terça-feira, 5 de outubro de 2021

AUSTRALIA: Berejiklian's replacement is an anti-lockdown, pro-life Catholic

 

 

LifeSite News

SYDNEY, Australia — On Tuesday morning, 39-year-old conservative Catholic Dominic Perrottet was elected the 46th Premier of New South Wales in a 39-5 landslide.

This followed the shock resignation of Gladys Berejiklian amid corruption investigation, signalling the dawn of a new era in Australian politics.

 


During his first speech as the 46th Premier of New South Wales, Perrottet stated: “Today begins a new chapter for NSW and one that we will all write together. I am honoured that my colleagues have asked me to write that chapter as Premier, and I thank them for the confidence that they have put in me.”

After acknowledging the contributions of the recently resigned former NSW Premier, Gladys Berejiklian, Perrottet  added, “Being Premier is a great honour, but I want to be clear that the job I have committed to today is not just to lead NSW, but to serve all the people of our state.”

“For the past 18 months together, we have been battling a storm that is COVID-19,” he continued.

“Some have lost their lives. Many have lost their livelihoods. So many sacrifices, big and small, have been made by so many for so long. Not being able to leave our homes, not being able to go to work, not being able to visit our loved ones, parents having to work and balance homeschool at the same time, many have missed weddings, many have missed funerals and the opportunity to say goodbye to their loved ones.”

Perrottet then addressed the economy.

“As a former treasurer, I know that a strong society needs a strong economy, and that is why our first priority will be to continue the plan that we have started: keeping people safe, opening up the economy and securing our recovery.” he said.


“Up until now, all of our Liberal premiers have been infrastructure premiers, building roads, rail, schools and hospitals for communities right across our state, and that will not change with me, but I will also be a family Premier, focusing on how we can make life better for working families, living the Liberal values of opportunity, aspiration and hard work,” the new leader continued.

Perrottet concluded his speech by stating: “We live in the best state in the best country in the world, and together we will make it better.”

The new Premier then responded to an array of questions from reporters. When asked about his Catholic faith and how it will impact his leadership, Perorates responded, “My religious views and my Christian faith is something I am incredibly proud of as many people across our state are.”

“We live in a very diverse society,” he continued. “I think some of the criticism in relation to that diversity has been unfounded and I am proud to live and I love our state and I love the diversity and the multicultural backgrounds and the religious backgrounds.”

“I am very proud of the fact that I have a strong Christian faith” he added. “But I think in the main, people right across our state believe in freedom of religion and freedom of the opportunity to serve in public life regardless of what your ethnic background is or what your religious values are.”

As the former deputy leader of the NSW Liberal Party, and leader of the Liberal Party’s conservative faction, Perrottet established himself as conservative with populist leanings due to public support of US President Donald Trump.

Perrottet has also denounced the “almost religious devotion of the political left to climate change”, opposed same-sex marriage, criticised “pronoun police” who impose gender neutral language, and vehemently challenged Australia’s pro-abortion legislation in 2019. As a devout Catholic, Perrottet declared that he could not support laws that stopped “the beating heart of an unborn child.”

Perrottet has also criticised the expansion of the socialist-style welfare system in Australia that encourages the breakdown of the traditional family structure. Instead, he has encouraged the reintroduction of traditional family values as the foundation of society. In addition, Perrottet has highlighted the importance of the workforce as the foundation of a classical free market economy to improve the living conditions of Australian families and to increase the strength of Australia as a nation.

Perrottet’s position on these significant issues has drawn the ire from opponents who see his adherence to Catholic social teaching as a threat to their progressive social and political agenda.

Prior to his appointment as New South Wales Premier, Perrottet hinted he would bring about immediate economic reform and end of draconian public health orders. This includes indefinite lockdowns, the restrictions on businesses or places of worship, and mandatory vaccinations.

When NSW Chief Health Officer Dr Kerry Chant suggested the initial extension of lockdowns in Sydney, Perrottet is reported to have responded that Chant and other government officials should sacrifice their own salaries in solidarity with the Australians they were forcing into bankruptcy.

While working under the constraints of the Liberal government’s COVID lockdowns, Perrottet has been praised by the Australian people for his behind-the-scenes work. He is responsible for the reduced COVID-19 limitations on workplaces, particularly in the construction industry; the promotion of government funds to assist business owners; the opening of domestic borders and international travel; and the investment of $5 billion into local governments following the devastating lockdowns.

He is responsible for the reduced COVID-19 limitations on workplaces, particularly in the construction industry; the promotion of government funds to assist business owners; the opening of domestic borders and international travel; and the investment of $5 billion into local governments following the devastating lockdowns.

 

Source: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-2/?utm_source=featured&utm_campaign=usa

Investigación de 10 muertes posteriores a la vacuna: los sorprendentes hallazgos de un equipo de investigadores alemanes

 




MWGFD – médicos y científicos por la Salud, la Libertad y la Democracia.

Sott.net 1/09/2021

Durante una conferencia de prensa celebrada el 21 de septiembre, dos patólogos alemanes de larga trayectoria presentaron los resultados de sus investigaciones sobre 10 muertes en relación con las vacunas contra Covid-19. Lo que descubrieron los sorprendió fuertemente: linfocitos incontrolables, enfermedades autoinmunes extremadamente raras y fragmentos metálicos "no declarados" en las vacunas..

El profesor Arne Burkhardt y el profesor Walter Lang, que presentaron sus resultados en una conferencia de prensa, son dos patólogos con muchos años de experiencia en su haber. Burkhardt dirigió el Instituto de Patología Reutlingen durante 18 años, Lang dirigió un instituto privado durante 35 años especializado, entre otras cosas, en patologías pulmonares. Junto con otros patólogos anónimos, investigaron diez muertes ocurridas luego de la vacunación contra COVID-19. Los patólogos forenses y patólogos que realizaron las autopsias les proporcionaron los tejidos. Todos los fallecidos examinados tenían más de 50 años.

De esas diez muertes, encontraron que cinco estaban muy probablemente relacionadas con la vacuna, y dos probablemente lo estaban; un caso se consideró dudoso y no encontraron relación causal en los dos últimos casos. Sin embargo, lo que los sorprendió fueron las similitudes entre los casos que relacionaron con la vacunación.

En tres casos, descubrieron enfermedades autoinmunes raras; uno de ellos es tan raro que solo se descubrió mediante una inspección más cercana de la imagen escaneada. Estos fueron la tiroiditis de Hashimoto, un hipotiroidismo autoinmune; vasculitis leucoclástica, una reacción inflamatoria en los capilares que produce hemorragia intracutánea; y síndrome de Sjögren, una inflamación de las glándulas salivales y lagrimales. Incluso si las muertes sospechosas de estar relacionadas con la vacunación están lejos de constituir una muestra representativa de la población, tres enfermedades autoinmunes (que además son muy raras) de cada diez constituyen una tasa sorprendentemente alta.

Sin embargo, el descubrimiento más sorprendente se refería a los linfocitos. «Los linfocitos se liberan en todos los órganos», dijo el profesor Lang. Las acumulaciones de linfocitos se observan en una amplia variedad de tejidos, desde el músculo cardíaco hasta los riñones, desde el hígado hasta el bazo y el útero; Además, en las imágenes presentadas se observa una agresión masiva de los tejidos consecutiva a este estallido de linfocitos, así como toda una serie de folículos linfocíticos, que son pequeños ganglios linfáticos que se desarrollan en un lugar totalmente aberrante, por ejemplo en el tejido. pulmonar.

Los investigadores también observaron desprendimientos de células endoteliales, las células lisas que forman las paredes de los vasos sanguíneos, grupos de glóbulos rojos que generan trombosis y células gigantes que se han formado alrededor de cuerpos extraños «encapsulados».

Lang dijo que jamás había visto tales grupos de linfocitos en cientos de miles de exámenes patológicos realizados antes. Normalmente, con la inflamación, hay otros glóbulos blancos llamados granulocitos. En estos casos, sin embargo, prácticamente no se encuentran, sino que se observan masas de linfocitos.

Se necesitan más investigaciones para determinar qué tipo de linfocitos están involucrados en este proceso y cómo se desencadena, a fin de proporcionar pruebas sólidas de un vínculo con la vacunación; los exámenes histológicos requeridos tomarán al menos otros seis meses. Sin embargo, los resultados disponibles hasta la fecha son lo suficientemente importantes como para ser anunciados a través de esta rueda de prensa.

“Nos falta estudiar el 90%”, dijo Lang, refiriéndose a la tasa de reacciones fatales a las vacunas. No es culpa de los patólogos o patólogos forenses; después de todo, solo puede ver lo que se conoce, y la ciencia forense no puede realizar exámenes histológicos de cualquier modo. Pero existe una necesidad urgente de realizar más autopsias en estos casos. Desafortunadamente, este tipo de enfoque a menudo se ve obstaculizado.

“Nuestro trabajo es proporcionar información sobre riesgos y efectos secundarios”, dice Lang sobre el propósito de su trabajo. Una tarea que, en el caso de las vacunas experimentales, debería ser cumplida por instituciones como el Instituto Paul Ehrlich, con autorización de emergencia.

Resumen de los puntos clave de la conferencia de prensa:

Mujer, 82 años, vacunación: Moderna (1a y 2a dosis), fallecimiento: D + 37
Varón, 72 años vacunación: Comirnaty (1a dosis), fallecimiento: D + 31
Mujer, 95 años, vacunación: Moderna (1a y 2a dosis), fallecimiento: D + 68
Mujer, 73 años, vacunación Comirnaty (1a dosis)
Hombre, 54 años, vacunación Janssen (1a dosis), fallecimiento: D + 65
Mujer, 55 años, vacunación Pfizer-BioNTech (1.a y 2.a dosis), muerte: D + 11
Hombre, 56 años, vacunación Comirnaty (1a y 2a dosis), fallecimiento: D + 8
Hombre, 80 años, vacunación Pfizer-BioNTech (1a y 2a dosis), fallecimiento: D + 37
Mujer, 89 años, vacunación: tipo de vacuna desconocido (1ª y 2ª dosis), muerte: aprox. 6 meses después de las inyecciones
Varón, 62 años, vacunación: tipo de vacuna y número de dosis desconocido, fallecimiento: D + 20
(“Comirnaty” es el nombre comercial de vacuna de Pfizer-BioNTech)

Muertes asociadas con las vacunas Covid
10 casos de autopsia examinados de antemano

Relación muy probable: 5
Relación probable: 2
Relación cuestionable / posible: 1
Correlación probablemente debida al azar: 1
Aún no calificado: 1

Sobre el registro de efectos secundarios posteriores a la vacuna con consecuencias fatales

* Los datos del certificado de defunción sin información sobre el estado de vacunación son completamente inútiles
* Las personas afectadas y sus seres queridos guardan silencio porque se ven afectados
* No hay motivación de los médicos y fiscales involucrados para registrar estos efectos secundarios.
* Las autopsias realizadas en institutos de medicina forense sin un examen histológico de rutina son, a priori,
metodológicamente inadecuadas.
* Las autopsias se rechazan en parte en los institutos de patología; a menudo hay una falta de conocimiento de los patrones relacionados
con una ‘nueva’ enfermedad.

Una autopsia unida a una evaluación interdisciplinaria realizada por médicos forenses y patólogos con la obligación de examen histológico de todos los órganos y lesiones es la única forma justificable de abordar este problema.

Principales descubrimientos.
Miocarditis, epicarditis, pericarditis linfocítica, predominio linfocítico

* Típico de las infecciones virales
* Difícil de reconocer a nivel macroscópico
* Histológicamente, a menudo se malinterpreta como una infección (¡granulocitos!)
* Efecto sobre la función de bombeo
* Paro cardíaco cuando el sistema de conducción se ve afectado, muerte súbita por paro cardiopulmonar, detección casi imposible

Sospecha de efectos secundarios posteriores a la vacuna, con consecuencias potencialmente fatales.

* Fenómenos autoinmunes («autoagresión»)
* Capacidad inmunológica reducida
*Influencia en el desarrollo del cáncer
* Daño vascular, «endotelitis», vasculitis, perivascularitis
* Aglutinación de eritrocitos.

Durante esta conferencia de prensa, los investigadores también mostraron detalles microscópicos de los cambios tisulares. El profesor Werner Bergholz presentó los parámetros actuales para el registro estadístico de eventos de vacunas.

También se presentó un análisis de muestras de vacuna COVID-19 realizado por un grupo de investigación austriaco. Los resultados corresponden a las conclusiones de investigadores japoneses y estadounidenses. Se han detectado elementos metálicos no declarados en la vacuna. Estos elementos son visualmente llamativos debido a su forma inusual.

Estos hallazgos deberían conducir al cese inmediato del programa de vacunación.

Por supuesto, cuando se descubren fragmentos metálicos no declarados por los fabricantes en las vacunas administradas a cientos de millones de personas, las autoridades responsables deben suspender inmediatamente el programa de vacunación.

En su comunicado de prensa, los investigadores afirman:

Los resultados de esta investigación dan lugar a demandas legales y políticas, es decir, que las autoridades deben recopilar información de manera inmediata para evaluar el riesgo para la salud que enfrenta la población debido a las vacunas COVID-19. Por ejemplo, al consultar el registro de FIV, se pueden verificar los primeros signos de disminución de la fertilidad en las vacunadas. El registro de cáncer se puede utilizar para obtener conocimientos sobre el desarrollo del cáncer como resultado de cambios genéticos en el ARN viral. Se debe considerar la interrupción de la vacunación contra COVID-19.

 


 

 

domingo, 3 de outubro de 2021

Brazilian judge battles Rio's "Health Pass", citing a Nazi-style "sanitary dictatorship"

 


David Montoute

October 3rd

 On Wednesday 29th September, Judge Paulo Rangel, from the Court of Appeals of Rio de Janeiro, suspended the requirement of a vaccination passport in the city. The decision was made based on a request made by a resident of the city. In his ruling, Judge Paulo Sergio Rangel says the passport imposes a “sanitary dictatorship” and draws an analogy with slavery. “If in the past slaves and cattle were branded with iron and fire, today the vaccination card separates society. Time passes, but the abusive, illegal and retrograde practices remain the same”.

The judge went on to make a comparison with the Third Reich and the persecutions suffered by minorities: “Another person who knew how to instil fear of enemies in the people was Hitler, who, through Nazi propaganda, instilled fear of Jews and gypsies in the population.

One day later, however, Rio's City Hall to appealed the decision, and Brazil's Supreme Court on Thursday annulled Judge Rangel's ruling.

The reinstated vaccination passport, brought about by the decree of Mayor Eduardo Paes, is compulsory for access to gyms, swimming pools and tourist attractions. According to Rangel, the document requirement is an affront to the right to freedom of movement:

“I said it on another occasion and I repeat it here. The decree divides society into two types: the vaccinated and the unvaccinated… The mayor says who will walk the streets and who will not: only the vaccinated. And the unvaccinated? They can’t move around the city. Their freedom of movement is restricted. They are marked, tagged, trapped in their homes. And incredible as it may seem, all this is done by decree...a decree cannot prevent people from circulating freely in the city's streets if they are not vaccinated. A decree does not limit the freedom of movement of anyone who is not vaccinated. We are not in a state of defense or siege. And even so, if we were, only through a presidential act within the exact limits of the Constitution.”

The court decision had been requested by a citizen of Rio de Janeiro in an habeas corpus proceeding, although its scope extended to the entire population of the city.

According to the newspaper O Globo, ten more lawsuits have since been filed against the decree with essentially the same content, following a model disclosed by Federal Deputy Chris Tonietto. The parliamentarian shared in her Telegram an habeas corpus template with instructions on how to fill it out, with a step-by-step guide of what people need to do until they arrive at the forum. On her Twitter account, Tonietto celebrated Judge Rangel's decision. 


The parliamentarian Chris Tonietto
 

The strong stance against the "Health Pass" is further supported by President Jair Bolsonaro, who has warned that if the passport were to be accepted, more requirements would soon follow. Bolsonaro personally flouted vaccination rules at the United Nations headquarters in New York last month, addressing the global body in person despite not having received any Covid vaccine.

Underlining the foundation of the anti-pass position, Judge Rangel has stated:

Whether or not the citizen wants to be vaccinated is his problem, which is supported by the principle of self-determination and the principle of legality, but a municipal decree can never impede the freedom of movement of anyone because he is not vaccinated. It doesn't matter in habeas corpus whether the vaccine is effective or not, or whether those who got vaccinated got infected or not.

                                                             *** 


Bolsonaro will not take the CV-19 'vaccine': 

 

Sources:

https://lemediaen442.fr/bresil-la-justice-de-rio-suspend-le-pass-sanitaire-une-dictature-sanitaire-comparable-a-la-propagande-nazie/

https://www.frontliner.com.br/cai-passaporte-da-vacina-no-rio-de-janeiro/

https://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/rio-politics/brazil-rio-de-janeiro-court-suspends-vaccination-certificate-and-mentions-health-dictatorship/

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/09/30/americas/rio-vaccine-passport-intl-latam/index.html

 

RELATED: Brazil: 22 thousand dead after 1st vaccine dose (an alternate hypothesis)

 

sábado, 2 de outubro de 2021

With blackouts looming, German government holds disaster preparation day, promotes ‘cooking without electricity’

 


RT

1 Oct, 2021

High demand and the transition to green power has left much of Europe at risk of blackouts. In Germany, state authorities are teaching the public to heat their homes with candles and get used to “cooking without electricity.”

State authorities in North-Rhine Westphalia will hold their first ‘Disaster Protection Day’ on Saturday, with instructors in the city of Bonn teaching citizens how to get by “in the event of a long power failure.” An advert by the federal Civil Protection Office gives a hint of what’s in store, and features an elderly woman wearing several layers of clothing, heating her apartment with candles burning under an upturned flower pot and sealing her windows with reflective foil.

The Civil Protection Office on Friday unveiled an ad campaign focusing on all aspects of crisis preparation, and will soon release a targeted strategy addressing “stockpiling, extreme weather, power failure and emergency baggage.” Meanwhile, officials will present a new book entitled ‘Cooking Without Electricity’ at the event in Bonn on Saturday.

Based on these official communications, blackouts are coming to Germany soon. While the idea of the world’s sixth-most developed country being unable to power itself may seem ludicrous, the problem is Europe-wide, and is the result of a number of factors.

Germany relies heavily on natural gas for heat and power, and supplies were depleted following an unusually cold winter and spring. Globally, gas markets are tight, with increased demand in Asia and an upsurge in air-conditioner use during a hot summer in Europe driving prices to record highs.

Compounding the problem, wind-power generation fell this year, literally due to a lack of wind in Germany. Coal burning has increased to make up this shortfall, yet the cost of European Union ‘carbon credits’ on this fuel is passed on to consumers, with the end result being a spike in energy costs for ordinary Germans, who already pay the highest price per kilowatt hour in the world.

Both the EU and the German government want to rely more heavily on wind and other renewables for power in the future. The EU’s 2030 plan calls for 32% of all energy to be generated from renewable sources, and while Germany already exceeds this target with 44%, the German government plans on eliminating nuclear power by next year and coal by 2038. 

Combined, nuclear and coal account for 39% of all electricity generated in Germany. Unless the country can dramatically expand its renewable sector, and count on the wind to power it, their elimination will likely result in even higher prices, and more ‘Disaster Protection Days’ in the coming years.

The same mismatch of supply and demand, coupled with a costly and unreliable transition to green power, has also been seen in other European countries in recent months.


Source: https://www.rt.com/news/536361-germany-blackouts-power-ad/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

 

Steve Kirsch: vaccine side effects are underreported by a factor of 41

 


France Soir

30 September 2021

Steve Kirsch, business executive and analyst, has spent many hours analysing data in the United States. He participated in the 8 hour presentation to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, ANSM equivalent) alongside numerous doctors and specialists.

In his analysis, he methodically sets about estimating how many deaths could be linked to vaccines in the US. The figures he reaches range between 150,000 and 200,000.

After speaking to numerous experts, he has yet to find anyone capable countering his analysis.

In this debriefing, offered in partnership with BonSens.org, Kirsch goes into detail over the methods used and especially how he manages to estimate the underreporting of serious side effects in the American VAERS database. He believes the figure is underestimated by a factor of 41. 

Interview with France Soir:

BREAKING – Pfizer stand accused of experimenting on orphan babies to test their Covid-19 vaccine

 


The Exposé

October 1st 

Allegations that Pfizer are conducting experiments on six-month-old orphans to test their Covid-19 vaccine have been made by whistleblowers in Poland leading to a group of lawyers, medical professionals and activists demanding members of the Polish parliament and Senate organise an urgent conference on Saturday 2nd October.

Children’s Health Defense was recently alerted by Polish whistleblowers that Pfizer is conducting experiments on orphan babies 6 months old to test their new vaccines. Babies and children do not die from Covid and rarely transmit the disease. This alone should be enough to refuse any kind of clinical trials with experimental vaccines.  But Pfizer seems to be operating outside legal boundaries. If this is case, it is simply unacceptable and needs to stop. Answers and action are needed.

 A group of lawyers, medical professionals and activists asked members of the Polish parliament and Senate to organise the following conference on Saturday October 2nd  entitled:

“MEDICAL TESTS ON CHILDREN AND INFANTS – MEDICAL, LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES ”.

The conference is planned at 12pm CET time (Warsaw).
Please watch our re-stream here with live translations as we will follow closely on this issue. 

Conference in EN, FR, DE, IT or ES
CLICK HERE

The conference is organised by Polish associations and foundations such as  The Polish Association of Independent Doctors and ScientistsThe Association of Lawyers Voice of FreedomDobrostan Health Information Center Association, and the New Spectrum Foundation

International speakers will feature Dr. Natalia Prego Cancelo from Spain, Dr. Meryl Nass and Mrs. Vera Sharav from the United States.

Here are some of the major questions that must be answered:

– Is Pfizer conducting experiments on orphan children who are the most vulnerable and have no one to take their interests at heart if things go wrong? If so why and who consented to this?

– Why is Pfizer allowed to do clinical trials on babies with a product that has not completed phase 3 of the clinical trials and that is a new technology? 

– Why is Pfizer refusing elected officials the get access to their documents?

– What is happening in the other countries where these experiments are conducted?

– Are the EMA and the FDA really doing their job?

And finally…are vaccine manufacturers operating in complete secrecy and outside any legal control? 

Other information on the science and ethics of the clinical trials on children have also raised our concerns.  Yaffa Shir- Raz, a risk-communication researcher of the University of Haifa in Israel has published an article on the very questionable methods used by the company called Serious violations and manipulations of the trial protocol: This is how Pfizer managed to obtain the FDA’s emergency authorisation for children’.  

This article points to troublesome facts questioning Pfizer’s intention to demonstrate safety of the use of its vaccines in children. For example, children who suffered severe depression were suddenly found to have pre-existing psychiatric conditions that should have excluded them from the study cohort and the reporting criteria seem to have been designed to exclude signals of adverse events. 

Vaccine developers have a long story of experimenting on the most vulnerable: orphans, mentally and physically disabled, political refugees and impoverished populations. Stanley Plotkin, who patented numerous vaccines and is nicknamed ‘the pope of vaccines’ once defended himself by saying that disabled people ‘were only human in form’.  

Getting rid of the weakest has always been practiced in the name of the greater good.   Now is the time to take responsibility and put an end to this barbarian practice.  

Letter from Polish activists and medical associations on the medical tests on children and infants 

Dear All,  

We would like to invite you to participate in a conference that will be taking place on the 2nd of October 2021 at 12:00 Warsaw time in the Polish Parliament. 

The conference will include medical and legal debate in regards to testing medical products on children and very young babies. This conference is apolitical and non-religious. It is organized by Polish associations and foundations such as  The Polish Association of Independent Doctors and ScientistsThe Association of Lawyers Voice of FreedomDobrostan Health Information Center Association, and the New Spectrum Foundation. Representatives of the parliament and the government as well as main stream media have been invited to passively participate and to help the public understand the depth of the issue. 

 This conference has been requested in connection with the theoretical and practical analysis of clinical trials involving children and infants due to the fact that children cannot consent to participate in a biomedical study and therefore additional safeguards should and must be applied to protect them. We believe this is not happening at present. 

We are therefore asking for your help in defending Polish children and children in clinical trials around the world. This is now happening in at least four countries because of the misinformation and the confidential agreements imposed by Pfizer.

Since June 2021, Pfizer has been conducting experimental trials on Polish children with vaccines against Covid-19. To our knowledge these experiments are done on healthy infants from 3 and 6 months of age up to age of 11. 

These facts are not known to the Polish public opinion as Pfizer’s documents contain a “secret” clause. Even a member of the Polish Parliament who intervened in this matter has been refused access to the documents, in complete violation of  the Polish law. 

8 Centers in Poland are known to be conducting the above testing however, these are  small private clinics and private clinical research centers who do not seem to be equipped to run such studies. 

Separately, we are aware of one more center that has not been mentioned on Pfizer’s website. This raises the question whether there may be more undisclosed sites in the 4 countries that Pfizer is claiming these tests are being done. 

From unofficial reports (we are in possession of recordings from July and August of this year) we know that children age 6 to 11 years old were already been injected with Pfizer’s product and children age 3 to 5 years old received  at least 1 dose.  

Children age 6 months old to 2 years old are currently being recruited however, Pfizer on its’ official website has released documents dated 20/09/2021 claiming that they are expecting results on the youngest group before the end of this year. 

This suggests that trials in the youngest group started at the same time as in the older groups as Pfizer claims results of these trials will be available after 6 months.

It is estimated that there may be around 1000 children being injected in Poland. 

Considering how quickly these children have been recruited for the study we strongly suspect they come from orphanages and care homes, as this already has happened with trials of other vaccines. Under Polish legislation such exceptional cases need the authorisation of a court but so far we are unable to locate any court hearings allowing for such experiments on children. 

Consent for these trials on infants and young children in Poland was given by Grzegorz Cessak, pharmacologist and president of the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products. He is also a member of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which seems to create a conflict of interest. 

As Pfizer did not complete animal studies nor studies on young animals (off springs) it seems that Polish infants and the youngest children are used as the first experimental ‘offsprings’.

If  relevant authorities of the Polish state do not take action, we will not be able to confirm how many of these children may or already have faced death or severe health complications. Administration of a genetic experimental technology is completely new in medicine and it is defined as a phase I and II / III clinical trial on infants and children 6 years of age and children up to 11 years of age. 

In adults phase III is not completed but numerous complications were reported, including very severe thromboembolic, autoimmune and inflammatory problems and  even deaths. 

Information about similar complications and unfortunate fatalities also applies to children from the age of 12. 

We are in possession of audio recordings from all 8 centers that can serve as evidence in a criminal case. These recordings show that children from 6 to 11 years old have already been injected  and possibly 3 to 5 years  as well.

At the same time, it seems that the administration of the vaccines was suspended in the youngest group between 6 months and 2 years of age, because on July 22 there was a crisis meeting to decide “what to do”  (this might have been caused by protests of people from local freedom organizations near these centers).  

Following this episode it was stated that the recruitment of infants and children up to 2 years old will continue and restart  at the beginning of August. 

Considering how many serious complications there are after these injections, including deaths in adults and adolescents these injections carry far more greater threat to  the life and health of these children than Covid-19 itself. 

More Information on Pfizer’s trials

The full list of 101 centers  in 4 countries ( USA, Spain, Finland and Poland) can be found here.

Under: 

Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of an RNA Vaccine Candidate Against COVID-19 in Healthy Children <12 Years of Age 

 On Monday, September 20, 2021 Pfizer has announced on their official  website results of as they called it first pivotal trial of COVID-19 vaccine in children under 12 years of age 

According to Pfizer in participants 5 to 11 years of age, the vaccine was safe, well tolerated and showed robust neutralizing antibody responses. Companies plan to submit these data to the FDA, EMA and other regulatory agencies around the world as soon as possible 

They also stated that results in children under 5 years of age are expected as soon as later this year.

In regards to the Phase 1/2/3 Trial in Children 

“The Phase 1/2/3 trial initially enrolled up to 4,500 children ages 6 months to 11 years of age in the United States, Finland, Poland, and Spain from more than 90 clinical trial sites. It was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on a two-dose schedule (approximately 21 days apart) in three age groups: ages 5 to 11 years; ages 2 to 5 years; and ages 6 months to 2 years.  

Based on the Phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the trial, children ages 5 to 11 years received two-dose schedule of 10 µg each while children under age 5 received a lower 3 µg dose for each injection in the Phase 2/3 study. The trial enrolled children with or without prior evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection”. 

Full information can be found here.

 

Soucre: https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/01/breaking-pfizer-stand-accused-of-experimenting-on-orphan-babies-to-test-their-covid-19-vaccine/

sexta-feira, 1 de outubro de 2021

Conformity: The Vice of the Coward

 


Stacey Rudin

May 24th

One of my favorite phrases, coined by Robert Greene, is “resist the downward pull of the group.” Remembering this every day, every hour, is necessary to keep our minds free and independent, able to innovate and decide what is best for us, as opposed to what is best for the rule-makers, the most powerful in society. Everything must be questioned.

Historically, cigarettes were encouraged for pregnant women. Mercury was administered as a medicine. Lead was in all of the paint; asbestos in all of the insulation. Butter and lard were good, then bad, then good again. Populations were systematically killed with the cooperation of nearly all of polite society. These things happened, and they were completely bizarre and crazy, yet they happened. “Everyone was doing it.”

Bad actors know about this, about the madness of crowds. They’ve used it for millennia to control the masses, culminating in the biggest tragedies the world has ever seen. In the present era of mass data collection, manipulation of populations is even easier. The more they know about us, the better they can tailor their messaging.

This use of manipulation on a population-wide scale used to be highly controversial. When JFK ran for president, back when computers were new, his campaign enlisted a startup called the Simulmatics Corporation to create a computer model of the voting public, compiled using surveys, then asked this virtual populace how it would respond to various civil rights messaging. JFK used that messaging and won, but when his tactics leaked, the public was outraged. They wanted authenticity, not a data-driven betrayal. Who knew what JFK really thought about civil rights? Not them. He’d merely figured out what they wanted to hear, and said it.

Viewed through the lens of today’s data goldmine, the social science models used by politicians like JFK back in 1960 were laughably unsophisticated. Yet they still worked. Today, tech companies have all — and I do mean all — of our data, so they can do a much better job of controlling us. Combine this with Robert Greene’s 27th “Law of Power,” and you get the “COVID-19” propaganda campaign and resulting cult, complete with universal mask-wearing and the exclusion of “the unvaccinated” from polite society.

The 27th Law of Power: Play on People’s Need to Believe to Create a Cultlike Following

People have an overwhelming desire to believe in something. Become the focal point of such desire by offering them a cause, a new faith to follow. Keep your words vague but full of promise; emphasize enthusiasm over rationality and clear thinking. Give your new disciples rituals to perform, ask them to make sacrifices on your behalf. In the absence of organized religion and grand causes, your new belief system will bring you untold power.

As Greene explains, charlatans understand that “the greater the group they gather around themselves, the easier it is to deceive.” In a group setting, “people are more emotional” and “less able to reason” due to the “communal mood of rapt attention.” This makes it “impossible to find the distance to be skeptical . . . any deficiencies in the charlatan’s ideas are hidden by the zeal of the mass. Passion and enthusiasm sweeps through the crowd like a contagion, and they react violently to anyone who dares to spread a seed of doubt.”

Why does this happen? Because humans are what humans are. Like bees, they behave a certain way in the hive. When they see “everyone else” doing something, they assume it must be the right thing. They want to be popular, and to “do the right thing,” so they follow the crowd, regardless of what the crowd is doing at the moment. In the 1940s, the crowd was burning Jews in ovens. In 2021, the crowd is bankrupting business owners, prohibiting children from breathing, and requiring perfectly healthy people to receive an experimental injection in order to go to the theater. This is “the downward pull of the group” in action — the conformity of cowards sinking the entire societal ship.

Resist the Downward Pull of the Group: The Law of Conformity

“We have a side to our character that we are generally unaware of — our social personality, the different person we become when we operate in groups of people. In the group setting, we unconsciously imitate what others are saying and doing. We think differently, more concerned with fitting in and believing what others believe. We feel different emotions, infected by the group mood. We are more prone to taking risks, to acting irrationally, because everyone else is. This social personality can come to dominate who we are. Listening so much to others and conforming our behavior to them, we slowly lose a sense of our uniqueness and the ability to think for ourselves. The only solution is to develop self-awareness and a superior understanding of the changes that occur in us in groups.”

Knowing this about human nature, today’s tyrant can easily use social media (and mass media) to create the impression of a completely unified group. Astroturf propaganda was used by China early on to create the impression that “lockdown works,” and any politician who fails to impose one is “committing genocide.” Now that the data is in, we know that the people imposing the lockdowns were actually the ones committing genocide. But the cult cannot admit that — doing so would at this point be blasphemy.

In short, it was very easy to know how to manipulate today’s society into “lockdowns,” masks, “social distancing,” and universal experimental injections for people at statistically zero disease-risk. The manipulator merely needed to create the impression of a very scary risk, and use virtue-based messaging to convince the fearful, emotional masses that (1) they indeed should be very scared, and (2) an action was available to them to ensure not their own safety, but “the safety of others.” They were not cowards; by adamantly supporting “lockdowns,” they were heroic saviors of humankind. “Just obey the rules, and you will save lives.” Boy, did this messaging work.

The manipulators now have an emotionally vulnerable population on the defensive, unwilling to concede — even after unequivocal data on the failure of lockdowns is in — that its actions resulted in untold damages and saved no one. The cult members will never admit that they were taken in by the classic logical fallacy, post hoc, ergo propter hoc: “because the disease went away, your actions worked.” These people were duped, on some level they know it, and as a result, they are willing to look the other way when their unvaccinated fellow man is forced to wear a symbol of “the unclean.”

Now we know how historical tragedies unfold.


Most people stay “safe” in the crowd, unwilling to stand out, infected by the group mood. Whatever the majority is doing is the most comfortable course of action, and most people default to comfort. They fail to understand the value of discomfort, and of following the few courageous people who are willing to endure that discomfort by standing apart from the crowd.

 

                                                            ***

Source:

https://staceyrudin.medium.com/conformity-the-vice-of-the-coward-b38926245233