There are now four teams in New Zealand performing microscopic examinations in an attempt to establish what the so-called Covid vaccines contain and Dr. Robin Wakeling has gone public with his findings. He compares the Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) Covid injections to other vaccines and discusses the findings with Dr Mark Bailey.
Dr. Robin Wakeling is a microbiologist and biodeterioration expert from New Zealand. During a presentation with Dr. Sam Bailey’s husband Mark, he gave a step by step, demonstration of how Pfizer’s Comirnaty “vaccine” begins with tiny droplets, and over time, accelerated with heat or magnetism, the droplets form strings, become straight lines, and slowly become more complex rectangular structures with protrusions.
Although he does not use a high magnification microscope as some of the other researchers, what he discovered supports the findings reported by researchers from the Spanish La Quinta Columna and New Zealand’s Life of the Blood.
You can read more about what other researchers have found in our previous articles:
the lipid nano particles (“LNPs”) appear to be self-assembling into highly varied colloidal structures; these colloidal structures then seem to change their form into right-angled sheets and wires in response to collision with interfaces, for example, the glass surfaces of the microscope, preparations or air bubbles etc.; and then, these right-angled sheets and wires go on, in some situations where it appears some sort of environmental triggers are involved, to order themselves in a highly ordered, complex way.
The disclosed ingredients, according to literature, of Pfizer’s Comirnaty mRNA injection are: mRNA; four different lipids; buffers; surfactants, stabilisers and at least two unnamed, as they are under a trademark or patent, but declared as “proprietary additives.”
It’s important to note that the Covid injections contain polyethylene glycol (“PEG”), a compound derived from petroleum. PEG is a well-established metabolic poison, Dr. Wakeling said but, “for some bizarre reason it seems okay to add it to a vaccine.” If you added PEG to most other drugs “you’d be laughed out the door,” he said.
Although it is not disclosed as an ingredient there are some very good reasons for people to suspect the Covid injections contain graphene oxide, Dr. Wakeling said, if you do a quick search on the internet, it wouldn’t take very long to find at least a couple of dozen papers that touch on the use of graphene oxide in medicine. He added that the safety concerns regarding graphene oxide are extensive.
FW Comment: The cat is finally out of the bag and we now see the real purpose of the Russian invasion. What couldn't be achieved by the bogus pandemic will now be realised through a war that has been deliberately designed to break the global supply chains and shatter the global economy. Kontrainfo
"The
Russian invasion of Ukraine has put an end to the globalization we have
experienced over the last three decades," BlackRock CEO Larry Fink
wrote in his annual letter
to shareholders of the world's leading financial fund. In his opinion,
the military conflict will reshape the world economy and further
increase inflation by prompting companies to withdraw from their global
supply chains.
While the immediate result has been Russia's complete isolation from capital markets, Fink predicted that “companies and governments will also look more broadly at their dependence on other nations. This may lead companies to conduct more of their operations on or near land, resulting in faster withdrawal from some countries, thus more closed and protectionist economies. He also warned that "a large-scale reorientation of supply chains will inherently be inflationary," in the far-reaching 10-page letter that also addressed the war's effect on the "energy transition" and cryptocurrencies.
"Russia’s brutal attack on Ukraine has upended the world order that had
been in place since the end of the Cold War, more than 30 years ago," he said, and in the following line he set the position of the financial mega-fund: "I speak for everyone at BlackRock when I say that witnessing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been truly heartbreaking. We stand with the Ukrainian people, who have shown true heroism in the face of merciless aggression."
“In the early 1990s, as the world emerged from the Cold War, Russia was welcomed into the global financial system and given access to global capital markets. In time, Russia became interconnected with the world and deeply linked to Western Europe. The world benefited from a global peace dividend and the expansion of globalization (…) But the Russian invasion of Ukraine has put an end to the globalization we have experienced over the last three decades (…) BlackRock has been committed to doing our part. Grounded in our fiduciary duty, we moved quickly to suspend the purchase of any Russian securities in our active or index portfolios. Over the past few weeks, I’ve spoken to countless stakeholders, including our clients and employees, who are all looking to understand what could be done to prevent capital from being deployed to Russia… Russia has been essentially cut off from global capital markets, demonstrating the commitment of major companies to operate consistent with core values. This “economic war” shows what we can achieve when companies, supported by their stakeholders, come together in the face of violence and aggression.
Fink wrote that “Mexico, Brazil, the United States, or manufacturing hubs in Southeast Asia – could stand to benefit” and advocated that companies BlackRock invests in do more to address climate change. His letter predicted that the war will affect the transition to cleaner energy, he wrote. “In response to the energy shock caused by the war in Ukraine, many
countries are looking for new sources of energy. In the US much of the
focus is on increasing oil and gas supply, and in Europe and Asia, coal
consumption may increase over the next year. This will inevitably slow
the world’s progress toward net zero in the near term,” he maintained.
Although BlackRock's hopes for renewables were allowed to remain: “In the longer term, I think recent events will accelerate the shift to greener energy sources” as higher fossil fuel prices would make a wider range renewable energy is financially competitive, he wrote.
In one of his first comments on cryptocurrencies, Fink drew attention to the “potential impact [of the Ukraine war] on accelerating digital currencies,” warning that “global digital payment system, thoughtfully designed, can enhance the
settlement of international transactions while reducing the risk of
money laundering and corruption.”
And he ended by warning: "The magnitude of Russia’s actions will play out for decades to come and
mark a turning point in the world order of geopolitics, macro-economic
trends, and capital markets."
The recent Russian invasion of Ukraine has garnered a lot of attention from both the mainstream and alternative media.
There are plenty of theories floating around about what’s really
going on, the true reason behind the invasion and the true motives and
allegiances of Russian President, Vladimir Putin.
Among this entangled mess of assertions, ill-conceived opinions and
downright false assumptions is a certain theory that has gained traction
in alt media circles, and that is the idea that Putin is some kind of
saviour, and that his moves in Ukraine represent an attack against the
Western, globalist elite.
When I first saw this claim circulating on the web, the immediate
thought that came to my mind is that this must have originated with the
QAnon crowd. You see, in the Q-niverse, Vladimir Putin is one of the
good guys and he is given the same messiah status as the God-king
himself, Donald Trump.
Many of the QAnon “decoders” are still very active online and they
are the driving force behind the
Russia-went-into-Ukraine-to-save-us-from-the-biolabs theory, itself a
curious idea that seemed to have originated on Twitter, and was ardently
censored before circulating widely in the alternative media.
Recently, Victoria Nuland, the US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, admitted that
Ukraine houses “biological research facilities” and expressed concern
that Russia would commandeer them. Um… Okay. Anyone else think this
narrative seems eerily similar to the whole Covid lab-leak hypothesis?
In both cases, the theories have followed a similar life-cycle:
Originated at the beginning of the event but exact origins unclear
Widely promoted in alternative circles
Heavily censored on social media and denounced by fact-checkers
Finally accepted into the mainstream narrative
In my article on the Q phenomenon,
I endorsed the idea that Q was actually a military intelligence Psy-op
being run from within the Western intelligence establishment. This is an
idea I derived from the excellent research of Bernard Grover, Joseph
Farrell and Catherine Austin-Fitts.
Although ‘Q’ the entity hasn’t posted anything for over a year, I
don’t believe that such a sophisticated operation merely vanished into
thin air.
In fact, I have a hunch that the powers behind Q learned everything
they needed to learn about how information circulates in alternative
circles and are now using that data to “poison the well” as it were by
subtly introducing bits and pieces of misinformation into the picture in
an effort to infiltrate and discredit alternative media. However, that
is a subject for another article altogether.
Suffice it to say that many people are pushing the idea that Putin is
trying to fight back against the Western globalist elite, thereby
implying he is NOT on board with the overarching WEF technocratic control agenda.
However, the facts seem to indicate otherwise. Here are ten reasons to question the “Putin vs Davos” narrative.
1. RUSSIA’S COVID VACCINE IS THE SAME AS THOSE IN THE WEST
Russia played along with the Covid-19 nonpandemic just like most
other countries in the world. They even developed their own vaccine
called “Sputnik V”.
The vaccine was created by the Russian Health Ministry’s Gamaleya
Center, an institution that describes itself as “the world’s leading
research institution”, yet doesn’t even have enough money to install an elevator!
Sputnik V uses an adenovirus vector to
transport synthetic genetic material into cells, causing the cell’s
machinery to manufacture the viral “spike protein” (so they say).
Although different from mRNA technology, vaccines utilizing Adenovirus
vectors are arguably still a form of gene therapy (“Ad” vectors have
been used as gene delivery vehicles since the introduction of gene therapy).
So yes, Russia’s vaccine is based on the same transhumanist technology that all the other injections use. In fact, according to Gamaleya’s director, Alexander Gintsburg, there are no significant differences between Sputnik V and the adenovirus-based vaccine produced by the Oxford-AstraZeneca bunch.
Furthermore, in December 2020, Russia’s Gamaleya research centre signed a
“memorandum of cooperation” with AstraZeneca, in the “fight against
COVID-19”. Not only did Putin participate in the signing ceremony, he
stated that he was
“absolutely convinced that such an attitude towards
partnership today can serve as a good, convincing example of combining
scientific forces, technologies, investments for a common goal – to
protect the life, health and safety of millions of people on the planet
as a whole.”
(Let’s not forget the links between the Oxford-AstraZeneca researchers, the Wellcome Trust and the British eugenics society).
Putin himself has openly endorsed both Russia’s vaccine as well as their peculiar “intranasal vaccination” booster.
That brings us to the second point…
2. RUSSIA COLLABORATES WITH BIG PHARMA
The developers of Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine have conducted join
trials not only with AstraZeneca but with Pfizer and Moderna as well!
In October 2021 Kirill Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), said that he thought the
Pfizer and Sputnik injections would be “a very successful combination”.
One of Sputnik V’s lead developers also voiced his support for the
rollout of foreign vaccines in Russia.
Just recently, this March, Russian pharmaceutical company R-Pharm applied for registration of
the AstraZeneca Vaccine in Russia. This comes off the back of a new
report published by the RDIF claiming amazing benefits from combining
“Sputnik Lite” and the UK-Swedish AstraZeneca shot.
For more information on these two points, I highly recommend checking out Edward Slavsquat’s blog.
3. VACCINE PASSPORTS ARE MANDATORY IN RUSSIA
Russia was an early adopter of
vaccination passports. By early 2021, residents were able to receive a
Covid passport, proving their vaccination status. The passes contain a
QR code that can be scanned at various venues and allow residents to
receive discounts and other benefits.
The passports remained voluntary for some time, until, in November 2021, the Moscow Times reported that:
“The Russian government said Friday it had submitted to
parliament two bills that will introduce mandatory health passes to
access restaurants and public transport, amid a new wave of coronavirus
cases.”
According to the article, the new legislation was aimed at “boosting
Russia’s sluggish immunization rates amid strong anti-vaccination
sentiment”. Sounds familiar.
The measure is supposedly in place until June 1, 2022.
4. RUSSIA IS DEVELOPING ITS OWN CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY (CBDC)
This year the Bank of Russia began piloting their
“digital ruble”, its version of a central bank digital currency. The
central bank also called for a total ban on cryptocurrencies, stating
that the digital ruble would become an alternative to decentralized
coins.
Three banks in Russia are already supporting pilot transactions using
their existing mobile app banking technology with nine more banks
expected to join them soon.
If you’re unfamiliar with “central bank digital currencies”, they are a centralized form of digital, programmable money, issued and controlled by the central banks,
allowing for complete surveillance across all transactions, giving the
banks the ability to control who can spend what and where.
In other words, the introduction of CBDCs is a key part of the
technocratic control grid that the WEF globalists seek to construct and
Russia is fully on board with the plan.
5. RUSSIA’S COVID LOCKDOWN WAS JUST AS STRICT AS THE WEST’S
Like most countries around the world, Russia instituted a draconian lockdown as a measure to “fight” the Covid-19 “pandemic”. The initial lockdown began in April 2020 and lasted approximately six weeks.
Russia’s capital, Moscow instituted another lockdown in October 2021 and also ordered all unvaccinated citizens over 60 to remain home for four months. Four months!
Granted, Russia’s lockdowns haven’t been as long or as many as certain other countries. However, according to the Covid-19 Stringency Index, Russia’s Covid-19 measures were just as strict as their Western counterparts and sometimes more so.
In other words, Russia played along with the phoney pandemic narrative.
6. PUTIN HAS DECLARED SUPPORT FOR GLOBALIZATION AND AGENDA 21
Last month, Russia and China issued a joint statement on “international relations entering a new era and the global sustainable development”,
in which they expressed support for globalization, Agenda 21, vaccines,
pandemic control, financing for climate change, the digital economy and
more.
Here are some key snippets from the report (emphasis added):
“The ongoing pandemic of the new coronavirus infection
poses a serious challenge to the fulfilment of the UN 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development. It is vital to enhance partnership relations for the sake of global development and make sure that the new stage of global development is defined by balance, harmony and inclusiveness…”
In order to accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,
the sides call on the international community to take practical steps
in key areas of cooperation such as poverty reduction, food security, vaccines and epidemics control,
financing for development, climate change, sustainable development,
including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and
infrastructure connectivity.”
7. PUTIN IS CLOSE FRIENDS WITH HENRY KISSINGER
Russian President, Vladimir Putin has “long-standing, friendly relations” with former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.
According to Kremlin Spokesman,
Dmitry Peskov, Putin and Kissinger “communicate all the time”, taking
the opportunity to “discuss pressing international issues as well as
exchange opinions on global perspectives”.
Apparently, Kissinger has been a frequent guest in
Russia since Putin took over in 2000. In 2007, Putin appointed
Kissinger to co-chair a bilateral “working group” aimed at improving
US-Russia relations.
Kissinger and the team that accompanied him to Moscow were all high-level members of
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), one of the prominent Western
“think tanks” leading the charge for a New World Order. Kissinger is
also a member of the Bilderberg Group and the Bohemian Club.
8. PUTIN HAS TIES TO THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
Putin has been attending events organized by the WEF since the early 1990s.
Just last year, WEF head Klaus Schwab invited Putin to give a special address at the WEF annual meeting (held in digital Davos).
During his address, Putin called for more testing and vaccines as measures to combat the coronavirus, stating that
“It is essential to join and coordinate the efforts
of the world in countering the spread of the virus and making the much
needed vaccines more accessible. We need to help the countries that need
support, including the African nations. I am referring to expanding
the scale of testing and vaccinations.”
He then went on to emphasize the role of central banks in rebuilding
global economies “affected by the pandemic”, in what was seemingly an
endorsement of Schwab’s Great Reset agenda:
“So, the key question today is how to build a programme
of actions in order to not only quickly restore the global and national
economies affected by the pandemic, but to ensure that this recovery is
sustainable in the long run, relies on a high-quality structure
and helps overcome the burden of social imbalances. Clearly, with
the above restrictions and macroeconomic policy in mind, economic growth
will largely rely on fiscal incentives with state budgets and central
banks playing the key role.”
Schwab even claimed that
Putin was a member of his “Young Global Leaders” program, graduates of
which include Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Bill Gates,
Mark Zuckerberg and Emmanuel Macron.
However, apart from Schwab having said so, there is no other evidence
to support this claim, and Putin would have been too old to join when
the program was launched anyway.
So, did Schwab just make a mistake? The man is in his 80s so it’s
understandable if he did, or was his slip a sign that the two share a
rather close relationship? Putin did begin his WEF address with an
intimate “Dear Klaus” after all…
9. PUTIN’S WAR IN UKRAINE IS ACCELERATING THE RISE OF CBDCS ALL OVER THE WORLD
Kit Knightly at OffGuardian recently published an article titled
“Ukraine crisis accelerating rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies”,
highlighting the fact that governments around the world are developing
and trialling CBDCs.
As stated earlier, CBDCs would give the state absolute control by
allowing them to track individual transactions, restrict people’s
spending and ensure people only purchase goods and services that the
state deems to be acceptable.
As Knightly rightly points out,
“Western governments are currently declaring financial war
on dozens of private citizens who have not been charged – let alone
convicted – of any crime, just because of their nationality. It’s being
done under the guise of “punishing dirty Russians”, but what can be done
to an oligarch can be done to anyone.”
10. THE WAR IN UKRAINE IS AIDING THE GREAT RESET
Part of the globalist agenda is the destruction of the current
economy, allowing for the introduction of a new economic system (the
“Great Reset”), one based on CBDCs, surveillance and run by artificial
intelligence.
“The elites dress it up with
buzzwords and catch-phrases like “sustainable development” and
“inclusivity”, but at the end of the day, the “great reset” is about the
creation of a digital surveillance state run on artificial intelligence
where we all transact with “central bank digital currencies” (that can
be fully tracked and traced).”
Putin’s war in Ukraine is aiding this goal by helping to further
destabilize the world economy and destroy the middle class (exactly what
COVID was meant to do).
Sky News is reporting that
an increase in food prices is “inevitable” due to the rising costs of
fertilizer, animal feed and fuel, raising concern for food security in
the UK. Likewise, the New York Times reported that “Russia’s war is raising gas prices and roiling financial markets”.
According to the article,
“If the effective closing of Russian financial markets and
rising commodity prices lead to a steeper stock market decline, or have
other, unexpected consequences, the Fed will be in a tough place. It is
moving toward tightening monetary conditions but might have to reverse
itself and engage in another rescue operation, as it did in March 2020.”
At this stage, the Russia-Ukraine situation is a minefield of conflicting narratives, disinformation and dodgy reporting.
All we can do is look at the facts and try to piece together a
picture of what may be happening… and when we do, it’s rather clear that
the “Putin vs Davos” narrative fails to hold up.
“Truth is the daughter of time, not of authority.” – Sir Francis Bacon
I
am persuaded by the arguments that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS and that like
President Thabo Mbeki I have done the unspeakable scientific act of
looking at the evidence and then deciding to change my mind.
The Scandal Started April 23, 1984
1984
was an election year and US President Ronald Reagan had not said a word
about AIDS. To prevent the Democratic Party from making AIDS a campaign
issue, Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services, called a Press Conference declaring that the cause of AIDS had been found. The culprit was a retrovirus discovered by Dr. Robert Gallo.
US President Ronald Reagan was re-elected.
The story that was “too big to fail” was full of holes and that became clear when a 1992 US federal investigation found Dr. Robert Gallo had committed scientific fraud.
After
three years of investigations, the Federal Office of Research Integrity
today found that Dr. Robert C. Gallo, the American co-discoverer of the
cause of AIDS, had committed scientific misconduct. The investigators
said he had "falsely reported" a critical fact in the scientific paper
of 1984 in which he described isolating the virus that causes AIDS.
The
new report said Dr. Gallo had intentionally misled colleagues to gain
credit for himself and diminish credit due to his French competitors.
The report also said that his false statement had "impeded potential
AIDS research progress" by diverting scientists from potentially
fruitful work with the French researchers.
AIDS in South Africa
No
disease has gripped the South African psyche more than the Acquired
Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). During my school years the pandemic
was said to be spreading throughout the country and it got the media,
government departments, private businesses and the education system
swept up into a frenzy – a situation that is comparable to what we are
experiencing today with the coronavirus. Red ribbons were placed on
every communication in South Africa, children had to be taught the
benefits of safe sex practices and churches had opening and closing
prayers to ask for a blessing from the Almighty for those that are
suffering from the deadly disease. To address “his biggest regret in
office” former President Nelson Mandela spent his retirement years with
influencers like Bono, Opera Winfrey, and the Spice Girls to raise awareness of the dangerous lifestyle practices that leads to the HIV+ infection and the development of AIDS.
And
who could forget the brave Nkosi Johnson, the AIDS orphan, who spoke
out against President Thabo Mbeki at the year 2000 Durban AIDS
conference and pleaded with him in public that so that other children
could like him also get access to the antiretroviral medication? Then
there was Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang labelled by the Mail
and Guardian as “Dr. Beetroot” after she suggested that beetroot and garlic could treat the disease at the 2006 International AIDS conference in Toronto. In an interview
with Radio 702’s host John Robbie, she was asked if she truly believes
that HIV causes AIDS? Robbie told her in anger and probably without
thinking “to go away” – sparking an understandable accusation of racism
as this was often the tone of language that black women received under
Apartheid.
In the media it was said that Thabo Mbeki was
associating himself with crank AIDS denialist and that he was being
stubborn and irresponsible for delaying the rollout of lifesaving
antiretroviral medication to the poorest of the poor. In parliament when
the Democratic Alliance’s health spokesperson Ryan Coetzee asked him
if “he truly believes that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS” it resulted in
another accusation of racism. In opposition to the government’s policies
a new form of activism was born called “AIDS activists” that included
notably Zachie Achmat, Nathan Geffen and Mark Heywood from the Treatment Action Campaign.
The
death toll caused by President Mbeki’s denialism was estimated to be on
the order of a quarter of a million South Africans, leading to the
South African Communist Party’s Youth League to demand
that he be tried for genocide. Thabo Mbeki’s negligence contributed to
his political defeat at the Polokwane conference and him being recalled
during his final term in office. The African National Congress (ANC)
replaced him by a more charismatic President Jacob Zuma whose first act
when he came into power was to distance himself
from the country’s “era of denialism”. Jacob Zuma started a massive
rollout of antiretrovirals and rare in the divisiveness of South African
politics he was temporarily praised by the leader of the opposition
party Helen Zille. Zille felt strongly about AIDS, so strong that a few
years later she called for the criminalization of HIV transmission in
what one commentator referred to as “an AIDS Gestapo”.
Until
two years ago I couldn’t make sense of the HIV/AIDS pandemic in South
Africa and why Thabo Mbeki who was highly intelligent seemed so stubborn
about the issue. Why was it that he and his cabinet was so sensitive to
criticism and often resorted to unfounded claims of racism when they
were pressured on the issue? The attitude struck me as absurd, but that
was until I realized I was one of those that just assumed what he said
and didn’t listen to what he was saying.
The HIV/AIDS falsehood goes back to the misreading of the original isolation attempt by the French Virologist Luc Montagnier. I base my opinion on the findings of the Perth Group in Australia whose work is routinely cited in the new book ‘Virus Mania’.
The Perth Group convinced President Thabo Mbeki that we are looking at
HIV/AIDS disease through the wrong paradigm and I encourage those who
disagree with me to at least read their scientific work. The Perth group not only exposed that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, but it was the beginning of the revival of the “Ecological Theory”
of disease. The idea that that the entire premise of Germ Theory sits
on a shaky foundation and that environmental conditions also play a
significant role in disease progression.
My Journey into AIDS
During
the Covid19 pandemic I and many others were appalled when dissident
scientific voices who opposed the lockdowns on legitimate public health
grounds were silenced, and when off label medication was discouraged to
push through the rushed mRNA vaccine without proper long term safety
data available. In denying the truth the authorities launched one of the
most sophisticated media ran propaganda campaigns in modern human history.
As the physicist Denis Rancourt and his colleagues recently showed, the data does not suggest that there is a dangerous Covid19 pandemic
as is evident that all-cause mortality in the United States, Europe and
Canada hasn’t changed much during the last 2 years. By going through
the mortality data, I am startled at how innumerate the media and the
general populace is. Humans simply struggle to put numbers into an
understandable perspective especially when there is a deliberate attempt
by the authorities to spread fear, mislead and monopolize the truth. I
can only conclude that there is only a pandemic of fear that is driven
by the unreliable nature of the PCR test and the non-specificity of the
antibody tests.
As I did my research and interviews on Covid19, it became obvious that Covid19 was not Anthony Fauci’s first of many crimes
and that the the techniques that are currently being deployed to
manipulate the public on a global scale were pioneered during the AIDS
pandemic.
AZT – Poison by Prescription
My journey into the HIV/AIDS question came as I stumbled across an article
by the Yale Epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch that gave the account of
Anthony Fauci’s refusal to allow gay men in the 1980s the treatment drug
Bactrim. Bactrim like Ivermectin was an off-label medication that could
have treated the associated pneumocystis pneumonia and today doctors
routinely use as part of the AIDS HAART Protocol. Probably to appease
his friends in the pharmaceutical industry Anthony Fauci decided to
block the rollout of the medication for nearly 2 years and push through a
drug known as AZT without proper clinical trials being done. As with
the Covid19 vaccine, the placebo group was deliberately broken to hide
the background risks and the criminality was only revealed after a gay
activist by the name of John Lauritsen investigated the FDA’s approval
process. Dr. Risch pointed out that while the AZT drug did work, it was
highly toxic in the initial dosages, but as I read further about the
toxicity in John’s book “Poison by Prescription”
– the entire lid came off HIV and AIDS. Also, late last year Neville
Hodgkinson a former scientific correspondent of the Sunday Times raised
my suspicion when he wrote that the Covid19 tricks were pioneered during the HIV/AIDS pandemic, leading me to ask the simply question.
“What did President Mbeki know about HIV/AIDS?”
What
were the dissidents saying and why were they wrong? As it turns out I
am now of the opinion that not only was President Mbeki correct, but
that he was right to question the toxicity of the antiretrovirals and
specifically AZT (later branded as zidovudine). AZT—initially designed as cancer chemotherapy—targets
DNA synthesis, the basis of all life and after its widespread use, the
rate of “AIDS deaths” among gay men went up by a factor of 10. Recently
an old BBC documentary title “Guinea Pig Kids” resurfaced that exposed how orphanage children in New York were used in the trial of AZT – most of them died.
South African born HIV/AIDS doctor Joseph Sonnabend called AZT “incompatible with life”
- the definition of a poison. John Lauritsen estimated AZT killed
330,000 gay men in America and in the Vienna AIDS Conference in 2010 he
gave an emotional speech where he didn’t hesitate to use the term the “the gay holocaust” in honor of the young gay men who took poison thinking that it would cure them when in fact it took them to their graves.
Yet
this was the medication that AIDS activists from Treatment Action
Campaign (TAC, a PR front for BigPharma) wanted President Thabo Mbeki to
import to South Africa. During the Covid19 pandemic TAC and Nathan
Geffen in particular wrote a series of hit pieces on Panda’s Nick Hudson
after he questioned the Western Cape Government’s reporting of the
vaccination statistics. The same characters that put profit before lives
during the AIDS pandemic are doing it again with Covid19.
With respect to South Africa, what struck me further was Nkosi Johnson’s words at the 2000 Durban AIDS conference that was published by all the media around the world.
“I
hate having Aids because I get very sick and I get very sad when I
think of all the other children and babies that are sick with Aids. I
just wish that the government can start giving AZT to pregnant HIV
mothers to help stop the virus being passed on to their babies.”
Was
Nkosi Johnson’s story used by the pharmaceutical industry as emotional
propaganda to sell a toxic medication and what was the medication that
he took before he died?
Mbeki’s Journey – Debating AZT
During my interview
with AIDS dissident Anthony Brink, he told me the story of how Thabo
Mbeki got interested in the debate as like me it also started with AZT.
Brink was an advocate from the Pietermaritzburg Bar who took interest
into AZT after media pressure started building on Mandela’s government
to take the HIV/AIDS pandemic seriously and import antiretrovirals into
the country. His wife alerted him that there were scientific discussions
about the toxicity of the drugs on the internet. As his interest took
hold in the topic, he decided to write a book titled Debating AZT that contained all the medical and scientific literature about the toxicity of the drug.
Brink
also mentioned to me that he knew a fellow attorney who died after
testing positive for HIV. His legal partner informed him that he was
taking antiretrovirals before his death. Brink sent the widow his
manuscript and to his horror he found out that the symptoms precisely
those predicted by in the literature quoted in Debating AZT.
Brink
alerted the Minister of Health Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma by sending her
office a copy of his book, but by that time President Nelson Mandela was
about to leave office and one of her Special Advisors Dr. Ian Roberts
thought it best to delay the issue for the next health minister.
Immediately
after being sworn into office, first item on Health Minister Manto
Tshabalala-Msimang’s agenda was to go through the Anthony Brink’s book Debating AZT.
After being informed by the findings of the book the ANC’s Presidency
Director General Smuts Ngonyama gave Brink a call and asked him to write
the ANC’s media statement on AZT. Mbeki became aware that there was a
toxicity issue related to the antiretrovirals and this lead him on the
path to discover that there was more to AIDS than just the HIV virus and
that the medication themselves are toxic.
Advisory Panel
Debating AZT
set off a bombshell in South Africa. It convinced Mbeki to hear the
arguments of the AIDS dissidents. They can be found at the website Virusmyth, and the documentary film House of Numbers. The dissidents as well as the mainstream scientists were invited to his March 2000 AIDS Panel
held at the Sheraton hotel in Pretoria. Among the attendees of the
first meeting were AIDS skeptics such as Professor Peter Duesberg, David
Rasnick and Medunsa’s Professor Sam Mhlongo. The mainstream scientists
including Professor Glenda Gray, Professor Salim S Abdool-Karim, Dr
Malegapuru W Makgoba, and the discoverer of HIV Dr. Luc Montagnier were
also present. More significant are those could only attend the second
meeting Professor Eleni Papadopoulos-Eleopulos and Dr Valander Turner
known as “the Perth group”. Brink told me that Mbeki and Kgalema
Motlanthe would eventually be persuaded by their arguments.
Mbeki’s Presidential Advisory Report
gives the best summary of the arguments for or against the HIV/AIDS
hypothesis and it is a tragedy to South Africa that our media never
properly debated the findings of the report, for it would have blown the
lid of the whole scandal. The report carries enormous value for medical
history and the pandemic in South Africa. The South African
Broadcasting corporation also refused to air the videos of the event,
but fortunately some of the material has resurfaced and it is available
on by anonymous sources on odysee.
There
are few interviews where Thabo Mbeki was given an honest opportunity to
express himself on AIDS, but a good film includes “Search for Solutions” that was aired on Carte Blanche and broadcasted only in Africa.
The only honest debate
about the toxicity of AZT was aired on ETV in 2005. It featured Dr.
David Rasnick and Dr. Sam Mhlongo against and Dr Malegapuru W Makgoba
and Professor Ian Sanne.
Dr. Sam Mhlongo was Head of the
Department of Family Practice and Medical Health Care at the Medical
University of Southern Africa (MEDUNSA). For decades, Dr Mhlongo was
exiled for opposing the Apartheid Regime. After his return to South
Africa he continued to fight a new enemy: the devastating impact of the
pharmaceutical “business with disease” in South Africa.
He was a
member of the Presidential Aids Advisory Panel, where he explored and
embraced viable alternatives to cope with this epidemic especially for
the poor and marginalized communities. Dr. Mhlongo sadly died in 2006 in a car accident, his reflections on AIDS and the medications are well kept online.
The HIV-AIDS Hypothesis
From
Mbeki’s advisory report I am going to highlight a few statements that
show why I too reject the HIV hypothesis and why it has lessons for
Covid19.
A particular concern raised by some members
of the panel was that after 15 years of research, there is the lack of a
'gold standard' against which to measure the accuracy and reliability
of the data generated from the commonly used methods to diagnose HIV
infection.
The PCR Test
Arguments
against the use of PCR are that this test is characterized by high
variability and lack of reproducibility. In addition, the very wide
variability may lead to the erroneous interpretation of results, thus
compromising the accuracy and validity of the PCR results. Dr Bialy
pointed out that the PCR viral load test might not be a legitimate
measure of infectious virus. It demonstrates a high level of
fluctuation, and the viral load can be increased non-specifically by
other viral and bacterial infections (opportunistic infections may also
increase viral load). Research results indicate that the viral load test
may not always be an indicator for the clinical progression of HIV to
AIDS.
Dr. Kary Mullis,
the inventor of PCR, said on many occasions that so-called PCR tests
cannot detect infection or the presence of virus. Even the package
inserts say the PCR “tests” cannot be used to diagnose AIDS or detect
the presence of HIV.
The same is true of the antibody tests most notably the Elisa and Western blot. They tell you nothing about a unique virus or infection.
The Elisa Test
The
lack of standardization of ELISA results, both within the country and
across countries, was a source of major concern to some panelists.
Results of ELISA tests may be interpreted differently within a single
laboratory, between laboratories within one country, and between
countries. This may mean that a person that tests positive at one
laboratory in South Africa may test negative at a different laboratory
in the same country. Moreover, the lack of standardization across
countries could result in an individual's testing positive in one
country and negative in another.
Western Blot
Dr
Papadopoulos-Eleopulos presented a transparency showing the results of a
Western Blot test with a number of samples from leprosy, TB and AIDS
patients. It appeared that the Western Blot results from the different
samples were indistinguishable from one another, showing the Western
Blot test to be non-specific and unreliable. All the samples tested
positive, even those from leprosy and TB patients. In further
deliberations, Dr Mark Smith pointed out that Max Essex had already
demonstrated the indeterminate results from Western Blot results in
1994. The above underlines the fact that the Western Blot test cannot be
used as a determinate diagnostic tool.
So what
does one make of a virus for which there is no reliable test for its
presence? How can it be that the public at large has been driven into a
frenzy on the basis of false positive results?
As a medical
doctor confirmed to me, today the practice is to use both the Elisa and
Western blood test as well as the PCR test to measure the arbitrary and meaningless “viral load”.
But if none of the three tests carry any meaning? What is their purpose when the following factors are known to cause to Cause False-Positive HIV Antibody Test Results?
Anti-carbohydrate antibodies (52, 19, 13)
Anti-carbohydrate antibodies (52, 19, 13)
Naturally-occurring antibodies (5, 19)
Passive
immunization: receipt of gamma globulin or immune globulin (as
prophylaxis against infection which contains antibodies)(18, 26, 60, 4,
22, 42, 43, 13)
Leprosy (2, 25)
Tuberculosis (25)
Mycobacterium avium (25)
Systemic lupus erythematosus (15, 23)
Renal (kidney) failure (48, 23, 13)
Hemodialysis/renal failure (56, 16, 41, 10, 49)
Alpha interferon therapy in hemodialysis patients (54)
Flu (36)
Flu vaccination (30, 11, 3, 20, 13, 43)
Herpes simplex I (27)
Herpes simplex II (11)
Upper respiratory tract infection (cold or flu)(11)
Recent viral infection or exposure to viral vaccines (11)
Pregnancy in multiparous women (58, 53, 13, 43, 36)
Malaria (6, 12)
High levels of circulating immune complexes (6, 33)
Hypergammaglobulinemia (high levels of antibodies) (40, 33)
False positives on other tests, including RPR (rapid plasma reagent) test for syphilis (17, 48, 33, 10, 49)
Rheumatoid arthritis (36)
Hepatitis B vaccination (28, 21, 40, 43)
Tetanus vaccination (40)
Organ transplantation (1, 36)
Renal transplantation (35, 9, 48, 13, 56)
Anti-lymphocyte antibodies (56, 31)
Anti-collagen antibodies (found in gay men, haemophiliacs, Africans of both sexes and people with leprosy)(31)
Serum-positive
for rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody (both found in rheumatoid
arthritis and other autoantibodies)(14, 62, 53)
Lipemic serum (blood with high levels of fat or lipids)(49)
Haemolyzed serum (blood where haemoglobin is separated from the red cells)(49)
Hyperbilirubinemia (10, 13)
Globulins produced during polyclonal gammopathies (which are seen in AIDS risk groups)(10, 13, 48)
Healthy individuals as a result of poorly-understood cross-reactions (10)
Normal human ribonucleoproteins (48,13)
Other retroviruses (8, 55, 14, 48, 13)
Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (48, 13)
Anti-nuclear antibodies (48, 13, 53)
Anti-microsomal antibodies (34)
T-cell leukocyte antigen antibodies (48, 13)
Proteins on the filter paper (13)
Epstein-Barr virus (37)
Visceral leishmaniasis (45)
Receptive anal sex (39, 64)
Luc Montagnier’s experiment.
The
human immunodeficiency virus was said to be discovered by French
virologist Luc Montagnier in the early 1980s. At an AIDS conference in San Francisco in 1990, Montagnier expressed his own skepticism towards the HIV hypothesis.
“HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause AIDS.” -Luc Montagnier
While
never fully walking away from the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, Montagnier, in
the documentary series House of Numbers, further doubled down on his
skepticism, in particular as it relates to Africa.
"AIDS
does not inevitably lead to death, especially if you suppress the
co-factors that support the disease. It is very important to tell this
to people who are infected, I think we should put the same weight on the
co-factors as we have on HIV. Psychological factors are critical in
supporting immune function. If you suppress this psychological support
by telling someone he's condemned to die, your words alone will have
condemned him." -Luc Montagnier
In 2000 at Mbeki’s
AIDS Advisory Panel in Pretoria, Montagnier was asked if he had actually
“purified” HIV. He simply said that it was an old technique and no
longer valid. The Perth group argued against Montagnier’s original
interpretation.
That AIDS and all the phenomena
inferred as "HIV" are induced by changes in cellular redox brought about
by the oxidative nature of substances and exposures common to all the
AIDS risk groups and to the cells used in the "culture" and "isolation"
of "HIV".
The problems with isolating authentic HIV are well presented in Bret Leung’s extended interview with the Perth Group in the film House of Numbers as well as on the Perth Group’s Website.
Anthony Fauci
Compounding
Gallo’s fraud, Anthony Fauci repurposed the highly toxic chemotherapy
AZT as an anti-HIV drug, which John Lauritsen estimated killed 330,000
gay men.
Fauci promised a vaccine against HIV was “2 years away”.
We’re still waiting 37-years later. Since then, the US government has
spent over 600 billion dollars on AIDS and not saved a single life.
The story of how the AIDS dogma got started was told in Joan Shenton’s film “Positively False”.
So, if the HIV virus has not been isolated, what then what is AIDS?
AIDS
“The missing deaths”
During
Thabo Mbeki’s presidency, Journalist Rian Malan, on a contract from
Rolling Stone Magazine, looked into the HIV/AIDS issue and set out to
find the 250 000 deaths and the 20 million victims that are said to be
dying of the disease throughout the continent. To his astonishment he
found that “Africa isn’t dying of AIDS”
and that towns that were set to be dying of the pandemic actually had
their population numbers increase. After going through coroners’ reports
and visiting AIDS clinics throughout South Africa, Malan simply couldn’t find the excess deaths.
“A
note on the MRC website explained that modeling was an inexact science,
and that ‘the number of people dying of Aids has only now started to
increase’. Furthermore, said the MRC, there was a new model in the
works, one that would ‘probably’ produce estimates ‘about 10 per cent
lower’ than those presently on the table. The exercise was not strictly
valid, but I persuaded my scientist pal Rodney Richards to run the
revised data on his own simulator and see what he came up with for 1999.
The answer, very crudely, was an Aids death toll somewhere around
65,000 — a far cry indeed from the 250,000 initially put forth by
UNAIDS.
Without making a claim to know anything
about HIV/AIDS, Rian Malan simply articulated that the millions of
people that were set to suffer from the diseases were the product of
computer models.
What is AIDS?
Originally AIDS was confined to gay men in America who used poppers as a party drug
whose side effects gave known AIDS like symptoms. The gay population
was highly targeted with testing and given the high false positivity
rate they tested positive in high numbers. As time went on the CDC
lumped together diseases that had nothing to do with each other. As with
Covid19 the definition of AIDS started to expand by adding new symptoms
to the disease. Perhaps the biggest absurdity is that AIDS in Africa
and AIDS in America have nothing in common other than the name. In
Africa it is largely a disease of poverty and in America it is mostly a
disease of drug usage.
Those
two diseases are entirely distinct to the point that they cannot
possibly come from the same virus. If you were to be diagnosed with AIDS
in SA and fly to America, under the official definition you would be
cured? As David Rasnick
told me an interview “HIV has only 3 structural genes and yet it knows
whether you’re black or white, gay or straight, rich or poor, and what
continent you live in”.
Mbeki’s Advisory report also expressed concerned about the definition of the AIDS construct.
“Why
is HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa heterosexually transmitted while in
the western world it is said to be largely homosexually transmitted”
Surely
Africans cannot be so distinct to suffer differently from the exact
same virus? When faced with this anomaly the AIDS establishment decided
to “reclassify” these two diseases as HIV-1 and HIV-2.
In Summary
As evident by the workings of the Perth Group, the evidence that the HIV virus has been purified does not exist.
As
evident by the contradictions in the testing methods, none of the HIV
tests are able to say anything about the presence of the virus.
As evident by the Rian Malan’s finding, Africa isn’t dying of a deadly pandemic.
As
evident by the definition of AIDS, the diseases of AIDS in Africa are
largely related to malnutrition and poverty and in the United States it
is a consequence of lifestyle and drug usage.
What
I would expect to originate from this article is that we start and open
conversation on HIV and AIDS on the following points.
The
toxicity of the antiretrovirals must be openly admitted and the
pharmaceutical companies and FDA must be held accountable for countless
deaths for which they are responsible.
The lessons of
HIV/AIDS are paramount if we want to come to terms with the crimes that
are being committed under the name of the Covid19 health emergency and
if we ever believe in justice for the hundred and thousands of gay men
and millions of Africans that were subjected to this cruel
experimentation by giving them medication on the basis of a false
positive test result.
For South Africans it is time to
look objectively at the evidence detailed in Mbeki’s advisory report and
then for us all to provide him with an apology.
.png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}