the world of experience is inferior and accidental, and that there are timeless "Forms" that are the real substances. In the atomic theory of matter, eternal, unchanging atoms took the place of platonic forms, and there are still molecular biologists who insist that life can only be explained in terms of its constituent atoms ("What else is there but atoms?"). This philosophy of timeless forms was a deep commitment of people like Gregor Mendel and August Weismann, whose ideas dominated the thinking of early 20th century geneticists. Genes were the immutable essence of organisms, and the cells, tissues, and organs that form the organism are merely temporal and accidental. Weismann's "germ plasm" or germ line contained the immortal genes, the rest of the body lacked them, and was essentially mortal. 

For most of the 20th century, the official doctrine was that most of the cells of the adult body became stationary once the body reached its adult size, and that aging consisted of the "wearing out" of those mortal cells. When a tumor, containing new cells, would appear and grow, these cells were called "immortal," because they didn't follow the rule for normal, stationary, mortal cells. Their "immortality" is often demonstrated by growing them endlessly in culture dishes. Normal cells, if they can be made to survive in a culture dish, are likely to be "transformed" into cancer, demonstrated by their ability to replicate in dishes.  

This is an important ideological point, that developed as biologists were experiencing the extreme difficulty of getting cells to replicate, or even to survive, in culture dishes. It has only recently been realized that cells need more than nutritional and hormonal signals to survive in culture; they require certain textural, structural, even rhythmically repeating conditions that mimic their surroundings in the living body. 

Applied to cancer, the gene theory made it seem clear that the changes occurring in tumor cells were irrevocable, and it has seemed self-evident to oncologists that the only hope the cancer patient has is for the physician to destroy every bit of the alien substance. The recurrence of a cancer that has been removed has been evidence to them that fragments had remained, or that the cancer had distributed its seeds into other parts of the body. This seems to be the necessary conclusion if cancer is "caused" by defective genes. 

New ideas of causality have grown up in science beside, or within, the science culture that is committed to platonism, reductionism, and genetic determinism. A few biologists, including Ana Soto and Carlos Sonnenschein, are applying more realistic ideas of causality to ecological, developmental, and cancer research. They have said (Soto, et al., 2009) "The ecological developmental biology (eco-devo) movement rejects the notion that development is merely the unfolding of a genetic program." If events such as cancer aren't "caused by genes," understanding the causes of cancer and the appropriate ways to treat it will require more holistic ways of looking at the tumor's relation to the organism, and the organism's relation to the environment. 

It has been more than 40 years since experimenters demonstrated that cancer cells could be caused to revert to normal, by changing their environment. Harry Rubin (2006) has observed that cells can accumulate hundreds of mutations, and still function normally in the organism, but when separated and grown in a culture dish their differences become obvious. The surrounding cells in the body are causing the defective cells to remain normal in appearance, function, and growth behavior, instead of acting like cancer cells, and can also cause "stem-like" cells to differentiate appropriately.. He says "Intimate contact between the interacting cells is required to induce these changes." When stem cells enter a tumor, they don't find that regulatory, normalizing interaction with normal cells. 

Work like Rubin's shows that even "myriad" mutations don't necessarily cause cancer, and another line of research shows that things which don't cause mutations can cause cancer--the "non-mutagenic carcinogens." The presence of mutations is neither sufficient nor necessary for causing cancer, but tumors do eventually accumulate serious damage, which causes most of the tumor cells to die quickly. Biological stress, or excitotoxic energy deprivation, destabilizes the genome; genetic changes develop as a result of prolonged destructive influences. The "non-genotoxic" carcinogens first cause inflammation, excitation, and energy impairment, leading to fibrosis, and atrophy.

Cycles of cell injury, death, and repair cause chromosomes to deteriorate as the tissue loses its organization. When a cell is stimulated, it responds, and the response requires energy. The stronger and more continuous the stimulus, the more energy the cell needs to continue responding. In some conditions, cells can desensitize themselves, to survive in the presence of continuous stimulation or irritation, but otherwise they are killed when they don't have enough energy to keep responding. 

When a nerve is stimulated and responds, a wave of negative electrical charge passes through it; the electrical field accompanies a structural change in the cytoplasm of the nerve; similar changes occur in other types of cell. Stimulation of a nerve with negative (cathodal) polarity causes swelling, stimulation with the opposite polarity causes the opposite behavior; when nerve cells are inhibited, they shrink (Tasaki and Byrne, 1980; Tasaki, et al., 1988; Tasaki, 1999). 

Swelling, an increase of the water content of an area of tissue, is a general feature of inflammation (Weiss, et al., 1951), whether it's in a lump caused by a bee sting, a bruise, or hives, or a cancer. Besides the instantaneous uptake of water described by Tasaki, there are increases that continue because of metabolic and chemical changes in the irritated cell. Tasaki has used gels of synthetic polymers to demonstrate that an electrical field can cause these changes, without the need for the "chemical osmotic" changes that are customarily assumed to account for the swelling changes caused by stress (Tasaki, 2002). When the pH of a protein gel becomes more alkaline, it swells. 

The electrical activation of a nerve causes a quick shift towards internal alkalinity (Endres, et al., 1986), followed by a sudden increase in lactic acid production. Although increased lactic acid causes acidity of an irritated or inflamed region, the conversion of pyruvic acid to lactic acid causes the interior of the stressed cell to become more alkaline, causing it to swell. This is the same process that causes the familiar swelling of tired muscles. 

If blood vessels swell, the delivery of oxygen may be restricted, and hypoxia causes more intense swelling, because more lactic acid is produced, and less oxidized. This swelling pressure resembles an increase of osmolarity. For over 100 years, it has been customary to treat shock with "isotonic" fluids, which are in balance with well oxygenated tissues, with approximately 290 milliosmoles per liter, but this usually causes edema, swelling, and weight gain. Stressed tissues have been found to be in balance with fluids of much higher osmolarity, for example 372 mOsm/L (Tranum- Jensen, et al., 1981), and sometimes much higher. 

Apart from its acidity, lactic acid acts as an excitatory signal. A very slight increase above the normal amount of lactic acid in the body fluids excites sensitive cells, and the amounts reached in inflamed tissues and in cancers will excite even stable cells such as myelinated nerves (Uchida and Murao, 1975). 

Cancer cells show all the signs of being intensely stimulated, and this includes a high rate of oxygen consumption (deGroof, et al., 2009). The stimulation increases the energy requirements beyond the ability of the mitochondria's capacity to meet them, leading to the production of lactate even when a normal amount of oxygen is present. 

Even when both glucose and oxygen are supplied (which they usually aren't), the tumor cells will consume amino acids as fuel, as well as using them as material for growth. 

Tumors have been called "nitrogen traps" or "glutamine traps," but this has meaning beyond the use of the nitrogen for growth; it is involved in the energetic inefficiency of this process, and the reorganizing effects this wasteful flow of energy has on the tissue structure (Medina, 2001). When glutamine enters the Krebs cycle to be used as fuel, this interferes with the ability to oxidize glucose, causing more lactic acid to be formed, contributing to the excitation and increased energy requirement. 

Lactic acid activates the other major mediators of inflammation, including prostaglandins (made from PUFA), free fatty acids (including arachidonate, that forms prostaglandins; Schoonderwoerd, et al., 1989), nitric oxide, carbon monoxide, proteolytic enzymes that degrade the extracellular matrix, TNF (Jensen, et al., 1990), hypoxia inducible factor (Lu, et al., 2002; McFate, et al., 2008), interferon, and interleukins. Arachidonic acid itself can increase lactate production (Meroni, et al., 2003). TNFalpha and interferon gamma activate lactic acid production by increasing prostaglandins (Taylor, et al., 1992). 

Most of the present information about cancer cells' behavior, such as reactions to radiation and chemical toxins, has been based on the study of cells in culture dishes. For more than 70 years, it was generally believed that radiation caused mutations and cancer by directly modifying the cells' genetic material. Then, it was discovered that fresh cells that were added to a dish of irradiated cells also developed mutations. The radiation causes cells to emit excitatory, inflammatory, substances such as serotonin and nitric oxide, which injure the cells that are later put near them. 

Applying this information to the existing knowledge that radiation induces cancer in animals, the doctrine of genetic determinism inferred that the radiation "bystander effect" is just another mechanism by which radiation produces the "mutant cancer cell" or clone of cancer cells. But the difference between events in vitro and in vivo is that cells which are injured in the organism immediately initiate a process of healing, and in that situation each of the substances emitted by injured cells is acting both locally and systemically to activate repair or regeneration of the damaged tissue. Cells isolated in a culture dish can't call on the organism for the necessary materials, so the responses of the "bystander" cells, leading to mutations and death, seem meaningless. The injured cells are merely toxic, rather than potentially being a stimulus to healing.  

When any part of a living organism is injured, for example by x-rays or surgery, the emitted substances affect the endocrine and nervous systems, activating processes that change metabolism and behavior. The injured tissue takes on new functions, for example by locally synthesizing estrogen, cortisol (Vukelic, et al., 2011), and other hormones, as well as stimulating the normal endocrine glands to secrete them. These interactions have been generally disregarded in cancer treatment, because of the gene centered theory of cancer, but they are essential for understanding the "malignancy" of tumors, that property that makes them likely to return after the tumor has been destroyed, and to spread to other tissues. Has anyone ever heard of a radiologist or surgeon who measured estrogen or the various mediators of inflammation before, during, and after their treatments? Long range survival after breast cancer surgery is affected by the time in the menstrual cycle when the surgery is done (Lemon, et al., 1996).

 All sorts of stress, inflammation, and tissue injury increase the concentration of
estrogen, both locally and systemically. Estrogen in turn produces hypoxia, swelling, lactic acid formation, and stimulates cell multiplication. Even a brief period of hypoxia will cause the secretion of lactate and other chemoattractants (Neumann, et al., 1993), which will cause cells to move into the hypoxic area from the blood stream. Although lactic acid attracts immune cells, it probably reduces their anticancer functions, and it stimulates the formation of new blood vessels, supporting continued growth and expansion of the multiplying cells (Hirschhaeuer, et al., 2011). When a tissue is being repaired normally, the new cells sense a quorum, and stop multiplying. The return of nerves to the damaged area is part of the regenerative process; nerves have inductive and stabilizing effects on differentiating cells. 

These complex interactions between tumor cells and the rest of the organism are not considered by the ideology of medical oncologists. The ruling belief is that the malignancy of cells can be determined by examining them microscopically, and that their rate of growth can be determined, and that the tumor's approximate time of origin can be estimated. After surgically removing a tumor, the administration of chemotherapy and/or radiation is governed by mathematical descriptions of the expected behavior of cancer cells. 

The mathematical relation of mortality to aging was described by Benjamin Gompertz, an actuary, in 1825, based on the understanding that people become less able to resist dying as they get older. This Gompertzian growth curve, which is realistic when applied to a population of people, flies, or rabbits, was applied to tumor growth (A.K. Laird, in 1964). Gompertz' reasoning that the probability of a person's dying increases with age has nothing to do with cancer cells, and there is very little evidence that his law of growth is useful for describing tumors. Laird's evidence consisted of 19 tumor samples, taken from 10 mice, 8 rats, and a rabbit. Her suggestion that the continuing deceleration of the growth rate might represent a natural growth regulating process wasn't influential, but her use of an actuarial formula, suggesting certain properties of cancer cells, has been extremely influential. It seems to be the profession's great need for justification that has made a Law of Tumor Growth so important to them. 

At the time Laird did the tumor growth study, there was considerable interest in the idea that the immune system could be induced to prevent tumor growth. In 1951, Chester Southam, of the Sloan-Kettering Institute, tested his theory of cancer immunity on hundreds of patients and prisoners, and his results were widely reported. He found that pieces of tumor implanted in healthy people caused a local intense inflammation, which healed completely after two or three weeks. In sick people, the rejection of the cancer implant took about twice as long, and in people who already had cancer, the implant was very slow to be destroyed, and sometimes it was still present when they died. 

In 1889, Stephen Paget had noticed that cancers metastasize only into certain organs, and compared the cancer cells to seeds that "can only live and grow if they fall on congenial soil." While many people, like Southam, saw a failing "immune system" as part of the congenial soil, and suggested vaccination to activate an immune rejection of the tumor, others have suggested "reducing the soil to dust," making growth impossible in a more general way. Recently, this attitude has taken the form of different ways of "starving" cancer, by reducing sugar in the diet, or by blocking cells' ability to use sugar. 

The idea of making the "soil" inhospitable to cancer is a variation on the theme of killing the unwanted tissue. As long as the lump is defined as an alien material, killing it by any means seems reasonable, but if it is seen as the body's attempt to repair itself, then killing it is no more reasonable than it would be to cut the spots out of someone with smallpox. 

When a cell is dying, it emits growth stimulating signals (Huang, et al., 2011). That's a normal part of tissue renewal. Some of its substance guides the differentiation of new cells, as demonstrated long ago by Polezhaev (discussed in my previous article, "Stem cells, cell culture, and culture: Issues in regeneration"). Anything that injures a tissue enough to require cells to be replaced causes the activation of a regulatory protein, hypoxia-inducible factor, HIF, which inhibits mitochondrial respiration, causing a shift toward glycolytic metabolism, increasing substances needed for growth. HIF is essential to the healing of any wound. Even glucose deprivation can cause the induction of HIF. 

Prostaglandins, made from polyunsaturated fatty acids released by stimulation, can cause HIF to increase, but HIF also causes prostaglandins to increase. Lactic acid increases the expression of HIF, while HIF causes cells to shift metabolically to depend on converting glucose to lactic acid, that is, to adopt the "cancer metabolism." HIF is recognized as a fundamental problem in "cancer therapy," since HIF allows the cancer to resist the treatment, but the treatment increases HIF.

Radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery all activate these processes of cell replacement, and unless something has changed to improve the organism's recuperative ability, it isn't clear why the cells which replace the missing part should be more able to satisfactorily complete the recovery process than the original cells were. Even the amount of radiation in a single dental x-ray is enough to activate the excitatory-inflammatory processes, and a "therapeutic" x-ray to any part of the body excites similar, but much greater, processes throughout the body. But the ideology of "the cancer cell," and the Gompertz Growth Law, guide the practice of cancer treatment. 

Many years ago, Harry Rubin was impressed by hearing from a pathologist that he had been able to find diagnosable cancer somewhere in the body of every person over the age of 50 that he had autopsied. If everyone has cancer by the age of 50, that means that cancer is harmless for most people, and that small cancers might frequently appear, and be spontaneously removed as part of the body's regular house-cleaning. 

One of the reasons that spontaneous regression of tumors seems so rare is
undoubtedly that most tumors are quickly cut out by surgeons. Preventing injury should be a basic consideration, but the medical slogan, "first do no harm," just doesn't apply to the cancer treatment industry, and this results from the doctrine of "the cancer cell," which is something to be destroyed or kept from multiplying. In the process of diagnosing a cancer, and during the course of treating it, the patient is usually subjected to multiple x-ray examinations, sometimes given radioactive drugs that supposedly concentrate in hidden tumors to emit positrons, and often has toxic contrast agents injected even for MRI examinations. These procedures, even before the destructive "therapies" begin, are adding to the body's inflammatory burden, interfering with the body's ability to complete a healing process. Decisions about pain control usually disregard the effects of the drugs on tumor growth and general vitality--for example, the opiates stimulate histamine release, which increases inflammation and tumor growth. 

In 1927, Bernstein and Elias found that rats eating a fat free diet had almost no
spontaneous cancer, and many studies since then in animals and people have shown a close association between polyunsaturated fatty acids and cancer. The polyunsaturated fatty acids in themselves, and their breakdown products, are excitatory and destabilizing to normal cells, but by modifying the sensitivity and energy production of cells, they limit cells' ability to respond to stimulation and destabilizing influences. Although they aren't essential for wound healing (Porras-Reyes, et al., 1992), they and their metabolites, the prostaglandins, are very conspicuous in wounds and tumors, and their proportion generally increases with aging. The prostaglandins are involved in several vicious cycles, including that with HIF mentioned above. This makes the PUFA and prostaglandins important to consider in relation to optimizing wound healing, and decreasing cancerization. Aspirin's protective and therapeutic effects in cancer are starting to be recognized, but there are several other things that can synergize with aspirin to reduce the circulation of free fatty acids and their conversion to prostaglandins. Niacinamide, progesterone, sugar, carbon dioxide, and red light protect against both free fatty acids and prostaglandins. 

Since excitation leads to intracellular alkalinity and swelling, reducing the excitation seems reasonable, and many things which protect cells against excitation also have demonstrated anticancer effects. Local anesthetics, antihistamines, and antiinflammatory substances and some anesthetics such as xenon (Weigt, et al., 2009) are safe. Inhibitory substances related to GABA are being investigated for their ability to stop tumor growth. Simply stopping excessive excitation tends to restore the dominance of oxidative respiration over glycolysis. 

To restore the supply of oxygen, sugar, and nutrients, swelling must be stopped.
Hyperosmotic fluids act directly on swollen cells, removing water. Stopping excitation allows a return to efficient metabolism and reduces the injury potential, allowing the pH to decrease; with lower pH, the cell releases some of its water. Increasing carbon dioxide lowers the intracellular pH, as well as inhibiting lactic acid formation, and restoring the oxidation of glucose increases CO2. Inhibiting carbonic anhydrase, to allow more CO2 to stay in the cell, contributes to intracellular acidification, and by systemically increasing carbon dioxide this inhibition has a broad range of protective anti-excitatory effects. The drug industry is now looking for chemicals that will specifically inhibit the carbonic anhydrase enzymes that are active in tumors. Existing carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, such as acetazolamide, will inhibit those enzymes, without harming other tissues. Aspirin has some effect as an inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase (Bayram, et al., 2008). Since histamine, serotonin (Vullo, et al., 2007), and estrogen (Barnett, et al., 2008; Garg, 1975) are carbonic anhydrase activators, their antagonists would help to acidify the hypoxic cells. Testosterone (Suzuki, et al., 1996) and progesterone are estrogen antagonists that inhibit carbonic anhydrase. 

With aging, cells have less ability to produce energy, and are often more easily
stimulated. The accumulation of polyunsaturated fats is one of the factors that reduce the ability of mitochondria to produce energy (Zhang, et al., 2006, 2009; Yazbeck, et al., 1989). Increased estrogen exposure, decreased thyroid hormone, an increased ratio of iron to copper, and lack of light, are other factors that impair the cytochrome oxidase enzyme. 

The increased intracellular alkalinity and intracellular calcium that result from the
combination of those factors increase the tendency of cells to be overstimulated, leading to aerobic glycolysis, the cancer metabolism. Improving any part of the system tends to increase carbon dioxide and decrease lactate, permitting differentiated functioning. 

There are many people currently recommending fish oil (or other highly unsaturated oils) for preventing or treating cancer, and it has become almost as common to recommend a sugar free diet, "because sugar feeds cancer." This is often, incorrectly, said to be the meaning of Warburg's demonstration that cancer cells have a respiratory defect that causes them to produce lactic acid from glucose even in the presence of oxygen. Cancer cells use glucose and the amino acid glutamine primarily for synthetic purposes, and use fats as their energy source;the growth stimulating effect of the "essential fatty acids" (Sueyoshi and Nagao, 1962a; Holley, et al., 1974) shows that depriving a tumor of those fats retards its growth. The great energetic inefficiency of the cancer metabolism, which causes it to produce a large amount of heat and to cause systemic stress, failure of immunity, and weight loss, is because it synthesizes fat from glucose and amino acids, and then oxidizes the fat as if it were diabetic. 

Estrogen, which is responsible for the fact that women burn fatty acids more easily than men, is centrally involved in this metabolic inefficiency. When a tissue is exposed to estrogen, within minutes it takes up water, and begins to synthesize fat, with a tendency to produce lactic acid at the same time. The alkalizing effect of lactic acid production is apparently what accounts for the uptake of water. Since it takes longer, at least 30 minutes, to produce a significant amount of new enzymes, these early changes are explained by the activation of existing enzymes by estrogen. 

The transhydrogenases, or the transhydrogenase function of the steroid
dehydrogenases, which shift metabolic energy between glycolytic and oxidative
systems, have been shown to explain these effects of estrogen, but the
transhydrogenases can be activated by many stressors. The biological function of the transhydrogenases seems to be to allow cells to continue growth and repair processes in a hypoxic environment. Estrogen can start the process by creating new pathways for electrons, and will promote processes that are started by something else, and progesterone is estrogen's natural antagonist, terminating the process. 

Recently, a group at Johns Hopkins University (Le, et al., 2012) has been working out the implications of this ability to change the metabolism under hypoxia: Using an isotope-labeled amino acid, ". . . glutamine import and metabolism through the TCA cycle persisted under hypoxia, and glutamine contributed significantly to citrate carbons. Under glucose deprivation, glutamine-derived fumarate, malate, and citrate were significantly increased." The implication of this is that if the tumor isn't supplied with sugar, it will increase the rate at which it consumes the host's proteins. 

Forty years ago the work of Shapot and Blinov was showing the same effect, except that they demonstrated the involvement of the whole organism, especially the liver, in interaction with the tumor (Blinov and Shapot, 1975). The alkaline cancer cell surrounds itself by the acid that it emits, and this extracellular acidity increases the ability of fatty acids to enter the cell (Spector, 1969); cancer cells, although they are synthesizing fat, also avidly take it up from their environment (Sueyoshi and Nagao, 1962b). This fat avidity is so extreme that cancer cells in vitro will eat enough polyunsaturated fat to kill themselves. This has been offered as proof that fish oil kills cancer. Saturated fats, however, have a calming effect on cancer cells, inhibiting their aerobic glycolysis (Marchut, et al., 1986) while permitting them to resume the respiratory production of energy. 

The foods that nourish the patient well enough to support healing while permitting energy reserves to be built up are also the foods that don't interfere with the hormones, that don't cause spurious excitation of the tissues. The polyunsaturated fats directly stimulate the stress hormones, activate the excitatory amino acid signals, and directly excite cells, while the saturated fats have opposite effects, and are anti-inflammatory, and also don't interfere with mitochondrial function. When we eat more carbohydrate than can be oxidized, some of it will be turned into saturated fats and omega-9 fats, and these will support mitochondrial energy production. Carbohydrates in the diet also help to decrease the mobilization of fatty acids from storage; niacinamide and aspirin support that effect. Sugars are probably more favorable than starches for the immune system (Harris, et al., 1999), and failure of the immune system is a common feature of cancer. 

Polyunsaturated fats are generally known to suppress the immune system. Foods that provide generous amounts of sodium, calcium, magnesium, and potassium, help to minimize stress. Trace minerals and vitamins are important, but can be harmful if used excessively--iron excess is important to avoid. 

Emodin, an anti-inflammatory substance found in cascara sagrada bark and other plants, is similar to other molecules that have been used for treating cancer, and one of its effects is to lower HIF: "Consistently, emodin attenuated the expression of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), VEGF, hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1!), MMP-1 and MMP-13 at mRNA level in IL-1" and LPS-treated synoviocytes under hypoxia" (Ha, et al., 2011). MMP-1 and MMP-13 are collagenase enzymes involved in metastasis.  

When cells are fully nourished, supplied with protective hormones, and properly
illuminated, their ability to communicate should be able to govern their movements, preventing--and possibly reversing--metastatic migration.  

REFERENCES 

Cancer Res. 2008 May 1;68(9):3505-15. Estrogen receptor regulation of carbonic anhydrase XII through a distal enhancer in breast cancer. Barnett DH, Sheng S, Charn TH, Waheed A, Sly WS, Lin CY, Liu ET, Katzenellenbogen BS. 

Bioorg Med Chem. 2008 Oct 15;16(20):9101-5.In vitro inhibition of salicylic acid derivatives on human cytosolic carbonic anhydrase isozymes I and II. Bayram E, Senturk M, Kufrevioglu OI, Supuran CT. 

Int J Cancer. 1984 Oct 15;34(4):529-33. Effect of dietary stearic acid on the genesis of spontaneous mammary adenocarcinomas in strain A/ST mice. Bennett AS. 

Zeitschr. Krebsforsch. 28(1), 1-14, 1. Lipoids and carcinoma growth, Bernstein, S. and Elias, H. Vopr Onkol. 1974;20(12):60-5. [Role of gluconeogenesis in the maintenance of normoglycemia in the body of animals with transplanted tumors]. [Article in Russian] Blinov VA, Shapot VS. 

Bull Exp Biol Med. 1975 Jan;77(7):770-2. Hyperglycemia and gluconeogenesis in the liver of mice with tumors. Blinov VA, Shapot VS. Gluconeogenesis, when sharply stimulated by exhaustion of the liver glycogen reserves, is one of the factors maintaining the normal blood sugar level in mice with tumors.

Hyperglycemia induce by glucose leads to an increase in the liver glycogen content and a decrease in the intensity of gluconeogenesis in control mice with tumors. Only in the latter, however, does glycogen synthesis from noncarbohydrate compounds rise again steadily after the injections of glucose are discontinued. 

Minerva Ginecol. 2010 Dec;62(6):573-83. Extranuclear signaling by estrogen: role in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Cortez V, Mann M, Brann DW, Vadlamudi RK. 

J Steroid Biochem. 1987 Jun;26(6):679-85. Cooxidation of steroidal and nonsteroidal estrogens by purified prostaglandin synthase results in a stimulation of prostaglandin formation. Degen GH, McLachlan JA, Eling TE, Sivarajah K. 

Mol Cancer. 2009 Jul 31;8:54. Increased OXPHOS activity precedes rise in glycolytic rate in H-RasV12/E1A transformed fibroblasts that develop a Warburg phenotype. de Groof AJ, te Lindert MM, van Dommelen MM, Wu M, Willemse M, Smift AL, Winer M, Oerlemans F, Pluk H, Fransen JA, Wieringa B. 

Can J Biochem. 1972 May;50(5):447-56. Pyridine-adenine dinucleotide transhydrogenase activity in cells cultured from rat hepatoma. De Luca C, Gioeli RP. 

J Clin Invest. 1966 Aug;45(8):1268-72. Pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase in normal human and leukemic leukocytes. Evans AE, Kaplan NO. 

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975 Feb;192(2):297-302. Induction of hepatic carbonic anhydrase by estrogen. Garg LC. 

Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34(9):1432-7. Emodin inhibits proinflammatory responses and inactivates histone deacetylase 1 in hypoxic rheumatoid synoviocytes. Ha MK, Song YH, Jeong SJ, Lee HJ, Jung JH, Kim B, Song HS, Huh JE, Kim SH. 

Eur J Cancer. 1977 Aug;13(8):793-800. Alkalotic disequilibrium in patients with solid tumors: rediscovery of an old finding. Harguindey S, Speir WA, Kolbeck RC, Bransome ED. 

J Surg Res. 1999 Apr;82(2):339-45. Diet-induced protection against lipopolysaccharide includes increased hepatic NO production. Harris HW, Rockey DC, Young DM, Welch WJ. 

J Biol Chem. 2011 Dec 23;286(51):44177-86. A dormant state modulated by osmotic pressure controls clonogenicity of prostate cancer cells. Havard M, Dautry F, Tchenio T. 

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Jan 12;352(2):437-43. Non-hypoxic induction of HIF-3alpha by 2-deoxy-D-glucose and insulin. Heidbreder M, Qadri F, Johren O, Dendorfer A, Depping R, Frohlich F, Wagner KF, Dominiak P. 

Surg Forum. 1958;9:614-9. An estradiol sensitive transhydrogenase in normal and malignant breast tissue. Hershey FB. 

Cancer Res. 2011 Nov 15;71(22):6921-5. Lactate: a metabolic key player in cancer.Hirschhaeuser F, Sattler UG, Mueller-Klieser W.

Am J Physiol Cell Physiol May 2000 vol. 278 no. 5, Hypertonic perfusion inhibits intracellular Na and Ca accumulation in hypoxic myocardium. Ho HS, Liu H, Cala PM, and Anderson SE. 

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Oct;71(10):3976-8. Control of growth of a tumor cell by linoleic acid. Holley RW, Baldwin JH, Kiernan JA. "The growth of mouse myeloma XS 63.5 cells in cell culture is dependent on serum. Among the several growth factors present in serum, the lipid fraction is highly active. The growth factor(s) provided by the serum lipid fraction can be replaced by unsaturated fatty acids." 

Nat Med. 2011 Jul 3;17(7):860-6. Caspase 3-medxiated stimulation of tumor cell repopulation during cancer radiotherapy. Huang Q, Li F, Liu X, Li W, Shi W, Liu FF, O'Sullivan B, He Z, Peng Y, Tan AC, Zhou L, Shen J, Han G, Wang XJ, Thorburn J, Thorburn A, Jimeno A, Raben D, Bedford JS, Li CY. "In cancer treatment, apoptosis is a well-recognized cell death mechanism through which cytotoxic agents kill tumor cells. Here we report that dying tumor cells use the apoptotic process to generate potent growth-stimulating signals to stimulate the repopulation of tumors undergoing radiotherapy." 

J Surg Res. 1990 Oct;49(4):350-3. Lactic acidosis increases tumor necrosis factor secretion and transcription in vitro. Jensen JC, Buresh C, Norton JA. 

J Biol Chem. 1969 Aug 25;244(16):4413-21. Human placental 17 beta-estradiol dehydrogenase. IV. Differentiation of 17 beta-estradiol-activated transhydrogenase from the transhydrogenase function of 17 beta-estradiol dehydrogenase. Karavolas HJ, Orr JC, Engel LL. 

Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32(4):380-8. Immunotherapy of cervical cancer as a biological dissipative structure. Klimek R, Klimek M, Jasiczek D. 

BMC Cancer. 2010 Jun 7;10:263. The microenvironment determines the breast cancer cells' phenotype: organization of MCF7 cells in 3D cultures. Krause S, Maffini MV, Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. 

Biosci Rep. 2012 Feb;32(1):91-104. Anti-neoplastic action of aspirin against a T-cell lymphoma involves an alteration in the tumour microenvironment and regulation of tumour cell survival. Kumar A, Vishvakarma NK, Tyagi A, Bharti AC, Singh SM. 

ANL Rep. 1963 May:216-22. Dynamics of tumor growth. ANL-6723. Laird AK. Br J Cancer. 1964 Sep;13:490-502. Dynamics of tumor growth. Laird AK. 

Cell Metab. 2012 Jan 4;15(1):110-21. Glucose-independent glutamine metabolism via TCA cycling for proliferation and survival in B cells. Le A, Lane AN, Hamaker M, Bose S, Gouw A, Barbi J, Tsukamoto T, Rojas CJ, Slusher BS, Zhang H, Zimmerman LJ, Liebler DC, Slebos RJ, Lorkiewicz PK, Higashi RM, Fan TW, Dang CV. "Using [U- (13)C,(15)N]-glutamine as the tracer, glutamine import and metabolism through the TCA cycle persisted under hypoxia, and glutamine contributed significantly to citrate carbons. Under glucose deprivation, glutamine-derived fumarate, malate, and citrate were significantly increased." 

Steroids. 2012 Jan 28. Calcium-induced activation of estrogen receptor alpha--New insight.Leclercq G. 

Nebr Med J. 1996 Apr;81(4):110-5. Timing of breast cancer surgery during the luteal menstrual phase may improve prognosis. Lemon HM, Rodriguez-Sierra JF. 

Oncogene. 2012 Jan 23. RhoA triggers a specific signaling pathway that generates transforming microvesicles in cancer cells. Li B, Antonyak MA, Zhang J, Cerione RA. Ralph SJ: ; Milsom C; Chang YW. 

J Biol Chem. 2002 Dec 20;277(51):50081-6. Prostaglandin E2 induces hypoxiainducible factor-1alpha stabilization and nuclear localization in a human prostate cancer cell line. Liu XH, Kirschenbaum A, Lu M, Yao S, Dosoretz A, Holland JF, Levine AC. 

Cancer Res. 2007 Oct 1;67(19):9013-7. Loss of the mitochondrial bioenergetic capacity underlies the glucose avidity of carcinomas. López-Ríos F, Sánchez-Aragó M, García-García E, Ortega AD, Berrendero JR, Pozo-Rodríguez F, L ópez-Encuentra A, Ballestín C, Cuezva JM. 

J Biol Chem. 2002 Jun 28;277(26):23111-5. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activation by aerobic glycolysis implicates the Warburg effect in carcinogenesis. Lu H, Forbes RA, Verma A. 

Acta Biochimica Polonica (1986) 33(1), 7-16. The inhibitory effect of various fatty acids on aerobic glycolysis in Ehrlich ascites tumour cells. Marchut E, GumiÅ„ska M, Kedryna T. 

J Biol Chem. 2008 Aug 15;283(33):22700-8. Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity controls metabolic and malignant phenotype in cancer cells. McFate T, Mohyeldin A, Lu H, Thakar J, Henriques J, Halim ND, Wu H, Schell MJ, Tsang TM, Teahan O, Zhou S, Califano JA, Jeoung NH, Harris RA, Verma A. 

Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Aug;42(6):489-93. Effect of Ga-Al-As laser irradiation on COX-2 and cPLA2-alpha expression in compressed human periodontal ligament cells. Mayahara K, Yamaguchi A, Sakaguchi M, Igarashi Y, Shimizu N. 

Circ Shock. 1990 Aug;31(4):407-18. Capillary narrowing in hemorrhagic shock is rectified by hyperosmotic saline-dextran reinfusion. Mazzoni MC, Borgstrom P, Intaglietta M, Arfors KE. 

Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:2539S-2542S. Glutamine and Cancer, Medina MÃ. 

Int J Androl. 2003 Oct;26(5):310-7. Possible role of arachidonic acid in the regulation of lactate production in rat Sertoli cells. Meroni SB, Riera MF, Pellizzari EH, Schteingart HF, Cigorraga SB. 

Biofizika. 1967 Nov-Dec;12(6):1085-6. [Increase in unsaturated fatty acids during tumor growth]. [Article in Russian] NeÄfakh EA, Lankin VZ. 

Br Heart J. 1993 Jul;70(1):27-34. Cardiac release of chemoattractants after ischaemia induced by coronary balloon angioplasty. Neumann FJ, Richardt G,Schneider M, Ott I, Haupt HM, Tillmanns H, Schömig A, Rauch B. 

J Steroid Biochem 1986 May;24(5):1033-9. Aromatase activity and concentrations of cortisol, progesterone and testosterone in breast and abdominal adipose tissue. Newton CJ, Samuel DL, James VH. 

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Aug;60(8):970-5. Coenzyme Q10 protects from
aging-related oxidative stress and improves mitochondrial function in heart of rats fed a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA)-rich diet. Ochoa JJ, Quiles JL, Huertas JR, Mataix J. 

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Nov;62(11):1211-8. Effect of lifelong coenzyme Q10 supplementation on age-related oxidative stress and mitochondrial function in liver and skeletal muscle of rats fed on a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA)-rich diet. Ochoa JJ, Quiles JL, Lopez-Frias M, Huertas JR, Mataix J. 

Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 3;97(11):1505-12. In vitro irradiation of basement membrane enhances the invasiveness of breast cancer cells. Paquette B, Baptiste C,Therriault H, Arguin G, Plouffe B, Lemay R. 

Br J Cancer. 2011 Aug 9;105(4):534-41. Radiation-enhancement of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell invasion prevented by a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. Paquette B, Therriault H, Desmarais G, Wagner R, Royer R, Bujold R. 

Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1992 Apr;45(4):293-8. Essential fatty acids are not required for wound healing. Porras-Reyes BH, Schreiner GF, Lefkowith JB, Mustoe TA.

Cancer Res. 1957 Dec;17(11):1112-9. Comparison of transhydrogenase and pyridine nucleotide-cytochrome c reductase activities in rat liver and Novikoff hepatoma. Reynafarje B, Potter VR. 

Bioessays. 2006 May;28(5):515-24. What keeps cells in tissues behaving normally in the face of myriad mutations? Rubin H. 

Enzymologia. 1966 Apr 30;30(4):237-42. [Occurrence of pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase in mitochondria of various ascites tumors] [Article in German] Salvenmoser F, Kramar R, Seelich F. 

Basic Res Cardiol. 1989 Mar-Apr;84(2):165-73. Enhanced lipolysis of myocardial triglycerides during low-flow ischemia and anoxia in the isolated rat heart. Schoonderwoerd K, Broekhoven-Schokker S, Hulsmann WC, Stam H. 

Naturwissenschaften. 1965 Jun;52:307-8. On the effect of NADPH2 NADtranshydrogenase on direct oxidation of glucose; experiments with the use of Ehrlich ascites tumor homogenates. Seelich F, Salvenmoser F, Kramar R. J Endocrinol 1998 Sep;158(3):401-7. Progesterone inhibits glucocorticoiddependent aromatase induction in human adipose fibroblasts. Schmidt M, Renner C, Loffler G. 

Cancer Res. 1974 Aug;34(8):1827-32. Blood glucose levels and gluconeogenesis in animals bearing transplantable tumors. Shapot VS, Blinov VA. 

EMBO J. 2007 Mar 21;26(6):1713-25. Structures and physiological roles of 13 integral lipids of bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase. Shinzawa-Itoh K, Aoyama H, Muramoto K, Terada H, Kurauchi T, Tadehara Y, Yamasaki A, Sugimura T, Kurono S, Tsujimoto K, Mizushima T, Yamashita E, Tsukihara T, Yoshikawa S. 

Semin Cancer Biol. 2008 Oct;18(5):372-7. Theories of carcinogenesis: an emerging
perspective. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. 

Cancer Res. 2011 Jul 1;71(13):4334-7. The death of the cancer cell. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. 

J Lipid Res. 1969 Mar;10(2):207-15. Influence of pH of the medium on free fatty acid utilization by isolated mammalian cells. Spector AA. 

Cancer Biol Ther. 2009 Jan;8(1):31-5. Inflammation, but not hypoxia, mediated HIF-1alpha activation depends on COX-2. Stasinopoulos I, O'Brien DR, Bhujwalla ZM. 

Cancer Res. 1965 Aug;25(7):957-61. Hepatic lipids in tumor-bearing (glioma) mice. Stein AA, Opalka E, Rosenblum I. 

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;559:325-30. Cell swelling-induced peptide hormone secretion. Strbak V, Benicky J, Greer SE, Bacova Z, Najvirtova M, Greer MA. 

Allergy. 2011 Mar;66(3):341-50. Treatment of mast cells with carbon dioxide suppresses degranulation via a novel mechanism involving repression of increased intracellular calcium levels. Strider JW, Masterson CG, Durham PL. 

Keio J Med. 1962 Dec;11:223-5. The influence of linoleum acid upon the growth of transplanted sarcoma, Sueyoshi Y and Nagao Y. 

Keio J. Med. 1962;11(1):25-32. Studies on the linoleum acid contents in the phospholipids of the sarcoma, Sueyoshi Y and Nagao Y. 

Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1996 Jun;114(2): 105-12. Effect of testosterone on carbonic anhydrase and MG(2+)-dependent HCO3-stimulated ATPase activities in rat kidney: comparison with estradiol effect. Suzuki S, Yoshida J, Takahashi T. 

Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991 Aug 15;289(1):33-8. A possible mechanism of mitochondrial dysfunction during cerebral ischemia: inhibition of mitochondrial respiration activity by arachidonic acid. Takeuchi Y, Morii H, Tamura M, Hayaishi O, Watanabe Y. 

Int J Cancer. 2012 Jan 1;130(1):159-69. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25990. Sugars in diet and risk of cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Tasevska N, Jiao L, Cross AJ, Kipnis V, Subar AF, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A, Potischman N. Circ Shock. 1992 Jun;37(2):105-10. Inflammatory cytokines stimulate glucose uptake and glycolysis but reduce glucose oxidation in human dermal fibroblasts in vitro. Taylor DJ, Faragher EB, Evanson JM. 

Acta Biol Med Ger. 1966;16(4):364-71. [The effect of higher fatty acids on the energy metabolism of Ehrlich-ascites tumor cells. I. The effect of saturated and transconfigurated unsaturated fatty acids on anaerobic glycolysis]. [Article in German] Theise H. 

Am J Physiol. 1975 Jan;228(1):27-33. Acid-induced excitation of afferent cardiac sympathetic nerve fibers. Uchida Y, Murao S. 

J Biol Chem. 2011 Mar 25;286(12):10265-75. Cortisol synthesis in epidermis is induced by IL-1 and tissue injury. Vukelic S, Stojadinovic O, Pastar I, Rabach M, Krzyzanowska A, Lebrun E, Davis SC, Resnik S, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. 

Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007 Aug 1;17(15):4107-12. Carbonic anhydrase activators: activation of the human isoforms VII (cytosolic) and XIV (transmembrane) with amino acids and amines. Vullo D, Innocenti A, Nishimori I, Scozzafava A, Kaila K, Supuran CT. 

Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011 Dec;55(12):1745-58. GABA (ÎÑ-aminobutyric acid), a nonprotein amino acid counters the ÎÇ-adrenergic cascade-activated oncogenic signaling in pancreatic cancer: a review of experimental evidence. Al-Wadei HA, Ullah MF, Al-Wadei M. 

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2011 Dec 22. Bioenergetic Origins of Complexity and Disease. Wallace DC. "The organizing power of energy flow is hypothesized to be the origin of biological complexity and its decline the basis of "complex" diseases and aging." 

Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2009;69(4):429-40. Xenon blocks AMPA and NMDA
receptor channels by different mechanisms. Weigt HU, Fohr KJ, Georgieff M,
Georgieff EM, Senftleben U, Adolph O. 

Neuroscience. 2010 Dec 15;171(3):859-68. Low energy laser light (632.8 nm)
suppresses amyloid-ÎÇ peptide-induced oxidative and inflammatory responses in
astrocytes. Yang X, Askarova S, Sheng W, Chen JK, Sun AY, Sun GY, Yao G, Lee JC. 

Comp Biochem Physiol A. 1989;94(2):273-6. The effects of essential fatty acid
deficiency on brown adipose tissue activity in rats maintained at thermal
neutrality. Yazbeck J, Goubern M, Senault C, Chapey MF, Portet R. 

Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006 May;290(5):C1321-33. Polyunsaturated fatty acids
mobilize intracellular Ca2+ in NT2 human teratocarcinoma cells by causing
release of Ca2+ from mitochondria. Zhang BX, Ma X, Zhang W, Yeh CK, Lin A, Luo J, Sprague EA, Swerdlow RH, Katz MS. 

PLoS One. 2009 Jun 26;4(6):e6048. Linoleic acid-induced mitochondrial Ca(2+)
efflux causes peroxynitrite generation and protein nitrotyrosylation. Zhang HM,
Dang H, Yeh CK, Zhang BX. 

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Nov;301(5):H1882-90. Dihydrotestosterone attenuates hypoxia inducible factor-1α and cyclooxygenase-2 in cerebral arteries during hypoxia or hypoxia with glucose deprivation. Zuloaga KL, Gonzales RJ.


Ray Peat 


© Ray Peat Ph.D. 2014. All Rights Reserved. www.RayPeat.com


Source: https://raypeat.com/articles/articles/cancer-disorder-energy.shtml

Mariangela Hungria, the Brazilian Nobel Laureate Who Pushed Back on Chemical Fertilizers

 



Fourth World
May 18th, 2026

One year ago, the World Food Prize Foundation Brazilian agronomist and microbiologist Dr. Mariangela Hungria won the 2025 World Food Prize for her work on work on nitrogen fixation, soil health, and crop nutrition.

Hungria’s research has focused on increasing food production and improving crop quality by fully or partially replacing chemical fertilizers with microorganisms capable of biological nitrogen fixation, phytohormone synthesis, and the solubilization of phosphates and potassium-rich rocks. One of her major contributions was showing that, unlike findings reported in the United States, Australia, and Europe, annual soybean inoculation with Bradyrhizobium increases yields by an average of 8% in Brazil. And these gains can be achieved without nitrogen fertilizer - farmers have adopted the practice on 85% of Brazil’s soybean acreage. 

Brazil is the largest agricultural producer and exporter in the Global South. Its agricultural sector generates over $500 billion annually, accounting for over 20% of the country's GDP. It is the world’s top exporter of soybeans, coffee, and beef, and leads in the production of sugarcane, maize, and poultry. 

But Brazil is highly dependent on imported fertilizer, and farmers are expected to reduce their applications this year, impacting yields. As elsewhere, geopolitical events are impacting the country's productive capacity. The US-Israeli aggression against Iran has resulted in a partial shut down the Strait of Hormuz, which is a crucial part of the fertilizer supply chain.  

A micro green revolution 

Hungria, a researcher with the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), is credited with helping Brazil become an agricultural powerhouse. But it took time for her methods to be widely embraced.

The World Food Prize laureate attended school in the 1970s, a time when when crop yields were seeing dramatic increases as a result of the Green Revolution, characterized by the heavy use of fertilizers and pesticides. But Hungria was interested in microorganisms, and she believed they offered a solution that didn’t require farmers to rely so heavily on synthetic chemicals. She called it a micro green revolution.

These methods are now being looked at worldwide as part of the shift toward regenerative agriculture, systems that restore soil life, reduce chemical dependence, and promote resilience in food systems. Hungria's work shows that tropical agriculture can be both productive and environmentally protective.

The pushback that Hungria once received from her teachers and peers was significant. “Everybody said that I had no future with biologicals,” she said in an interview with Food Tank. But Hungria persisted. In her research, she proved that it was possible for farmers to apply less fertilizer while also improving their yields and livelihoods.

“Nature already offers solutions. Our role is to understand these mechanisms and make them available to farmers in a safe, efficient, and accessible way.” 

And through her career, farmers remained central to her work, Hungria says. “Every research that I did, it was because a farmer came to me to talk about something. It was because a farmer came [to me] or I met a farmer in the field, and he told me what he wanted and what was happening, and that gave me ideas to do my work.”


Sources include:

https://foodtank.com/news/2025/07/dr-mariangela-hungria-is-driving-an-agricultural-revolution-for-people-and-planet/

https://www.brazilianfarmers.com/news/brazils-mariangela-hungria-wins-the-world-food-prize-for-pioneering-sustainable-agriculture-with-soil-microbes/

https://www.foodmanufacturing.com/safety/news/22941154/microbiologist-who-pushed-back-on-chemical-fertilizers-wins-world-food-prize

https://farmingfirst.org/2025/05/dr-mariangela-hungria-named-2025-world-food-prize-laureate/ 

domingo, 17 de maio de 2026

China transforms desert into arable land using cyanobacteria



mpr21
February 25th 

Chinese researchers are accelerating the stabilization of desert soils. An experimental technology developed in northwest China forms a biofilm in just a few years, compared to more than a decade under natural conditions.

A Chinese scientific team is testing "soil seeds" capable of fixing sand and preparing the ground for vegetation. The experiment is being conducted at the Shapotou Research Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

The seeds are based on solid cyanobacteria. Once dispersed on the sand, they reactivate under the effect of rain, aggregate with the grains, and form a biofilm. This layer stabilizes the surface and facilitates plant growth. At Shapotou, the researchers are talking about a game-changer.

Initially, laboratory tests did not withstand desert conditions. Exposed to wind and shifting sands, the cyanobacteria disappeared in less than a week. Inspired by natural mechanisms, the team refined their method. Pressure injection now allows microorganisms to be introduced between the grains of sand, limiting their dispersal and improving their settlement.

The researchers' findings suggest that the biofilm, whose spontaneous formation can take up to fifteen years, could appear in one or two years. The survival rate exceeds 60 percent. Sand stabilization, a process that can take many years, would be reduced to just a few years. These results are still based on experimental trials.

The challenges go beyond simply combating erosion. In many countries, the expansion of arid zones reduces arable land and jeopardizes food production. In Africa and Asia, millions of hectares are being lost to desertification. Restoring soils is a direct way to maintain agricultural production, limit rural exodus, and ensure farmers' incomes.

The technology being tested in China does not aim for immediate transformation into fertile land. It establishes a biological foundation. Pioneer plants can take root on this foundation, paving the way for gradual soil regeneration. Instead of planting trees directly, a strategy often ineffective on unstable dunes, researchers prioritize rebuilding the soil structure. The system has been integrated into the country's northern windbreak forest program. Scientists aim to restore between 5,300 and 6,600 hectares over the next five years. 

Source: https://mpr21.info/china-transforma-el-desierto-en-tierra-cultivable-con-cianobacterias/ 

Medicine DAO: Decentralized Like the Forest



How Tribal Memory, Sacred Healing, and Medicine DAOs Could Reweave What Civilization Forgot  

 

1. When Science Becomes Servitude 

I used to believe that working in a European research lab meant freedom, the freedom of science to explore, to innovate, to push the boundaries of human knowledge. But I quickly discovered that even curiosity must submit to funding priorities. Grants were often awarded not based on vision, but on alignment with the interests of major corporations, which controlled the funds of the European Community.

When I proposed a study to my boss on the effects of marijuana on brain–computer interfaces—at the frontier of neuroscience and altered states—the answer was polite, but clear: no funding available. Not because the science was weak, but because the topic fell outside the sphere of what mattered to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital where I was working, and the Ministry of Health.

Even the academic world around me felt quietly transactional. Conference submissions required high fees. Publishing in respected journals often depended more on institutional affiliations than merit. There was brilliance, yes, sure, but there were also gatekeepers. And a growing sense that science, as I had imagined it when I was a child, was no longer a free field of exploration, but a system increasingly shaped by hierarchy and economics.

So I left.

I went to China, not to escape, but to breathe. What began as a sabbatical year slowly turned into something much longer. And there, in the mountains of Yunnan, something unexpected happened: spirituality entered my life. I found myself surrounded by a group of foreigners: artists, hackers, and meditators, each on their own journey.

Then something truly unforeseen emerged. In science, we call it an emergent property—when the whole becomes more than the sum of its parts, when the result is unpredictable, greater than the input. That’s how RiShi Labs was born—the Laboratory of the Eclipse: a self-organized, boundaryless creative commune.

We were inspired, not by books or theories, but by what we felt in the everyday rhythms of Chinese life. One concept stood out: guanxi—the subtle, living network of relationships that flows beneath society. And another phrase we heard often: “double happiness” (双喜): your happiness makes me happy, so joy is multiplied when shared.

This was the hidden virus of China, not control, but a kind of millenarian relational wisdom. We caught it. It changed us. We stopped organizing around individual goals and began living through shared ones. Art, music, healing, food, silence, celebration, it all flowed through relationship, not roles.

RiShi Labs was born of this contagion, not as a project, but as a pulse. No bosses. No plan. No product. Just a network of people infected by the quiet, ancient intelligence of a civilization that had survived collapse more than once, not by force, but by flexibility, harmony, and flow.

2. Tribes Were the First DAOs

At RiShi Labs, decisions were made by consensus. No one was above the group. Resources were shared. Healing happened in relationship. If someone was struggling, others stepped in, not out of obligation, but out of recognition: your well-being is part of mine.

It echoed what I would later experience among the Huni Kuin in Brazil and in the forests of Peru: an older form of intelligence, not based on dominance but on distributed presence. Elders offered guidance, not control. Ceremonies were collective, not transactional. There was no brand, no profit motive, only reciprocity, rhythm, and story.

In Civilized to Death, Christopher Ryan shows how our hunter-gatherer ancestors lived in egalitarian, mutually sustaining bands for 95% of human history. These were not primitive societies, but actually they were highly functional, emotionally sane, relationally rich.

Daniel Pinchbeck, in How Soon Is Now, takes this further, arguing that our only path forward lies in remembering what we’ve buried: tribal coherence, ecological intimacy, sacred time. What we need is not reinvention. It is re-indigenization.

And strangely, the DAO—the Decentralized Autonomous Organization—might be one of the tools to help us get there.

3. Decentralized Since the Beginning: Tribal Roots of the DAO

Long before smart contracts and governance tokens, tribes practiced what we now call decentralization. Power was earned, not imposed. Value was shared, not hoarded. Identity was collective, not branded.

Among the Zapatista-inspired communities I visited in Chiapas, there was no money. No top-down rules. Decisions were made in horizontal assemblies. Labor was exchanged through trust. Food, care, stories, and healing circulated through mutual obligation, not profit.

DAOs today attempt to mirror these dynamics in code. They promise flat governance, token-based value distribution, and collective stewardship. But what we code now in blockchain, our ancestors already lived through ritual, myth, and land-based community.

To say DAOs are the future is misleading. They are, in their most sacred form, a return.

4. What Is a DAO? (And Why Should You Care?)

Before we go further, let’s pause.

DAO stands for Decentralized Autonomous Organization. Sounds futuristic, maybe even a little robotic. But the concept is ancient, older than banks, governments, or even alphabets.

A DAO is a system where rules are not enforced by bosses or buildings, but by code and community. Decisions are made collectively. Resources are managed transparently. Power is distributed, not concentrated.

Think of it like this:
If a traditional organization is a pyramid, with power at the top, a DAO is a circle, where every voice, every vote, matters.

In technical terms, a DAO is built using blockchain technology. This means the rules and financial flows are encoded in “smart contracts”: public, tamper-proof agreements that anyone can verify. No middlemen. No secret boardrooms. Just people, purpose, and protocol.

But here’s the important part:
A DAO is not just tech. It’s trust.
It only works if the people in it show up with integrity. The code provides structure, but the spirit has to come from us.

So when we talk about a Medicine DAO, we’re talking about a new way to hold sacred work. A way to organize healing not through hierarchy or branding—but through shared responsibility, collective vision, and accountability to the values we claim to serve.

Not a new religion. Not another guru cult. Just a circle.
Like the fire. Like the tribe. Like the forest.

5. The Medicine DAO: A Mycelial Network for the Sacred

Imagine a network of healing centers, not franchises, not brands, but living communities, each deeply rooted in the land they inhabit and the traditions they honor. One in the Amazon. One in the Andes. One in Mexico. One in Gabon. All different. All autonomous. Yet all connected.

Each center is guided by the ancestral medicines and cultural memory of its place: ayahuasca, iboga, huachuma, mushrooms, Chinese herbs, sweat lodges, songs. But not as frozen heritage. Rather, as living traditions, capable of evolving through respectful dialogue with modern knowledge: trauma therapy, breathwork, neuroscience, and qigong.

Not fusion. Not appropriation. Evolution. Like DNA recombining to face a changing world.

The DAO is the nervous system connecting these nodes. It allows centers to share resources, coordinate support, and remain accountable, not to donors, but to each other and to the sacred. It provides a non-corporate framework for value to move between centers, elders, and seekers. It is a container, not for scaling, but for spreading with integrity.

At Paojilhuasca, we’ve already walked this path: ceremonies rooted in the Amazonian tradition, integrated with bodywork, Chinese medicine, qigong, and deep, slow integration. We don’t mass-produce healing. We protect it. We make it relational again.

The Medicine DAO is a way to protect that spirit across geography and generations.

6. Shadow Warning: Don’t Code the Same Empire Twice

But let’s not be naïve. Power always finds its way into the system, especially when wrapped in good intentions. If DAOs forget their tribal roots, they risk repeating the same patterns they were meant to disrupt.

If we tokenize the sacred without embodying its values, if we reduce healing to content, to metrics, to branded “medicine experiences”, we haven’t built a new future. We’ve just given the empire a new mask.

The DAO must be more than a tool. It must be a ritual in itself. A structure that demands participation, presence, humility, and care.

Otherwise, we will simply rebuild the same hierarchies on chains—and the forest will look at us and sigh.

7. Conclusion: A Return, Not an Escape

I left the laboratory not because I hated science but because I loved it too much to watch it decay. I left the system that paid me because I could no longer afford the cost of my own silence. I went to the jungle thinking I was escaping. But what I found was a return.

A return to curiosity without permission. To community without hierarchy. To healing that lives in the body, not the brand.

Now I stand between worlds. I still believe in technology, but only when it remembers the soil. I still believe in progress, but only if it spirals. And I believe we can build systems that protect what is sacred, if we root them in what has always made us human: reciprocity, presence, and story.

The Medicine DAO is not the answer. But it may be a vessel, to carry the fire forward without extinguishing its soul.

 

Source: https://realitysandwich.com/medicine-dao-decentralized-like-the-forest/

How did Venezuela become a US protectorate? Interview with Malfred Gerig



Nuso.org | Monday, 23/02/2026 (leer en español)

The US military attack on Venezuela on January 3, along with the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro, has sparked intense debate about how it could have happened, what the new government of Delcy Rodríguez represents, and what all this means for Venezuelan sovereignty.

In this interview, Malfred Gerig, a sociologist and graduate of the Central University of Venezuela, and author of the book *The Long Venezuelan Depression: Political Economy of the Rise and Fall of the Oil Century*, addresses the political, economic, moral, and military decline of the Maduro regime, which transformed Venezuela into such a weak link that Donald Trump's actions proved remarkably easy. He also reflects on the characteristics of the new protectorate and the possibilities of finding the energy to recover national autonomy and a democratic future. And, no less importantly, he critically examines the position of the international left regarding the Venezuelan crisis.

How do you interpret the US military actions that, after deploying warships in the Caribbean for several months, culminated in a military assault and the kidnapping of Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Congresswoman Cilia Flores? Was the motivation simply to gain control of Venezuelan oil?

Obviously, the military intervention is related to oil, because everything concerning Venezuela is always related to oil. But it's a bit more complex, because two things came together here: the Venezuelan crisis and Trump's foreign policy. The long Venezuelan depression and the political crisis were compounded by the transfer of the conflict to the international arena. The weakening, over so many years, of the sources of national power—economic, political, institutional, military, and cultural—ultimately led to the most humiliating episode in Venezuela's republican history.

This national weakening made intervention in Venezuela appealing to Trump. First, because he was acting against a government without a social base and without rational-legal legitimacy. The United States knew that the Venezuelan people would not come out to defend Maduro, and this weighed heavily in the equation that led to the military action. They intervened against an unpopular head of state lacking democratic legitimacy. Second, because the country's political institutions were completely illegitimate and severely weakened in terms of their capacity for wielding real power—as seen in the (non)reaction to the military operation. And third, because the Maduro government, being a weak government that had undermined state capabilities for so many years in order to cling to power for its own sake, was an easy target for the United States to begin reshaping its entire foreign policy toward Latin America.

To this we can add that the Venezuelan political class doubled down on externalizing the conflict, believing that Trump would arbitrate in good faith in favor of one of the parties, without subsequently demanding anything in return. In the case of the opposition, this is very clear: they sought Trump's support to overthrow the regime and seize power. But the Maduro regime simultaneously sought an agreement with Trump that would legitimize electoral fraud and repression; a normalization that required Washington's blessing. I have called this, using Turkey as an example, Maduro's failed "Erdoganization," a failed transition to "competitive authoritarianism."

Here we see the moral, ethical, and above all, strategic character of the various factions within the Venezuelan political class. If responsibility for the catastrophic outcome of this systemic crisis must be assigned, it lies precisely with the political elites, both Maduro supporters and the opposition.

The country's weakening was exploited by the "foreign sentinel," who now seeks to reap economic and political gain. They will find a way to make Venezuela pay tribute—because the word that matters here is "pay tribute"—and pay dearly for the folly of its political class.

Oil is crucial to the United States' plans to profit from its intervention through the payment of an imperial tribute. The Venezuelan people, unfortunately, will pay dearly, given Trumpian territorialism and neo-mercantilism, for our inability to resolve the state's general crisis on our own. We will pay with oil, but also with dependence and the loss of national and popular sovereignty over our immediate future.

But Trump was negotiating with the Maduro government, as we saw with the visit of his special envoy Richard Grenell to Caracas. Why not simply accept Maduro's offer to hand over Venezuela's resources in exchange for remaining in power?

It's clear that there came a point when Trump changed his mind and Maduro ceased to be a credible negotiating partner. That moment was when Grenell was withdrawn from the negotiations. Trump realized that Maduro was untrustworthy. And by offering everything to the United States, Maduro also lost credibility with Russia and China. Secretary of State Marco Rubio even stated in an interview that Maduro "has violated every agreement he has signed."

When Trump withdrew Grenell, many of us believed that the United States was going to take military action in Venezuela. In military terms, it was very similar to what happened with Russia and Ukraine: this military buildup wasn't intended, as some analysts suggested, to force an internal collapse. It was clear that the United States was preparing for some kind of intervention. What was at stake was how he would act and what the aftermath would look like.

Simply put, Maduro lacked the national and international credibility to be the man of geopolitical realignment. Credibility is highly valued in international politics, and Maduro's, like his rational-legal legitimacy, was nonexistent.

You pointed out that Venezuela was seen as an easy target for the United States and its desire to reconfigure its policy toward Latin America. What role did Venezuela play in the foreign policy of Trump's second term?

The target ceased to be solely Venezuela. Irrational policies were implemented, for example, against a popular and legitimately elected president like Gustavo Petro in Colombia, by including him on the Clinton List [of individuals sanctioned for alleged involvement in drug trafficking and money laundering]. Constant threats of "ground" military interventions began in Mexico, along with open electoral interference in support of candidates aligned with what we might call the MAGA International, particularly in Honduras and Argentina. Petro's recent visit to the White House, celebrated by both leaders, which included the US president's statement that Petro is "terrific," demonstrates the inconsistencies in Trump's accusations. Furthermore, the Venezuelan issue has clearly become intertwined with the Cuban issue, creating a chain of weaknesses.

Venezuela has become the lever for a much more maximalist policy toward Latin America. This shift was reflected in the National Security Strategy and the reactivation of the Monroe Doctrine, with its "Trump corollary." Behind this lies an entire school of geostrategists, from Nicholas Spykman to Robert J. Art, who conceive of territorialism in Latin America as essential in a moment of global or hegemonic conflict. According to this view, North and South America possess the resources the United States needs to survive a major global confrontation, which would inevitably destabilize the world market. The "Trump corollary" represents precisely a return to territorialism, in which the United States, by controlling the western hemisphere, can afford a large-scale global conflict without becoming isolated or falling into a general depression due to the disruption of supply chains.

That is why we have gone from Barack Obama's "pivot to Asia" to Trump's "pivot to Latin America." Latin America will pay the price for the empire's decline and its withdrawal from Europe and, above all, from Asia. Venezuela offered the Trump administration a weakened opponent, with limited military capacity and international discrediting, upon which to reorganize its Latin American policy according to the MAGA vision; the possibility of a victory at very low cost.

Ideologically, this represents the defeat of socialism, even if the Maduro regime was socialist in name only. Militarily, it is a demonstration of firepower and persuasive power. Geopolitically, it represents a power shift at the table of the great powers, something Washington longed for. Economically, it promises a substantial oil windfall for the United States and the corporations that financed Trump's campaigns, although these corporations are somewhat skeptical given the massive investments needed to reactivate the industry in a still uncertain context.

There was much talk of “regime change,” but in the end, power remains in the hands of those who governed under Maduro. How can we understand this situation?

Regarding regime change, I recently wrote an article about it. Also, in *The Long Venezuelan Depression*, I argued that the sanctions implemented during Trump’s first term had failed to achieve regime change from above, but had been absolutely successful in achieving regime change from below; that is, they had achieved regime change in the country’s political economy, steering it toward what I called a “neoliberalism with patrimonial characteristics” and a very sui generis Venezuelan model of crony capitalism.

This regime change from below has now become linked to what we could categorize as regime change from the outside, or a geopolitical realignment. A prime example of this type of dynamic is Anwar Sadat’s Egypt. The United States achieved a complete realignment—against the Soviet Union—of Egypt after Nasser's death in 1970. That is what, with some differences, the United States is doing today in Venezuela.

But it was very difficult to achieve this with Maduro, since his ability to change the country's political climate was nonexistent. Maduro tried: we can see his last interview with journalist Ignacio Ramonet, on December 30th, where he clearly states everything he was willing to give up, namely, all the country's natural resources, which, as a true patrimonialist, he believed were his. That proposal failed initially, but it became a reality with Maduroism without Maduro. So the realignment, or regime change, continues externally, and we can see it happening every day.

Do you think he will succeed in this realignment?

A few days ago, when asked why he was doing things this way, Trump said, “If you ever remember a place called Iraq, they kicked everyone out—police, generals, everyone was removed—and they ended up joining ISIS.” Trump may be right about that. He’s trying a different approach to dealing with the day after regime change. But that doesn’t mean he’s going to succeed.

Venezuela is facing a kind of "Shimonoseki moment," alluding to the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895. That war, and especially the tributes that followed the signing of the Treaty of Shimonoseki imposed by Japan, ushered in what is known as the "era of humiliation" for China. This was later replicated in the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I—and we know where that led. That is precisely what the United States is doing today: taking advantage of the collapse of the Venezuelan state, it seeks to impose a colonial policy in the form of a protectorate and make the oil-based colonial model irreversible in the medium term.

A model in which the United States—as requested by the CEOs of the major American oil companies—guarantees, for a considerable period (20 or 30 years), that things remain unchanged and that a constant tribute is paid. What the Trump administration is proposing is a counterrevolution against Venezuelan oil nationalism, which was the backbone of the Venezuelan state during the 20th century. And I go even further: to impose this protectorate, it has the acquiescence of the two major factions of the political class.

What was the condition that made all this possible? The extreme weakening of the foundations of the Venezuelan nation, to the point that Venezuelans preferred a military intervention to the impossibility of resolving things on their own. This national weakening was the responsibility not only of the opposition, but also of the regime that for so many years ignored the consequences of its strategies to maintain power and plunder public resources.

Now the Venezuelan political class has no substantive agency whatsoever, neither the opposition nor the ruling elite. The only thing it can do is obey Washington's dictates and compete to see who is the best janitor.

How does this leave the right-wing opposition, which remains out of power?

Regarding the opposition, there is much to say. First, it's important to highlight the idiosyncrasies, the worldview, of a sector of Venezuelan society that is ignorant of Venezuela and is utterly subservient. This led a large segment of the opposition to adopt a strategy of externalizing the conflict, putting all their eggs in the basket of the foreign watchdog. If we look at María Corina Machado's speeches, especially after the presidential elections of July 28, 2024, we realize that rather than speaking to Venezuelans in Venezuela, she focused on exploiting the emotions of the Venezuelan diaspora. This reflected a complete weakening of her internal political strength, an inability to manage and capitalize on the electoral fraud.

This weakening of the opposition's internal capacity for resistance was exploited by the United States. Machado's entire discourse—which even justified the deportation of Venezuelan immigrants from the United States—was utterly irresponsible and, I dare say, criminal. Machado and the opposition political elite provided Trump with ammunition to bolster his anti-Venezuelan policy, which considers Venezuelan immigrants practically hostis humani generis [enemies of humankind], to drive not only his foreign policy but also his domestic immigration policy based on the criminalization of an entire national group. This crime was completed when they called for military intervention and stained their hands with the blood of Venezuelans killed by a foreign military force on January 3rd.

What we have now is a very significant fraction of the political class vying to see who can best guarantee the new US protectorate in the country. That's the magnitude of our tragedy.

Were you at all surprised by how quickly relations between Delcy Rodríguez's new government and Trump's became so friendly, just hours after Maduro's kidnapping?

I wasn't surprised because it was widely known that the Maduro regime had been fostering a realignment, in which they were willing to concede everything in order to maintain their grip on "political power," as they like to call it. Nor was it surprising that the much-touted slogans about a "thousand-year war," a "second Vietnam," or "permanent resistance," repeated by the government in the face of the possibility of US military action, vanished, and that in just two hours the United States captured Maduro in an operation that was extremely humiliating for the Venezuelan Armed Forces. All of this was very consistent with Maduro's regime: absolute incompetence in military terms—as in the broader management of the state—with no one taking responsibility for the military debacle.

Maduro's regime abandoned its programmatic, ideological, and ethical principles long ago. What is surprising is that Delcy Rodríguez appeared in the National Assembly to refer to the funds that the Trump administration will manage as "sovereign funds" "intended to guarantee the social protection of the Venezuelan people and to promote the country's economic and social development." This is yet another episode in the absolute distortion of language and reality to which we have become accustomed in Venezuela: the reign of Newspeak.

The situation now is as pathetic as it is worrying. Trump is issuing orders that will include absolute control over the marketing of Venezuelan oil and the completely discretionary management of the revenue from those transactions, transferring to the Venezuelan government whatever he deems appropriate, in addition to deciding what Venezuela can and cannot import and from where. Trump dictates, and they obey. “Sovereign is he who decides,” wrote Carl Schmitt, and those who are deciding in Venezuela right now are in Washington, not in Caracas.

In this neocolonial context, it will be up to the Venezuelan people, the Venezuelan nation, the remaining moral, ethical, and dignified reserves in the country, to decide how long this situation will continue. The answer will not come from either the Maduro regime or the opposition. If anyone can become an agent against all this national humiliation, it is precisely the Venezuelan people, not those responsible for this situation.

The government of Delcy Rodríguez is taking steps to amend Chávez's hydrocarbons law. What is happening in terms of state sovereignty over oil?

What is being done is to dismantle—to the delight of many in the country who have always wanted this—the foundations of Venezuelan oil nationalism, which is far from being the sole property of Chavismo. This was one of the great pillars of the construction of the Venezuelan state and nation throughout the 20th century. The Bolivarian Revolution, which had as one of its pillars precisely the vindication of oil sovereignty, is becoming the most anti-national episode in our oil history. Even worse than the Gómez regime, with its oil concessions that enriched the power elite. Today, what we have is a "lease agreement" imposed by force, in the sense that oil production is being granted to private US companies.

This reform of the Hydrocarbons Law is Venezuela's surrender as an oil-producing country and a step backward to the first half of the 20th century as a country that owned the resource. Specifically, it is a radicalization of what was already happening, a formalization of it. The precedent was the Anti-Blockade Law and the so-called "Chevron model," so celebrated by Maduro, with its production participation contracts (CPPs), through which PDVSA's [the state-owned Petróleos de Venezuela] partners manage everything within the framework of absolute operational delegation. The Chevron model will now be intensified: we will see it on steroids, as it adds the monopoly of US private companies over marketing, discretionary management of revenues, and a monopoly over imports.

Some argue: "But they pay taxes, they pay royalties." Even that isn't clear; how it works is completely opaque. The extent of the embezzlement of the nation's assets is still unclear.

Obviously, all of this goes against what is enshrined in the Constitution and the current Hydrocarbons Law. That is why it is necessary to adapt the regulations in accordance with the new reality, something that some oil companies were requesting in their meeting with Trump. This will allow oil companies with far greater expertise and capacity to enter the market, while all those shady, unknown, and dubious shell companies, like the one backed by Trump's friend Harry Sargeant, will be forced out. These companies will now have to compete with the megacorporations of Big Oil. These companies had entered the oil business without any oversight or transparency, in a completely opaque manner, under the Maduro government. The CPP (Committees for Productive Development) were the prerequisite for the arrival of crony capitalism in the oil business, through these phantom oil companies that served the interests of the political clique and were created precisely to plunder Venezuelan oil.

Juan Pablo Pérez Alfonzo, a Venezuelan lawyer and former Minister of Mines and Hydrocarbons between 1959 and 1963, understood very well that the logical consequence of the state owning oil was the state producing oil, since being a producer was the only way to maximize revenue. A state that doesn't produce oil has no way to claim revenue from its property. In other words, ownership of oil is meaningless if you can't extract the resource.

Furthermore, the model being implemented envisions an oil-producing country dependent on importing light crude and diluents to be able to market its heavy crude. Revenue is likely to plummet, even if production increases—currently at historic lows. All of this is a consequence of having undermined PDVSA's capacity for vertical integration for 60 years.

Do you see any possibility of resistance against Trump's recolonization plans?

The future, even in the short term, is very difficult to predict because all these agreements are highly unstable. It's true that the Maduro political class is the least resistant—so to speak—to implementing Trump's foreign policy in Venezuela. It's no coincidence that the CIA reports on which Trump based his policies chose the Maduro regime to lead the transition to a protectorate. And as we can see, for the moment, it's succeeding without major problems.

But there are also some potential lines of resistance: for example, internal conflicts within the Maduro regime could cause this new normal to be disrupted at some point. Not due to issues of dignity, ethics, or policy, but rather due to power struggles within each faction, as well as attempts to make rivals pay the price. It doesn't seem that the social base of the Maduro regime—what remains of it—is going to accuse the Maduro regime without Maduro of betraying the legacy of Hugo Chávez or the Bolivarian Revolution. A lot of water has flowed under the bridge in a very long time. Maduro's regime is an utterly devoid of ideology, advocating only for the economic survival of its cronies. Its only homeland is power, its privileges tied to the control of the state.

But I do believe—and that's why I mentioned the Shimonoseki moment—that nations possess moral and ethical reserves that allow them to persevere in their very being, the conatus of the homeland. What came after the Shimonoseki moment in China? The Boxer Rebellion. The Venezuelan nation, in some way, will have to demonstrate a reservoir of dignity to reclaim our right to self-governance.

We are perhaps entering the most important crossroads in our republican history, a crossroads in which we will see how the nation rebuilds itself and begins to demand its rights, primarily its right to decide its own destiny. There will be no shortage of reactionaries who advocate for Venezuela to lose its sovereignty as penance for the catastrophic outcome of the political conflict, but there will also be no shortage of republicans and Bolivarian supporters who will advocate for freedom, sovereignty, equality, virtue, and the general and national-popular interest as a supreme value that we can give ourselves and deserve.

Do you believe a return to democratic governance is possible in the short or medium term?

The transition to democracy—including free elections—is not foreseen in the short term by the United States. Why? Because Trump makes sound decisions, in terms of his own interests, when he realizes that Maduroism without Maduro could guarantee much greater governability than a government led by María Corina Machado or Edmundo González [opposition candidate in 2024], which would have to confront democratic, economic, and popular demands that Maduroism is currently suppressing. I think we must pay close attention to this, to see what happens in the future. For Trump—and Marco Rubio—tribute comes first; democracy can wait.

I don't see, in the short or medium term, that a transition to democracy is the most important thing for the United States. The main thing is to make the protectorate irreversible or "make a lot of money," in Trump's own words. He seems to agree with the government on this, which believes that the Venezuelan people must be kept politically captive so they don't vote for the extreme right. I think other international actors—not the United States—will begin to pressure for a government with genuine electoral legitimacy as the months go by, and I think this will be no small matter.

But it's important to think about how to rebuild the state. A nation that collapses militarily, as Venezuela did on January 3rd, is not viable. But neither is a country with its healthcare system destroyed, its education system in ruins, and its political institutions lacking any legitimacy. For Trump, Venezuelans will only be able to vote when they are capable of not voting against the interests of the United States. That is, when the protectorate is irreversible. But for the Venezuelan people, political participation and electoral expression in accordance with their interests should be a vital demand.

What could the international left do to support the Venezuelan people in this critical moment?

The first thing the left should understand is that its solidarity must be with the people of Venezuela, not with the Maduro government, as has been the case. What we in Venezuela are asking for is a political ethic that stands with those who have truly endured this crisis and will continue to endure it for a long time.

This regime ceased representing the deepest and most fundamental interests of the Venezuelan people long ago—and now it no longer represents the nation's basic interests either. Nicolás Maduro's son, "Nicolasito," had no qualms about saying that Venezuela should establish relations with Israel, while what Maduro did with the global left is very similar to what Machado did with the Venezuelan diaspora: sentimental exploitation and nothing more.

The Maduro government represented a moral and strategic debacle for the left, not only in Latin America, but throughout the world. When I say strategic, I mean that Maduro orchestrated defeats that weakened the nation, but he also annihilated the ethical and political strength of the movement he inherited. He reduced it to rubble. And when he had to plunge that movement into an irreversible crisis to defend his own power, he didn't hesitate.

This attack by U.S. imperialism doesn't prove that Maduro was right. Rather, it proves that Maduro was utterly incompetent to defend the Venezuelan nation against that same imperialism. What he did was precisely to aid what the United States wanted to do to Venezuela: weaken it militarily, economically, and culturally—areas where the possibilities for social transformation lay. What we must ask ourselves is: why did an attack like this, against international law, generate hope in the majority of the Venezuelan people, both inside and outside the country?

For much of the left, Venezuelans are incapable of even sustaining a "domestic tyranny," to use an expression of Bolívar. This left denies the Maduro government any agency, even the agency to implement a despotic regime; thus, the only subject in this whole story is imperialism. The problem with much of the global left is that they don't consider Venezuelans, neither the elite nor the people, as subjects in this story, their own story. Because for them, we are merely objects of a history determined by imperialism. Imperialism's actions against Venezuela are very useful for fueling the "anti-imperialist" discourse in their respective countries. The complexities of reality matter little to them.

However, when it seems we lack the capacity to decide our own destiny, I am certain that the Venezuelan nation will be reborn in some way, sooner rather than later, and we will take the reins of our future and our destiny.

Note: This interview was also published in English in Links. International Journal of Socialist Renewal and is available here.

1. Juan Vicente Gómez established a dictatorship that lasted from 1908 to 1935, a period known as the Gomecismo [Editor's note]. 

 

Source: https://www.aporrea.org/tiburon/n415874.html