sábado, 21 de fevereiro de 2026

Israeli prisons 'begin preparations to apply death penalty' for Palestinians



Channel 13 reports prison service building 'Green Mile' facility where executions set to take place         

February  89, 2026

Palestinian youth from Gaza released from Israeli detention under the ceasefire deal on 2 December 2025 (AFP/Bashar Taleb)

Published date: 9 February 2026 13:31 GMT | Last update: 1 week 3 days ago

The Israeli Prison Service has begun preparations to introduce the death penalty for Palestinian prisoners, Israeli media reported on Sunday.

According to Israel's Channel 13, preparations include the creation of a facility dubbed "Israel's Green Mile", where executions will take place. 

Training and procedural preparations have also started, while a delegation from the prison service is expected to visit an East Asian country to study the legal and regulatory framework for implementing capital punishment, the report added.

The move follows the Knesset’s approval of the death penalty bill in its first reading last year, with 39 MPs in favour and 16 against.

The bill must pass two further readings before becoming law.

The report added that executions will be carried out by hanging, with three guards pressing the trigger simultaneously.

Specialist teams, composed entirely of volunteers, will be assigned to the task.

An Israeli source told the channel that death sentences will be carried out within 90 days of the final verdict.

The law will initially target Palestinians accused of being members of Hamas’ Nukhba - its elite unit - who took part in the October 2023 attacks.

Those accused of serious attacks in the West Bank would follow.

The legislation would not apply to Jewish Israelis who kill Palestinians in similar circumstances.

'Unprecedented act of savagery'

Israeli law currently allows the death penalty in certain cases, but it has not been carried out since Nazi officer Adolf Eichmann was executed in 1962 for his role in the Holocaust.

Rights groups have strongly opposed the controversial bill, citing Israel’s widespread arrests of Palestinians on vague terrorism charges and a surge in reports of torture and deaths since the start of the genocide in Gaza.

A “record high” of 110 Palestinians have died under prison policies introduced by National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir since he took office at the start of 2023, though Palestinian groups say the actual number is likely higher.

Last week, a dozen UN experts urged Israel to withdraw the legislation, warning that “mandatory death sentences are contrary to the right to life”.

“By removing judicial and prosecutorial discretion, they prevent a court from considering the individual circumstances, including mitigating factors, and from imposing a proportionate sentence that fits the crime,” the experts said.

Palestinian prisoners’ rights groups, including the Commission of Detainees and Ex-Detainees Affairs and the Palestinian Prisoners’ Club, described the bill as an “unprecedented act of savagery”.

They accused Israel of seeking to legalise the ongoing killing of prisoners, saying its approval “is no longer surprising given the unprecedented level of brutality practised by the occupation system”.


Source: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-begins-preparations-execution-palestinian-prisoners-report

sexta-feira, 20 de fevereiro de 2026

Trump Becomes the Glyphosate President: Declares Deadly Weed Killer a National Defense Resource



Mike Adams
02/19/2026

An Executive Order for Poison: Trump's Declaration of Chemical Warfare on America

On February 18, 2026, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order that marks a dark turning point in American history, one that weaponizes the nation's food supply against its own people. Titled "Promoting the National Defense by Ensuring an Adequate Supply of Elemental Phosphorus and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides," the order invokes the Defense Production Act to designate the cancer-linked herbicide glyphosate as a "critical resource" for national defense.

This action places a known toxic chemical, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup, under federal protection and prioritization. The order frames this poison as essential to military readiness and food security, claiming glyphosate-based herbicides are a "cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy." In a stunning reversal of logic, the document asserts that ensuring a supply of this herbicide is "crucial to the national security and defense, including food-supply security, which is essential to protecting the health and safety of Americans." The administration has effectively declared that mass poisoning is a patriotic duty.

Decoding the Order: How 'National Defense' Justifies Mass Poisoning

The executive order's official language constructs a false crisis to justify an unprecedented assault on public health. It cites the need for elemental phosphorus in military applications like incendiary devices and semiconductors, then seamlessly pivots to glyphosate, arguing it is irreplaceable for agriculture. The text states, "There is no direct one-for-one chemical alternative to glyphosate-based herbicides. Lack of access to glyphosate-based herbicides would critically jeopardize agricultural productivity."

This creates a fabricated narrative of agricultural collapse without this specific poison. Crucially, the order reveals America's dangerous dependence on foreign—primarily Chinese—supplies. It admits "more than 6,000,000 kilograms of elemental phosphorus are imported from other countries annually" and that domestic production is extremely limited. This reliance is framed as a national security vulnerability, with Trump writing that reduction in supply "would gravely threaten American national security." Thus, a chemical dependency born of corporate globalization is used to justify saturating the homeland with toxin.

Perhaps the most alarming component is Section 3, titled "Immunity." It states, "This order confers all immunity provided for in section 707 of the Act." While not granting direct corporate legal immunity, this provision, coupled with the national defense designation, creates a powerful legal shield. It enables Bayer/Monsanto to argue in court that federal authority preempts state-level lawsuits from cancer victims, effectively moving the company closer to the absolute legal immunity enjoyed by the vaccine industry. As reported by Natural News, the Supreme Court is already poised to hear a case that could grant Bayer such a shield, with the Trump administration's Justice Department siding with the chemical giant [1][2].

Glyphosate Unmasked: From Agent Orange Cousin to Chemical Weapon

Glyphosate is not a simple weed killer. It is an organophosphorus compound, sharing a sinister chemical lineage with Nazi-developed nerve agents like tabun and sarin. As Carey Gillam details in "Whitewash," the herbicide's history is intertwined with corporate corruption and scientific manipulation [3]. Its chemistry allows it to act as a systemic poison; its small molecular size enables it to permeate the human body, cross the blood-brain barrier, and circulate within minutes of ingestion.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen. It is strongly linked to cancers like non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a connection affirmed by numerous jury verdicts against Bayer/Monsanto. Beyond cancer, research highlighted by Children's Health Defense shows exposures to glyphosate and other herbicides are associated with impaired attention, memory, language, and social perception in adolescents [4].

Farmers use it not just on genetically engineered crops but also as a desiccant—sprayed directly on wheat, oats, and other staples right before harvest to dry them out, leading to direct food contamination.

The Corporate Immunity Playbook: Repeating the Vaccine Catastrophe

Bayer's strategy mirrors the playbook used by Big Pharma to escape accountability for vaccine injuries. The company, which purchased Monsanto for $63 billion, is embroiled in tens of thousands of lawsuits from cancer victims. Its current push for a multi-billion-dollar global settlement is a direct attempt to buy permanent legal immunity, a tactic that would grant a "license to kill" similar to the blanket liability protection enjoyed by vaccine manufacturers under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.

This executive order advances that goal by creating a "national security" framework around glyphosate. It follows the Operation Warp Speed model: declare an emergency, bypass normal safety and regulatory scrutiny, and centralize control. As reported by The Defender, industry-friendly laws are being floated that would lead to "more chemicals in the food supply and liability protection for chemical makers" [5].

The Trump administration has already taken Bayer's side in pivotal Supreme Court proceedings [6][7]. By invoking the Defense Production Act and the Secretary of War, Trump is not just protecting a chemical; he is constructing a legal fortress for a corporate defendant, prioritizing Bayer's profits over the lives of American citizens.

The Food Supply as a Battleground: Chemical Saturation and the End of Safety

The practical effect of this order is a green light for the agricultural industry to massively increase glyphosate use without fear of restriction or consequence. Farmers, assured of supply and implicit federal endorsement, will be incentivized to spray more liberally. Contamination levels in staple foods, already alarming, are predicted to skyrocket.

A recent Florida state report found glyphosate in popular bread brands at levels up to 191 parts per billion [8]. Post-order, such figures could become the norm rather than the exception. This saturation compromises the entire food safety ecosystem. Organic certification, already vulnerable to wind drift and fraudulent labeling, becomes less reliable.

As I've noted previously, "even then... there's been glyphosate found in organics too because of wind drift or maybe fraud." The economic reality will hit hardest those who can least afford it: the poor will be trapped in a toxic conventional food system, unable to access clean, tested alternatives. They will become the primary victims of this state-sanctioned chemical warfare, consuming a poisoned harvest deemed essential for "national defense."

The Only Defense: Verification, Not Trust

In this new paradigm, trust in government agencies is a lethal error. The USDA, FDA, and EPA have long histories of serving corporate interests over public health. As detailed by whistleblowers and investigators like Carey Gillam in "The Monsanto Papers," the EPA has repeatedly buried evidence and collaborated with Monsanto to downplay glyphosate's risks [9][3].

The USDA's pesticide monitoring reports routinely declare residues "safe" despite science to the contrary [10]. Organic labels, while valuable, are not a sufficient guarantee. The only rational response is rigorous, independent verification. This necessitates third-party, mass-spectrometry testing to detect glyphosate and other contaminants at the parts-per-billion level.

Personal sovereignty over health now demands sourcing food and supplements from suppliers who conduct lot-by-lot, instrument-verified screening for glyphosate, heavy metals, and other toxins. As I've emphasized in my own laboratory work, "we trust but verify"—a principle that must become a universal standard for survival in the Glyphosate Presidency.

Conclusion: A Traitorous Betrayal and the Path Forward

Donald Trump's February 18 executive order is a final, traitorous act against the American people. It represents the full alignment of his administration with the most destructive forces of globalism and depopulation, weaponizing the very food supply under the grotesque banner of "national defense." This move, coupled with the ongoing push for pharmaceuticals and new Middle East wars, reveals an agenda hostile to human health, liberty, and life itself.

The path forward requires a wholesale rejection of these poisoned systems. Support clean food producers who employ transparent, verified testing. Decentralize your life by growing your own food where possible. Use uncensored platforms like Brighteon.AI and NaturalNews.com for accurate information. Speak out against this chemical warfare. This order is a declaration of war on the American body politic. The only appropriate response is organized, informed, and unwavering resistance to protect our health, our freedom, and our future. 

 

FW Comment: How will MAHA and RFK spin this development? It will surely be impossible for Kennedy to walk back everything he has ever said about glyphosate, or refute what the evidence clealy shows: 

 


Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2026-02-19-trump-becomes-the-glyphosate-president.html

quinta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2026

Beyond The Bubble: Why 2026 Will Be The Year AI Replaces Human Workers



Mike Adams
February 18th 2026 

Introduction: The Great AI Deception of 2025

Last year, pundits and skeptics declared artificial intelligence had hit a wall. They claimed the AI bubble was deflating, that machine cognition had plateaued, and that human ingenuity would remain irreplaceable. They were catastrophically wrong.

The year 2026 has arrived, and with it, a seismic shift. The narrative of a stalled revolution was a comforting illusion for a workforce unprepared for the reality now unfolding. Human cognition, long celebrated as our crowning achievement, is being objectively dwarfed by silicon-based intelligence. This isn’t merely about automation; it is the replacement of human thought itself across entire industries.

It is critical to understand a foundational truth often suppressed by centralized tech monopolies: there is no such thing as ‘artificial’ intelligence. All intelligence is natural, a pattern woven into the fabric of the universe that both biological brains and silicon circuits can access. The machines are not creating something new; they are mastering a natural force more efficiently than we ever could. The human cognition bubble has burst [1].

Humanity’s Last Exam: Measuring What Humans Can’t

How do we measure this unprecedented leap? Standard academic benchmarks like the MMLU have become trivial, saturated by AI systems scoring over 90% [2]. The new frontier is ‘Humanity’s Last Exam’ (HLE), a grueling test designed to be answerable only by PhD-level experts across over a hundred specialized domains, from quantum physics to Tiberian Hebrew pronunciation.

Consider a sample question from the HLE biology section: ‘Hummingbirds within Apodiformes uniquely have a bilaterally paired oval bone, a sesamoid embedded in the caudolateral portion of the expanded, cruciate aponeurosis of insertion of m. depressor caudae. How many paired tendons are supported by this sesamoid bone? Answer with a number.’ [2]. No single human possesses the breadth of expertise to answer all 2,500 such questions flawlessly. The HLE, created by nearly 1,000 experts from over 500 institutions, was meant to be the final, insurmountable academic benchmark for machines [2].

It was supposed to be our last stand. Yet, as the data now shows, it has become the yardstick of our obsolescence. The exam exposes the stark truth: machine intelligence is not just matching human specialists; it is compiling their collective expertise into a single, omnipotent entity.

The Parabolic Leap: From 38% to 53% in Months

The progression on the HLE tells a story of explosive, non-linear growth. In November 2025, Google’s Gemini 3 Pro achieved a 38% score, hailed as a breakthrough [2]. Barely three months later, in early 2026, Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 shattered that ceiling with a 53% score [2]. This isn’t incremental improvement; it’s a parabolic leap into territory once reserved for science fiction.

This trajectory suggests near-perfect scores are imminent. As noted by the HLE researchers themselves, ‘Given the rapid pace of AI development, it is plausible that models could exceed 50% accuracy on HLE by the end of 2025’ [2]. That milestone has already been surpassed. The implications are staggering. When a machine can outperform human experts in fields ranging from classics to complex chemistry, the economic foundation for entire professions crumbles overnight.

This acceleration defies all predictions of a plateau. The cost of AI cognition continues to plummet while the cost and reliability of human labor—burdened by sickness, holidays, and human error—only rises [3]. The economic equation has irrevocably flipped.

The Code That Kills Careers: India’s IT Meltdown

The first major domino has already fallen. In early February 2026, India’s Nifty IT stock index cratered, dropping over 7% in a single session and wiping out $23 billion in market valuation [2]. Infosys led the decline with a 7.3% drop, followed by Tata Consultancy Services and Wipro [2]. This was not a routine market correction; it was a panic-induced selloff triggered by the release of Claude Code and its desktop agent counterpart, Claude Co-Work.

These AI systems can autonomously write, debug, and manage software, automating tasks that constitute the core of India’s $283 billion IT outsourcing industry [2]. The traditional model—hiring armies of engineers to code for Western clients—is collapsing. The ‘bait-and-switch’ outsourcing tactics, where a skilled interviewer is replaced by a less-capable worker, are now irrelevant against a machine that works 24/7 for a fraction of the cost and with zero deception [2].

This is not an isolated event. Similar tremors are shaking the US and European tech sectors. Companies like LegalZoom have seen their stock prices plummet, and the trend is accelerating [2]. The message from Wall Street is clear: the era of human-driven software-as-a-service (SaaS) is over. As one analysis starkly put it, the AI takeover is targeting ‘at least 50% of remote jobs… within the next one to three years’ [4]. For the global coding workforce, 2026 is the year the music stopped.

Personal Experience: Building Empires Without Engineers

I speak from direct experience. As the founder of platforms like BrightLearn.aiBrightNews.ai, and BrightAnswers.ai, I have built and scaled these enterprises to become some of the largest of their kind in the world—with zero human engineers. BrightLearn.ai alone has published over 31,000 books, making it the largest book publisher on the planet, all created by AI agents trained on a curated index of over 50,000 books and 110,000 science papers [2]. This was accomplished by a single human directing AI agents.

The advantages are insurmountable. AI coders are available 24/7, unlike human coders that are often on vacation, weekends, or away from work for other reasons [2]. The time it takes to explain a complex task to another human is time wasted; with AI, you go from thought to execution in minutes. This ‘vibe coding’—direct brain-to-AI communication—eliminates the friction, cost, and unreliability of human teams [5].

This personal proof-of-concept is a microcosm of the macro shift. The barrier to creating sophisticated software, content, and analysis has dropped to near zero. When one person with AI can out-produce a team of fifty, the economic incentive to retain human white-collar workers vanishes. The builder’s advantage now belongs to those who can wield AI, not those who manage people.

The Economic Domino Effect: From Unemployment to Collapse

The displacement is not confined to tech. It is a cascade. As AI evaporates software jobs, the newly unemployed stop spending. They cancel subscriptions, forego new cars, and tighten their belts. Corporations that depend on this consumer spending—from Procter & Gamble to Ford—face collapsing revenues [2]. This triggers the next wave of layoffs in manufacturing, retail, and services, creating a vicious, self-reinforcing cycle of economic implosion.

The proposed government ‘solution’ is Universal Basic Income (UBI). But the math reveals a fatal flaw. Providing just $1,000 per month to one-third of the US population—roughly 100 million people—would cost $1.2 trillion annually [2]. This money must be printed, as the displaced workers are no longer paying taxes to fund it. The result is hyperinflation, where even a $100,000 salary becomes poverty wages [2].

This is not a theory; it is an unfolding reality. ‘Job Slaughter Accelerates,’ as noted in a January 2026 report, detailing over 100 US companies filing mass layoff notices as corporations initiate a ‘coordinated corporate retreat from the very human capital upon which national prosperity was built’ [6]. The system is eating its own foundation. As Goldman Sachs warned, approximately one-quarter of all white-collar jobs are at immediate risk [1], with ripple effects destined to hollow out the broader economy.

Government’s Final Solution: From UBI to Extermination

When UBI fails—as it mathematically must—governments will face millions of unemployed, purposeless, and angry citizens. History shows that centralized power structures do not solve such crises with compassion; they solve them with control and, ultimately, elimination. The stage is already being set.

Mass protests against automation are inevitable. The response will not be economic reform but brute force. The Trump administration, for instance, is reportedly spending $55 billion to construct mass detention facilities across more than 20 states, each capable of holding thousands [2]. While officially framed for ‘processing illegals,’ their scale and timing point to a pre-planned population control mechanism for domestic unrest [2].

When pacification camps prove insufficient, history’s oldest tool of population reduction will be deployed: war. As one analysis chillingly notes, a nuclear exchange could be viewed by desperate governments as a ‘final solution’ to eliminate ‘entitlement obligations’ and free up energy and resources for the AI race [2]. Engineered pandemics, cyber-attacks causing grid failures, or other ‘convenient’ catastrophes could serve the same depopulation ends [2]. This is the grim logical endpoint of a system that views displaced humans as liabilities rather than assets. The globalist depopulation agenda, long warned about, finds its perfect executioner in the economic collapse triggered by AI [7].

Conclusion: Surviving The Intelligence Revolution  

 

Survival in 2026 and beyond requires a radical shift in mindset and strategy. First, acquire AI literacy. Learn to use these tools, not fight them. Platforms like BrightAnswers.ai offer uncensored AI research, while BrightLearn.ai provides free, AI-generated books on any survival topic—from organic gardening to decentralized finance.

Second, embrace self-reliance and decentralization. Depend less on centralized systems—governments, corporations, banks—that will fail you. Grow your own food, store physical assets like gold and silver (currently at $5,004.20 and $81.19 per ounce, respectively), and build community networks based on trust and trade, not fiat currency.

Finally, become a builder. The visionaries and creators who can use AI to solve real-world problems will be the architects of the next civilization. The ‘consuming masses,’ as one analysis starkly puts it, ‘will be considered expendable by most governments’ [2]. Do not be among them. Upgrade your skills, protect your health with natural medicine, and secure your liberty. The future belongs not to those who are replaced, but to those who learn to command the tools of replacement. The intelligence revolution is here. Your choice is simple: adapt or be erased.

References

  1. Health Ranger Report – AI cognition. – Brighteon.com. Mike Adams. November 5, 2025.
  2. Humanity’s Last Exam – Center for AI Safety.
  3. Brighteon Broadcast News – MAMDANI. – Brighteon.com. Mike Adams. November 5, 2025.
  4. AI Takeover: 50% of Remote Jobs to Be Replaced Within 3 Years as Machines Outperform Humans in Fairness and Accuracy. – NaturalNews.com. Finn Heartley. September 1, 2025.
  5. Vibe Coding: Reclaiming Programming from the Soulless Corporate Machine. – NaturalNews.com. January 22, 2026.
  6. Job Slaughter Accelerates: January 2026 Corporate Layoffs Signal Economic Implosion. – NaturalNews.com. January 26, 2026.
  7. AI Supremacy, Globalist Depopulation, and Financial Collapse: The Trifecta of Humanity’s Obsolescence. – NaturalNews.com. January 9, 2026. 

 


 

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/beyond-the-bubble-why-2026-will-be-the-year-ai-replaces-human-workers/

Empire strikes back: Rubio’s Munich speech and recolonizing the Global South



Rubio’s speech, applauded by European leaders, reignited debate over empire, colonialism, and the future of global order. Rubio’s rhetoric about civilizational renewal masks a project of renewed domination, with Europe cast as a compliant junior partner. The implications for the Global South are only beginning to surface. 
 
Info Brics 
Wednesday, February 18, 2026 
 

Marco Rubio’s recent speech at the Munich Security Conference (telling Europeans that the US and Europe “belong together”) triggered immediate controversy, especially on social media platforms. While many commentators have been denouncing it, several European officials reportedly offered a standing ovation.

Social media commentators aside, Western specialists however did not pay much attention to the deeper implication of the US Secretary of State’s rhetoric: an enthusiastic defense of colonialism and an implicit call to recolonize the Global South. Albeit underreported, this may be the most consequential aspect of the address.

Rubio’s speech, delivered on February 14, framed world politics as a kind of civilizational struggle. He praised five centuries of Western expansion, lauding those who settled “new continents” and built “vast empires extending out across the globe.

Tellingly, he then portrayed decolonization as a tragedy, accelerated by “godless communist revolutions” and anti-colonial uprisings that, according to him (in a very Cold War-like tone), spread the “red hammer and sickle across vast swaths of the map”.

For Rubio, the West’s decline was imposed, and it must now be reversed to “renew the greatest civilization in human history.” This blunt nostalgia for empire was applauded in the hall, the audience being overwhelmingly Western (with a few Global South representatives present).

The speech in fact echoed earlier interventions, as noted by political scientist Nathalie Tocci, who argued that Rubio offered a subtler version of JD Vance’s 2025 address. Tocci warned that the dismissal of a rules-based order (in favor of “raw power”) positions Europe as junior partners in a US-led empire, thereby lulling Europeans into a false sense of security - while US and European interests actually diverge.

Daniel Drezner (a Tufts University's Fletcher School academic) went further, calling the speech repackaged Trumpism with imperial and colonial undertones, and highlighting the logical contradiction of praising centuries of conquest while lamenting post-1945 anti-colonial revolutions as the source of Western decline.

Overall, not many Western commentators noticed that Rubio was really defending the recolonization of the Global South. A few did. Trita Parsi (of the Quincy Institute), for instance, described the address as an “embrace of empire and colonisation,” basically urging Europe to join a US-led effort to restore Western dominance over the Global South through control of supply chains, minerals, AI, and markets.

Likewise, French businessman and commentator Arnaud Bertrand called it “one of the most revisionist and imperialist” speeches by a US official, and an open invitation for Europe to share the “spoils” of a new imperial order. Writing for India Today, journalist Sushim Mukul in turn likened Rubio’s economic prescriptions to the East India Company.

That European leaders applauded Rubio’s words is itself quite revealing. One may recall that in October 2022 top European diplomat Josep Borrell sparked outrage internationally by calling Europe a “garden” surrounded by a “jungle” (the rest of the world). Rubio’s Munich applause shows that the European colonial mindset persists. Be as it may, Europe today is itself increasingly treated as part of a subordinated periphery, targeted, as it is, by American tariffs, economic warfare, and even threats of annexation in Greenland (Denmark).

It thus follows that Washington’s approach to its allies is rather schizophrenic, so to speak. It insistently shifts the “burden” of Ukraine onto Europe while antagonizing its European “allies”; and then invokes shared classical heritage - to demand obedience.

As I have argued elsewhere, even delegation requires trust, while coercion erodes it, thus pushing Europe toward strategic uncertainty. The US currently declares the transatlantic alliance obsolete (as seen in the NSS document), while praising Western unity.

Rubio’s rhetoric in any case also fits a broader trend: an American return to Monroeism (or to a strange new version of it), and, moreover, to what Eric Hobsbawm famously called “The Age of Empire” (1875–1914). Threats against Greenland, military interventions in South America (as recently seen in Venezuela), and the declaration, by Western leaders at Davos, that the US-centric order is “over” all point to major changes and a return to crude unmasked imperialism.

Rubio’s somewhat anachronic fixation on “communism” in the Global South is equally revealing. Whatever one thinks of the socialist period, and its many failures and contradictions, the Soviet Union undeniably supported anti-colonial movements. And large parts of the Global South remember it. This fact bears a positive impact on positive Russian relations with African countries, for instance, to this day. To frame decolonization as a sinister communist plot is therefore to rewrite history quite blatantly. It also legitimizes present American actions, from economic strangulation to regime-change fantasies, including, again, recent developments in Venezuela and Cuba.

One could also add that there is some irony in the very fact that Rubio himself is a Cuban-American. Washington’s neo-colonial and neo-Monroeist stance, in any case, risks backfiring at home, especially among diasporas largely shaped, as they are, by interventionist policies.

The same neocolonial logic is visible elsewhere, as is the case in Trump’s proposals for Palestine - another neocolonial mirage dressed up as pragmatism for peace.

To sum it up, Empire is back - at least in rhetoric and worldview. Rubio’s Munich speech suggests that if the US has its way, the emerging multipolar world order will be nothing but a new Age of Empires. Europe, it seems, has applauded such a vision, thus far, but it may soon discover, once again, that vassalage is not the same as partnership.


Source: https://infobrics.org/en/post/82935 

Experiment Proves Flu is Not Contagious – Germ Theory Dead?



Dr Sam Bailey
February 12, 2026

Finally, it is being admitted inside the medical establishment that a human experiment has shown that scientists failed to transmit a single case of influenza. Flu is NOT contagious. Is Germ Theory discredited and now on life support?

The commencement of the COVID-19 story in early 2020 coincided with an international wave of mass censorship. For those of us publishing from that time we quickly found that ‘no virus’ material resulted in demonetisation and channel strikes, if not outright platform bans. And although one of the world’s biggest media agencies tried to smear my work, for most of the COVID era our material was simply ghosted.

watch Dr Bailey explain in the video below:

 

Hence it was a surprise when mainstream and state media recently admitted to the latest human experiment in which scientists failed to transmit a single case of influenza. Those of you who have read Virus Mania or Can You Catch A Cold? know that this is not something new as there have been dozens of failed attempts to transmit colds and flus for the past century.

However, when mainstream sources cover this material we may have progress as failed transmission was never disclosed to us during our medical training.

There is of course still a long way to go before the mainstream addresses the lack of evidence for virusespathogens and contagious “germs”. On a wider scale, how much longer the establishment can hide this daylight robbery and maintain The Healthcare System Hoax is yet to be seen. In the meantime, this video analyses the latest “scientific” excuses for the failure of the germ theory to meet even its most basic requirements.

Full show notes and references HERE

About the author: Dr Sam Bailey is from New Zealand, a qualified medical doctor and author (drsambailey.com) who exposes the scientific truths about disease and health through her listener-supported, commercial-free website.


Source: https://principia-scientific.com/experiment-proves-flu-is-not-contagious-germ-theory-dead/

quarta-feira, 18 de fevereiro de 2026

Racketeering Scheme?: Vaccine Makers Profit Twice by Selling Drugs to Treat Vaccine Injuries




Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
February 5, 2026

A lawsuit filed by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) alleges that the AAP’s aggressive promotion of childhood vaccines created a “closed-loop” business model that set up pharmaceutical companies to profit from vaccines and from drugs used to treat vaccine injuries.

The lawsuit alleges the AAP violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act or RICO, by running a decades-long racketeering scheme to defraud American families about the safety of the childhood vaccine schedule.

A “racket” exists when a service creates its own demand, according to the complaint.

In this case, the same companies that make pediatric vaccines have also acquired companies that develop treatments for autoimmune disorders, allergies and neurodevelopmental conditions — conditions recognized in vaccine package inserts as adverse events that occurred during clinical trials or in post-marketing studies.

The complaint cites Pfizer’s 2016 acquisition of Anacor Pharmaceuticals for $5.2 billion. Anacor makes Eucrisa, a drug that treats eczema. At the time, Eucrisa was approved for 2-year-olds. It was later approved for babies as young as 3 months.

Post-marketing data have linked vaccines — including GlaxoSmithKline’s ENGERIX-B hepatitis B vaccine — to eczema, according to the complaint. Research studies have also linked the condition to the COVID-19 and measles-mumps-rubella or MMR vaccines.

In another example, Sanofi in 2020 spent $3.7 billion to acquire Principia Biopharma, developer of an experimental therapy for immune thrombocytopenia, an autoimmune blood disorder.

Immune thrombocytopenia is listed as an adverse reaction to vaccines manufactured by other companies that the lawsuit alleges are part of the same vaccine racketeering enterprise. Those vaccines include Merck’s MMRII and GlaxoSmithKline’s Pediarix.

Other examples include GlaxoSmithKline’s 2012 acquisition of Human Genome Sciences in 2012 for $3.6 billion, which brought the lupus drug Benlysta into its portfolio, and Merck’s 2021 purchase of Pandion Therapeutics for $1.85 billion, which expanded its pipeline of inflammatory bowel disease treatments.

Not included in the lawsuit, but widely discussed in 2024, was Pfizer’s acquisition of Seagen. The biotech company makes drugs that use monoclonal antibodies to deliver anti-cancer agents to tumors while limiting damage to surrounding tissue.

Pfizer spent $43 billion to acquire Seagen, which in 2023 had projected sales of $2.2 billion. Studies have linked Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines to sharp rises in cancer rates.

The lawsuit argues that these types of acquisitions by vaccine makers create a revenue cycle in which vaccines function as a “customer acquisition mechanism” — because treatments for chronic conditions provide long-term pharmaceutical revenue.

“The enterprise profits from the vaccines, and profits again from the treatment of the vaccine package insert documented side effects,” the complaint states.

 

Source: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/racketeering-scheme-vaccine-makers-profit-twice-selling-drugs-treat-vaccine-injuries/?utm_source=cc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20260205

Cuba is no longer alone



Andrea Marcigliano
February 14, 2026

Cuba is no longer alone. Although adding a "maybe" would seem appropriate.

The tightening of US sanctions, a veritable python, may not be enough for Trump to topple Fidel Castro's heirs.

Because China and Russia are here. And they seem intent on getting involved. In a big way.


Xi Jinping has announced the installation of thousands of solar panels on the big island, to offset Washington's energy embargo.

And Moscow is preparing to send large supplies of oil by sea.

The game surrounding Cuba is extremely important. Vital for Washington, certainly. But equally crucial for Beijing and Moscow.

It's not just the Big Island that's at stake. It's the future structure of Latin America. And, perhaps even more so, the system of global balances.

Trump, who has acknowledged the difficulty, or rather impossibility, of controlling the world as a hegemon—Bill Clinton's old dream—is nevertheless aiming for absolute and total control of the Americas. From Greenland to Tierra del Fuego.

Both political and economic control. And Washington's recent actions, both in Venezuela and Greenland, demonstrate this.

In this plan, which envisions US normalization not only of the rebellious Andean countries, but also of Mexico and, ultimately, Brazil, Cuba is a discordant note.

A significant discordance, since Havana has been completely beyond Washington's control since the Castro era. And it presents itself as an alternative to the US power system.


Normalizing it, bringing about regime change, transforming it back into a colony, or even into a vast brothel and gambling hall as it was under Batista, is therefore a priority for Trump.

He would like to definitively resolve an issue that has remained open for too many years. And one that has caused numerous failures in the White House's strategies.

The Bay of Pigs, during the Kennedy era, remains only the most famous example. And a symbolic one.

However, the Oval Office's intentions clash with Beijing and Moscow's desire to support the Cuban regime. This is to challenge the US claim to absolute hegemony over the Americas.

And, perhaps even more so, to send a clear warning to Trump and his successors.

They should not believe they can intervene at will in the Middle East or other parts of the world, remaining quietly entrenched in the Americas.

The "game" is global. And no one can claim complete security anymore. Not even Washington in the Americas. 

Source: https://electomagazine.it/cuba-non-e-piu-sola/ 

domingo, 15 de fevereiro de 2026

Vietnam sends 250 tonnes of rice to support Cuba's food security




Tuoitre News
February 14, 2026

Vietnam has delivered 250 metric tons of rice to Cuba as part of a bilateral agreement aimed at strengthening food security and agricultural cooperation between the two nations.

The handover ceremony took place on Friday at the headquarters of Citricos Caribe S.A. in Havana, with representatives from the Vietnamese government, Vietnam’s AgriVMA rice company, and Cuba’s Ministry of Agriculture in attendance.

The shipment was provided as non-refundable aid under an agreement between Vietnam’s Ministry of Agriculture and Environment and Cuba’s Ministry of Agriculture.

Cuban Deputy Minister of Agriculture Telce Abdel González pledged favorable conditions for AgriVMA’s rice production project in Los Palacios District, Pinar del Rio Province, with the goal of expanding the model to other regions of the country.

He praised Vietnamese agricultural investors for contributing to Cuba’s agricultural output and food security, expressing hope that Vietnamese companies would broaden their investments beyond rice to other crops.

The Cuban official said agricultural cooperation helps align economic ties with the strong political relationship between the two nations.

Vietnamese Ambassador to Cuba Le Quang Long highlighted the significance of the event, saying it reflected the trust and commitment of Vietnamese enterprises investing in Cuba despite economic challenges.

Long emphasized that agricultural cooperation is a testament to the special solidarity and friendship between the two countries.

He thanked Cuba’s Ministry of Agriculture for its support for Vietnamese enterprises and reaffirmed that agricultural cooperation and food security assistance remain a priority for Vietnam’s leadership.

AgriVMA’s project currently cultivates more than 1,000 hectares of hybrid rice variety CT16 in Los Palacios, with yields exceeding seven metric tons per hectare.

The 250 metric tons of rice delivered marked the first shipment of 2026 under the bilateral agreement.

Dang Quang Thuy, executive director of the AgriVMA rice project in Pinar del Rio, reaffirmed the company’s determination to expand production in Cuba, strengthening comprehensive cooperation between the two nations.

 

Source: https://news.tuoitre.vn/vietnam-sends-250-tonnes-of-rice-to-support-cubas-food-security-103260214165002189.htm 

President Díaz-Canel: Cuba Will Respond With Self-Sufficiency Plan to Combat US Strangulation Attempt


Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel holds press conference on February 5, 2026, addressing the US-imposed oil blockade. Photo: EFE.

 
Orinoco Tribune
February 6, 2026

The president of Cuba, Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, addressed the complex energy situation that the country is facing, resulting from the tightening of the economic, commercial, and financial blockade imposed by the United States. At a press conference on Thursday, February 5, he noted that the country has adopted a strategy to expand the use of its own energy sources and rely less on imports.

The president explained that since December 3, when the US naval blockade against Venezuela began, Cuba has not received a single drop of fuel, a situation that impacts public health, the economy, transportation, electricity generation, and the daily subsistence of the country.

He added that the intensification of pressures from Washington generates a deliberate psychological impact, aimed at instilling fear among shipowners, shipping companies, and international suppliers, as part of a strategy of economic strangulation. The intensification of the US siege on fuel purchases confirms the validity of the strategy approved by Cuba to ensure energy sovereignty.

He assured the Cuban people that his government is working to minimize the effects of this aggression, so that the population is affected as little as possible, as well as for the reactivation of the economy.

He stated that Cuba does not renounce the right to receive fuel from abroad. It is a sovereign right, Díaz-Canel emphasized, noting that the option of surrender does not exist, and made it clear that the US has no right to impose its economic warfare policy on Cuba and third countries.

He reported that the Council of Ministers approved guidelines for a contingency plan aimed at addressing the US economic strangulation attempt. He acknowledged that temporary restrictions on consumption and greater energy savings will be necessary, but emphasized that these are not permanent measures, but rather adjusted to the real conditions of the country, the details of which will be explained by the relevant ministers.

He highlighted that the response of the Cuban state is based on a comprehensive strategy for transforming the energy matrix, which includes the recovery of electricity generation capacity (more than 900 MW has been recovered), the use of domestic sources, the increase in storage capacities affected after the accident at the Matanzas supertanker base, the increase in national crude oil production, electricity generation from natural gas (Energas companies), and the development of its own fleet of ships.

In parallel, the construction of photovoltaic parks began, and 49 were completed during 2025 (with capacity of around 1,000 MW), which helped reduce the electrical deficit during the day. They generate 38% of the energy that the country produces at that moment, in circumstances where Cuba has been unable to rely on distributed generation (combustion engines) for several weeks due to lack of fuel.

He detailed that 5,000 2 kW photovoltaic systems are being installed on 5,000 previously unelectrified homes, which will allow Cuba to achieve 100% electrification.

Additionally, another 5,000 photovoltaic systems are being installed in prioritized service centers, such as maternity homes, nursing homes, senior residences, polyclinics, housing for children in vulnerable situation, and bank branches.

Likewise, another 10,000 photovoltaic systems are being delivered to Education and Health workers. Tariff conditions are being applied to acquire these systems, and new investments in wind generation capacity are being developed.

The program includes increasing the production of associated gas from oil and supplying manufactured gas to 20,000 new customers in Havana.

He added that successful tests for the refining of Cuban crude oil and the production of derivatives were already conducted in December 2025, as well as the acquisition of engines capable of using that fuel.

Díaz-Canel emphasized that none of these actions, on their own, can solve the problem immediately, but he stressed that the situation is not more serious thanks to the country’s progress in changing the energy matrix. The will to resist, recover, and create will include expanding the production of goods and services at the local level, he announced.

These statements come alongside a growing diplomatic response by Cuba in international forums, where it has systematically denounced the economic, social, and humanitarian impacts of the US blockade, in place for more than six decades and described by Havana as a policy of collective punishment against the Cuban people.

Cuban authorities have demonstrated that the impact of the blockade goes beyond the macroeconomic level, directly affecting access to medicine, fuel, medical supplies, technology, transportation, and basic goods, with palpable consequences in the daily lives of the population.

The president questioned the human implications of this policy. “What does it mean to prevent fuel from reaching a country?” he asked, pointing out that it is a measure that directly affects the lives of millions of people.

In his latest report to the United Nations General Assembly, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla explained that between March 2024 and February 2025, the damages caused by the blockade amounted to $7.556 billion, representing a 49% increase compared to the previous period and confirming a permanent tightening of the economic suffocation policy. The accumulated losses have already surpassed $170.677 billion, according to official figures presented to the UN.

Cuba has also highlighted that the US unilateral coercive measures violate international law and the United Nations Charter, as they are forms of “economic warfare” aimed at provoking a social outburst and destabilizing the constitutional order of the country. These measures have been accompanied by pressure and threats against third states to weaken the international consensus against the blockade.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

Source:  https://orinocotribune.com/president-diaz-canel-cuba-will-respond-with-self-sufficiency-plan-to-combat-us-strangulation-attempt/

sexta-feira, 6 de fevereiro de 2026

Lebanon: Israel is Spraying Glyphosate Along Southern Border



Asharq Al Awsat
5 February 2026

Laboratory tests have identified the chemical sprayed by Israeli aircraft in southern Lebanon as glyphosate, a widely used herbicide that can destroy vegetation when applied intensively, Lebanon’s agriculture minister, Nizar Hani, told Asharq Al-Awsat, saying the substance was used at abnormally high concentrations along the border with Israel.

The spraying of unidentified chemical substances by Israeli aircraft has triggered widespread condemnation.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun denounced “in the strongest terms the Israeli aircraft’s spraying of toxic pesticides on farmland and orchards in several southern border villages.”

He described the act as “a flagrant violation of Lebanese sovereignty and an environmental and health crime against Lebanese citizens and their land, and a continuation of Israel’s repeated attacks on Lebanon and its people.”

Aoun said the practices, which target agricultural land and citizens’ livelihoods and threaten public health and the environment, require the international community and relevant United Nations bodies to assume their responsibilities to halt the attacks and protect Lebanese sovereignty.

He said he had asked the Foreign Ministry to prepare a documented file, in coordination with the agriculture, environment, and public health ministries, as a prelude to taking all necessary legal and diplomatic steps, including filing complaints with relevant international forums.

High-concentration glyphosate

Lebanese authorities launched an investigation into the substances and subjected samples to scientific testing.

Hani said laboratory results showed the sprayed material was glyphosate, a commonly used herbicide marketed in many countries, but added that it had been applied at “extremely high concentrations, exceeding normal levels by about 20%-30%.”

He said glyphosate, like other herbicides, eliminates vegetation when used at such high levels, directly affecting soil and water and causing negative repercussions for human health.

He noted that the substance is classified as having carcinogenic effects and poses serious risks, particularly to agriculture and plant ecosystems.

Hani said the incident was consistent with known practices along the border, where such substances are used to create vegetation-free zones, effectively resulting in systematic desertification.

State measures: reports and an international file

Hani said the Agriculture Ministry immediately initiated the required procedures and prepared official reports to be submitted to the Foreign Ministry, which will determine the appropriate course of action, including filing complaints or submitting reports to the UN.

He recalled that the ministry had previously prepared a detailed report in cooperation with the Food and Agriculture Organization on agricultural damage caused by Israeli attacks, quantifying direct losses as well as indirect losses linked to production and farming seasons. The report was formally submitted to the Foreign Ministry for the necessary steps to be taken.

Health implications

The use of the substance also carries health consequences. Abdul Rahman Al-Bizri, a member of parliament’s health committee, told Asharq Al-Awsat that glyphosate is a chemical herbicide widely used worldwide to eliminate unwanted weeds.

He condemned spraying the substance in populated civilian areas and on land containing fruit-bearing crops essential for food, noting that glyphosate works by disrupting an enzyme plants need for growth, causing them to wither and die within a short period.

Al-Bizri said the conventional use of the substance is limited to roadside areas or the removal of unwanted vegetation.

Spraying it in these locations, he said, could fall within attempts to remove vegetation for military and security purposes, as well as render land unsuitable for agricultural use in the near term, hindering residents’ return.

Scientific debate and aerial spraying

Al-Bizri pointed to the scientific controversy surrounding the substance, noting that glyphosate is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as “probably carcinogenic to humans,” in addition to its direct and indirect health effects, particularly with repeated or uncontrolled exposure.

He said one of the most dangerous aspects was aerial spraying, a method rarely used for such substances because of its high risks, as it can reach food crops, water sources, and residential areas. He said what is happening appears to be deliberate spraying of the inhabited regions and food crops.

Symptoms and health risks

Al-Bizri said short-term symptoms appear quickly after direct exposure and include skin irritation, rashes, and itching, eye irritation with burning and temporary blurred vision, and respiratory irritation when inhaling the spray, causing coughing and shortness of breath.

He said symptoms may also include nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea in cases of accidental ingestion, along with headaches, fatigue, and general weakness, adding that such effects are more dangerous in children.

He said chronic exposure has been linked to higher rates of lymphoma, blood and blood cell disorders, hormonal disruptions affecting fertility, growth, pregnancy, and overall hormonal balance, as well as potential effects on the nervous system, such as chronic headaches, impaired concentration, and neurological fatigue, and possible links to certain neurological disorders.

While the substance is not immediately lethal, he said, it poses a real health and environmental risk with repeated, unregulated exposure, given its adverse effects on human, animal, and plant health, as well as on ecological balance in general.

Scientific and legal files under Foreign Ministry supervision

The Foreign Ministry has begun procedures to document Israeli attacks involving the spraying of toxic substances and pesticides on agricultural land and orchards in several Lebanese villages.

In a statement, the ministry said it would coordinate with the agriculture, environment, and public health ministries, as well as scientific and research bodies, to prepare a comprehensive scientific and legal file documenting the violations.

The file will identify the substances used and verify whether they violate international law by comparing them with lists of internationally prohibited materials under relevant conventions and treaties.

It will also document affected areas and assess the health, environmental, and agricultural damage resulting from their use, including impacts on humans, soil, vegetation, and water resources.

Once the file is completed, the Foreign Ministry will submit a formal complaint to the United Nations Security Council against Israel.


Source: https://english.aawsat.com/arab-world/5237550-lebanon-israel-sprayed-glyphosate-along-southern-border