The Transfection Fraud: a Japanese study confirmed Scoglio's thesis

 

Data on the bio-distribution of Pfizer's pseudo-vaccine shows that it doesn't enter cells, and doesn't produce any spike protein. It does, however, produce enormous damage to all organ systems. Here, we provide an answer to Facta's debunkers.

Dr. Stefano Scoglio, Ph.D.
2021 (Read in Italian)

At the current time, I am a constant target of the Facta organisation. These are the toy soldiers of the dominant narrative whose purpose is not to prove anything, but only to shout that whatever I say is false. In short, it seems that my arguments have hit the mark, and are touching on essential contradictions and inconsistencies of the dominant pseudo-scientific narrative. My arguments are therefore to be branded as fake news. This time they have it in for an article in which I explain why, according to the scientific literature, the RNA or DNA vaccine technology and RNA/DNA drug technology have not managed to solve the fundamental problem of delivery, that is, the ability to carry the genetic material into the cell. In support of my thesis, I have brought abundant scientific evidence in the form of all the articles that were published on the subject for the period of 2018-2021, articles which unequivocally show that there are 5 fundamental obstacles to the entry of synthetic RNA/DNA into the cell:

- the large abundance of extracellular ribonucleases, which break down any foreign genetic material;

- the fact that the portion that survived the attack of the aforementioned ribonucleases would then have to enter the cell through endocytosis, but often what happens is exocytosis, i.e. the cell invaginates the vaccine material, but to keep it out, not to bring it in;

- the fact, recognised by all scientists who deal with the matter, that the endosome / lysosome endo-cellular system captures, breaks up and expels more than 98% of the foreign material that enters it;

- the further existence of ribonucleases inside the cell, which would finish the work already done by the extra-cellular ribonucleases;

- finally, the most important element, i.e. the fact that this synthetic genetic material, RNA or DNA, is "intrinsically immunogenic", i.e. it is so toxic, with recognised inflammatory, autoimmune hyper-stimulation, generation of systemic oedemas and venous thrombi, as to immediately trigger the disruptive reaction of the immune system against the injected serum, thus making the action of the other aforementioned factors not even necessary.

So, how do the debunkers answer this? Listen closely:

“Scoglio cites some scientific review articles published in past years, in which the technological difficulties relating to mRNA vaccines were discussed, in order to argue that, in trying to make vaccines work, there would still be insurmountable problems: the mRNA contained in vaccines would not be capable of entering cells and, if it did, it would be immediately destroyed by specific enzymes, known as intracellular ribonucleases. We don't need to go into the details of Scoglio's arguments to know that they are wrong. We have experimental data, which tell us that the vaccine actually induces the production of spike protein in the body."

In summary, they claim that my statements are false, and to say this "there is no need to go into the detail of my arguments"! As I wrote in another article about the debunkers: that's how it is because that's how it is!

These characters are almost pitiful. In order to be able to say that my theses are false, they must also reduce my position to a minimum. Of the 5 factors indicated above, they only mention the intracellular ribonucleases, the last and least of those factors. They thereby falsify my position by reducing it to its least important topic. 

The debunkers then claim:

“Regarding intracellular ribonucleases, mRNA vaccines are modified exactly like the cell's natural mRNA to prevent them from being degraded by these enzymes.”

It is true that there is research in this sense, but it is equally true that the researchers themselves state that this research is not yet satisfactory, and that the challenge of protecting genetic material not only from the sole factor that the factcheckers want to talk about, but also from the other factors I listed above, is still an open problem. I'm not going to repeat here every deliberately partial and manipulative thing that the debunkers say, but in the article you will find all the quotes that confirm what I say, from the fact that the cell constitutes a "formidable barrier" for everything that you want to introduce into it, to the fact that the endosome / lysosome system eliminates more than 98% of the material that could possibly enter.

The debunkers argue that, beyond the theoretical discussion, the fact that synthetic RNA/DNA vaccines are able to produce the proteins they are designed to produce is confirmed by experimental data, i.e. by the fact that in very few studies, have researchers concluded having found the specific proteins in the body (in the case of coronaviruses, the spike protein) that the RNA/DNA was supposed to produce.

I don't know if it's out of ignorance or out of a desire to mystify, but the factcheckers obscure the difference between the direct retrieval of these proteins in the blood and their indirect retrieval via antibodies. Perhaps it's because they don't want people to know that the post-vaccination proteins are never found directly, but only ever through antibodies.

And this is another crucial point: finding proteins directly in the body is not difficult, But why do researchers not go looking for the proteins themselves instead of the antibodies to those proteins? And if, as I maintain, antibodies are not specific, it is clear that their value as an indicator of the presence of this or that protein is null and void.

Here too, the debunkers do not enter into the merits of my statements, but, as usual, limit themselves to the argument from authority:

“These are grossly incorrect claims, at odds with the basis of immunology.”

I mean, I'm wrong because I don't accept the dominant doxa. In reality, they themselves open up the possibility of the non-specificity of antibodies:

“As the CNR researcher quoted by Scoglio says on page 12 of the document, it is true that in some cases an antibody can react with several different molecules, a phenomenon which leads, for example, to cross allergies, in which an allergy to a substance can induce also allergy to another, but this does not mean that antibodies bind indiscriminately to any antigen.”

In fact, an antibody does not necessarily react indiscriminately to any antigen, but the fact that it can react to multiple antigens should already raise the question of their fundamental specificity.

The antibodies that are tested are (almost) always limited to two: IgM and IgG, and these two antibodies must be specific for billions of viruses and bacteria. How is this possible? Are there billions of subgroups of these IgG and IgM? No, there is no subgroup. This is what happens: serum is taken from the blood of the subject to be tested, and through different procedures, for example the ELISA test, the serum containing the antibodies of the subject is brought into contact with the antigen whose specificity is to be tested. Apart from the fact that the virus has never been purified and so it is not known what is being used as an antigen, if the antibody is activated when in contact with this "antigen", then it is said to be specific for that antigen. In practice: vaccines, as we have said, are highly "immunogenic", which means that they independently stimulate the production of antibodies in the recipient. But instead of attributing the increase in antibodies to the toxicity of the vaccine, the serum of the vaccinees is taken, put in contact with the artificial spike protein (produced in a laboratory and not deriving from any natural virus), and if there is a reaction of the subject's antibody to the artificial spike protein (whose toxicity has been proven) then the vaccine is said to be effective, since it stimulated the production of antibodies against the virus. The problem is that all these tests are done without controls!

The correct way to proceed would be as follows: the patient's serum is taken and put in contact not only with the artificial antigen of the presumed virus, but also with the vaccine, with other presumed pathogens and toxins, and only if the antibody is activated exclusively with the spike protein and with no other toxins or pathogens, only then can we say that the antibody is specific. This is never done. The serum is tested exclusively with the selected antigen. In this way, it is almost guaranteed that every time the antibody is tested against an antigen it is activated against that antigen. In short, if you want to prove that you have antibodies against malaria, test the serum only with the malaria antigen; when you want to demonstrate that you have specific antibodies for E.Coli, test the patient's serum only with E.Coli; and so on. Ultimately, it is a scam which, by sequentially testing a universal antibody each time with a different antigen and only with that antigen, leads us to believe that there are specific antibodies for each different toxin or pathogenic material; whereas the antibody reacts to all pathogenic factors precisely because it is universal and generic. Much pseudo-science and chemotoxic medicine is based on this scam.

I realise that the questioning of the antibody method touches a raw nerve, and that even many critics of the SARS-Cov2 virus thesis don't feel like going so deeply into the critique of virology. But someone needs to do it, even at the cost of accusations and defamations coming from the mainstream.

And so, I now come to the definitive proof that what I say about the impossibility of the gene serums entering the cell is true. That is, the Japanese government study on the bio-distribution of the Pfizer vaccine.

This is a study carried out by the Japanese Government and which Pfizer has done everything to keep secret, but which has been made public thanks to a FOIA.

The article is in Japanese, and attached to this article you will find the translation made by the undersigned. I don't know Japanese, and I translated through Google Translate, which obviously translated awkwardly, but I managed to reconstruct a sensible and substantially correct interpretation of the article. This is also thanks to the fact that the tables with the numerical data, and the relative legends, are in English (left in the original English in the translation). The test, which was carried out in collaboration with Pfizer itself, took place as follows.

The researchers evaluated the bio-distribution of lipids that encapsulate the mRNA in the body, through a double detection system: encoding the mRNA for the fluorescent enzyme luciferase, or making the lipids radioactive. The research focused on the lipids ALC-0315 (aminolipid) and ALC-0159 (PEG lipids), while ignoring the finding of nucleic acids and metabolites produced by the metabolites of the spike protein that should have been produced with the entry of the
vaccine material into the cell. Actually, it would have been interesting to verify these last two factors as well, but obviously, with the researchers being linked to Pfizer, they had to assume, at least a priori, that the spike protein and nucleic acids derived from the endocellular decomposition of the mRNA were formed, even if the conclusions of the study, as we shall see, demonstrate the exact opposite. In fact, the official narrative on the functioning of these genetic pseudo-vaccines, which is taken for granted even by "alternative" researchers, is that the vaccine material enters the cell thanks to the lipids that act as transporters via the mechanism of endocytosis; so that the mRNA reaches the cellular ribosomes to instruct them to generate the spike protein of the presumed virus. In this model, the mRNA, once its work is done, is degraded by the endocellular enzymes into nucleic acids (it is not clear why these endocellular enzymes, the ribonucleases but also the endosome / lysosome system should degrade the mRNA after and not before it has accomplished his deed). The same thing would happen to the lipids that would have transported the mRNA into the cell, they would also be degraded into their lipid metabolites, such as chylomicrons in the case of cholesterol. In this sense, if the model proposed by Pfizer, Moderna and Astra Zeneca works, the encapsulating lipids and amines, ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 in the case of Pfizer, should in turn be degraded, through proteolysis as regards the amines and through lipolysis for lipids, and therefore they should not be found in their original form in the body of the vaccinated. But this is exactly what Japanese researchers found!

Since the translation of the article has been attached, I will limit myself to reporting the main points. Let's take this first result reported in the study:

“In our biodistribution assay, luciferase RNA-encapsulated LNP was administered intramuscularly to BALB/c mice. Consequently, luciferase expression was observed at the site of administration and the level of expression was lower than that in the liver. The administration site expression of luciferase was observed from 6 hours after administration and disappeared 9 days after administration. Expression in the liver was also observed 6 hours after dosing and disappeared within 48 hours after dosing.”

The fact that the luciferase-containing material is found immediately in the liver and much less at the injection site immediately demonstrates that the vaccine does not work as expected. In fact, according to the official narrative, the vaccine material, once injected, should be rapidly absorbed by the dendritic cells, where it should precisely stimulate the production of spike protein. Instead, here we see that the injected material almost instantaneously passes into the liver, as evidenced by the fact that it is found both in the injection site and in the liver after the same 6 hours. The very fact that after 9 days the unchanged drug is found in quantity at the injection site is further proof that it does not enter the cells, where it would be rapidly metabolised, but rather remains in the tissues in an unaltered form.

As can be seen in Table 1 (from the translated article), the vaccine material almost immediately passes into the liver in large quantities, as much as 60% of the total in the case of ALC-0315 and 20% in the case of ALC-0159. From the liver, as we will see, the material circulates to all the organs, where it is deposited, except for the portion which is excreted.

That the material circulating in the injection site (& as we will see, in all the organs) is in fact the unmodified drug, which therefore never entered the cells, is also proven by tissue analysis of the of post-vaccinated animals:

“The proportion of unchanged drug after inoculation was measured to see which of ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 was also metabolically stable in animal species and test systems, with a final percentage of the unchanged drug that was greater than 82%.”

This data, in itself, puts an end to the illusion that the genetic material enters the cells and triggers the production of spike protein. The 82% refers to the total material contained in the tissues, not to the total material injected, because the analysis of the vaccine material content in urine and faeces confirms that about 50% of the injected material is excreted:

“Concentrations of ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 in urine and faeces collected over time were measured. Neither ALC-0315 nor unchanged ALC-0159 were detected in urine, but were found in faeces, where unchanged forms of ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 were detected, at a rate of approximately 1% per dose, respectively, and constituted about 50% of the total.”

Thus, approximately 50% of the injection's total content is excreted unchanged from the form in which it was injected. Of the remaining 50% that remained in the body, 82% remained unchanged, in the form in which it was injected, while the remaining 18% was metabolized, not at the intracellular level but through enzymatic mechanisms described in figures 3 4 If the metabolites were the product of intracellular degradation, they would already be formed in the bloodstream. Instead, they are formed through a progressive series of enzymatic degradation mechanisms in the blood and liver. This confirms that even the remaining 18% of the non-excreted material, equal to 9% of the total injected content, is degraded, perhaps ending up in the urine, outside of the cells. From this it emerges that 91% (50% + 82% of 50%) of the inoculated material is either excreted or deposited in organs and tissues, while the remaining 9% is enzymatically degraded in the blood and liver, before it can enter any cells.

What is strongly relevant is the important presence of the unaltered vaccine material, with its infinitesimal nanometric particles, in all organs, with a massive presence in organs such as the liver, spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries, as demonstrated by the attached Tables 2.6.5.5B:

As can be seen from these tables, the mRNA encapsulating lipids ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 are dispersed, in their original formulation in unaltered nanoparticles, in all organs. If the lipids and mRNA, encoded with a radioactive or fluorescent marker (luciferase), had entered the cells to produce the spike protein, they would have been metabolised, degraded into their metabolites, and therefore it would not have been possible to find them unchanged in the organs, as actually occurred. This confirms my statement that the intrinsic toxicity of this material, the so-called immunogenicity of the pseudo-vaccine, triggers such an immune reaction that the vaccine material explodes into its innumerable constituent nano-particles, which spread and deposit in all organs of the body, in particular, as evidenced by the yellow underlining, in the liver, spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries.

However, the main place of storage remains the injection site, where the vaccine material remained for a good 9 days before being excreted via the faeces (directly) and the urine (metabolised) by about 50%, with the rest (unaltered) then ending up in the organs. In fact, if one looks at the progression of the concentrations, one sees that as the concentration of lipids at the injection site decreases, passing from 394 after 1 hour to 164 after 48 hours, the concentrations of the same lipids progressively increase in all the organs. For example, it goes from 4.63 after one hour in the liver to 24.3 after 48 hours. This further confirms that the vaccine material, once inoculated, remains for 9 days at the injection site, and without being absorbed by the dendritic cells, its concentration progressively decreases as it transfers its share of material to all of the organs via the bloodstream.

There is one last point related to entry into the cells. In the Japanese study, in Figure 3, we talk about the metabolisation of the two lipid compounds also in the hepatocytes, which are the liver cells, and this would suggest that the vaccine material then enters the hepatocytes, and would therefore have some chance of reaching the ribosomes. But if you look closely, you will see that the authors speak of monkey and human hepatocytes, i.e. the tissues used for in vitro analysis, not of mice and rats, the only animals on which bio-distribution was evaluated. Therefore, not only is this data not relevant for the effective metabolism of the serum, but it must also be said that in vitro cells are much weaker, they no longer constitute that "formidable barrier"¹ of live cells which are part of a living organism, and therefore with in vitro cells something can be done.

I conclude this article with an emphasis on how the mRNA and these highly immunogenic synthetic lipids, which are deposited in the organs, are highly toxic and generate significant damage in the body. It was already clear that the fate of the mRNA-encapsulating LNPs was to deposit themselves in the organs, from where they are very difficult to clear:

“...large cationic LNPs fail to extravasate from the capillaries found in the lungs and cannot be filtered from the bloodstream by the kidney. This can lead to the accumulation of delivery materials in the liver, lungs, or other organs”²

And once in the organs, in all organs as we have seen, even if in different concentrations, these LNP particles manifest their iatrogenic character:

“...some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity…Another potential safety issue could derive from the presence of extracellular RNA during mRNA vaccination. Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema. Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation."³

Inflammation, autoimmunity, systemic oedema formation, pathogenic thrombus formation. I'd say this would be enough by itself!

But as the quote above already indicates, synthetic mRNA itself is a source of toxicity:

“...mRNA molecules are themselves a PAMP when delivered to cells exogenously....However, the intrinsic nature of these PAMPs may make it difficult to modulate the inflammatory profile or reactogenicity of...vaccines.”⁴

That is, the level of toxicity of the mRNA makes it difficult to control the inflammation generated and the reactivity, or stimulation of an uncontrolled response by the immune system, which, as we have seen, is the main reason for the vaccine's ineffectiveness and its dispersion in all organs in the form of nanoparticles. Let's not forget that in the same trial of the Pfizer Phase I/II vaccine, extensive damage was found in the guinea pigs:

“Related adverse events were reported by 25%...in the 10 μg group, [and by] 50% in the 30 μg and 100 μg groups.”⁵

And the dosage chosen by Pfizer for the human anti-Covid vaccine was that of 30 μg. Further, it has long been known that nucleoside analogues, i.e. synthetic mRNAs, “...demonstrated unexpected mitochondrial toxicity.”⁶

In this regard, the authors cite several articles”⁷, one of which, even dated 1995, where it was found that an artificial analogue nucleoside, developed to treat chronic hepatitis B, actually caused severe liver failure (hepatic failure) and lactic acidosis.⁸ This is what a recent article on the subject concludes: 

 “The flip side of the possibly beneficial adjuvant inflammation, however, is potential toxicity of the mRNA vaccines...Such toxicities...Such toxicities… have been seen with drugs that contain unnatural modified nucleosides. The clinical adverse effects have included myopathy (caused by mitochondrial toxicity), lactic acidosis, pancreatitis, lipodystrophy, liver steatosis, and nerve damage; certain ones have been fatal.”⁹

Pretty impressive as side effects go, including some fatal ones, and especially those that involve all the physiological domains, from muscles (myopathies) to the pancreas, to the liver to the nervous system all the way to lipid and glucose metabolism (lipodystrophy).

In short, we could go on for pages with data like this, because it is clear that all scientific articles, even the most recent ones, underline the broad-spectrum toxicity of both synthetic mRNA and LNP lipid compounds. Given these scientifically proven bases, the inability of the serum to enter the cell and produce the spike protein, together with its broad and high level of toxicity, that marketing authorisations should have been granted, and green passes and vaccination mandates imposed, is a crime that cries out for vengeance.

                                                             ***

1 Wadhwa A. et al., Opportunities and Challenges in the Delivery of mRNA-Based Vaccines,
Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 102.

2 Kowalski PS et al., Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery, Molecular Therapy Vol. 27 No 4 April 2019, p.5.

3 Pardi N. et al., mRNA vaccines – a new era in vaccinology, Nature Reviews/ Drug Discovery, Vol 17, April 2018, pp. 261-279, p. 275.

4 Pardi N. et al., mRNA vaccines – a new era in vaccinology, Nature Reviews/ Drug Discovery, Vol 17, April 2018, pp. 261-279, p. 262, p. 268. 5 Mulligan MJ et al., PhaseI/PhaseII study of Covid-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults, Nature, Vol 568, 22 Oct 2020, pp. 589-93.

6 Sahin U. et al., mRNA-based therapeutics - developing a new class of drugs, NATURE REVIEWS | DRUG DISCOVERY VOLUME 13 | OCTOBER 2014 | 759.

7 Lewis, W. et al. Fialuridine and its metabolites inhibit DNA polymerase γ at sites of multiple adjacent analog incorporation, decrease mtDNA abundance, and cause mitochondrial structural defects in cultured hepatoblasts, Proc. Nat.Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 3592–3597 (1996).

8 McKenzie R. et al.,Hepatic failure and lactic acidosis due to fialuridine (FIAU), an investigational nucleoside analogue for chronic hepatitis B. N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 1099–1105 (1995). The Japanese study would seem to disprove this liver toxicity, since the researchers conclude that the mRNA deposited in the liver did not cause liver toxicity. But the parameters of the toxicity test used are not declared, so this conclusion has no value.

9 Liu Margaret A., A Comparison of Plasmid DNA and mRNA as Vaccine Technologies, Vaccines 2019, 7, 37, p.8; che cita: Feng J.Y. et al, Insights into the Molecular Mechanism of Mitochondrial Toxicity by AIDS Drugs. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 23832–23837; Moyle, G. Toxicity of antiretroviral nucleoside and nucleotide analogues: Is mitochondrial toxicity the only mechanism? Drug Saf. 2000, 23, 467–481; Johnson A.A. et al., Toxicity of Antiviral Nucleoside Analogs and the Human Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 40847–40857.

Source: https://www.byoblu.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Lo-studio-giapponese-sulla-bio-distribuzione-del-vaccino-Pfizer.pdf

Translation: David Montoute

The West: An Elephant On Stilts?

 

 
Morgoth
October 8th

There’s a scene in The Matrix Reloaded in which Councillor Hamann engages Neo in conversation and suggests that they take a walk down to the engineering level of the real world city, curiously named ‘‘Zion’’. Hamann explains to Neo that he enjoys walking in the bowels of the engineering district late of an evening because it reminds him of the raw mechanics which keep their rogue city functioning. It is here the air is purified and it is here that the water is processed, it is here that the electricity is generated.

Hamann, as man of authority and power within Zion, has to be conscious of the machines keeping the citizens alive in a way that the citizens themselves do not. Indeed, almost nobody even considers that the air they breathe is being ran through mechanical processes which can, and sometimes do, breakdown. Hamann somewhat ominously tells Neo that it is only when machines breakdown that people become conscious of them.

Similarly, we can think of a young lady enjoying caviar and champagne on the upper decks of the Titanic. She has the luxury of being entirely oblivious to the thought, skill and technical brilliance which went into keeping her ice-cream cold and her tea warm.

I have absolutely no idea how any of the technology I’m using to write this article works, non of it. Now, fair enough, I do tend to comedown on the ‘‘technophobe’’ side of things. I have no doubt that many readers could explain how the keyboard works or how Substack’s hosting works or the manner in which the content flows through the interwebs to and from Silicone Valley — if it even does that — but by and large this may as well be magic to me. I am not unlike the young lady on the Titanic who takes it as a given that she can order ice-cream while sitting in a giant metal tub floating (temporarily) on the Atlantic ocean.

There are many secrets and mysteries lying dormant on the cold and remote seabed of the Atlantic ocean. The Titanic is one, and as I learned recently, the internet cables connecting Europe to America are another. Though, when I say ‘‘learned’’ I think I was aware of it, I just hadn’t really thought about it very much because…who cares?

But then I did think about it. The reality we inhabit in the 21st Century is defined by the internet. Our economic systems, communications grids and supply lines are all built on the infrastructure of the interconnected world offered by the internet. It is perhaps the pinnacle of Faustian achievement, space has finally been collapsed entirely and been made irrelevant. The only problem is that this engineering miracle is bobbing about under water with crabs scuttling across it.

An older CNN article describes it thus:

“Before the cable-laying vessels go out they send out another specialized ship that maps the sea floor in the area when they want to go,” said TeleGeography’s Stronge. “They want to avoid areas where there’s a lot of undersea currents, certainly want to avoid volcanic areas, and avoid a lot of elevation change on the sea floor.”

Once the route is plotted and checked, and the shore connections are secure, huge cable laying ships begin passing out the equipment.’’

What they mean by ‘‘elevation change’’ is the uncomfortable reality that perhaps the most vital infrastructure of the Western world is hanging over the side of underwater cliffs, no doubt draped with seaweed and molluscs. This, along with the volcanoes(!) are somewhat problematic and need to be avoided. However, the Atlantic Ocean is not a flat sandy expanse, it has mountain ranges, gorges and deep valleys, across all of which the internet cables dangle precariously with our finances, friendships and information being transmitted within.

 

An actual internet cable under the Atlantic  

It is not my intention here to speculate on what could go wrong, but to illustrate that we in the West are becoming increasingly conscious of the infrastructure upon which our reality is built. I use the word ‘‘reality’’ here intentionally because that is what I mean, rather than material comfort or wealth. Our reality, how we process and understand life, has largely been based an a priori assumption of technological innovation which became so all encompassing we forgot it even existed, or at least fell into a mode of taking it for granted.

As a boy I always felt that the Christmas lights added a sense of the sacred and magical to the living-room. Our mundane council house was, for a few weeks each year ‘‘enchanted’’ with tinsel and sparkling lights. Each year on New Year’s Day my mother would remove all of the decorations, returning life— my reality— to the drab norm. I was particularly despondent when I saw the once twinkling Christmas lights reduced to clumps of tangled grey wiring in shoe-boxes.

The lights have been twinkling for a very long time in the West but now we’re starting to notice that the tinsel is just string with plastic attached and that the snow comes out of a spray can.

This time last year I was only vaguely aware of what potassium nitrate was, now I do know what it is because it is in short supply and could very well lead to food shortages. The times of plenty largely relied on intensity farming using chemical compounds such as nitrogen, potash and phosphates. It isn’t just the Russia/Ukraine war which is interfering with the supply of these crucial materials, the ever present (and very often hidden) hand of the Climate Change Agenda is also at work.

It is not uncommon for Western dissidents to somewhat mockingly invoke the phrase ‘‘Bread and circuses’’ when describing what keeps the masses subdued. However, more often than not it is the circuses which are the focus of attention and not the bread. Which is to say, the academic, entertainment and media complex which drives ideology and not the foodstuffs and material conditions used to keep bellies full and riots and revolutions to a minimum. 

The Roman ‘‘corn dole’’ was originally a temporary measure which ended up becoming a permanent feature of Roman life, for centuries. However that corn had to be imported primarily (but not exclusively) from Egypt. This, then, seems pretty straightforward — except those grain supplies had to cross the pirate infested waters of the Mediterranean. In order to prevent their precious food supplies falling into the hands of pirates the Romans had to maintain strategic dominance of the Mediterranean Sea. This required ships, and men to man the ships, those men had to be paid and their pay would have to be in money which was actually worth something.

The genius of the Roman Empire was that they managed to hold this vast and intricate system together for 700 years(!)

Implicit within a term such as ‘‘bread and circuses’’ is the understanding that a managerial elite will see to the affairs of state and that the masses should simply not concern themselves with pirates or inflation or a shortage of timber for the ship-yards or that the crops failed. The idea was to keep the public in a somewhat child-like state of innocence while responsibility was outsourced to others.

To return to my earlier analogy, the gentle glow of the Christmas tree lights occupied the public, not the cable extension and sockets.

Western dissidents have spent years pointing out the ideological flaws and injustices of the West. Its hypocrisy and double standards, its lies and its falsehoods and contradictions. In the last five years or so in particular we’ve witnessed a fraying of the fabric which binds the West together in an intellectual sense. Institutions were corrupt, science was corrupted, active policy was founded on falsehoods and it was all increasingly obvious. This then in turn resulted in mass-censorship which is itself a betrayal of a core Western, liberal value.

Western political life was seen as being bankrupt and merely a matter of might-makes-right and Machiavellian power-plays. Here too the machinery, the reality, was laid bare and the political class hardly even seemed to care, you can always just be censored anyway.

This disillusionment with the intolerably politicized and downright moronic mainstream of Western intellectual life is, in my view, now being mirrored in the material realm of infrastructure and supply-chains.

The circuses turned out to be freak-shows and now we’re noticing that the bread is turning into maggot protein blocks.

The (many) centres of power which sprawl across the Western world would prefer that you didn’t notice the elections being rigged or the persecution of heretical ideas or the nonsensical policies enacted in response to emergencies. And yet even the means by which these so-called ‘‘culture wars’’ can be conducted are now being revealed to us as just cables dangling over crevices under the Atlantic Ocean. The prole-feed which keeps us fat and lethargic is reliant on fertilizers supplied by countries we want to destroy and our energy supplies are in an even more precarious situation than the internet cables.

In a recent essay I asked the question ‘‘Can woke values survive without central heating?’’. Just a few months later and I’m asking myself what a civilization based entirely on materialism and consumption can ground itself in if the products and comfort end?

In his 1948 painting ‘‘The Elephants’’ Salvador Dali invites us to contemplate the fleeting nature and tenuousness of power. Upon first glance The Elephants seems typically nonsensical and surrealist. However, upon closer inspection something else is revealed to us. The elephants are a symbol of power and majesty, they appear almost to hover above the earth, defying gravity as indeed the obelisks (phallic symbolism) floating above their backs actually do. The question we’re asking ourselves subconsciously is, is this a snapshot frozen in time? or is this is a permanent state of affairs? The elephant on the right in the painting appears to be a little off-balance as if its about to face-plant into the ground.

Gazing into Dali’s painting it’s difficult not to look at those extraordinarily spindly, vulnerable legs propping up the elephants and not be once again reminded of those pipelines and internet cables which, let us be honest, they do resemble.

In our world elephants cannot walk on stilts, but, we are told, men can get pregnant. People form their entire identities and worldviews based upon algorithmic stimulation being carried through cables under the sea powered by electric power-grids controlled by people whom they want overthrown or killed.

Progress, the idea of progress as an end in and of itself, is here put into perspective. Dali’s elephants are a welcome and much needed antidote to the all pervasive mindset that progress, ideological and technological, is inevitable. To believe it is inevitable is to convince yourself that Dali’s painting is one of permanence and not a snapshot taken a second before the elephants crash into a heap on the ground.

The linear view of history which forms the core of the‘‘progressive’’ worldview is not just reliant on ideological factors, but on material infrastructure too. It depends on more stilts being used to bolster the bulk of an ever greater elephant. In a recent speech the geopolitical analyst Peter Zeihan casually noted that Germany’s energy crisis was so chronic that ‘‘Germany will never be coming back’’. And it isn’t just Germans who will be sitting in the cold this winter, and it won’t be just this winter either.

The cyclical reality of history is dragging the progressive, linear view of history kicking and screaming into a downwards trajectory. This, on the one hand, is a very dangerous period because the progressive mind will look for ever more extreme and barbaric ways to defy the course of history, perhaps they’ll try a ‘‘Great Reset’’ or two to change course.

On the other hand, I’m not as worried about having the same living standards as my great grandmother as I am of living in a digital Gulag as a transhuman abomination eating Uncle Bill’s synthetic meat.

Fundamentally, the existential crisis brought about by the end of progress is for the progressive liberals to face, not reactionaries or nationalists or traditionalists.

It won’t be pretty, but it’s better to be on the ground than on the back of an elephant on stilts.

Source: https://morgoth.substack.com/p/the-west-an-elephant-on-stilts

Swiss naturopath creates an “unvaxxed blood bank ”

 

 

FranceSoir

December 7th [Lire en français]

Rejection of the Covid vaccine has now taken a another form. “Horrified” by Covid-vaccinated blood, George Della Dietra, a Swiss naturopath, has founded Safe Blood Donation, a non-profit organization whose goal is to establish a matchmaking service between applicants and non-vaccinated blood donors and, eventually, to set up a blood bank from non-vaccinated donors. In New Zealand, two parents who refused to allow their sick child to receive “vaccinated blood” partially lost custody of the child this Wednesday, December 7th.

George Della Dietra expressed in a statement his "horror" after studying blood from a Covid vaccine recipient. “I've never seen blood like this. That was, to be honest, the main reason I started this whole thing, because when I saw this I was so horrified,” he said. He said he was convinced that "this whole vaccination thing" is intended to "control people". He believes that anyone who has not been vaccinated has the right to receive blood that does not contain the mRNA technology. .

By creating Safe Blood Donation, this naturopath thus explains his desire to be “a platform for people who want a free choice of blood donors... whether they think that there is a real conspiracy, that the New World Order is taking over, or whether they just say they don't want that blood for whatever reason,” he said.

 

“Putting pressure on the authorities”

The task looks daunting. According to the New York Times, approximately 71.1% of the world's population has already received at least one Covid vaccine dose. In the United States, a September 2021 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association claims that 83.3% of blood donations had combined antibodies due to vaccination. "I get hundreds of emails asking me, 'Do you have blood, because I have to have surgery in three weeks,'" Della Dietra said.

In addition to creating “non-vaccinated” blood banks, SafeBlood Donation, which has members in at least 16 countries, intends to “pressure hospitals and health authorities around the world to allow “directed donations” of blood” not containing traces of the vaccine, explains its founder. The members of this organisation are therefore asking the authorities to modify their policies. “As soon as we have enough medical partners (for the application, collection and treatment of blood), we will start with mediation,” says its founder.

The medical authorities do not authorise these “directed donations”. The health authorities of several countries, such as the United States or Canada, say that there is “no risk in receiving blood from people who have been vaccinated”. In addition to this, the reception of blood donations in the transfusion centers is not organised according to the vaccination status of the donors.

New Zealand couple lose custody of their child

Cases of unvaccinated people requesting blood donations from the unvaccinated have been increasingly since last summer. In New Zealand, a couple lost custody of their four-month-old son on Wednesday (December 7th) because of their refusal to allow him to receive blood from donors who were vaccinated prior to heart operations.

The four-month-old infant has pulmonary valve stenosis and surgery has been delayed. Their request for a "non-vaccinated" blood transfusion for their child was rejected because hospitals in New Zealand do not separate donated blood according to the donors' vaccination status.

The parents, accused of "conspiracy theory" by the lawyer of the opposing party, have temporarily lost custody of their child. The courts have granted hte request of the authorities to give them partial custody of the baby. So the couple will retain authority over their child, except in medical matters. 

 

 

 

                                                             

Source: https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/la-transfusion-de-sang-vaccine-rejetee-une-organisation-suisse-veut-creer-des-banques

Scientists world-wide debate discovery of Nanotech found in COVID jabs & strange structures found in vaxxed Blood

Rhoda Wilson
December 6, 2022

A little more than a week ago, International Crimes Investigative Committee (“ICIC”), hosted by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Dr Mike Yeadon, held a discussion with four experts on nanotechnology and self-assembling structures in mRNA injections.  The panel of experts comprised Dr. David Nixon, Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, Karen Kingston and Shimon Yanowitz.

Yesterday, ICIC Dr. Fuellmich hosted a second discussion, following on from the first, to discuss with Holger Reißner and Klaus Retzlaff what the observed phenomena and structures in the blood of people who have had an mRNA injection are all about.

As most will now be aware, there was a recent split in the Corona Investigative Committee.  Our aim is not to go into details about that here.  If you haven’t been following events you can start with details as documented HERE.  In response to the “vicious and treacherous assault” against him, Dr. Fuellmich has come back fighting by launching the ICIC.  You can follow ICIC on their Telegram channel HERE or their video channel HERE.

Nanotechnology: self-assembly structures in mRNA-injections

Using dark-field microscopy, Dr. Nixon has examined blood samples from people who have been injected with mRNA-based substances and explains the results with corresponding images. Crystalline, unnatural structures are revealed, which change in further observation and show characteristics of a kind of nano- or micro-technology.

Dr. Mihalcea is intensively involved with the ingredients of the Covid mRNA substances. In particular, also with the so-called “shedding effect” of which it is assumed that harmful excretions can be transferred from “vaccinated” people to the “unvaccinated.”

Kingston, whose research interests include toxicology and the analysis of clinical data as well as the ingredients of the covid mRNA substances, complains that all measures regarding a functioning quality assurance management in the administration of a so-called novel “vaccination” to billions of people worldwide have failed and are still not being implemented after the already poor data situation.

For electrical engineer Shimon Yanowitz, the results of his research have shown that it is a kind of micro-technology, as the injected substances change strangely in the human body and have characteristics of electronic circuits. It is also disturbing that the lipid nanoparticles found in the substances have been approved as “technical devices”, as Karen Kingston reports.

For a bit of background, below is a list of relevant articles we have previously published on these topics:

• Nanostructures in Covid “Vaccines” are Not Self-Assembling; they are Being Constructed by Micro-Machines
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately
• Covid “Tests” and “Vaccines” Are Delivering a Hybrid Biological/Technological Weapon Which is Activated By 5G, Fibre Optics and Light
• Dr. Shimon Yanowitz Discusses Covid Injection Vial Contents – We are in a Genocidal War

This was the first of ICIC’s episodes on self-assembling structures in mRNA injections.  Below is an edited 20-minute clip from the 2 hr 30 min session.  You can watch the full session on ICIC’s video channel HERE or Rumble HERE. 

ICIC Covid Vaccines – Nanotech self-assembling structures within them, 27 November 2022 (20 mins)

Self-assembly structures in mRNA injections: natural or created after all

After the first episode on self-assembling structures in mRNA injections, the second part deals, among other things, with the question of whether these self-assembling structures are of natural origin or could be created after all. Is it possibly a biological weapon or a combination in the context of so-called gain-of-function research?

In this second episode, Holger Reißner, European Industrial Engineer for Research and Development and Klaus Retzlaff, Doctor of Physics and Therapist, spokesperson for the Vaccination Experts Working Group report their research findings. They use images and video material to show what the observed phenomena and structures in the blood of people who have had an mRNA injection are all about.

Are there graphene oxide and other impurities in the mRNA substances? What is it about cortisol crystals and toxic nano lipids that can be identified? Can our DNA be altered by them? What are the known side effects of mRNA injections? In which time windows do they occur, and what conclusions can be drawn from the available statistical data? What is the state of knowledge regarding correlations between mRNA injections and external influences, such as radio waves, 5G and other electromagnetic influences? What can those affected do to minimise damage to their health and where can they find support?

Many questions of this kind and further insights were discussed.  Also discussed were ways out of fear and towards personal responsibility.

You can watch this episode below or on ICIC’s video channel HERE.

ICIC Backup: Self-assembly structures in mRNA-injections: natural or created after all, 4 December 2022 (85 minutes)

 

Source: https://expose-news.com/2022/12/06/researchers-discuss-nanotechnology-and-structures/ 

Crisis energética: una estrategia largamente planificada para desmantelar las economías industriales en nombre de una distópica ‘agenda verde’

 

 

La mayoría de la gente está desconcertada por lo que es una crisis energética mundial, con los precios del petróleo, el gas y el carbón que se disparan simultáneamente y que incluso obligan a cerrar grandes plantas industriales como las de productos químicos o de aluminio o acero. La Administración Biden y la UE han insistido en que todo se debe a las acciones militares de Putin y Rusia en Ucrania. Esto no es así. La crisis energética es una estrategia largamente planificada por los círculos empresariales y políticos occidentales para desmantelar las economías industriales en nombre de una distópica Agenda Verde. Como documenta F. William Engdahl, esta agenda tiene tiene sus raíces en años anteriores a febrero de 2022, cuando Rusia lanzó su acción militar en Ucrania.

 

WilliamEngdahl

18 de noviembre de 2022 [Read in English]

En enero de 2020, en vísperas de los devastadores cierres de covacha desde el punto de vista económico y social, el director general del mayor fondo de inversión del mundo, Larry Fink, de Blackrock, publicó una carta dirigida a sus colegas de Wall Street y a los directores generales de las empresas sobre el futuro de los flujos de inversión. En el documento, modestamente titulado “Una remodelación fundamental de las finanzas”, Fink, que gestiona el mayor fondo de inversión del mundo, con unos 7 billones de dólares gestionados en ese momento, anunció un cambio radical para la inversión empresarial. El dinero “se volvería verde”. En su carta de 2020, muy seguida, Fink declaró: “En un futuro próximo -y antes de lo que la mayoría prevé- habrá una reasignación significativa del capital… El riesgo climático es un riesgo de inversión”. Además, declaró: “Todos los gobiernos, empresas y accionistas deben enfrentarse al cambio climático”.

En otra carta dirigida a los clientes inversores de Blackrock, Fink presentó la nueva agenda de inversión de capital. Declaró que Blackrock saldrá de ciertas inversiones con altas emisiones de carbono, como el carbón, la mayor fuente de electricidad para EE.UU. y muchos otros países. Añadió que Blackrock examinaría las nuevas inversiones en petróleo, gas y carbón para determinar su adhesión a la “sostenibilidad” de la Agenda 2030 de la ONU.

Fink dejó claro que el mayor fondo del mundo comenzaría a desinvertir en petróleo, gas y carbón. “Con el tiempo”, escribió Fink, “las empresas y los gobiernos que no respondan a las partes interesadas y aborden los riesgos de sostenibilidad se encontrarán con un creciente escepticismo de los mercados y, a su vez, con un mayor coste de capital.” Añadió que “el cambio climático se ha convertido en un factor definitorio de las perspectivas a largo plazo de las empresas… estamos al borde de una remodelación fundamental de las finanzas”.

A partir de ahí, la llamada inversión ESG, que penaliza a las empresas emisoras de CO2 como ExxonMobil, se ha puesto de moda entre los hedge funds y los bancos y fondos de inversión de Wall Street, incluidos State Street y Vanguard. Tal es el poder de Blackrock. Fink también consiguió que cuatro nuevos miembros del consejo de administración de ExxonMobil se comprometieran a acabar con el negocio del petróleo y el gas de la empresa.

La carta de Fink de enero de 2020 fue una declaración de guerra de las grandes finanzas contra la industria energética convencional. BlackRock fue miembro fundador del Grupo de Trabajo sobre Divulgaciones Financieras Relacionadas con el Clima (el TCFD) y es firmante de los Principios de Inversión Responsable de la ONU, una red de inversores apoyada por la ONU que impulsa la inversión en carbono cero utilizando los criterios ESG -medioambientales, sociales y de gobernanza- altamente corruptos en las decisiones de inversión. No existe un control objetivo sobre los datos fak de los ESG de una empresa. Además Blackrock firmó la declaración del Vaticano de 2019 que aboga por los regímenes de precios del carbono. BlackRock también se unió en 2020 a Climate Action 100, una coalición de casi 400 gestores de inversiones que gestionan 40 billones de dólares.

Con esa fatídica carta del director general de enero de 2020, Larry Fink puso en marcha una colosal desinversión en el billonario sector mundial del petróleo y el gas. Notablemente, ese mismo año Fink, de BlackRock, fue nombrado miembro del Consejo de Administración del distópico Foro Económico Mundial de Klaus Schwab, el nexo corporativo y político de la Agenda 2030 de la ONU con cero emisiones de carbono. En junio de 2019, el Foro Económico Mundial y las Naciones Unidas firmaron un marco de asociación estratégica para acelerar la implementación de la Agenda 2030. El FEM cuenta con una plataforma de Inteligencia Estratégica que incluye los 17 Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible de la Agenda 2030.

En su carta de director general de 2021, Fink redobló el ataque al petróleo, el gas y el carbón. “Dado lo fundamental que será la transición energética para las perspectivas de crecimiento de cada empresa, pedimos a las empresas que revelen un plan sobre cómo su modelo de negocio será compatible con una economía neta cero”, escribió Fink. Otro directivo de BlackRock dijo en una reciente conferencia sobre energía que “donde vaya BlackRock, otros le seguirán”.

En sólo dos años, se estima que en 2022 se habrá salido de la inversión en exploración y desarrollo de petróleo y gas a nivel mundial un billón de dólares. La extracción de petróleo es un negocio caro y el corte de la inversión externa por parte de BlackRock y otros inversores de Wall Street supone la muerte lenta de la industria.

                                                                Larry Fink

Biden, ¿un presidente de BlackRock?

Al principio de su entonces deslucida candidatura presidencial, Biden tuvo una reunión a puerta cerrada a finales de 2019 con Fink, quien supuestamente le dijo al candidato que “estoy aquí para ayudar.” Después de su fatídica reunión con Fink de BlackRock, el candidato Biden anunció: “Vamos a deshacernos de los combustibles fósiles…” En diciembre de 2020, incluso antes de que Biden tomara posesión de su cargo en enero de 2021, nombró a Brian Deese, jefe global de inversiones sostenibles de BlackRock, como asistente del presidente y director del Consejo Económico Nacional. Aquí, Deese, que desempeñó un papel clave para Obama en la redacción del Acuerdo Climático de París en 2015, ha dado forma silenciosamente a la guerra de Biden contra la energía.

Esto ha sido catastrófico para la industria del petróleo y el gas. Deese, el hombre de Fink, participó activamente en la entrega al nuevo presidente Biden de una lista de medidas antipetroleras para que las firmara por orden ejecutiva a partir del primer día de enero de 2021. Eso incluía el cierre del enorme oleoducto Keystone XL, que llevaría 830.000 barriles diarios desde Canadá hasta las refinerías de Texas, y la detención de cualquier nuevo arrendamiento en el Refugio Nacional de Vida Silvestre del Ártico (ANWR). Biden también se reincorporó al Acuerdo Climático de París que Deese había negociado para Obama en 2015 y que Trump canceló.

El mismo día, Biden puso en marcha un cambio del llamado “Coste Social del Carbono” que impone un castigo de 51 dólares por tonelada de CO2 a la industria del petróleo y el gas. Esa medida, establecida bajo la autoridad puramente ejecutiva sin el consentimiento del Congreso, está suponiendo un coste devastador para la inversión en petróleo y gas en Estados Unidos, un país que sólo dos años antes era el mayor productor de petróleo del mundo.

Acabar con la capacidad de las refinerías

Peor aún, las agresivas normas medioambientales de Biden y los mandatos de inversión ESG de BlackRock están acabando con la capacidad de las refinerías estadounidenses. Sin refinerías, no importa cuántos barriles de petróleo se tomen de la Reserva Estratégica de Petróleo. En los dos primeros años de la presidencia de Biden, EE.UU. ha cerrado alrededor de un millón de barriles diarios de capacidad de refinado de gasolina y diésel, en parte debido al colapso de la demanda covada, el descenso más rápido de la historia de EE.UU. Los cierres son permanentes. En 2023 se cerrará una capacidad adicional de 1,7 millones de barriles diarios como resultado de la desinversión de BlackRock y Wall Street y de las regulaciones de Biden.

Citando la fuerte desinversión de Wall Street en el petróleo y las políticas antipetróleo de Biden, el director general de Chevron declaró en junio de 2022 que no cree que Estados Unidos vuelva a construir otra refinería nueva.

Larry Fink, miembro de la Junta del Foro Económico Mundial de Klaus Schwab, se une a la UE, cuya presidenta de la Comisión de la UE, la notoriamente corrupta Ursula von der Leyen, dejó la Junta del FEM en 2019 para convertirse en jefa de la Comisión de la UE. Su primer acto importante en Bruselas fue impulsar la agenda de la UE Zero Carbon Fit for 55. Eso ha impuesto importantes impuestos sobre el carbono y otras restricciones sobre el petróleo, el gas y el carbón en la UE mucho antes de las acciones rusas de febrero de 2022 en Ucrania. El impacto combinado de la fraudulenta agenda ESG de Fink en el gobierno de Biden y la locura de Carbono Cero de la UE está creando la peor crisis energética y de inflación de la historia.

 

Fuente: http://www.williamengdahl.com/gr15November2022.php a través de https://trikooba.org/crisis-energetica-una-estrategia-largamente-planificada-por-circulos-empresariales-y-politicos-occidentales-para-desmantelar-las-economias-industriales-en-nombre-de-una-distopica-agenda-verde/