quinta-feira, 31 de março de 2022

Covid Injection Under the Microscope: A New Zealand Microbiologist Presents His Findings


Rhoda Wilson

There are now four teams in New Zealand performing microscopic examinations in an attempt to establish what the so-called Covid vaccines contain and Dr. Robin Wakeling has gone public with his findings. He compares the Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) Covid injections to other vaccines and discusses the findings with Dr Mark Bailey.

Dr. Robin Wakeling is a microbiologist and biodeterioration expert from New Zealand.  During a presentation with Dr. Sam Bailey’s husband Mark, he gave a step by step, demonstration of how Pfizer’s Comirnaty “vaccine” begins with tiny droplets, and over time, accelerated with heat or magnetism, the droplets form strings, become straight lines, and slowly become more complex rectangular structures with protrusions.

Although he does not use a high magnification microscope as some of the other researchers, what he discovered supports the findings reported by researchers from the Spanish
La Quinta Columna and New Zealand’s Life of the Blood.

You can read more about what other researchers have found in our previous articles:

Dr. Wakeling’s key findings were:

    the lipid nano particles (“LNPs”) appear to be self-assembling into highly varied colloidal structures;
    these colloidal structures then seem to change their form into right-angled sheets and wires in response to collision with interfaces, for example, the glass surfaces of the microscope, preparations or air bubbles etc.; and then,
    these right-angled sheets and wires go on, in some situations where it appears some sort of environmental triggers are involved, to order themselves in a highly ordered, complex way.

The disclosed ingredients, according to literature, of Pfizer’s Comirnaty mRNA injection are: mRNA; four different lipids; buffers; surfactants, stabilisers and at least two unnamed, as they are under a trademark or patent, but declared as “proprietary additives.”

It’s important to note that the Covid injections contain polyethylene glycol (“PEG”), a compound derived from petroleum. PEG is a well-established metabolic poison, Dr. Wakeling said but, “for some bizarre reason it seems okay to add it to a vaccine.”  If you added PEG to most other drugs “you’d be laughed out the door,” he said.

Although it is not disclosed as an ingredient there are some very good reasons for people to suspect the Covid injections contain graphene oxide, Dr. Wakeling said, if you do a quick search on the internet, it wouldn’t take very long to find at least a couple of dozen papers that touch on the use of graphene oxide in medicine.  He added that the safety concerns regarding graphene oxide are extensive. 

Kiwi Scientists Replicate Dr Campra's Findings: 

 Dr. Sam Bailey: NZ Scientist Examines Pfizer Jab Under the Microscope, 22 March 2022 (63 mins)


Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/27/covid-injection-under-the-microscope/

sábado, 26 de março de 2022

CEO of BlackRock: the war in Ukraine "has put an end to globalization" and calls for a "global digital payment system"


FW Comment: The cat is finally out of the bag and we now see the real purpose of the Russian invasion. What couldn't be achieved by the bogus pandemic will now be realised through a war that has been deliberately designed to break the global supply chains and shatter the global economy.


March 26th, 2022  (leer en castellano)

"The Russian invasion of Ukraine has put an end to the globalization we have experienced over the last three decades," BlackRock CEO Larry Fink wrote in his annual letter to shareholders of the world's leading financial fund. In his opinion, the military conflict will reshape the world economy and further increase inflation by prompting companies to withdraw from their global supply chains.

While the immediate result has been Russia's complete isolation from capital markets, Fink predicted that “companies and governments will also look more broadly at their dependence on other nations. This may lead companies to conduct more of their operations on or near land, resulting in faster withdrawal from some countries, thus more closed and protectionist economies. He also warned that "a large-scale reorientation of supply chains will inherently be inflationary," in the far-reaching 10-page letter that also addressed the war's effect on the "energy transition" and cryptocurrencies.

Russia’s brutal attack on Ukraine has upended the world order that had been in place since the end of the Cold War, more than 30 years ago," he said, and in the following line he set the position of the financial mega-fund: "I speak for everyone at BlackRock when I say that witnessing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been truly heartbreaking. We stand with the Ukrainian people, who have shown true heroism in the face of merciless aggression."

“In the early 1990s, as the world emerged from the Cold War, Russia was welcomed into the global financial system and given access to global capital markets. In time, Russia became interconnected with the world and deeply linked to Western Europe. The world benefited from a global peace dividend and the expansion of globalization (…) But the Russian invasion of Ukraine has put an end to the globalization we have experienced over the last three decades (…) BlackRock has been committed to doing our part. Grounded in our fiduciary duty, we moved quickly to suspend the purchase of any Russian securities in our active or index portfolios. Over the past few weeks, I’ve spoken to countless stakeholders, including our clients and employees, who are all looking to understand what could be done to prevent capital from being deployed to Russia… Russia has been essentially cut off from global capital markets, demonstrating the commitment of major companies to operate consistent with core values. This “economic war” shows what we can achieve when companies, supported by their stakeholders, come together in the face of violence and aggression.

Fink wrote that “
Mexico, Brazil, the United States, or manufacturing hubs in Southeast Asia – could stand to benefit” and advocated that companies BlackRock invests in do more to address climate change. His letter predicted that the war will affect the transition to cleaner energy, he wrote. “In response to the energy shock caused by the war in Ukraine, many countries are looking for new sources of energy.  In the US much of the focus is on increasing oil and gas supply, and in Europe and Asia, coal consumption may increase over the next year.  This will inevitably slow the world’s progress toward net zero in the near term,” he maintained.

Although BlackRock's hopes for renewables were allowed to remain: “In the longer term, I think recent events will accelerate the shift to greener energy sources” as higher fossil fuel prices would make a wider range renewable energy is financially competitive, he wrote.

In one of his first comments on cryptocurrencies, Fink drew attention to the “potential impact [of the Ukraine war]
on accelerating digital currencies,” warning that “global digital payment system, thoughtfully designed, can enhance the settlement of international transactions while reducing the risk of money laundering and corruption. 

And he ended by warning: "The magnitude of Russia’s actions will play out for decades to come and mark a turning point in the world order of geopolitics, macro-economic trends, and capital markets." 


Food shortages, "bird flu" and digital payments:

Source: https://trikoobanews.com/43337.html

Related: 10 Reasons to Question the “Putin vs Davos” Narrative

10 Reasons to Question the “Putin vs Davos” Narrative


Ryan Matters
March 22nd

The recent Russian invasion of Ukraine has garnered a lot of attention from both the mainstream and alternative media.

There are plenty of theories floating around about what’s really going on, the true reason behind the invasion and the true motives and allegiances of Russian President, Vladimir Putin.

Among this entangled mess of assertions, ill-conceived opinions and downright false assumptions is a certain theory that has gained traction in alt media circles, and that is the idea that Putin is some kind of saviour, and that his moves in Ukraine represent an attack against the Western, globalist elite.

When I first saw this claim circulating on the web, the immediate thought that came to my mind is that this must have originated with the QAnon crowd. You see, in the Q-niverse, Vladimir Putin is one of the good guys and he is given the same messiah status as the God-king himself, Donald Trump.

Many of the QAnon “decoders” are still very active online and they are the driving force behind the Russia-went-into-Ukraine-to-save-us-from-the-biolabs theory, itself a curious idea that seemed to have originated on Twitter, and was ardently censored before circulating widely in the alternative media.

Recently, Victoria Nuland, the US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, admitted that Ukraine houses “biological research facilities” and expressed concern that Russia would commandeer them. Um… Okay. Anyone else think this narrative seems eerily similar to the whole Covid lab-leak hypothesis?

In both cases, the theories have followed a similar life-cycle:

  1. Originated at the beginning of the event but exact origins unclear
  2. Widely promoted in alternative circles
  3. Heavily censored on social media and denounced by fact-checkers
  4. Finally accepted into the mainstream narrative

In my article on the Q phenomenon, I endorsed the idea that Q was actually a military intelligence Psy-op being run from within the Western intelligence establishment. This is an idea I derived from the excellent research of Bernard Grover, Joseph Farrell and Catherine Austin-Fitts.

Although ‘Q’ the entity hasn’t posted anything for over a year, I don’t believe that such a sophisticated operation merely vanished into thin air.

In fact, I have a hunch that the powers behind Q learned everything they needed to learn about how information circulates in alternative circles and are now using that data to “poison the well” as it were by subtly introducing bits and pieces of misinformation into the picture in an effort to infiltrate and discredit alternative media. However, that is a subject for another article altogether.

Suffice it to say that many people are pushing the idea that Putin is trying to fight back against the Western globalist elite, thereby implying he is NOT on board with the overarching WEF technocratic control agenda.

However, the facts seem to indicate otherwise. Here are ten reasons to question the “Putin vs Davos” narrative.


Russia played along with the Covid-19 nonpandemic just like most other countries in the world. They even developed their own vaccine called “Sputnik V”.

The vaccine was created by the Russian Health Ministry’s Gamaleya Center, an institution that describes itself as “the world’s leading research institution”, yet doesn’t even have enough money to install an elevator!

Sputnik V uses an adenovirus vector to transport synthetic genetic material into cells, causing the cell’s machinery to manufacture the viral “spike protein” (so they say). Although different from mRNA technology, vaccines utilizing Adenovirus vectors are arguably still a form of gene therapy (“Ad” vectors have been used as gene delivery vehicles since the introduction of gene therapy).

So yes, Russia’s vaccine is based on the same transhumanist technology that all the other injections use. In fact, according to Gamaleya’s director, Alexander Gintsburg, there are no significant differences between Sputnik V and the adenovirus-based vaccine produced by the Oxford-AstraZeneca bunch.

Furthermore, in December 2020, Russia’s Gamaleya research centre signed a “memorandum of cooperation” with AstraZeneca, in the “fight against COVID-19”. Not only did Putin participate in the signing ceremony, he stated that he was

“absolutely convinced that such an attitude towards partnership today can serve as a good, convincing example of combining scientific forces, technologies, investments for a common goal – to protect the life, health and safety of millions of people on the planet as a whole.”

(Let’s not forget the links between the Oxford-AstraZeneca researchers, the Wellcome Trust and the British eugenics society).

Putin himself has openly endorsed both Russia’s vaccine as well as their peculiar “intranasal vaccination” booster.

That brings us to the second point…


The developers of Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine have conducted join trials not only with AstraZeneca but with Pfizer and Moderna as well!

In October 2021 Kirill Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), said that he thought the Pfizer and Sputnik injections would be “a very successful combination”. One of Sputnik V’s lead developers also voiced his support for the rollout of foreign vaccines in Russia.

Just recently, this March, Russian pharmaceutical company R-Pharm applied for registration of the AstraZeneca Vaccine in Russia. This comes off the back of a new report published by the RDIF claiming amazing benefits from combining “Sputnik Lite” and the UK-Swedish AstraZeneca shot.

For more information on these two points, I highly recommend checking out Edward Slavsquat’s blog.


Russia was an early adopter of vaccination passports. By early 2021, residents were able to receive a Covid passport, proving their vaccination status. The passes contain a QR code that can be scanned at various venues and allow residents to receive discounts and other benefits.

The passports remained voluntary for some time, until, in November 2021, the Moscow Times reported that:

“The Russian government said Friday it had submitted to parliament two bills that will introduce mandatory health passes to access restaurants and public transport, amid a new wave of coronavirus cases.”

According to the article, the new legislation was aimed at “boosting Russia’s sluggish immunization rates amid strong anti-vaccination sentiment”. Sounds familiar.

The measure is supposedly in place until June 1, 2022.


This year the Bank of Russia began piloting their “digital ruble”, its version of a central bank digital currency. The central bank also called for a total ban on cryptocurrencies, stating that the digital ruble would become an alternative to decentralized coins.

Three banks in Russia are already supporting pilot transactions using their existing mobile app banking technology with nine more banks expected to join them soon.

If you’re unfamiliar with “central bank digital currencies”, they are a centralized form of digital, programmable money, issued and controlled by the central banks, allowing for complete surveillance across all transactions, giving the banks the ability to control who can spend what and where.

In other words, the introduction of CBDCs is a key part of the technocratic control grid that the WEF globalists seek to construct and Russia is fully on board with the plan.


Like most countries around the world, Russia instituted a draconian lockdown as a measure to “fight” the Covid-19 “pandemic”. The initial lockdown began in April 2020 and lasted approximately six weeks.

Russia’s capital, Moscow instituted another lockdown in October 2021 and also ordered all unvaccinated citizens over 60 to remain home for four months. Four months!

Granted, Russia’s lockdowns haven’t been as long or as many as certain other countries. However, according to the Covid-19 Stringency Index, Russia’s Covid-19 measures were just as strict as their Western counterparts and sometimes more so.

In other words, Russia played along with the phoney pandemic narrative.


Last month, Russia and China issued a joint statement on “international relations entering a new era and the global sustainable development”, in which they expressed support for globalization, Agenda 21, vaccines, pandemic control, financing for climate change, the digital economy and more.

Here are some key snippets from the report (emphasis added):

“The ongoing pandemic of the new coronavirus infection poses a serious challenge to the fulfilment of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It is vital to enhance partnership relations for the sake of global development and make sure that the new stage of global development is defined by balance, harmony and inclusiveness…”

In order to accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the sides call on the international community to take practical steps in key areas of cooperation such as poverty reduction, food security, vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity.”


Russian President, Vladimir Putin has “long-standing, friendly relations” with former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.

According to Kremlin Spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, Putin and Kissinger “communicate all the time”, taking the opportunity to  “discuss pressing international issues as well as exchange opinions on global perspectives”.

Apparently, Kissinger has been a frequent guest in Russia since Putin took over in 2000. In 2007, Putin appointed Kissinger to co-chair a bilateral “working group” aimed at improving US-Russia relations.

Kissinger and the team that accompanied him to Moscow were all high-level members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), one of the prominent Western “think tanks” leading the charge for a New World Order. Kissinger is also a member of the Bilderberg Group and the Bohemian Club.


Putin has been attending events organized by the WEF since the early 1990s.

Just last year, WEF head Klaus Schwab invited Putin to give a special address at the WEF annual meeting (held in digital Davos).

During his address, Putin called for more testing and vaccines as measures to combat the coronavirus, stating that

“It is essential to join and coordinate the efforts of the world in countering the spread of the virus and making the much needed vaccines more accessible. We need to help the countries that need support, including the African nations. I am referring to expanding the scale of testing and vaccinations.”

He then went on to emphasize the role of central banks in rebuilding global economies “affected by the pandemic”, in what was seemingly an endorsement of Schwab’s Great Reset agenda:

“So, the key question today is how to build a programme of actions in order to not only quickly restore the global and national economies affected by the pandemic, but to ensure that this recovery is sustainable in the long run, relies on a high-quality structure and helps overcome the burden of social imbalances. Clearly, with the above restrictions and macroeconomic policy in mind, economic growth will largely rely on fiscal incentives with state budgets and central banks playing the key role.”

Schwab even claimed that Putin was a member of his “Young Global Leaders” program, graduates of which include Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Emmanuel Macron.

However, apart from Schwab having said so, there is no other evidence to support this claim, and Putin would have been too old to join when the program was launched anyway.

So, did Schwab just make a mistake? The man is in his 80s so it’s understandable if he did, or was his slip a sign that the two share a rather close relationship? Putin did begin his WEF address with an intimate “Dear Klaus” after all…


Kit Knightly at OffGuardian recently published an article titled “Ukraine crisis accelerating rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies”, highlighting the fact that governments around the world are developing and trialling CBDCs.

As stated earlier, CBDCs would give the state absolute control by allowing them to track individual transactions, restrict people’s spending and ensure people only purchase goods and services that the state deems to be acceptable.

As Knightly rightly points out,

“Western governments are currently declaring financial war on dozens of private citizens who have not been charged – let alone convicted – of any crime, just because of their nationality. It’s being done under the guise of “punishing dirty Russians”, but what can be done to an oligarch can be done to anyone.”


Part of the globalist agenda is the destruction of the current economy, allowing for the introduction of a new economic system (the “Great Reset”), one based on CBDCs, surveillance and run by artificial intelligence.

As I said in a previous post,

“The elites dress it up with buzzwords and catch-phrases like “sustainable development” and “inclusivity”, but at the end of the day, the “great reset” is about the creation of a digital surveillance state run on artificial intelligence where we all transact with “central bank digital currencies” (that can be fully tracked and traced).”

Putin’s war in Ukraine is aiding this goal by helping to further destabilize the world economy and destroy the middle class (exactly what COVID was meant to do).

Sky News is reporting that an increase in food prices is “inevitable” due to the rising costs of fertilizer, animal feed and fuel, raising concern for food security in the UK. Likewise, the New York Times reported that “Russia’s war is raising gas prices and roiling financial markets”.

According to the article,

“If the effective closing of Russian financial markets and rising commodity prices lead to a steeper stock market decline, or have other, unexpected consequences, the Fed will be in a tough place. It is moving toward tightening monetary conditions but might have to reverse itself and engage in another rescue operation, as it did in March 2020.”

This comes alongside predictions of a recession in Europe. And there are plenty of other reasons why this war favours the Great Reset agenda.


At this stage, the Russia-Ukraine situation is a minefield of conflicting narratives, disinformation and dodgy reporting.

All we can do is look at the facts and try to piece together a picture of what may be happening… and when we do, it’s rather clear that the “Putin vs Davos” narrative fails to hold up.


Source: https://off-guardian.org/2022/03/22/10-reasons-to-question-the-putin-vs-davos-narrative/

quinta-feira, 24 de março de 2022

You were right, President Thabo Mbeki

Nov 24, 2021

“Truth is the daughter of time, not of authority.” – Sir Francis Bacon

I am persuaded by the arguments that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS and that like President Thabo Mbeki I have done the unspeakable scientific act of looking at the evidence and then deciding to change my mind.

The Scandal Started April 23, 1984

1984 was an election year and US President Ronald Reagan had not said a word about AIDS. To prevent the Democratic Party from making AIDS a campaign issue, Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, called a Press Conference declaring that the cause of AIDS had been found. The culprit was a retrovirus discovered by Dr. Robert Gallo. 


US President Ronald Reagan was re-elected.

The story that was “too big to fail” was full of holes and that became clear when a 1992 US federal investigation found Dr. Robert Gallo had committed scientific fraud.

After three years of investigations, the Federal Office of Research Integrity today found that Dr. Robert C. Gallo, the American co-discoverer of the cause of AIDS, had committed scientific misconduct. The investigators said he had "falsely reported" a critical fact in the scientific paper of 1984 in which he described isolating the virus that causes AIDS.

The new report said Dr. Gallo had intentionally misled colleagues to gain credit for himself and diminish credit due to his French competitors. The report also said that his false statement had "impeded potential AIDS research progress" by diverting scientists from potentially fruitful work with the French researchers.

AIDS in South Africa

No disease has gripped the South African psyche more than the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). During my school years the pandemic was said to be spreading throughout the country and it got the media, government departments, private businesses and the education system swept up into a frenzy – a situation that is comparable to what we are experiencing today with the coronavirus. Red ribbons were placed on every communication in South Africa, children had to be taught the benefits of safe sex practices and churches had opening and closing prayers to ask for a blessing from the Almighty for those that are suffering from the deadly disease. To address “his biggest regret in office” former President Nelson Mandela spent his retirement years with influencers like Bono, Opera Winfrey, and the Spice Girls to raise awareness of the dangerous lifestyle practices that leads to the HIV+ infection and the development of AIDS.

And who could forget the brave Nkosi Johnson, the AIDS orphan, who spoke out against President Thabo Mbeki at the year 2000 Durban AIDS conference and pleaded with him in public that so that other children could like him also get access to the antiretroviral medication? Then there was Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang labelled by the Mail and Guardian as “Dr. Beetroot” after she suggested that beetroot and garlic could treat the disease at the 2006 International AIDS conference in Toronto. In an interview with Radio 702’s host John Robbie, she was asked if she truly believes that HIV causes AIDS? Robbie told her in anger and probably without thinking “to go away” – sparking an understandable accusation of racism as this was often the tone of language that black women received under Apartheid.

In the media it was said that Thabo Mbeki was associating himself with crank AIDS denialist and that he was being stubborn and irresponsible for delaying the rollout of lifesaving antiretroviral medication to the poorest of the poor. In parliament when the Democratic Alliance’s health spokesperson Ryan Coetzee asked him if “he truly believes that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS” it resulted in another accusation of racism. In opposition to the government’s policies a new form of activism was born called “AIDS activists” that included notably Zachie Achmat, Nathan Geffen and Mark Heywood from the Treatment Action Campaign.

The death toll caused by President Mbeki’s denialism was estimated to be on the order of a quarter of a million South Africans, leading to the South African Communist Party’s Youth League to demand that he be tried for genocide. Thabo Mbeki’s negligence contributed to his political defeat at the Polokwane conference and him being recalled during his final term in office. The African National Congress (ANC) replaced him by a more charismatic President Jacob Zuma whose first act when he came into power was to distance himself from the country’s “era of denialism”. Jacob Zuma started a massive rollout of antiretrovirals and rare in the divisiveness of South African politics he was temporarily praised by the leader of the opposition party Helen Zille. Zille felt strongly about AIDS, so strong that a few years later she called for the criminalization of HIV transmission in what one commentator referred to as “an AIDS Gestapo”.

Until two years ago I couldn’t make sense of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in South Africa and why Thabo Mbeki who was highly intelligent seemed so stubborn about the issue. Why was it that he and his cabinet was so sensitive to criticism and often resorted to unfounded claims of racism when they were pressured on the issue? The attitude struck me as absurd, but that was until I realized I was one of those that just assumed what he said and didn’t listen to what he was saying.

The HIV/AIDS falsehood goes back to the misreading of the original isolation attempt by the French Virologist Luc Montagnier. I base my opinion on the findings of the Perth Group in Australia whose work is routinely cited in the new book ‘Virus Mania’. The Perth Group convinced President Thabo Mbeki that we are looking at HIV/AIDS disease through the wrong paradigm and I encourage those who disagree with me to at least read their scientific work. The Perth group not only exposed that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, but it was the beginning of the revival of the “Ecological Theory” of disease. The idea that that the entire premise of Germ Theory sits on a shaky foundation and that environmental conditions also play a significant role in disease progression.

My Journey into AIDS

During the Covid19 pandemic I and many others were appalled when dissident scientific voices who opposed the lockdowns on legitimate public health grounds were silenced, and when off label medication was discouraged to push through the rushed mRNA vaccine without proper long term safety data available. In denying the truth the authorities launched one of the most sophisticated media ran propaganda campaigns in modern human history.

As the physicist Denis Rancourt and his colleagues recently showed, the data does not suggest that there is a dangerous Covid19 pandemic as is evident that all-cause mortality in the United States, Europe and Canada hasn’t changed much during the last 2 years. By going through the mortality data, I am startled at how innumerate the media and the general populace is. Humans simply struggle to put numbers into an understandable perspective especially when there is a deliberate attempt by the authorities to spread fear, mislead and monopolize the truth. I can only conclude that there is only a pandemic of fear that is driven by the unreliable nature of the PCR test and the non-specificity of the antibody tests.

As I did my research and interviews on Covid19, it became obvious that Covid19 was not Anthony Fauci’s first of many crimes and that the the techniques that are currently being deployed to manipulate the public on a global scale were pioneered during the AIDS pandemic.

AZT – Poison by Prescription

My journey into the HIV/AIDS question came as I stumbled across an article by the Yale Epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch that gave the account of Anthony Fauci’s refusal to allow gay men in the 1980s the treatment drug Bactrim. Bactrim like Ivermectin was an off-label medication that could have treated the associated pneumocystis pneumonia and today doctors routinely use as part of the AIDS HAART Protocol. Probably to appease his friends in the pharmaceutical industry Anthony Fauci decided to block the rollout of the medication for nearly 2 years and push through a drug known as AZT without proper clinical trials being done. As with the Covid19 vaccine, the placebo group was deliberately broken to hide the background risks and the criminality was only revealed after a gay activist by the name of John Lauritsen investigated the FDA’s approval process. Dr. Risch pointed out that while the AZT drug did work, it was highly toxic in the initial dosages, but as I read further about the toxicity in John’s book “Poison by Prescription” – the entire lid came off HIV and AIDS. Also, late last year Neville Hodgkinson a former scientific correspondent of the Sunday Times raised my suspicion when he wrote that the Covid19 tricks were pioneered during the HIV/AIDS pandemic, leading me to ask the simply question.

What did President Mbeki know about HIV/AIDS?”

What were the dissidents saying and why were they wrong? As it turns out I am now of the opinion that not only was President Mbeki correct, but that he was right to question the toxicity of the antiretrovirals and specifically AZT (later branded as zidovudine). AZT—initially designed as cancer chemotherapy—targets DNA synthesis, the basis of all life and after its widespread use, the rate of “AIDS deaths” among gay men went up by a factor of 10. Recently an old BBC documentary title “Guinea Pig Kids” resurfaced that exposed how orphanage children in New York were used in the trial of AZT – most of them died.

South African born HIV/AIDS doctor Joseph Sonnabend called AZT “incompatible with life” - the definition of a poison. John Lauritsen estimated AZT killed 330,000 gay men in America and in the Vienna AIDS Conference in 2010 he gave an emotional speech where he didn’t hesitate to use the term the “the gay holocaust” in honor of the young gay men who took poison thinking that it would cure them when in fact it took them to their graves.

Yet this was the medication that AIDS activists from Treatment Action Campaign (TAC, a PR front for BigPharma) wanted President Thabo Mbeki to import to South Africa. During the Covid19 pandemic TAC and Nathan Geffen in particular wrote a series of hit pieces on Panda’s Nick Hudson after he questioned the Western Cape Government’s reporting of the vaccination statistics. The same characters that put profit before lives during the AIDS pandemic are doing it again with Covid19.

With respect to South Africa, what struck me further was Nkosi Johnson’s words at the 2000 Durban AIDS conference that was published by all the media around the world.

“I hate having Aids because I get very sick and I get very sad when I think of all the other children and babies that are sick with Aids. I just wish that the government can start giving AZT to pregnant HIV mothers to help stop the virus being passed on to their babies.”

Was Nkosi Johnson’s story used by the pharmaceutical industry as emotional propaganda to sell a toxic medication and what was the medication that he took before he died?

Mbeki’s Journey – Debating AZT

During my interview with AIDS dissident Anthony Brink, he told me the story of how Thabo Mbeki got interested in the debate as like me it also started with AZT. Brink was an advocate from the Pietermaritzburg Bar who took interest into AZT after media pressure started building on Mandela’s government to take the HIV/AIDS pandemic seriously and import antiretrovirals into the country. His wife alerted him that there were scientific discussions about the toxicity of the drugs on the internet. As his interest took hold in the topic, he decided to write a book titled Debating AZT that contained all the medical and scientific literature about the toxicity of the drug.

Brink also mentioned to me that he knew a fellow attorney who died after testing positive for HIV. His legal partner informed him that he was taking antiretrovirals before his death. Brink sent the widow his manuscript and to his horror he found out that the symptoms precisely those predicted by in the literature quoted in Debating AZT.

Brink alerted the Minister of Health Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma by sending her office a copy of his book, but by that time President Nelson Mandela was about to leave office and one of her Special Advisors Dr. Ian Roberts thought it best to delay the issue for the next health minister.

Immediately after being sworn into office, first item on Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang’s agenda was to go through the Anthony Brink’s book Debating AZT. After being informed by the findings of the book the ANC’s Presidency Director General Smuts Ngonyama gave Brink a call and asked him to write the ANC’s media statement on AZT. Mbeki became aware that there was a toxicity issue related to the antiretrovirals and this lead him on the path to discover that there was more to AIDS than just the HIV virus and that the medication themselves are toxic.

Advisory Panel

Debating AZT set off a bombshell in South Africa. It convinced Mbeki to hear the arguments of the AIDS dissidents. They can be found at the website Virusmyth, and the documentary film House of Numbers. The dissidents as well as the mainstream scientists were invited to his March 2000 AIDS Panel held at the Sheraton hotel in Pretoria. Among the attendees of the first meeting were AIDS skeptics such as Professor Peter Duesberg, David Rasnick and Medunsa’s Professor Sam Mhlongo. The mainstream scientists including Professor Glenda Gray, Professor Salim S Abdool-Karim, Dr Malegapuru W Makgoba, and the discoverer of HIV Dr. Luc Montagnier were also present. More significant are those could only attend the second meeting Professor Eleni Papadopoulos-Eleopulos and Dr Valander Turner known as “the Perth group”. Brink told me that Mbeki and Kgalema Motlanthe would eventually be persuaded by their arguments.

Mbeki’s Presidential Advisory Report gives the best summary of the arguments for or against the HIV/AIDS hypothesis and it is a tragedy to South Africa that our media never properly debated the findings of the report, for it would have blown the lid of the whole scandal. The report carries enormous value for medical history and the pandemic in South Africa. The South African Broadcasting corporation also refused to air the videos of the event, but fortunately some of the material has resurfaced and it is available on by anonymous sources on odysee.

There are few interviews where Thabo Mbeki was given an honest opportunity to express himself on AIDS, but a good film includes “Search for Solutions” that was aired on Carte Blanche and broadcasted only in Africa.

The only honest debate about the toxicity of AZT was aired on ETV in 2005.  It featured Dr. David Rasnick and Dr. Sam Mhlongo against and Dr Malegapuru W Makgoba and Professor Ian Sanne.

Dr. Sam Mhlongo was Head of the Department of Family Practice and Medical Health Care at the Medical University of Southern Africa (MEDUNSA). For decades, Dr Mhlongo was exiled for opposing the Apartheid Regime. After his return to South Africa he continued to fight a new enemy: the devastating impact of the pharmaceutical “business with disease” in South Africa.

He was a member of the Presidential Aids Advisory Panel, where he explored and embraced viable alternatives to cope with this epidemic especially for the poor and marginalized communities.  Dr. Mhlongo sadly died in 2006 in a car accident, his reflections on AIDS and the medications are well kept online.

The HIV-AIDS Hypothesis

From Mbeki’s advisory report I am going to highlight a few statements that show why I too reject the HIV hypothesis and why it has lessons for Covid19.

A particular concern raised by some members of the panel was that after 15 years of research, there is the lack of a 'gold standard' against which to measure the accuracy and reliability of the data generated from the commonly used methods to diagnose HIV infection.

The PCR Test

Arguments against the use of PCR are that this test is characterized by high variability and lack of reproducibility. In addition, the very wide variability may lead to the erroneous interpretation of results, thus compromising the accuracy and validity of the PCR results. Dr Bialy pointed out that the PCR viral load test might not be a legitimate measure of infectious virus. It demonstrates a high level of fluctuation, and the viral load can be increased non-specifically by other viral and bacterial infections (opportunistic infections may also increase viral load). Research results indicate that the viral load test may not always be an indicator for the clinical progression of HIV to AIDS.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, said on many occasions that so-called PCR tests cannot detect infection or the presence of virus. Even the package inserts say the PCR “tests” cannot be used to diagnose AIDS or detect the presence of HIV.

The same is true of the antibody tests most notably the Elisa and Western blot. They tell you nothing about a unique virus or infection.

The Elisa Test

The lack of standardization of ELISA results, both within the country and across countries, was a source of major concern to some panelists. Results of ELISA tests may be interpreted differently within a single laboratory, between laboratories within one country, and between countries. This may mean that a person that tests positive at one laboratory in South Africa may test negative at a different laboratory in the same country. Moreover, the lack of standardization across countries could result in an individual's testing positive in one country and negative in another.

Western Blot

Dr Papadopoulos-Eleopulos presented a transparency showing the results of a Western Blot test with a number of samples from leprosy, TB and AIDS patients. It appeared that the Western Blot results from the different samples were indistinguishable from one another, showing the Western Blot test to be non-specific and unreliable. All the samples tested positive, even those from leprosy and TB patients. In further deliberations, Dr Mark Smith pointed out that Max Essex had already demonstrated the indeterminate results from Western Blot results in 1994. The above underlines the fact that the Western Blot test cannot be used as a determinate diagnostic tool.

So what does one make of a virus for which there is no reliable test for its presence?  How can it be that the public at large has been driven into a frenzy on the basis of false positive results?

As a medical doctor confirmed to me, today the practice is to use both the Elisa and Western blood test as well as the PCR test to measure the arbitrary and meaningless “viral load”.

But if none of the three tests carry any meaning? What is their purpose when the following factors are known to cause to Cause False-Positive HIV Antibody Test Results?

Anti-carbohydrate antibodies (52, 19, 13)

Anti-carbohydrate antibodies (52, 19, 13)

Naturally-occurring antibodies (5, 19)

Passive immunization: receipt of gamma globulin or immune globulin (as prophylaxis against infection which contains antibodies)(18, 26, 60, 4, 22, 42, 43, 13)

Leprosy (2, 25)

Tuberculosis (25)

Mycobacterium avium (25)

Systemic lupus erythematosus (15, 23)

Renal (kidney) failure (48, 23, 13)

Hemodialysis/renal failure (56, 16, 41, 10, 49)

Alpha interferon therapy in hemodialysis patients (54)

Flu (36)

Flu vaccination (30, 11, 3, 20, 13, 43)

Herpes simplex I (27)

Herpes simplex II (11)

Upper respiratory tract infection (cold or flu)(11)

Recent viral infection or exposure to viral vaccines (11)

Pregnancy in multiparous women (58, 53, 13, 43, 36)

Malaria (6, 12)

High levels of circulating immune complexes (6, 33)

Hypergammaglobulinemia (high levels of antibodies) (40, 33)

False positives on other tests, including RPR (rapid plasma reagent) test for syphilis (17, 48, 33, 10, 49)

Rheumatoid arthritis (36)

Hepatitis B vaccination (28, 21, 40, 43)

Tetanus vaccination (40)

Organ transplantation (1, 36)

Renal transplantation (35, 9, 48, 13, 56)

Anti-lymphocyte antibodies (56, 31)

Anti-collagen antibodies (found in gay men, haemophiliacs, Africans of both sexes and people with leprosy)(31)

Serum-positive for rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody (both found in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoantibodies)(14, 62, 53)

Autoimmune diseases (44, 29, 10, 40, 49, 43): Systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, connective tissue disease, dermatomyositis

Acute viral infections, DNA viral infections (59, 48, 43, 53, 40, 13)

Malignant neoplasms (cancers)(40)

Alcoholic hepatitis/alcoholic liver disease (32, 48, 40,10,13, 49, 43, 53)

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (48, 53)

Hepatitis (54)

"Sticky" blood (in Africans) (38, 34, 40)

Antibodies with a high affinity for polystyrene (used in the test kits)(62, 40, 3)

Blood transfusions, multiple blood transfusions (63, 36,13, 49, 43, 41)

Multiple myeloma (10, 43, 53)

HLA antibodies (to Class I and II leukocyte antigens)(7, 46, 63, 48, 10, 13, 49, 43, 53)

Anti-smooth muscle antibody (48)

Anti-parietal cell antibody (48)

Anti-hepatitis A IgM (antibody)(48)

Anti-Hbc IgM (48)

Administration of human immunoglobulin preparations pooled before 1985 (10)

Haemophilia (10, 49)

Haematologic malignant disorders/lymphoma (43, 53, 9, 48, 13)

Primary biliary cirrhosis (43, 53, 13, 48)

Stevens-Johnson syndrome9, (48, 13)

Q-fever with associated hepatitis (61)

Heat-treated specimens (51, 57, 24, 49, 48)

Lipemic serum (blood with high levels of fat or lipids)(49)

Haemolyzed serum (blood where haemoglobin is separated from the red cells)(49)

Hyperbilirubinemia (10, 13)

Globulins produced during polyclonal gammopathies (which are seen in AIDS risk groups)(10, 13, 48)

Healthy individuals as a result of poorly-understood cross-reactions (10)

Normal human ribonucleoproteins (48,13)

Other retroviruses (8, 55, 14, 48, 13)

Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (48, 13)

Anti-nuclear antibodies (48, 13, 53)

Anti-microsomal antibodies (34)

T-cell leukocyte antigen antibodies (48, 13)

Proteins on the filter paper (13)

Epstein-Barr virus (37)

Visceral leishmaniasis (45)

Receptive anal sex (39, 64)

Luc Montagnier’s experiment.

The human immunodeficiency virus was said to be discovered by French virologist Luc Montagnier in the early 1980s. At an AIDS conference in San Francisco in 1990, Montagnier expressed his own skepticism towards the HIV hypothesis.

“HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause AIDS.” -Luc Montagnier

While never fully walking away from the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, Montagnier, in the documentary series House of Numbers, further doubled down on his skepticism, in particular as it relates to Africa.


"AIDS does not inevitably lead to death, especially if you suppress the co-factors that support the disease. It is very important to tell this to people who are infected, I think we should put the same weight on the co-factors as we have on HIV. Psychological factors are critical in supporting immune function. If you suppress this psychological support by telling someone he's condemned to die, your words alone will have condemned him." -Luc Montagnier

In 2000 at Mbeki’s AIDS Advisory Panel in Pretoria, Montagnier was asked if he had actually “purified” HIV. He simply said that it was an old technique and no longer valid. The Perth group argued against Montagnier’s original interpretation.

That AIDS and all the phenomena inferred as "HIV" are induced by changes in cellular redox brought about by the oxidative nature of substances and exposures common to all the AIDS risk groups and to the cells used in the "culture" and "isolation" of "HIV".

The problems with isolating authentic HIV are well presented in Bret Leung’s extended interview with the Perth Group in the film House of Numbers as well as on the Perth Group’s Website.


Anthony Fauci

Compounding Gallo’s fraud, Anthony Fauci repurposed the highly toxic chemotherapy AZT as an anti-HIV drug, which John Lauritsen estimated killed 330,000 gay men.

Fauci promised a vaccine against HIV was “2 years away”. We’re still waiting 37-years later. Since then, the US government has spent over 600 billion dollars on AIDS and not saved a single life.

The story of how the AIDS dogma got started was told in Joan Shenton’s film “Positively False”.

So, if the HIV virus has not been isolated, what then what is AIDS?


“The missing deaths”

During Thabo Mbeki’s presidency, Journalist Rian Malan, on a contract from Rolling Stone Magazine, looked into the HIV/AIDS issue and set out to find the 250 000 deaths and the 20 million victims that are said to be dying of the disease throughout the continent. To his astonishment he found that “Africa isn’t dying of AIDS” and that towns that were set to be dying of the pandemic actually had their population numbers increase. After going through coroners’ reports and visiting AIDS clinics throughout South Africa, Malan simply couldn’t find the excess deaths.

“A note on the MRC website explained that modeling was an inexact science, and that ‘the number of people dying of Aids has only now started to increase’. Furthermore, said the MRC, there was a new model in the works, one that would ‘probably’ produce estimates ‘about 10 per cent lower’ than those presently on the table. The exercise was not strictly valid, but I persuaded my scientist pal Rodney Richards to run the revised data on his own simulator and see what he came up with for 1999. The answer, very crudely, was an Aids death toll somewhere around 65,000 — a far cry indeed from the 250,000 initially put forth by UNAIDS.

Without making a claim to know anything about HIV/AIDS, Rian Malan simply articulated that the millions of people that were set to suffer from the diseases were the product of computer models.

What is AIDS?

Originally AIDS was confined to gay men in America who used poppers as a party drug whose side effects gave known AIDS like symptoms. The gay population was highly targeted with testing and given the high false positivity rate they tested positive in high numbers. As time went on the CDC lumped together diseases that had nothing to do with each other. As with Covid19 the definition of AIDS started to expand by adding new symptoms to the disease. Perhaps the biggest absurdity is that AIDS in Africa and AIDS in America have nothing in common other than the name. In Africa it is largely a disease of poverty and in America it is mostly a disease of drug usage.

The CDC lists 26 AIDS-defining diseases and conditions that have little or nothing to do with each other.

1.      Bacterial infections, multiple or recurrent

2.      Candidiasis of bronchi, trachea, or lungs

3.      Candidiasis of esophagus

4.      Carcinoma, invasive cervical

5.      Coccidioidomycosis,

6.      Cryptococcosis, extrapulmonary

7.      Cryptosporidiosis, chronic intestinal

8.      Cytomegalovirus disease

9.      Herpes simplex

10.   Histoplasmosis

11.   HIV encephalopathy (dementia)

12.   HIV wasting syndrome

13.   Isosporiasis

14.   Kaposi’s sarcoma

15.   Lymphoid interstitial pneumonia

16.   Lymphoma, Burkitt's

17.   Lymphoma, immunoblastic

18.   Lymphoma, primary in brain

19.   Mycobacterium avium or M. kansasii

20.   M. tuberculosis

21.   Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia

22.   Pneumonia, recurrent

23.   Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

24.   Salmonella septicemia

25.   Toxoplasmosis of brain

26.   Immunosuppression, severe HIV-related

Here is the United Nations definition of AIDS in Africa.

1.      Weight loss

2.      Fever

3.      Diarrhoea and

4.      Persistent cough

5.      TB

6.      Swollen lymph nodes

Those two diseases are entirely distinct to the point that they cannot possibly come from the same virus. If you were to be diagnosed with AIDS in SA and fly to America, under the official definition you would be cured? As David Rasnick told me an interview “HIV has only 3 structural genes and yet it knows whether you’re black or white, gay or straight, rich or poor, and what continent you live in”.

Mbeki’s Advisory report also expressed concerned about the definition of the AIDS construct.

“Why is HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa heterosexually transmitted while in the western world it is said to be largely homosexually transmitted”

Surely Africans cannot be so distinct to suffer differently from the exact same virus? When faced with this anomaly the AIDS establishment decided to “reclassify” these two diseases as HIV-1 and HIV-2.

In Summary

  • As evident by the workings of the Perth Group, the evidence that the HIV virus has been purified does not exist.

  • As evident by the contradictions in the testing methods, none of the HIV tests are able to say anything about the presence of the virus.

  • As evident by the Rian Malan’s finding, Africa isn’t dying of a deadly pandemic.

  • As evident by the definition of AIDS, the diseases of AIDS in Africa are largely related to malnutrition and poverty and in the United States it is a consequence of lifestyle and drug usage.

What I would expect to originate from this article is that we start and open conversation on HIV and AIDS on the following points.

  • The toxicity of the antiretrovirals must be openly admitted and the pharmaceutical companies and FDA must be held accountable for countless deaths for which they are responsible.

  • The lessons of HIV/AIDS are paramount if we want to come to terms with the crimes that are being committed under the name of the Covid19 health emergency and if we ever believe in justice for the hundred and thousands of gay men and millions of Africans that were subjected to this cruel experimentation by giving them medication on the basis of a false positive test result.

  • For South Africans it is time to look objectively at the evidence detailed in Mbeki’s advisory report and then for us all to provide him with an apology.

President Thabo Mbeki was right.

“HIV simply does not cause AIDS.


For those interested in the issue, blogs, good old newspaper articles on the argument by dissidents can be found on the following websites.

  1. Virusmyth for a collection of arguments on dissidents.

  2. Viroliegy for an introduction into terrain theory.

  3. Treatment Information Group for a collection on the toxicity of the antiretrovirals.

  1. The Perth Group for the dissident views that Mbeki endorsed.

  2. David Rasnick’s website for good references to AIDS. David decided to keep the reflections of his friend Dr. Sam Mhlongo online.

Books on the Topic

  1. Virus Mania: How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense, 3rd Edition by Torsten Engelbrecht (Author), Claus Köhnlein (Author), Samantha Bailey (Author), Stefano Scoglio (Author)

  2. Poison by Prescription - the AZT Story by John Lauritsen

  3. 'AIDS; The Failure of Contemporary Science' by Neville Hodgkinson

  4. Inventing the AIDS Virus by Peter Duesberg.

  5. Debating AZT - by Anthony Brink

Share Hügo’s Newsletter

Thabo Mbeki addressing AIDS Panel (6th May 2000)

Source: https://hkrugertjie.substack.com/p/you-were-right-president-thabo-mbeki?s=r