07/07/2022
In 2008, the United Nations (UN) published (and recently removed) an article stating that world hunger might not be such a bad thing. Decades before global food shortages emerged as a result of globalist “green” policies, the conflict in Ukraine and the series of food plant disasters, an editorial in the United Nations Chronicle touted the “benefits of hunger in the world”.
The 2008 editorial entitled “The Benefits of World Hunger” claims that contrary to the “naïve view” that widespread hunger is actually bad for humanity, it actually has “great positive value” for workers and their employers.
“We sometimes talk about hunger in the world as if it were a scourge that
all of us want to see abolished, viewing it as comparable with the
plague or aids. But that naïve view prevents us from coming to grips
with what causes and sustains hunger. Hunger has great positive value to
many people,” wrote Professor George Kent of the University of Hawaii.
“Indeed, it is fundamental to the working of the world's economy. Hungry
people are the most productive people, especially where there is a need
for manual labour.”
Kent goes on to say that without the "threat of hunger," the global economy would cease to exist.
“How many of us would sell our services if it were not for the threat of hunger?
More importantly, how many of us would sell our services so cheaply if it were not for the threat of hunger?” Kent wrote. “When we sell our services cheaply, we enrich others, those who own the
factories, the machines and the lands, and ultimately own the people who
work for them. For those who depend on the availability of cheap
labour, hunger is the foundation of their wealth.”
“No one works harder than hungry people. Yes, people who are well
nourished have greater capacity for productive physical activity, but
well-nourished people are far less willing to do that work,” he added.
If that wasn't psychotic enough, Kent admitted point-blank that elites do indeed view food shortages as an "asset", claiming that efforts to end global hunger "would be a disaster".
“For those of us at the high end of the social ladder, ending hunger
globally would be a disaster. If there were no hunger in the world, who
would plow the fields? Who would harvest our vegetables? Who would work
in the rendering plants? Who would clean our toilets? We would have to
produce our own food and clean our own toilets. No wonder people at the
high end are not rushing to solve the hunger problem. For many of us,
hunger is not a problem, but an asset.”
There you have it: the global power structure should really be pleased to see the emergence of food shortages as a result of a suspicious wave of food-distribution plant disasters, “green” initiatives, regional conflict, supply chain collapses and rampant inflation.
This is another suspicious fire. How these fields are being destroyed remains a mystery. Are they intentionally set on fire by humans or are military technologies being used to start fires remotely?
Below, we see a huge fire in a wheat field in Timis, Getaia, Romania.
And more recently, fields were burning in several regions of Turkey at the same time. At this rate, an approaching hungry winter for Europe is not some kind of horror story but a terrifying possibility.
Source: https://www.coletividade-evolutiva.com.br/2022/07/nacoes-unidas-os-beneficios-da-fome-no-mundo.html
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário