Rich Planet Interviews Mik Andersen

 

Mik Andersen 

April 15th, 2022 (leer en español)

An important commentator, Richard D. Hall, who runs the programme and website RichPlanet.net, contacted Corona2Inspect in February 2022 to interview Mik Andersen in relation to the evidence revealed from the study of Coronavirus vaccines. Richard put together a very comprehensive and interesting documentary called “Brain Jabbed” [ parts 1, 2 and 3 ], which explains many of the issues raised in the interview. On this occasion, I wish to belatedly share the text of the interview, which is still relevant at this time. I want to take this opportunity to thank Richard for his work and efforts in disseminating the attempts to establish the truth. But I'm also taking this opportunity to convey an affectionate greeting to all the followers of Corona2Inspect, and thank them for their loyalty, despite these weeks of apparent inactivity. Corona2Inspect is still active and continues the investigation and analysis work. Thank you, everyone. 

                                                           ***

1. Richard D. Hall: I have investigated the claims and evidence regarding MAC addresses. I got excited because I thought this would provide absolute proof of nanotechnology. So I devised some experiments to test Bluetooth on vaccinated people and managed to examine 10 vaccinated people. But I didn't find any that gave off Bluetooth signals. I suspect that if intra-body networks in vivo communicate with external systems, it may be with 5G or 6G signals, or something else. Could you say something about this?

Mik Andersen: The question of the MAC address is somewhat difficult to approach, since there are things that we know and many others that we do not know. The French team led by Germán Sarlange carried out an experiment to demonstrate the presence/issuance of MAC addresses through Bluetooth, and obtained positive results. In this work it is shown that a significant proportion of vaccinated people emit these MAC addresses. According to my own understanding, this phenomenon is real, although it must be demonstrated by appropriate means and under the appropriate conditions. What does seem certain is that a vaccinated person does not always emit these MAC addresses, which are visible through the mobile phone's Bluetooth receiver. This is described in the scientific literature, specifically in the DCCORONA and EECORONA wireless nanocommunication protocols. As indicated, one of the problems of nanocommunication networks is the limited energy they have to operate. This means that they are not always on, working, or signaling. It only happens when they receive signals from outside the body or when information is collected that must be transmitted. Obviously, this behavior responds to a client / server model, where the data server is the person inoculated with the vaccine, and the client (still unknown) sends the request for data or tasks. There are other aspects to consider in this matter of MAC addresses. It may happen that the vaccinated person is not sufficiently charged. This means that your nanocommunications network does not have enough energy, or some of its components have not been formed or built yet. The latest evidence seems to indicate that there is self-assembly of components. In other words, if the objects of the intrabody nanocommunication network do not assemble well, or there is some defect or deficiency, this could cause a malfunction. This is not surprising, given that they're constantly increasing the need for vaccine doses. On this subject of MAC addresses, I conducted an experiment with my mobile phone at a Christmas market where I obtained hundreds of MAC addresses, distinct from the mobile phones of vaccinated individuals waiting in checkout lines. I have also carried out tests in areas far from electromagnetic pollution and have effectively detected vaccinated people approaching my position. In addition to all this, there are other aspects to consider. One of them is the process of pinging/matching MAC addresses and their identification with the vaccinated individual. We're considering he hypothesis that there is a ping process by which the MAC addresses of the vaccinated are transmitted to a remote IP address through the Gateway (nearest mobile phone or smartphone) of the vaccinated person. This would be done periodically or recursively, until a record of emissions is obtained that links the MAC of the individual with a mobile device that most frequently sends it. Using a statistical algorithm, it can be determined that MAC 1,2,3,n… are sent 90% of the time with a given smartphone device. At the time this algorithm is applied, it could be known that these MACs correspond to a telephone or smartphone holder. From that moment on, the intracorporeal nanocommunications network of that individual could remain silent, until the next request. In any case, I would not rule out that there are other mechanisms or types of signal that infer the MAC phenomenon. It is very difficult to know what is really happening in this regard. Every day we are discovering something new in the scientific literature, and it seems clear that nothing that has been observed should be in vaccines. I can also give you details of nanocommunication within the body. According to the scientific literature, there is a clear reference to TS-OOK type signals, which would be the binary data transmission protocol. If evidence of TS-OOK communication were obtained within the body of an inoculated person, it would be a good test that would consolidate the hypothesis that we have been observing through microscope images and scientific articles.

2. Richard D. Hall: What would you say is the strongest evidence that micro/nanotechnology related to nano-communication is inside the COVID-19 injections?

Mik Andersen: There are three clear pieces of evidence in our opinion, although they still need to be confirmed going forward. The first is the detection of rectangular and quadrangular objects possessing the morphology of micro/nano bow tie antennas or double and quadruple leaf "bowties", which are explicitly described in the scientific literature, in the context of wireless nanocommunication networks. intracorporeal for nano-electronic devices. The chances of such a finding being random are equivalent to finding a 5-cent Euro coin on Mars. We believe that it is not accidental. We don't think it's a salt crystal, whose shape randomly results in a bow-tie micro-rectenna. Note that micro-rectennas are related to the use of MAC protocols and graphene, whose existence in vaccines was demonstrated by Dr. Campra. The second piece of evidence is the detection of objects with apparent circumscribed circuitry, with an important resemblance to the demux circuits of nano-routers, among other devices not yet identified. See the images obtained by the Quinta Columna and the team of New Zealand researchers. Third, the evidence of epitexial self-assembly based on synthetic or artificial DNA templates (See reference Liu, J.; Wei, J.; Yang, Z. 2021). Another hint of synthetic DNA self-assembly and nanotechnology has recently been obtained, with a very reasonable match between the type of crystals that form in vaccines, compared to those observed in the scientific literature on DNA nanotechnology. This last indication or observation is about to be published, and we hope that it will help clear up some doubts on the matter. 

3. Richard D. Hall: Have you contacted anyone in the field of nanotechnology, such as other scientists, to alert them to the images?

Mik Andersen: For reasons of discretion, I prefer not to say. However, I can tell you that public communication and disclosure has been blocked by censorship. Recently, the old Corona2Inspect blog was censored and then shut down. This tells us that the highest authorities, those responsible for this worldwide vaccination operation, do not want a scientific debate to take place, or seem to want to stifle any news of the published evidence. When this happens on any scientific matter, it shows that they're covering up the truth, or at least that they find it very uncomfortable. This censorship occurred without any explanation, argumentation or specific reason given. In science, discrepancies are normal and accepted, provided that our position is justified and our arguments are backed up with evidence. At Corona2Inspect we try to justify every statement that we make. In fact, you could say that Corona2Inspect's claims are the claims made by the authors of the cited articles. There is actually, nothing invented on my part. Everything is based on science that is published and disseminated through scientific journals, the vast majority of them being of recognised international prestige. I understand that the scientific community should be alert, attentive and cautious with everything relating to the vaccine, especially from the moment in which Dr. Campra found patterns and traces of graphene, which was disclosed in July 2021. We must also bear in mind that throughout the investigation that has been carried out in Corona2Inspect, topics have been addressed that range from biology, to chemistry, through neuroscience, nanotechnology, materials engineering, medicine, electronics and telecommunications. If you pay attention, you will realise that the direction and coordination capacity of universities and research centers is needed to facilitate, or at least, allow the study of the vaccine vials from all these different perspectives. However, we have seen that this has not happened. On the contrary, the pertinent counter-analyses to reproduce Campra's work have not been allowed. This has had to be done outside the governments and administrations of each country. Obviously, these policies make communication between researchers and the progress of any independent research or work extremely difficult. I also want to take this opportunity to convey a message to the scientific community, so that it takes the trouble to analyse the vaccine vials of the vaccines (samples of their different batches, from the beginning of the vaccination campaign), in order to corroborate what has already been observed by Campra and obviously, contribute and publish their assessments and the results of their observations, from their respective experience and areas of ​​knowledge. This work is urgent and must be produced and disseminated in rapidly, through more effective publication formats. An example of this could be the blog format, but I am sure that they will find the appropriate platforms and means to carry it out. 

4. Richard D. Hall: Have you found any evidence of mRNA nano-lipids or other vaccine technologies in the microscope images he has studied?

Mik Andersen: Unfortunately I have not found that pattern, but I cannot guarantee that they do not exist. In fact, Dr. Campra's preliminary report confirms the presence of RNA. It is for this reason that more eyes are needed to observe and analyze the vaccine samples. It is essential to establishthe truth, whatever it may be, and whether you like or dislike it.

5. Richard D. Hall: Or, do you believe that there is mRNA and nanotechnology in every vaccine?

Mik Andersen: This is a good question. In principle, it would seem that all vaccines have an aqueous solution in which graphene is present. This has been verified in Dr. Campra's final report. It could be conceived of as a common base. On the other hand, each vaccine seems to have different “ingredients”. In fact, there are differences between the objects observed in the different shots. But there isn't enough visual information, except for the most publicised samples, which are those of Pfizer. By this I mean that it is difficult to make an affirmation based on the little information that is available. Now, the fact that the presence of graphene in vaccines was hidden should be reason enough to doubt the compositions officially declared in all vaccines and therefore the presence of the virus and of course (if you may) of the “circus” established around the pandemic. Honestly, there is no reason to trust them. With this approach, anything is possible. However, to answer your question, in my opinion, I do believe that there can be present mRNA, CRISPR-Cas technology (for gene editing), nanotechnology and also graphene, CNT carbon micro/nanotubes in their SWCNT and MWCNT variants. I also believe there may be synthetic DNA based self-assembly with which micro/nano-electronic components and devices can be built. In fact, synthetic DNA nano-routers can be built using origami self-assembly, as inferred from the EU-funded CORDIS project for the development of DNA nanorouters, in which it is indicated and I quote, that "[t]he long-term goal of project NANOROUTERS has been to design nanoscale robots, fabricated from synthetic DNA molecules, capable of re-routing cellular communication between cells; and to demonstrate these in a clinically-relevant model.… The work carried out in the project focused on the design of DNA robots which can be synthesised in large scale, made entirely of DNA (and not include chemical drugs and proteins, to maintain material homogeneity and manufacturing simplicity); their demonstration in multiple-cell-type systems in vitro, and finally demonstration in an organ-on-chip system, by the end of 2017.” Now, since 2017 different self-assembly models have been developed, so it cannot be ruled out that a different solution has been developed for each vaccine to achieve the same aim or purpose. In any case, the investigation is still open and it is important to consider all possibilities, whilst always taking as our reference point the evidence, the scientific literature and everything that can be verified, in order to strengthen the grounds we're standing on. 

6. Richard D. Hall: Do you have any idea how the manufacture of such a large number of nanotechnology components was achieved?

Mik Andersen: As I have indicated before, under this scenario, the already-configured nanotech components are not actually manufactured. Apparently, they would self-assemble, according to a pattern or template of synthetic DNA. In fact, the CORDIS project that I just mentioned indicates that DNA can be synthesised on a large scale, so it would be interesting to pose this question to the researchers on this project. In any case, we can find an answer to your question in the scientific literature, it would be necessary to review the work of (Praetorius, F.; Kick, B.; Behler, K.L.; Honemann, M.N.; Weuster-Botz, D.; Dietz, H. 2017) entitled "Biotechnological mass production of DNA origami" where it is explained that synthetic DNA origami, used in self-assembly, is conceived from a "a nanostructure is assembled from a very long single-stranded scaffold molecule held in place by many short single-stranded staple oligonucleotides… Only the bacteriophage-derived scaffold molecules are amenable to scalable and efficient mass production; the shorter staple strands are obtained through costly solid-phase synthesis or enzymatic processes…we show that single strands of DNA of virtually arbitrary length and with virtually arbitrary sequences can be produced in a scalable and cost-efficient manner by using bacteriophages to generate single-stranded precursor DNA." It's not me saying it. Praetorius and his team say it. In summary, it seems that it is not a problem for modern science, according to what is being said.

7. Richard D. Hall: Where do you suspect the nanotechnology is being manufactured? There must be a team secretly working to produce the prototypes of the nanotech injections.

Mik Andersen: According to everything we are seeing, it could be in specialised laboratories, although I do not know the means required to do it. I can't imagine how sophisticated it could, or perhaps, paradoxically, couldn't be. This is something very difficult to determine. As for secret places, or perhaps not so secret, it could be, for example, in an industrial or office park, or an underground laboratory. It could even be the case that many technicians in charge of production do not know what the the compounds they make will be used for. In any case, what does seem clear is that the research of thousands of scientists around the world could have served as a basis to create the nanotechnology that would be involved in vaccines, and of course, the vast majority would have no idea of what the end use would be. In fact, in almost all the scientific articles that I have been able to read, I have observed that the purpose and objectives of the research were very praiseworthy and beneficial. For example, the development of treatments for neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, or tissue repair, the elimination of bacteria, or improving the supervision of the ill. Nuclear energy was also supposed to be a great advance in for humanity, but we already know how that turned out. Obviously, it is logical to think that there must be scientific managers in charge of these projects who have full knowledge of the entire operation, who know the purpose and objectives of the vaccines in great detail, as well as their political, economic, strategic implications, and obviously, their consequences for people's health. All this, would be in accord with guidelines given by people higher up in the food chain, and with greater decision-making power in the hierarchical scale.

8. Richard D. Hall: Do you have any idea who is involved? Which people, which organisations? Which countries?

Mik Andersen: I understand that it is important to know which individuals or which entities are involved in all this. Unfortunately, I do not investigate this issue, since it is something that should be up to judges and prosecutors. But I am aware of the hypotheses and theories that are published in this regard, so I will give you an opinion, which I hope all readers take with due reservation, as with any other opinion. I see this as a globally coordinated operation. If we analyse what is happening in all the countries of the world, the same indiscriminate vaccination policies and campaigns are being observed, the same excuses are given for vaccination, the same PCR diagnostic methods are used, the same news is published, the same journalistic stories and narratives. Vaccination is almost forced, critical voices are persecuted, the analysis of the vaccine is not allowed through official channels, freedoms are restricted, control and pressure on people is increased, statistics, the real data on deaths and damage they cause are hidden... The same thing is happening everywhere. This seems to indicate that almost all countries are complicit, or agree to take the vaccination campaign to its ultimate end, regardless of debate and scientific analysis (which has not taken place) and regardless of the deaths and suffering it is causing. Therefore, we must assume that it is a global phenomenon, on a large scale, proceeds according to a perfectly outlined plan and coordinated lines of action... and for which the political leaders have hidden motives that they will not share with the population. According to the geopolitical and economic situation that shapes the world order as we knew, it seems that supranational organisations such as the UN, and in particular the WHO, have had an incontestable influence and decision-making processes since the so-called "pandemic" began. It is quite probable that those responsible are sitting on the highest rungs of the pyramid of power, using the pandemic as an excuse, the vaccine as an instrument and terror as a means to use to change the order we know into what we now know as the New World Order.

9. Richard D. Hall: What method do you think intrabody systems could use in injections to communicate with external systems?

Mik Andersen: According to the scientific literature, wireless nanocommunication networks for intracorporeal nanodevices have two clear objectives. The first is to monitor and collect data on the parameters, activity or neurological, cardiac, physiological data of the individual, facilitating their transmission to remote servers and databases (on the Internet), to form Big-data and its analytics through AI software (Artificial intelligence). The second is to interact with individuals, especially in the nervous system and the human psyche. To achieve this, there are two theories of intracorporeal communication. On the one hand, there is electromagnetic communication aimed at propagating beyond the body electromagnetic signals which contain the data generated by the network nodes, and also taking them up from the outside to the inside, in order to be able to interact with them. On the other hand, there is molecular communication, whose range of application is oriented in particular to the brain and the central nervous system. This type of communication has a smaller scope, but it has the advantage of permitting scientists to distinguish aspects such as the segregation of neurotransmitters and other types of complex molecules, which are generated in natural neuronal communication. Molecular and neuronal communication are complementary. In fact, they are used in combination to build a complete picture of the state or situation of the individual. Once you understand these types of communication, you have to know that there is a network topology. Unlike our home or work network, the intrabody network topology is more complex and operates with several essential devices. First of all, basic nodes would be needed, biosensors and graphene GQD quantum dots, CNT carbon nanotubes, which expand and spread throughout the body, including our brain, thanks to the fact that they can cross the blood-brain barrier. These objects can act as sensors that pick up electrical signals, pulses, or voltage variations. In short, they pick up data from our body, biological constants, blood composition, brain activity... and transfer it as electrical pulses to the next object in the topology, that is, the nano-controller or nano-router. The micro/nano-routers are assembled from strands of synthetic DNA and graphene, allowing them to be housed throughout the body, including the brain. These could receive the signals emitted by the nodes and biosensors. The MAC addresses could be configured in the memory circuits (we think they could also be built with synthetic DNA and graphene). In this way, they receive the electromagnetic signals and automatically encode them into another simpler type of signal, called TS-OOK, with which the data is retransmitted in binary to a next level in the topology, that is, the nano-interface. The nano-interface would be another self-assembled electronic device that is capable of encoding TS-OOK binary data for transmission outside the body. The plasmonic nano-antennas would help to retransmit and propagate all the signals produced by the intracorporeal network, both inside the body in local regions, and towards the outside. The nano-interface transmit messages with very specific headers, where the MAC device is identified, the IP address to which the information is sent and the binary content with the information obtained from the nodes based on the topology. These messages have to be received by a "Gateway" (gateway), which is a mobile device or smartphone (usually referred to as such in the literature), which has an Internet connection, and which would be responsible for sending the message to its destination, but without alerting its owner, as it remains hidden in the data traffic. In other words, any mobile phone close to the vaccinated individual could be transmitting the data generated by the nanonetwork. Due to the sensitivity of the information which is trafficked in this system, security is an important aspect, and this has been taken into consideration. So it is to be expected that all kinds of measures have been created to limit this risk (Al -Turjman, F. 2020) and that the interception of communications is not easy. On the other hand, there is the reverse process of communication, the reception of signals from outside the body to the inside, more oriented to neuromodulation, behavioural control and neurostimulation from nodes, biosensors, and carbon nanotubes housed in brain tissue. The scientific literature seems to make it clear that areas of the brain can be activated wirelessly using these nodes, transducers and nanotechnology, which can affect behaviour patterns, graft ideas, predispose the individual to have certain feelings and sensations, and probably thoughts. Obviously, if this could be confirmed, this system would be an outrage against freedom, free will and the most basic and fundamental rights of human beings. Not surprisingly, neuro-rights laws are already being approved, according to different media reports, such as the case of Chile. This is more than just a declaration of intent, since it seems to indicate that something aberrant has been achieved.

10. Richard D. Hall: If people have been injected with micro/nano-technology, is there a way to destroy its function? For example, with a strong electromagnetic pulse?

Mik Andersen: We still do not know. Here we are entering the field of speculation. Although graphene can be degraded to some extent, the nanotechnology that would be formed inside the body, according to the synthetic DNA self-assembly hypothesis, is a problem that has yet to be solved. I'm sorry I can't give good news about it, but I still don't know a concrete method in the literature, by which it can be eliminated, although I can't guarantee that this doesn't exist either. More research is needed to provide a clearer answer. Probably, bioremediation techniques would have to be developed to proceed with the cleaning and decomposition of this synthetic DNA. Probably (and although it may be paradoxical) with another injection of nanotechnology that serves to counteract and clean the content of past injections. We really don't know. Regarding an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), we understand that it could disable conventional electronics. Despite this, we must also consider that electronic nanodevices based on synthetic DNA, combined with graphene and hydrogel, even though they have superconducting capabilities, also have plasmonic capabilities and, most likely, Quantum Hall capabilities. This means that it could well cause an interruption of its operation, but it is not clear that this was permanent. It would be necessary for specialists in the field to experience it conveniently to be able to give a clearer answer. Anyway, as I understand it, an EMP, depending on its intensity, could also cause damage to the individual's biology, so it doesn't seem like a safe solution. 

11. Richard D. Hall: Do you think that fractal antennas could be used as a micro-antenna to communicate with the outside of the body?

Mik Andersen: Yes, it could be, I don't think we can rule out that possibility. It is a definite hypothesis. In this post about graphene fractals, one of the first identifications I made, you can see an image of a fractal pattern that was formed during the drying process of a blood sample from a vaccinated person. The image was obtained and analysed by the German team (Axel Bolland, Bärbel Ghitalla, Holger Fischer, Elmar Becker). Curiously, it seemed to coincide with the fractal crystallization of graphene. Upon further investigation of this topic, I observed that the literature included graphene fractal antennas, and especially the development of dendrites, as the fundamental characteristic to enhance, increase and better propagate electromagnetic signals. At the time, I had no idea that this could be related to the intracorporeal wireless nanocommunication network. However, this indication helped me to understand a new hypothesis about the purposes of graphene in vaccines. Not only did it turn out to be a very harmful toxin, it also seemed to be evident that it could be used to transmit information/data as antennas, to which was added the detail of the ability to absorb electromagnetic radiation and operate in the band of THz. These data were key to finding the scientific articles which addressed in-vivo nanocommunication in the human body, and all the protocols and procedures involved. This was because the graphene fractal antennas provided a quality and bandwidth well suited to data traffic within the human body. This helped me to open my eyes and realise that this could probably be one of the reasons for the existence of the vaccines, without excluding other reasons too, of course. Subsequently, other indications were found in the scientific literature and in microscope images that seem to be in line with the nanotechnology hypothesis, by finding what could be plasmonic nano-antennas, nano-routers rectennas and recently DNA crystals compatible with nanotechnology. Taking into account these precedents, as I have indicated before, it cannot be ruled out that this type of microstructure could be used to transmit or receive data outside the body. As for the morphologies of the micro/nano antennas, it is very varied. In the literature, there are micro/nano antennas with triangular shapes, T, L, H, U and C shapes, even fractal cross (Moghadasi, M.N.; Sadeghzadeh, R.A.; Toolabi, M.; Jahangiri, P.; Zarrabi, F.B. 2016 | Moshiri, S.M.M., Nozhat, N. 2021 | Heydari, S., Bazgir, M., Zarrabi, F.B., Gandji, N.P., Rastan, I. 2017 | Ullah, Z., Witjaksono, G., Nawi , I., Tansu, N., Irfan-Khattak, M., Junaid, M. 2020 | Feichtner, T., Selig, O., Hecht, B. 2017 | Lee, S.Y. 2019 | Zarrabi, F.B. 2016 | Abdi, H., J. Nourinia, C. Ghobadi 2019 | H. Yao, X. Liu, H. Zhu, H. Li, G. Dong, K. Bi 2020). However, some objects have been observed that could coincide with a C, L and T scheme in vaccines. Therefore, it would not be ruled out that new objects and elements of the intracorporeal network could be discovered, as observations continue to be made and new images are obtained under the microscope. 

12. Richard D. Hall: Dr. Franc Zalewski claimed that he grew a 3-legged “thing” by feeding graphite tape on eggs. In the MS Saavedra 2014 it is stated that the growth of Nano Carbon Fiber could be achieved with adhesive tape. Do you think Zalewski was growing an octopus from carbon nanotubes? In fact, are the Hydra Vulgaris claims present in the actual CNT Octopus vaccines?

Mik Andersen: I think Dr. Zalewski was impressed when he looked at that under a microscope. I think anyone would have that reaction and feel great concern right away. In my opinion, he offered a press conference in which he wanted to raise awareness that something not very good was happening with the vaccines. I guess he called it “The Thing” to make it go viral and I think he did it and it made a lot of people aware. However, the images that he presented, I believe, could correspond to single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes and carbon nanooctopuses. Carbon micro/nanooctopuses grow from CNTs and also graphene ribbons, as long as they are decorated with other materials that act as catalysts or nucleation agents. These materials cause a growth of carbon in various arms or branches, which was described as the arms of the octopus. There has also been talk of hydra-vulgaris, but the observed morphology does not seem to correspond, nor do its motor skills, or its development and growth. Unless clear evidence of their presence is found, we must consider the most likely hypothesis to be branched CNT carbon nanotubes. The presence of carbon nanotubes would be compatible with the rest of the indications already observed regarding the intracorporeal network of nanocommunications, That is, a fundamental element for neuromodulation, since the CNTs in their diverse variants could be assimilated in the neuronal tissue to form an artificial neurological network, overlapping with the one that the individual already has, and developing the functions of electrodes, bridging neuronal conductivity and favoring neuromodulation and neurostimulation.

13. Richard D. Hall: Dr. Robert Young claimed in his report to have identified a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite. In 2016 Huang, H. W. | Sakar,MS | Petruska, AJ | PanŽ,S | Nelson, BJ discuss the creation of a synthetic version of Trypanosoma brucei as a swimmer that is very similar in appearance to the cruzi. Do you think Dr. Young could have discovered a synthetic swimmer?

Mik Andersen: It could be. They have a very similar morphology. In the entry on swimmers and based on the scientific literature, it is explained that these patterns correspond to hydrogel and graphene ribbons, whose movement and stimulation can be produced based on electromagnetic fields. It would not be unreasonable to think that these objects could be constituted through self-assembly and synthetic DNA. The hypotheses about this object are still open. 

14. Richard D. Hall: Carbon nanotubes in the environment. CNTs may already be in the environment and have self-assembly properties. Do you have any thoughts on their relationship to Morgellons?

Mik Andersen. We cannot rule out that this type of contamination exists. Dozens of patents have been found that take graphene as a fundamental component for the development of fertilisers, phytosanitary products, pesticides, fungicides... And agricultural products are consumed daily by the entire population. In fact, there are scientific articles such as the one by (Wang, J.; Zhu, M.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A.; Wang, X. 2019) that study ways to remove this toxicant, assuming that “[w]ith the fast development of graphene oxide (GO) and its related products, GO may be discharged into the natural environment and causes various environmental problems…. This study contributed significantly to the elimination of GO from the aquatic environment and provided more message for GO elimination in its pollution management.” We have no reason to distrust what Wang and his team indicate, so it can be affirmed that contamination by nanoparticles exists, be it graphene, nanotubes or carbon fibers of micrometric size. Another very interesting article in this regard is the one by (Fadeel, B.; Bussy, C.; Merino, S.; Vázquez, E.; Flahaut, E.; Mouchet, F.; Bianco, A. 2018) in which It is noted that “[t]he increasing exploitation of graphene-based materials (GBMs) necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of the potential impact of these materials on human health and the environment. Here, we discuss synthesis and characterization of GBMs as well as human and environmental hazard assessment of GBMs using in vitro and in vivo model systems with the aim to understand the properties that underlie the biological effects of these materials;” and offers a very interesting diagram. See figure 1. below.

 Fig.1. The chain of pollution by graphene. The human being is exposed to graphene, being able to inhale it, ingest it or absorb it through the skin. The environment is also affected, the entire food chain. (Fadeel, B.; Bussy, C.; Merino, S.; Vázquez, E.; Flahaut, E.; Mouchet, F.; Bianco, A. 2018)

Observing this diagram, we can clearly see the forms of environmental contamination and intoxication in humans (via inhalation, ingestion and dermal exposure). Nor can Fadeel and his team be suspected of lying in an article for the ACS Publications magazine. Therefore, contamination by graphene or carbon nanotubes is a very real possibility, both accidentally in their manufacture and by biodegradation of electronics and materials that have graphene, or by intentional actions too.

As for the possibility that CNTs with self-assembly capacity are in the environment, I can imagine it as very likely, but I don't know for sure. I don't have images that I can analyse that correspond to samples of suspended particles. I also don't have the instruments or the means to prove it reliably. In part, of this is the playing and manipulating of the situation that we have been experiencing since it all began. Hence the need to alert independent researchers in the relevant areas to analyse samples and develop methods to diagnose the presence of CNT, graphene and any other nanomaterial. It is clear that in aqueous solutions it seems easier to analyse under a microscope. I am sure that adequate methodologies exist to carry out such investigations. By the way, in relation to contamination by nanomaterials such as graphene, CNTs and fullerenes, I cannot avoid citing the work of (Suhail, M.; Ali, A.; Mathew, S.; Shah, M.A. 2015) that was already warning back then of the toxicity that caused necrosis, apoptosis, and cellular autophagy, cytokine storms... effects compatible with COVID-19.

In relation to Morgellons, in my opinion they are quite similar to carbon nanotubes, although not in scale. Put another way, Morgellons could be multi-walled, micro-scale carbon tubes or carbon fibers of the MWCNT type. As explained in the entry on nanooctopuses and carbon nanotubes, they can grow if they have enough material for nucleation. This only requires materials that act as catalysts, graphene or carbon derivatives in the environment and a suitable temperature. If these circumstances are present, its growth, although slow, can be prolonged indefinitely over time. This could explain the length that they can reach, as well as the colors observed (red, blue... which would depend on the catalyst material) and the reactions that occur when a magnetic field approaches or its temperature increases drastically, due to its piezoelectric nature. I think this would be the most likely hypothesis.

Bibliography:

1. Abdi, H., Nourinia, J., & Ghobadi, C. (2019). Design and parametric simulation of triangle nano-particle structures for the visible and near-infrared frequencies. SN Applied Sciences, 1(10), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1260-3
2. Al-Turjman, F. (2020). Inteligencia y seguridad en un gran IoNT orientado a 5G: descripción general = Intelligence and security in big 5G-oriented IoNT: An overview. Future Generation Computer Systems, 102, pp. 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.08.009
3. Bouchedjera, I.A.; Aliouat, Z.; Louail, L. (2020). EECORONA: Sistema de Coordinación y Enrutamiento de Eficiencia Energética para Nanoredes = EECORONA: Energy Efficiency Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks. En: International Symposium on Modelling and Implementation of Complex Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58861-8_2
4. Bouchedjera, I.A.; Louail, L.; Aliouat, Z.; Harous, S. (2020). DCCORONA: Distributed Cluster-based Coordinate and Routing System for Nanonetworks. En: 2020 11th IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON) (pp. 0939-0945). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON51285.2020.9298084
5. Fadeel, B.; Bussy, C.; Merino, S.; Vázquez, E.; Flahaut, E.; Mouchet, F.; Bianco, A. (2018). Safety assessment of graphene-based materials: focus on human health and the environment. ACS nano, 12(11), pp. 10582-10620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b04758
6. Feichtner, T., Selig, O., & Hecht, B. (2017). Plasmonic nanoantenna design and fabrication based on evolutionary optimization. Optics Express, 25(10), pp. 10828-10842. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.010828
7. Heydari, S., Bazgir, M., Zarrabi, F. B., Gandji, N. P., & Rastan, I. (2017). Novel optical polarizer design based on metasurface nano aperture for biological sensing in mid-infrared regime. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 49(2), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-017-0924-8
8. Lee, S. Y. (2019, May). The use of chalcogenide phase change materials for optical phase control and its plasmonic applications. In Micro-and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications XI (Vol. 10982, p. 109820T). International Society for Optics and Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518381
9. Liu, J.; Wei, J.; Yang, Z. (2021). Construyendo ensamblajes ordenados de nanopartículas inspirados en la epitaxia atómica = Building ordered nanoparticle assemblies inspired by atomic epitaxy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 23(36), pp. 20028-20037. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP02373J | https://sci-hub.yncjkj.com/10.1039/D1CP02373J
10. Moghadasi, M. N., Sadeghzadeh, R. A., Toolabi, M., Jahangiri, P., & Zarrabi, F. B. (2016). Fractal cross aperture nano-antenna with graphene coat for bio-sensing application. Microelectronic Engineering, 162, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2016.04.022
11. Moshiri, S. M. M., & Nozhat, N. (2021). Smart optical cross dipole nanoantenna with multibeam pattern. Scientific Reports, 11(1), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84495-0
12. Praetorius, F., Kick, B., Behler, K. L., Honemann, M. N., Weuster-Botz, D., & Dietz, H. (2017). Biotechnological mass production of DNA origami. Nature, 552(7683), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24650
13. Suhail, M.; Ali, A.; Mathew, S.; Shah, M.A. (2015). Nanomaterial Induced Immune Responses and Cytotoxicity. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 15(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.10885
14. Ullah, Z.; Witjaksono, G.; Nawi, I.; Tansu, N.; Irfan-Khattak, M.; Junaid, M. (2020). A review on the development of tunable graphene nanoantennas for terahertz optoelectronic and plasmonic applications. Sensors, 20(5), 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051401
15. Wang, J., Zhu, M., Chen, Z., Chen, Y., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A., & Wang, X. (2019). Polyacrylamide modified molybdenum disulfide composites for efficient removal of graphene oxide from aqueous solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 361, 651-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.123
16. Yao, H., Liu, X., Zhu, H., Li, H., Dong, G., & Bi, K. (2020). Dual-band microstrip antenna based on polarization conversion metasurface structure. Frontiers in Physics, 8, 279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00279
17. Zarrabi, F. B. (2016). Sub wavelength plasmonic nano-antenna with H and U shape for enhancement of multi resonance. Optik, 127(10), pp. 4490-4494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.01.189
18. Zhang, R., Yang, K., Abbasi, Q. H., Qaraqe, K. A., & Alomainy, A. (2017). Analytical characterisation of the terahertz in-vivo nano-network in the presence of interference based on TS-OOK communication scheme. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 10172-10181. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2713459
19. Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Sha, R.; Seeman, N.C.; Mao, C. (2018). Modulación del autoensamblaje de cristales de ADN con agentes diseñados racionalmente = Modulating Self‐Assembly of DNA Crystals with Rationally Designed Agents. Angewandte Chemie, 130(50), 16767-16770. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201809757

 

Source (archived): https://web.archive.org/web/20220518170550/https://corona2inspect.net/2022/04/15/entrevista-de-richplanet-a-mik-andersen/

Translation: David Montoute

Related:  Are we being chipped? New evidence emerges

               Dr. Luis de Benito's Bluetooth experiments