terça-feira, 7 de março de 2023

The word "Virus"

 


To the “Truth Movements” :

We need to stop using the word virus. We need to stop saying “viruses are not what we were told”

There is no such thing as a “virus” proven to exist in humans, animals, or plants.

We do not need antivaccine movements to fight for a “safe vaccine” , we need courage to see outside Plato's cave. There will be no place for Vaccines when we realize that there is nothing to vaccinate for.

Imagine a conversation from the “truth communities” debating  about the real origin of some “ genetic sequences “ .... sounds more ... scientific , more real ? If that sequences exist in the real world of course, not in a software. ( and whatever a gene is or is not )

If we don’t stop we will keep feeding the beast. The word “Vaccine” needs the word “Virus” 

Harmless Virus = Virus

Virus means Poison right ?

There is no “Harmless Poison”, Duesberg did his best to fight the genocide in the 80´ and was one of the first leaders to stand up for the truth about the Aids Scam, but it was not enough.

The Perth Group is now , after 40 years , being recognized for their outstanding scientific work.

They had a very clear focus and the courage to stand still for it: They went to the bottom of the scam, the very deep secret kept under a thousand locks.... the very existence of the famous “retro-virus”. There was nothing there, and they used the same official documents to show the world that what was called HIV was never proven to exist.

Stefan Lanka fought for the very same reason, he is another one that went out from the Plato's cave and had no fear to go back and tell everyone, and he won the measles case in supreme court, he proved that Enders paper ( the fundational paper on which the Virology stands ) DID NOT PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF A VIRUS.

There was an opportunity lost in the 80´ to show the world that there was a pseudoscience called virology. Maybe because, as in Plato's cave.... all people heard about in their lives were the words Virus, Contagious and Vaccines.

The tittle , just the title of Duesberg book ( “Inventing the Aids Virus “ ) , was all that people needed from Duesberg plus his Name on it, and the Forewords by his friend Mullis, the creator of the “plandemics machine generator” or PCR . Mullis also believed in phantom viruses , but we have to say that he was awakened to the pseudoscience used for genocide and control and fought in his way against those powers, sometimes…

Why do some people in the terrain community still talk about “we are 68% viruses “ “they are our friends ! “,  please tell me why ? Don’t they know what triggers in people’s minds when they mention “we are 68% poison “ we have poison as our Ally ! We are made of Poison !

Why do some people in the truth community still talk about 8% being Endogenous Retroviruses ?? That was also a problem in the 80´ We found HERVs ! “ That´s it ! They are part of us !

Its all endogenous , but why still use retro and virus ? Did we learn something in this 40 years ? RNA -- to --> DNA is not the exception , more the rule ?? Who knows.

Didn´t we know that the enzyme RT was not something special to look for , and instead more than 50% of our cells are using RT ?? So what was all that about finding RT ? Or finding human proteins ? Sometimes the truth is so easy to understand, that people need to complicate it.

Why do we accept the term Virus-like particles VLPs ? If we do not have Viruses to compare with ?  , what is something that is like something that doesn´t exist ??

We need to banish the word Virus and take it out of our conversations... replace it with something else if you want ! Maybe something that was really seen from a sample without alteration , under electron microscope for example ... ( If we can see anything from real life under an electron microscope at all ).

Don’t you know that when you see a term used in the opposite meaning , you are using Mason’s way to talk ? Don’t you know that by using a word but meaning the opposite ( like in isolation of “viruses”) you are promoting a schizophrenic society ? Did you read the book 1984 ??

Why people in the antivaccine community don’t want to listen when you put in their face the CDC saying on print “ no records of isolation from a sample taken directly from human exist for any virus ( HIV HPV SARSCov2, etc ) “, “because that is beyond What virology can do ???? “  AntiVax leaders say “ I´m not a virologist “ and I don’t want to scare people ¡?¡?, so then why do you talk about a phantom thing you don’t know ,  using the word “virus” ? If you are not a virologist, and that´s why you cannot discuss the non-existence of viruses , but you can affirm that viruses exist, because...... because.... everyone knows that ! ( everyone inside Plato's cave ) .

We cannot name something with a word that has been used for more than 100 years by controllers to confuse, control, and harm . We need to stop.

We cannot use the only word that allows the system to make and accept “vaccines” to destroy health and reduce population.

We cannot debate using that word , which is not a thing but a concept , or an idea or an illusion call it what you want, because if we mention that word we trigger in the audience what they saw in Plato's cave . Even if that audience is a little bit awake , the idea implanted using that word in the past ( with the fear ) has the power to block their mind , put it in automatic mode, and keep the hypnosis, taking out all critical thinking.

“no pathogenic viruses proven to exist” is not enough, NO VIRUS WAS PROVEN TO EXIST.

“no virus proven to cause any disease” is not enough , NO VIRUS WAS PROVEN TO EXIST

“viruses are not what we are told” is not enough, VIRUSES ARE JUST A CONCEPT THAT ONLY EXIST IN PEOPLE’S MIND

We all have to be very careful when talking about cellular debris or “exosomes” .... We need to avoid using a word that represents absolutely nothing in nature. Because then,  that nothing, will be filled with FEAR.

God Bless you all,

Misha

 

Source: https://gamzuletova.substack.com/p/the-word-virus

How "HIV/AIDS" foretold the "COVID" crisis

 


As Dr. Fauci engineered his lethal "HIV/AIDS" scam—laying the groundwork for the "COVID" horror to come—Celia Farber was there covering it; and now her book about that episode is back in print 

 

Mark Crispin Miller
March 6th

On March 23, Chelsea Green will publish Celia Farber’s Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS. This is certainly great news for all those who’ve been clamoring for a new edition of that book—which, first published in 2006, did not get the attention it deserved (to put it mildly), as it came out at the start of a ferocious propaganda drive against all those intrepid souls who called themselves “AIDS dissidents,” and who were slimed (preposterously) as “AIDS deniers.” (Sound familiar?) Since Farber was a special target of that propaganda (which had, in fact, been triggered by an article of hers—“Out of Control: AIDS and the Corruption of Medical Science,” which Harper’s featured as its cover story in March of that year), her great book sank without a trace, and then slipped quickly out of print (as so many great book have, and do).

And as that book’s reappearance (enriched with her new afterword) is great news for Farber’s longtime faithful readers, it’s great news also for the vast potential readership that has arisen in these last three years, and which is growing larger all the time, as ever more of us wake up to the unprecedented fraud known as “the COVID crisis”: a global horror foretold directly by the HIV/AIDS scam devised by Dr. Fauci, as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. points out in his magisterial The Real Anthony Fauci—and as I elaborate in my own foreword to this precious new edition of Serious Adverse Events.

News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

(Farber will be inviting people to book-related events throughout the Northeast US, through her Substack: celiafarber.substack.com.) 

When Celia Farber wrote the articles comprising this “uncensored history of AIDS,” she did not know, nor could she have imagined, that she was also writing an essential pre-history of the catastrophic sequel yet to come. There are, of course, already many books about the Covid crisis, and there will certainly be many more, but any thorough bibliography on “the coronavirus” and its myriad disastrous consequences must include this peerless book about HIV/AIDS—a dress rehearsal for the notional “pandemic” that premiered in January 2020 and that’s still simmering (with, perhaps, no end in sight).

Although it came as a big shock to We the Viewers—believing, as so many did, the propaganda line that SARS-CoV-2 had leapt scarily from bats to humans—“COVID-19” was a movie that we’d seen before, as this book should make clear to those who weren’t around when it first played back in the Eighties, or who were but couldn’t see its flaws (because the media would not report them, or talk to anyone who grasped them).

Back then, as an intrepid young reporter for SPIN, Farber was the only journalist, aside from some few allies in the gay press, to dig into the science (or “science”) of AIDS, and to discuss it with those fighting on both sides of the fierce struggle over its direction. While the majority of journalists (or “journalists”) sat reverently at Dr. Fauci’s feet and parroted his terroristic line on HIV (which made his agency, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID], a fortune, and him the very “God of public health”), Farber noted that the HIV/AIDS thesis was, in the United States, wholly based on the bombastic say-so of Dr. Robert Gallo. Well-informed by searching conversations with (real) scientists like Dr. Peter Duesberg, Farber realized, and reported, that there was apparently no evidence that HIV causes AIDS, whereas there was much evidence that HIV does not cause AIDS: evidence that was ferociously suppressed, while those seeking to pursue it—Dr. Duesberg above all—were maliciously attacked and (as we now say) cancelled.

Thus Farber was a lucid and courageous witness of the power-play behind the first “scamdemic,” which in many ways foretold the one that has now largely wrecked the world. That terrifying fabrication of the sure lethality of HIV, despite the evidence disproving it, foretold the terrifying exaggeration of the threat posed by SARS-CoV-2, despite the evidence that it was no more lethal than the flu, a mortal danger only to the old and very sick—evidence that was also dangerous to mention (although Dr. Fauci early on affirmed, confusingly, that SARS-CoV-2 was no more lethal than the flu).

Moreover, what made HIV so very frightening was its devilish invisibility, since it “spread” asymptomatically, so you couldn’t know you “had it” unless a PCR test found you “positive,” in which case you were doomed. As Farber learned from an infuriated Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR technology (for which he won a Nobel Prize), that test should not be used for diagnostic purposes, yet Fauci was now using it, strategically, to pump up the numbers of the doomed. Thus Fauci’s HIV/AIDS myth anticipated the mythology of Covid, whose rapid “spread” was also undetectable except by PCR, the test itself creating Covid “cases” by the millions out of thin air.

The terrifying “spread” of HIV was also (seemingly) affirmed by a certain diagnostic promiscuity, as all the millions allegedly “living with HIV/AIDS” worldwide included many who just maybe “had it,” or looked like they did. On the harrowing UNAIDS statistics released in 1987, Farber notes that they “represent the organization’s estimate of the number of people presumed to be infected with HIV”—a clear precursor to the millions stricken (presumably) with “presumed COVID-19.” HIV’s ever-spiking toll, or relentless “spread,” was inflated further by the frequent misdiagnosis of deaths from other illnesses as “AIDS deaths”—as Farber found in Africa, where she went in search of evidence that AIDS was wiping out the continent as asserted, with neo-colonial zeal, by the AIDS- industrial complex. In a Ugandan village overrun by heavily funded Western AIDS-fighters, Farber learned that the people there now called all deaths—from malaria or any other illness—“AIDS deaths.” (AIDS “is a formula for everything here,” one villager said wearily.) That African phenomenon foretold the global plague of bogus diagnoses, whereby deaths caused by flu, pneumonia, heart attack, and even motorcycle accidents were written up as “COVID deaths”—as were countless others who had “tested positive” but clearly died of other comorbidities.

So much for the terroristic fakery (some might say wizardry) behind the two “scamdemics.” What of the social, cultural, and medical effects of all that fear? Back then, Fauci brought the fear to a high boil by inventing what he called the “heterosexual spread” of AIDS—a myth without a shred of evidence behind it. Yet it was, at once, hysterically affirmed as “scientific” truth by the relentless fear-pornographers of “our free press,” who thereby helped make sexual union seem as dangerous as chain-smoking, or Russian roulette, so that people now refrained from passionate encounters, eyeing potential partners warily, and refusing to embrace without the latex armor of “safe sex.” That new fear in the sexual realm foretold the universal madness of mask mandates and “social distancing,” whereby millions now avoided not just casual sex but one another, on the crackpot premise that society itself is dangerous.

And yet there was—and is—a consequence of Fauci’s deviltry far graver than that misanthropic creed of “staying safe.” As Farber tried to tell the world back then, the purpose of the HIV/AIDS propaganda drive was not to save gay lives, or any lives: on the contrary. The purpose of arousing, and maintaining, all that panic over HIV was to make people desperate to take AZT—a “cure” far deadlier than that virus, and one that slowly killed some 300,000 gay men, including Rudolf Nureyev, Keith Haring, Freddie Mercury, and others whose death-agonies were misreported mawkishly as caused by AIDS. If Farber’s reportage had gotten the hearing it deserved and moved other journalists to dig into that crime against humanity, Fauci and his pharmaceutical colossus would have fallen, and he couldn’t have moved on to help kill millions (if not more) with those “vaccines” that are themselves far deadlier than any virus ever was, and that will go on killing and/or crippling people in unprecedented numbers, all throughout the world, long after Fauci and his cohorts have gone on to their reward.

And why was Farber’s reportage ignored—and she herself maligned for writing it? That punishment of an extraordinary journalist, and long blackout on her lifesaving work, was due to yet another feature of the HIV/AIDS cult that persisted through the Covid cult and that defines this era overall. The dismal Fauci’s rise to prominence and reputation as a great humanitarian; the marginalization of the brilliant Peter Duesberg (“He is a proponent of AIDS denialism, the debunked claim that HIV does not cause AIDS,” barks Wiki- pedia); the traumatic battering of Celia Farber; and—to jump ahead, again, to Covid—the epic slandering (and worse) of Zev Zelenko, Robert F. Kennedy, Peter McCullough, Pierre Kory, Tess Lawrie, Harvey Risch, Meryl Nass, Robert Malone, Scott Atlas, Mike Yeadon, Simone Gold, John Ioannidis, Knut Wittkowski, Paul Alexander, Delores Cahill, Judy Mikovits, Sucharit Bhakdi and Ryan Cole, and the many other honest doctors, scientists and activists who have worked to tell the truth about “the virus” or that “vaccination” drive: all such gross injustices, and the weird persistence of the Covid cult, are due to the “woke” takeover of science, medicine and journalism—a conquest that began with HIV/AIDS, as Farber shows us here.

That scientists would question Gallo's HIV/AIDS theory, expose its flaws and even offer an alternative, is only right, both scientifically and—since AIDS was killing people—morally; yet Duesberg stood condemned for doing it, smeared, ludicrously, as an "AIDS denialist," as if he'd claimed that AIDS does not exist, when what he did do was (a) show that HIV could not be "the cause" of AIDS, and (b) propose, compellingly, that AIDS was caused primarily by amyl nitrate, due to the overuse of poppers at gay bacchanalia. Despite his solid argument, and even though his theory, if duly heeded, would have saved the lives of countless gay men, Duesberg was (and still is) charged with homophobia, for daring to suggest that AIDS may have been caused by aspects of the "gay lifestyle"—a theory that, however valid scientifically, was, by "woke" standards, an egregious no-no, tantamount to hate speech, and therefore to be rejected out of hand by all goodthinkers as a variant of Holocaust denial.

That virulent "woke" attitude gave Fauci perfect cover for his depredations, and—literally—let him get away with murder. As Farber painfully reported (painful not just for the reader, but also for herself, she too having been absurdly slandered as an "AIDS denialist"), Fauci, though initially assailed by Larry Kramer and his movement, quickly worked his old black magic on (with some exceptions) that community, so that he now appeared as one of them, a savior of gay lives—and they now served as shock troops for his bio-fascist union with Big Pharma. Somewhat like Antifa today, and those young zealots flinging soup at artworks to "fight climate change," ACT UP used its "radical" theatrics to further an elite agenda. As if their scripts were written by the (mostly homophobic) laissez-faire extremists in the Reagan/Bush regime, ACT UP pushed for a lethal stroke of radical deregulation—i.e., the gutting of the FDA's slow drug approval process, to speed the (highly lucrative) release of AZT (and any other iffy drug that Fauci and his cohorts wanted on the market). Anyone defending the approval process as it was, noting the unfortunate necessity of running all those trials, to make sure every drug released was safe, and worked (not like, say, thalidomide) would now be lividly reviled for wanting to see more gay people die. 

One can only wonder just how many of those activists themselves took AZT, and "died of AIDS"—painfully, and prematurely, killed by the "woke" science that so benefited Dr. Fauci and his corporate partners, and that again now benefits them all, but this time with inconceivably destructive consequences for the entire human race (and countless other animals as well). Since the rollout, under Trump, of SARS-CoV-2, with Dr. Fauci as his (seeming) adversary, every single question raised by its career, and/or how best to deal with it, has been idiotically politicized, and "settled" by "woke" science, in glaring contradiction of real science, and to the incalculable detriment of all. 

Never mind what scientists have found, or what doctors have discovered treating patients. According to "woke" science, lockdowns work, masks "keep us safe" (as do "social distancing," plexiglass "workplace barriers" and hand sanitizers), all "in-person" gatherings are "super-spreaders," "putting everyone at risk" (except BLM's, and Antifa's, "the virus" making some allowances for "social justice"), hydroxychloraquine is poisonous, Ivermectin doesn't work, and (so) the only way to "get back to normal" is for every person on the planet (and their pets) to get "fully vaccinated," and then serially boosted—and those who've questioned or resisted any of those policies are all "far-right extremists," "Trump supporters," "white supremacists" (whether they're white or not), and (above all) "anti-vaxxers," whose claims that those vaccines have killed and crippled millions—or anyone at all—is just "misinformation," which ought to be against the law (and will be, if "woke" science has its way). 

Such "woke" blather is especially repellent in the case of Dr. Fauci, in light of his psychopathic crimes—killing multitudes of gay men while posing as a staunch protector of gay lives, and killing (some might say exterminating) millions of black people, along with countless people of all other colors, while feigning great concern about "the undeniable effects of racism" (as he told Emory's graduating class in May of 2021, urging them to be "part of the solution"). The most horrific revelations in this book are surely those of Fauci's sadism in using populations black and brown for "research" purposes, just as Dr. Mengele did, although Fauci tormented many more, and did it for far longer, than the "Angel of Death" did at Auschwitz. Farber's readers will not soon forget her harrowing accounts of the horrendous AZT trials in the US and Africa, and of her macabre discoveries at the Incarnation Children's Center in New York City, where children by the hundreds, black and brown (including babies), had been torturously dosed with toxic AIDS drugs, though they did not have AIDS—just as children by the millions (including babies) have now been "vaccinated" for a "virus" that does not pose any threat to them, although such "vaccine" surely does, just as did AZT.

Celia Farber’s work is journalism at its best—solid, lucid, and humane, attacking wrongs that few dare touch, and thereby helping right them, and doing so with uncommon literary grace (and flashes of a devastating humor). For this she should have won professional rewards and been exalted as a journalistic luminary. And yet, so mighty are the figures whose wrongdoing she exposed, and so corrupt is journalism in their world, that Farber was not hailed but trashed for her accomplishment, while Fauci is a multimillionaire, and widely deemed a saint, despite the evil he has done. With Serious Adverse Events now back in print, it should be possible, at last, to remedy that dual injustice

 

AIDS & its parallels with Covid-19

How the AIDS hoax led to 'Covid' 

 

Source: https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/how-hivaids-foretold-the-covid-crisis

Related: Celia Farber in RFK's "The Real Anthony Fauci"  

sábado, 4 de março de 2023

No, “Covid” STILL doesn’t come from a lab

 



Kit Knightly
Feb 28, 2023

The big Covid news the last couple of days has been that the US Department of Energy, via the Wall Street Journal, has claimed that a laboratory leak is the “most likely” origin of “Covid”.

Citing “new evidence”, a DoE panel has amended their assessment from 2021, essentially switching “we don’t know” to “it probably came from a lab”.

This is just the latest step in the lab-leak theory’s remarkable journey from fringe idea to mainstream position, or from “conspiracy theory to government debate”, according to Forbes’ article timelining the whole process.

You know what OffG thinks of the lab-leak theory, we did a fact-check on it back in 2021, and then addressed it again in 2022: “Lab leak” theory makes no sense, and only reinforces the mainstream narrative.

Further, it can now be used as fuel for the “new cold war” narrative.

The US can blame China for creating the virus, while China can either claim it was natural or that the US released it in an act of “bio-terrorism”.

Both sides will claim the other side’s vaccines don’t work, but that theirs do. And, make no mistake, both sides will still very much want to vaccinate everyone.

In some ways this is a symptom of the failure of the Covid narrative. The greatest propaganda push of all time ran out of steam just two years in, and is suddenly fighting defensively simply to hold itself together. Because the “lab leak” debate is very much a fallback position. A retreat in good order, protecting – at all costs – the fundamental lie of “Covid”, viz – there was no new disease.

Let’s say that once more with feeling….

There was NO NEW DISEASE!

There were the old flu symptoms, there was a new name, and there was a crappy test.

And that is all.

This is the one admission the establishment will never make, because it totally breaks their narrative.

Kills it stone dead.

Every other “admission”, debate or idea – “lab leak”, early treatment, government panic, “we underestimated natural immunity”, “the vaccine trials were misleading” – can eventually be brought back around to justifying lockdowns and other authoritarian “public health measures”.

If not for Covid, then for the next “pandemic”.

Patrick Henningsen put it perfectly on Twitter:

 

Further, every other admission preserves the idea that while governments might lie, they might manipulate, they might “panic”, they might be incompetent, they might be corupt, they may even do quite obscene things, they definitely don’t just make stuff up and pretend it’s real.

That’s a very important line that needs to never be crossed. They will tacitly admit to almost anything else – never that. Because once you start pulling on that thread, who knows what might unravel.

Hopefully the US Department of Energy and the Wall Street Journal throwing their collective weight behind the “lab-leak” theory finally wakes people up to what it really is and always has been.

There’s an old axiom in politics that says you should never believe something until it’s been officially denied.

The reverse holds true: Never believe something once it’s been officially endorsed.

They’ll admit to anything but the truth.

                                                             ***

Project Veritas and the "Virus":

 

Source: https://off-guardian.org/2023/02/28/no-covid-still-doesnt-come-from-a-lab/

quinta-feira, 2 de março de 2023

9/11 lawyer warns toxic Ohio train derailment could lead to 'explosion of cancers'

 

 

February 22, 2023 (leer en castellano)

Residents of East Palestine should fear the toxic train derailment that’s rocked the small Ohio town — because it’s an “explosion of cancers waiting to happen,” a lawyer who reps sickened 9/11 victims told The Post on Wednesday.

Attorney Michael Barasch issued the dire warning after the devastating Feb. 3 derailment in East Palestine exposed locals to a slew of spilled hazardous materials, sparking fears about the safety of air and drinking water.

“Be afraid, very afraid,” Barasch said of the potential health risks that lie ahead

“This is an explosion of cancers waiting to happen. And you won’t see it for years — sometimes 5, 10, 20 years. This is scary stuff.”

 


The attorney, whose firm has represented tens of thousands of 9/11 victims — including many diagnosed with cancer years after consuming toxic dust at Ground Zero — said he didn’t believe the Environmental Protection Agency’s assurances the air and drinking water were once again safe after the toxic spill.

 
Attorney Michael Barasch, who reps sickened 9/11 victims, said residents of East Palestine should be “very afraid” of the toxic train derailment in East Palestine.
R Umar Abbasi

“It sent shivers down my spine when the EPA told residents of East Palestine the air was safe to breathe,” Barasch said. “That’s exactly what EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman told downtown New Yorkers [after 9/11]. It wasn’t safe at all.”

He added: “If the World Trade Center attacks taught us anything, it’s that 9/11 didn’t end on 9/11.”

Barasch said residents were right to question the air and water quality as he called for scientists independent of the EPA to go in to carry out tests.

“When I hear the EPA now say the air is safe. I don’t believe them,” he said.

“I’ve seen the pictures of the bubbling in the water. I’ve seen the pictures of the dead animals. I wouldn’t drink that water, would you?

“I urge everyone: Protect yourselves, protect your families. Wait until there is independent scientific evidence.”

In East Palestine, officials carried out a “controlled burn” to avoid an explosion after 1.1 million pounds of vinyl chloride spilled out in the derailment, alongside butyl acrylate and isobutylene.

 
Barasch’s firm has represented thousands of 9/11 victims — including many diagnosed with cancer years after consuming toxic dust at Ground Zero.
Getty Images

Vinyl chloride has already been linked to liver, brain and lung cancers, and scientists recently told The Post there’s no knowing what the result of burning the combination of toxic chemicals which spilled would be.

Toxic dust at the 9/11 site was a stew of many hazardous materials, including cement dust, asbestos, and heavy metals poisonous to the human body and brain such as lead, mercury and cadmium. Barasch said new cancers are still being linked to toxic dust found at Ground Zero — some 22 years later.

The lawyer urged residents not to agree to any potential compensation settlements that rail company Norfolk Southern could offer so they can seek out money if they do fall seriously ill in the years to come. 

The devastating derailment in East Palestine exposed locals to a slew of spilled hazardous materials.
AP

“The statute of limitations within which to sue begins with the discovery of an illness. It’s way too soon to know if you’ll be sick,” he said.

“If 9/11 taught us anything, these cancers don’t come up for years.”

“Do not sign away your legal right,” he added.

Barasch also called for the federal government to step up after the East Palestine disaster and create a non-adversarial fund and health care system — similar to the one set up after 9/11 so residents can obtain free monitoring in the years to come.

“These people are going to need help and they deserve it, it’s not their fault,” he said.

 

Source: https://nypost.com/2023/02/22/9-11-lawyer-warns-toxic-ohio-train-derailment-could-lead-to-explosion-of-cancers/

Explosion of excess deaths in heavily vaccinated European countries; Romania and Bulgaria buck the trend

 

 

Claudia Marcu
Rio Times Online
February 23rd

Eurostat has published excess mortality rates for December 2022. The European average is plus 19%, with Romania and Bulgaria being the only countries where this parameter has decreased.

The report is based on an average mortality rate for 2016-2019, i.e., before the pandemic. The data published by Eurostat have shocked the entire scientific world.

Excess mortality measures the increase in deaths during a period and in a particular group, compared to the expected value or statistical trend during a reference period or in a reference population.

At the end of the pandemic, when there were almost no more covid deaths, the most vaccinated countries recorded shocking excess mortality rates in December 2022 compared to the normal 2016-2019.


The highest excess mortality rates were recorded in Iceland at 43.1% and Germany at 37.3%.

Compared to the European average of 19% in December 2022, which is still huge, Austria had excess mortality of plus 27.4%, Ireland 25.4%, France 24.5%, Slovenia 25.9%, Czech Republic 23.2%, Switzerland 22.9%, Netherlands 22.7%, Estonia 22.6%, Denmark 22.4%, Norway 21%, Finland 21.1%, Latvia 20.6%, and Belgium 19.1%.

In Germany, 78% of the population is vaccinated with 3 and 4 doses; in Iceland, 80% is immunized with two doses, and 69% is vaccinated with 3 and 4 doses.

Romania and Bulgaria were at the opposite pole of excess mortality in December 2022, minus 5.5% and 6%, respectively.

They are the only two EU/EEA countries with the lowest vaccination coverage.

Officially, 30% of the population in Bulgaria is vaccinated against covid, and 42% in Romania.

Considering the near-negative excess mortality rates between the two countries and the fictitious vaccinations in Bulgaria, the actual percentage of vaccinated people in Romania is likely no more than 25%.

After the publication of the shocking data by Eurostat, German doctors called for an investigation into the causes of the excess deaths, stressing that Covid did not cause them.

(Tucker Carlson and former Executive Of Blackrock Edward Dowd: Excess Deaths In The West Are A National Security Concern)

 


COVERING UP THE DISASTER?

Things are even worse than that. Germany had excess mortality of plus 46% in the last week of December last year.

Eurostat data clearly showed a correlation between the percentage of Covid vaccination and excess mortality.

“The higher the vaccination coverage, the higher the excess mortality.

Curiously, Italy and Sweden did not report data to Eurostat and did not do so between August and September 2022.

Portugal reported an additional 14.8% excess mortality in December 2022 but had over 40% in the summer because it vaccinated its population earlier than the other countries.

The UK tried to skew the excess mortality percentage by using 2016-2019 and 2021 as the reporting base.

So they took the year with the highest mortality, 2021, as the baseline because both Covid and the vaccine caused the deaths.

Then they significantly reduced the excess mortality by December 2022.

But even then, they still had 7% more deaths,” civil rights activist Aurelian Popa told us.

VACCINATION INCREASES MORTALITY

Official data show that in 2021, 4.5 billion people worldwide received one dose of the Covid vaccine, 3.8 billion received two doses, and 537 million received three doses.

However, compared to 2020, when the vaccine did not exist, the most Covid deaths were reported in 2021.

(Germany, whose government behaved so authoritarian during the Covid events that one doubted the country’s understanding of democracy, is now paying the bill with the highest excess mortality rate ever.)

 


Thus, if there were 1.9 million Covid deaths in 2020, there would be 3.4 million in 2022. [FW EDIT: not a single death can attributed to "Covid" since the alleged causative agent has never been demonstrated to exist].

This is perhaps the most telling evidence that the vaccine did not work in any way and did not protect anyone but caused mortality to increase tremendously.

By 2022, only 1 billion people had received another dose of the Covid vaccine, less than 1 billion had two doses, and 2.3 billion had welcomed their third and fourth doses.

In 2022, only 1.1 million Covid deaths were reported, but with a high excess mortality rate.

This post was first published here.

 

 

Source: https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/explosion-of-excess-deaths-in-heavily-vaccinated-european-countries-romania-and-bulgaria-go-against-trend/

 

domingo, 26 de fevereiro de 2023

The Ivermectin Double Cross

 


February 11th

Since 1998, I have been studying and experiencing in various manners the nature doctor path. I bloomed into visual arts as a child. I was a writer. I danced. Then my calling came. First, I began with the study of animals, then of plants and man. In nature and in the lab. Then chemical and mathematical, which taught me the natural methods of synergy and helped me train my pattern recognition. Then 15 years of clinical experience, designing medicine, and authoring a book (as a single parent). 11 years as an entrepreneur and ongoing. I had many years of studying my inner world. I trained in many disciplines. Red flags jump out at me. The Ivermectin double-cross story was simple for me to spot soon into it, akin to the plandemic on day one.

What is the double-cross? You can watch a video of me explaining how the slave manipulators pull off the double-cross. They know we are going to figure some things out about their agenda, but they have traps for us every step of the way. They were very well aware there would be those of us able to see through their overt cons, but they planned otherwise for us. Hold back the candy for long enough, the child will want it. Make it look like they are suppressing a “cure” for a disease (one that doesn’t even exist, for a more modern example) and those clever monkeys are going to start going bananas over it. They know how to manipulate a rebel mind. This is why there are so many gatekeepers and controlled opposition. The plan is to give you enough to think you know what’s going on, hoping you will stop your searching there, as they play the law of averages knowing that most people will stay trapped in a narrative they tailored all along.

You can like and do whatever you wish, of course. I am presenting an educated perspective other than the one you may have been listening to. I place ivermectin in the same arena as I do antibiotics. These are things that are designed to kill some sort of life inside of us. Mankind is always so heavy-handed with chemicals! Why must everything be bombed and eradicated? Obliterated?

 
                                                       The Real Cause of Polio

Has anyone ever stopped to ask what all these drug residues from stool may do once they hit our rivers and lakes; once they are in our wildlife? Antibiotics cause water and soil contamination. Does Ivermectin? Indeed, it does. The residue can kill insects, too. Also, it was found ivermectin breakdown takes months in cold weather, but faster (2 weeks) in hot weather. What happens when more and more people take this drug, believing it to be some sort of miracle?

A major mistake in our understanding is we don't realize that what we are calling parasite infections are all indicators, telling us something important about the health of our entire organism: the frequencies and signals it puts off. Calling out for a need to be met.

The controllers of "scienceTM" have no desire to fund such studies to test if our own signals call to us these situations so that we can metabolize something synthetic or express something emotionally (release) that has happened to us from our exposures and unfit habits. We look at these situations as if unwanted, rather than understand that they actually have a purpose, one that is meant for your ultimate benefit.

This understanding completely accepts the benevolence of the intent of our body's healing elegance and completely flips the picture about how we are in constant communication with our surroundings in a non-material manner, one that we have barely been allowed to explore (controlled knowledge). It alters our thinking about the world, as well as, places responsibility firmly in our own laps. 

 

   
A true Nature Doctor

I understand that once meddled, usually always meddled, and there will be situations of the drug leading to a dependency on it, so those people will use it for life. Those who are talked into chemo can use it alongside their treatments and, if lucky, score a few extra months or years of life with their cancer suppression. I also understand there can be metabolic problems with parasites, almost akin to an allergy, that is when there is a signaling of a “spill on aisle 4” that it is not handling the clean up so well with limited energetic resources to do so.


This is foundationally a problem of detox and if that were addressed, their symptoms would subside, and they would be metabolizing the parasitic wastes well (which are eating their highly toxic stores that have yet been able to be metabolized by anything else in the body). Primarily, the detox correction would be made with supplementation, while food and other lifestyle changes are being sorted out over time, and to build up reserves from depletion, unblock the meridians to prioritize proper cleansing. I have helped thousands of people successfully work with this method. 

 

                                                               Electrical man.

There are many environmental toxins that can accumulate in the human body and these are just a small few:

Lead: Found in old paint, contaminated soil, and drinking water.

Mercury: Found in seafood, dental fillings, and certain industrial processes.

Cadmium: Found in batteries, pigments, and some types of soil.

Arsenic: Found in water, soil, and some foods, found in old lace and some textiles.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): These are synthetic chemicals that were once widely used in electrical equipment and are now banned in many countries.

Dioxins: Toxic byproducts of some industrial processes, such as waste incineration and pesticide manufacturing.

Pesticides/Herbicides: Can accumulate in food and water, and damage soils.

Bisphenol A (BPA): Used in the production of certain plastics and resins and can leach into food and drinks stored in these materials.

Phthalates: Chemicals used in the production of plastics and personal care products, and can disrupt hormones and cause other health problems.

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs): These are synthetic “forever” chemicals used in nonstick cookware, waterproof clothing, and fire-fighting foam, and are persistent in the environment and can accumulate in the body.

Studies have found that parasites like tapeworms can accumulate high levels of lead, cadmium, and mercury, in higher concentrations than their hosts can, indicating that they are capable of absorbing and retaining these toxic substances from their hosts. When you kill these creatures, the body reabsorbs the wastes back into the tissues. We do a disservice to ourselves to go on a killing spree inside of our bodies at the expense of the terrain.

I suppose there will be no vegans taking ivermectin then since that philosophy is all about the preservation and respect of all sentient living things. Here is another problem you may wish to avoid that can happen when you come in, guns a-blazin’:

Ivermectin exerts a strong microfilaricidal effect on filariae, leading to a destruction of mf within one week after treatment. In subjects infected with Onchocerca volvulus, the destruction of mf in the skin is associated with inflammatory processes leading to the so-called Mazzotti reaction. In those infected with L. loa, the drug probably induces a paralysis of the L. loa mf, which are then drained passively in the blood circulation. If the microfilarial density is high, the process can lead to an embolization of mf in the brain capillaries, to inflammatory reactions at the cerebral level, and to an encephalopathy.

There is a choice to chase out (not kill) parasites. MMS is excellent for that (I don't see governments and huge industries handing CDS/MMS out like they do the anti-fertility ivermectin), DMSO and MSM together, as well, simple coffee enemas, correct pH, also, but we are aware when we cleanse them, you are now in charge of their job. You'd best know what you are going after and how. I like to simply start with a metals cleansing routine (various clays and minerals) a few times a year to prevent me from needing parasites to try and do the work for me.

What happens, if those wastes just stay within you? How could that affect your health? Longevity? What if you killed the parasites with ivermectin, what happens to your signaling and frequency from taking this drug? How does it affect your somatids? I’ve never seen such a safety study like that done. What happens when the drug weakens your kidneys (part of your "essence" in TCM describing energy flows in the body)? The kidney is where important energy emerges for many aspects of fertility. Are people taking the drug having their liver, heart, or kidney health monitored? Shouldn’t that be the responsibility of a doctor that is supposed to be specific in drug administration, as it is a drug that carries a heavy potential for side effects?

Are we really sure we haven’t been double-crossed on the ivermectin saga?

Share

I hope this stimulates your thinking and assists your self-reflection productively.

Where we are heading leads to further ideas/thoughts/actions toward our relationship with water, aether, a clean pineal, using frequency to heal, advancement into sovereign thinking, and finding a harmonious collective that isn't forced, natural law learned. The entire way we think about health is correcting itself.

Our better choices will disallow controllers to drug us and manipulate us. We will not be owned.

I surrender myself daily to The Unified Creator and offer this in service,

With love, Amandha


Further learning:

Spacebusters on Ivermectin

👇👇👇

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3GGjYlLVqP4g/

Ivermectin Toxicity: P-Glycoprotein Deficiency 👇👇👇

https://rumble.com/v256swm-ivermectin-toxicity-p-glycoprotein-deficiency-genetic-or-drug-induced-and-m.html

Amandha explains her perspective found in YumNaturals Emporium Telegram channel.

👇👇 👇

Part 1

https://t.me/amandhavollmer/4009

Part 2

https://t.me/healthydoseoftruth/241960

Amandha's blog post 👇👇👇

https://yummy.doctor/blog/a-note-about-ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine/

Subtle Poisons article 👇👇👇

https://www.swiftrunnerministries.com/Subtle-Poisons.php

Andrew Kaufman MD 👇👇👇

https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/videos/ivermectin-the-true-story-by-dr-andrew-kaufman/

Substack article 👇👇👇

Share Amandha D Vollmer's Newsletter


Source: https://amandhavollmer.substack.com/p/the-ivermectin-double-cross?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=1082201&post_id=102177178&isFreemail=true&utm_campaign=667911&utm_medium=email

Brazil: parents will be forced to vaccinate their children to keep government aid flowing



Rio Times Online
February 7, 2023

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT, progressive-globalist) said that the Bolsa Familia program would again require parents to prove the vaccination of their children to continue receiving the benefit.

Bolsa Familia is a social welfare program for the poorest families in Brazil.

It’s a kind of universal basic income guaranteed to tens of millions, but only, it now turns out, if they dance to Lula’s tune.

“The Bolsa Família is coming back, and it is coming back with something important; it is coming back with conditions. The children have to be in school. If they are not in school, the mother loses the benefit.”

“The children have to be vaccinated. Suppose they don’t have a vaccination certificate. In that case, the mother will lose the benefit”, said Lula during the inauguration of the ophthalmology and diagnostic units of the Super Carioca Health Center in Benfica, Rio de Janeiro.

During the campaign, Lula had already said that vaccination would be required.

 

Bolsa familia Is a kind of universal basic income guaranteed to tens of millions, but only, it now turns out, if they dance to Lula’s tune. (Photo internet reproduction)

 

During the transition, Senator Humberto Costa (PT) also made statements about the conditions of the Bolsa Família program.

Accompanied by the first lady, Rosangela da Silva, Janja, the health minister, Nísia Trindade, the mayor of Rio de Janeiro, Eduardo Paes, and governor Cláudio Castro (PL), Lula also said that the program would again require prenatal care for pregnant women when they are beneficiaries of the aid.

The president didn’t explain if the covid vaccine will also be required from children or just the doses of the traditional vaccines, which are part of the child vaccination calendar.

In one of his speeches, he mentioned both the vaccine against covid and the children’s vaccination campaign, which will have the return of Zé Gotinha and the participation of Xuxa Meneguel, Lula’s supporter in the electoral campaign.

“Now the Zé Gotinha campaign will begin. We can’t hesitate; we can’t play around. It is a question of science. If there are ten covid vaccines, 50 to take, I will take as many as necessary because I like my life. I think everyone has a duty to their children’s life, take them [to vaccinate] at the right age,” Lula said.

Health Minister Nísia Trindade also spoke but did not say which vaccines would be required.

“Vaccination is a child’s right,” Nísia declared about the requirement of proof of vaccination to receive Bolsa Família.

Children’s vaccination – including doses against polio, viral triplet (measles, mumps, and rubella), and tuberculosis – has fallen since 2015. In 2021, for example, polio vaccination coverage did not reach 70%, when the recommended is 95%.

Bolsa Família stopped requiring the vaccination of children up to 6 years old when the Bolsonaro government reformulated it in 2021 and started to be called Auxílio Brasil.

The other conditions for maintaining the benefit, such as school attendance and prenatal care by pregnant beneficiaries, are no longer required.

The Bolsa Família will maintain the R$600, paid during the Bolsonaro government, and an additional R$150 per child up to 6 years old.

With information from Revista Oeste

 

Lula blackmails poor Brazilians into getting vaccinated 

Source: https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/lula-says-that-parents-will-be-forced-to-vaccinate-their-children-to-keep-the-bolsa-familia-program/