Ricardo Delgado: "They lie outright in the face of the evidence"

 

Alerta Digital
04/04/2023
 
Recently, thousands of people were able to view the contents of the Covid vaccines under a microscope, contents previously kept secret like a weapon of war. Some of these people watched it live in the city of Seville whilst many others around the world watched it streamed. The event was held on the third anniversary of the dystopian era they called a pandemic. It is a pandemic attributed to a murderous and contagious virus that does not exist, along with waves and variants that do not exist either. Instead, thousands of antennas have irradiated innocent human bodies, bodies inoculated with a 'vaccine' containing reduced graphene oxide, a nanomaterial that is determining the future of a humanity fast on its way to transhumanism. Ricardo Delgado has kindly granted us this interview, which we hope can answer some of our readers' questions.

Magdalena del Amo: At the beginning of this situation called a pandemic, you, like so many other people, believed that the cause was a highly contagious virus, and that the answers would come from biologists. In fact, the biologists began to raise awareness about mRNA and the spike protein. When did you realise that you had to change focus, and that the truth was elsewhere?

Ricardo Delgado: We realised that answers could only come from one place: direct observation via analysis of the "vaccines." Medicine and biology could barely explain the damage, because they did not know the true cause. However, disciplines such as epidemiology gave us the keys. This was confirmed by the fact that the "disease of the moment" and the first cases of what they called "coronavirus" were recorded in the Chinese city of Wuhan, from November 30th, 2019; and this was the very first city in the world chosen for the technological start-up of the 5G network.

To this day, we know from the pioneering analysis of the injections carried out by La Quinta Columna (The Fifth Column) and later by people in other parts of the world, that there are NO biological material in the samples. Obviously, both the mRNA platform and the involvement of the famous spike protein were just smokescreens to divert the investigation of anyone who analysed the "vaccines" in situ.

                                       Ricardo Delgado during his presentation.

When the injected graphene comes into contact with blood, it generates the formation of a biomolecular protein corona. The function of this crown of proteins is to protect our biology from the introduction of foreign material to make it go unnoticed. However, certain groups label it as toxic and associate it with the spike protein. Once again, with the sole intention of diverting the focus from the origin of the biological damage, since illness is a result of the cause – graphene, and not a result of the crown of proteins.

Magdalena: Assuming that the vast majority of readers are hearing this information for the first time, I would like to go through the most important points regarding the situation we are experiencing and, specifically, the content of the "vaccines". What La Quinta Columna has discovered is alarming. How did you come to these conclusions and what are they based on?

Ricardo: We rely on evidence corroborated by observation, on the guiding principle of the scientific method, on the use of scientifically validated tools in order to know and characterise what we observe. Our research has been corroborated in different parts of the world, and it has allowed us to establish a predictive model that made it even easier for us to anticipate what was going to happen.

Magdalena: You have found reduced graphene oxide in the vials. However, many doubt it while others deny it. Why has this become a taboo subject?

Ricardo: The evidence for the existence of reduced graphene oxide in the injections is clear and, additionally, has been corroborated in other parts of the world by different types of techniques, such as: light and dark field optical microscopy, electronic SEM and TEM, ultraviolet absorbance compatibility tests, X-ray diffraction, optical comparison with pattern images, fluorescence techniques and, above all, characterisation by RAMAN vibration with scanning electrons, showing the RAMAN vibration or peaks characteristic of reduced graphene oxide .

Magdalena: All this is very technical and we would have to take a course to understand it. But let's get down to the concrete level. We are dealing with a quasi-magical material, unknown until recently, endowed with spectacular characteristics. What are these qualities?

Ricardo: When we review the toxicity or presumed biocompatibility of the material in human biology, the scientific literature is also very clear. Graphene or its derivatives, such as reduced graphene oxide, have intrinsic properties, including being a superconductor, becoming magnetic while in contact with living cells, being piezoelectric, having high capacitance, being radiomodulable, flexible, and transparent.

Its superconducting capacity explains graphene's affinity for eminently electrical organs, such as the cardiac system and the central nervous system, that is, neurons and spinal cord.

Based on the magnetism acquired when in contact with organic molecules, we can explain the magnetic phenomenon appearing in vaccinated individuals.

Due to its piezoelectric quality, we can understand the excitation of the material causing it to generate electricity under any pressure, be it acoustic, pressure from the weight of water or any other kind.

 

                                Single-walled carbon nanotubes in Pfizer vaccine.
 

The capacitance of the material is such that it is currently used for the construction of state-of-the-art batteries. This quality makes it possible to condense the energy obtained from external sources. This, together with being present in vital organs such as the heart, means that those electrical discharges that the material activates can interrupt the heart's electrical conduction tissue, generating arrhythmias and the classic fainting spells (due to lack of cerebral blood supply) which, in many cases, result in sudden death.

The fact that this material is radiomodulable clearly indicates that it is excited by microwaves. In short, it acts as an amplifier or catalyst for electromagnetic radiation signals, such as the current 5G. Its extraordinary hardness – 200 times harder than steel – leads our biology to choose to expel it instead of degrading it. 

Magdalena: Tell us more about the toxicity of graphene oxide, as evidenced in the multiple harms it produces to the body, these being, curiously, the same ones attributed to Covid.

Ricardo: I must emphasise that this metamaterial, being foreign to biology, cannot be innocuous in a biological setting. First, the immune system handles it as if it were a pathogen. Depending on its route of entry, its toxicity is relative.

Magdalena: What do you mean by that exactly?

Ricardo: When graphene oxide enters our body through an intramuscular route, the immune system acts against it with a mesh of neutrophils and white blood cells. When it is in the lung, which is one of the routes of elimination, it is attacked by enzymes such as myeloperoxidase. In contact with the blood, it is surrounded by a protein crown called a biological corona or molecular biodistribution crown. The function of these structural proteins is to wrap it and make it go unnoticed by human biology due to its high toxicity.

Graphene oxide is a coagulant and, in fact, graphene oxide sponges are used in haemostatic wound healing treatments. Coagulation also facilitates the rouleaux effect of the microwave action itself. (The rouleaux effect is a literal stacking of red blood cells [erythrocytes] and it is the deformity that we are currently seeing in the blood cells of the vaccinated using light microscopy sessions). Obviously, after coagulation, we obtain, as a consequence, all kinds of thrombogenicity, which has contributed to thromboembolism and cardiocerebrovascular accidents, as well as ischemic accidents, strokes, heart attacks and other disorders.

We must also take into account the radiomodulable quality of graphene oxide. By amplifying incoming microwave radiation, it also amplifies damage to the body.

Magdalena: What is the body's first reaction to the entry of graphene?

Ricardo: The initial response mechanism is inflammation wherever the material has passed into our biology. That is why we see myocarditis, pericarditis, myopericarditis and pulmonary inflammation. It also passes through purification systems such as the liver and kidney. In the liver, it generates inflammation, as well as important problems in the kidneys –where it remains for a long time– as these filter the blood contaminated by the material. Likewise, it permeates the central nervous system by its superconducting affinity, where it alters the functioning, generating paralysis of all kinds. It inflames neurons, leading to various types of neuropathies, including initial memory loss, inattention, brain fog, or difficulty concentrating.

By amplifying the damage of non-ionising microwave radiation, it considerably increases oxidative stress, which contributes to premature aging and the appearance of various types of cancer and tumour tissue.

In reproductive cells – and according to the scientific literature itself – it affects the motility and mobility of human sperm, drastically reducing male fertility.

It also affects hormonal regulation in women, ultimately contributing to their infertility and generating postmenopausal syndrome.

Magdalena: It is understood that receiving one “vaccine” is not the same as receiving four, since the body gradually eliminates graphene.

Ricardo: That's right. Damage is directly proportional to the number of doses and the amount of electromagnetic radiation that the material absorbs or the amount of directed microwave exposure that the inoculated person receives. 

All this damage, and more that we have not mentioned, are not only the cause of the current excess mortality from these pathologies, but have also been clearly identified in the scientific literature for years. We only have to review the cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, biocompatibility and biodistribution of graphene oxide in the biological realm, including the infamous "covid lung" which is only pneumonitis or lung inflammation, which serves as one of the routes of elimination, contributing to the dyspnoea -difficulty breathing- and bronchiolitis that we see daily. 

Magdalena: And while society continued to be terrified by a non-existent virus, pushed by politicians and journalists, La Quinta Columna, with you at the helm, had already discovered the real killer in this plot.

Ricardo: Indeed, La Quinta Columna discovered and demonstrated the premeditated poisoning of the entire society with reduced graphene oxide whilst government institutions spoke of a "coronavirus" which, to this day, no one has seen. 

Magdalena: There is no doubt that we are talking about an important milestone, a vital and transcendent discovery, not only for humanity in the present, but for that of the future in its transition to transhumanism. But why has this not reached the general public or, when it does, is accompanied by a certain scepticism?

Ricardo: The evidence presented here is known by a large number of people around the world, but it is true that it hasn't permeated society to the degree needed. We have shown that this material was introduced en masse in the 2019 flu campaign, whose target population was the elderly in care homes or nursing homes, and this contributed to the massive extermination of the elderly, which was part of what was called the "first wave."

We have also shown that what were called "outbreaks" and "waves" were nothing more than the consequence of raising environmental radiation through telephone masts, whose microwaves excite graphene oxide (radiomodulable) to generate more oxidative stress and, ultimately, all the damage we had already seen in biological studies. And in spite of everything, a large part of society remains unaware of this.

Magdalena: Do you think this is down to pure cognitive dissonance or is it something else? Is there something we are missing?

Ricardo: In my opinion, there are important reasons why this evidence hasn't come to light, but I'll leave that for the end.

Magdalena: As you like. Let's continue talking about the material: Why did they introduce reduced graphene oxide into this "thing" they call a vaccine?

Ricardo: This is the big question, an answer to which we found through the top official institutions themselves, and by reviewing the scientific literature.

Earlier, we talked about the magnetic nature of graphene in contact with organic molecules, right? Well then, if we have a magnetic medium within biology and, moreover, a superconductor – with affinity for the heart and neurons – then we have the ability to read and write information on it, like on a hard drive. At the neural level and in the field of neuroscience, reading information is neural monitoring or supervision. Writing information on this magnetic medium – which is reduced graphene oxide – and impregnating the neurons, is known as neuromodulation or neurostimulation. That is, the ability to introduce or insert thoughts (instructions) or to alter human behavioural patterns remotely and wirelessly (scalar and millimetre microwaves). At the level of the cardiac system, we are also talking about a biosensor of the heart or stimulation of the heart at a distance.

Magdalena: All this appears to emerge spontaneously, but it seems that there is a carefully drawn plan that has synchronised things on several fronts.

Ricardo: Indeed. All this research and its associated scientific literature are coming out at the same time that figures like the ex-President of Chile, Sebastian Piñera start speaking of "neural monitoring and inserting thoughts and feelings" on the day of the 5G network's legal tender. At the same time, the Chilean Constitution has been reformed to accommodate the "Neuro-rights Act", as tens of millions of base stations and telephone masts are deployed all over the planet. And, among other events, the director of the World Economic Forum himself tells us about having biosensors in the brain for the year 2030, the "increase in transhumanism" or the new human being "Human 2.0", the "cloud" and "artificial intelligence ”.

Magdalena: Everything indicates that we are heading towards transhumanism or the end of the “human era”, as José Luis Cordeiro says. Doesn't it look terrifying?

Ricardo: Indeed, it is terrifying. It's the worst thing to have happened to human beings in their entire history. The objective couldn't be clearer: to trans-humanise all human beings in the shortest possible period of time; despite the serious damage and side effects of this technology for the purpose of neuromodulating and neurostimulating behaviours, in addition to the supervision of all individuals directly from their neurons. In short, the complete loss of the current human species. That is to say, the disappearance of the current human to turn him into "something else", deprived of his essence, free will, ability to think for himself and his natural tendency to spirituality. And to achieve this, the material that acts as the INTERFACE is reduced graphene oxide. This is the great KEY. That is why they try to deny it or ignore it in all kinds of ways.

Magdalena: We left your answer about the reasons why this important discovery has not come to light until the end of the discussion. Moreover, why hasn't it caused a great scandal. What factors have influenced and continue to influence this cover-up?

Ricardo: There are several factors. The first and very obvious one is the simple control that governments have of the institutions that are in their charge, including the media, health institutions, the judiciary, unions, etc. This allows them to carry out their agendas, perfectly planned in advance. But there is another clearly exposed factor that some apparent dissidents do not even want to mention.

It is the concept of controlled opposition, or false dissidence. These are people who claim to work for the resistance and for the Truth, but who, nevertheless, introduce all kinds of obstacles to prevent it from coming to light. This phenomenon has been introduced in all kinds of wars. And I'm not describing anything new when I say that we are in the worst war of all, where the enemy we have to overcome is the human being himself.

Magdalena: Could it be said that this is a counterintelligence action and that there is an action protocol that, in this specific case, is working?

Ricardo: Yes, that's right. And in their behaviour, there are several strategies that I will list, in reference to the case at hand:

1. In general, they tend to do everything possible to delay an initial discovery or eliminate all the "good leads" that come, which allows them to implant their objective. In this specific case, that is to cover up the purpose of graphene oxide as an interface.

2. They will typically deny the evidence or its properties. For example, they deny the existence of graphene in the "vaccines", as well as the magnetic phenomenon amongst the vaccinated or the emission of MAC addresses detected by Bluetooth.

3. They infiltrate good research and try to delay it using all sorts of strategies.

4. They introduce new points, presumably harmful ones, to obfuscate the damage generated by the true cause, which they must hide at all costs. For example, they try to hide graphene oxide with snake venom, radioactive isotopes, bee venom, heavy metals or the famous spike protein (which is precisely the response to the introduction of graphene into biology).

                          MICRO sheet of reduced graphene oxide in Pfizer vaccine.

5. They try to surround the KEY COMPONENT with any distracting element so that it loses its strength.

6. They use violence and personal attack, manipulating or even misrepresenting the personal lives of those who discover the evidence that they're covering up.

7. Normally, they are financed economically by the system itself, or are given promises of social promotions and other types of perks.

8. Controlled dissident groups were created before true dissident groups appeared naturally in response to the situation that was affecting us all. As in any war, the enemy has these groups, created in different parts of the world and with similar labels to counteract, capture, collapse and neutralise the discoveries of humans seeking the truth. A very significant example of these groups are the collectives “for the truth”, generated in different parts of the world and which have tried to discredit all research, evidence or discovery coming from observation by truly dissident groups.

9. Like the official version itself, they use attributes in their names and slogans, and whose real meaning is just the opposite of how they are labelled. The real meaning of “for the truth” is “to cover up the Truth”.

10. They tend to be active in the system itself, whether in the health, academic or other fields (doctors, official colleges of biologists, etc.).

11. They are organised hierarchically, so that their leaderships are occupied by "spokespersons" who govern and feed off the entire discourse of the collective, so that no one has an individual opinion, and if they do, they are eclipsed by the leadership itself. Thus, they steer the message wherever they want, while hiding the evidence.

12. They introduce bots and fictitious followers, as well as aggressive trolls on various platforms, to give the idea that they have unconditional human support. The reality is that practically no one follows them. This fact is evident when they hold public talks, which are attended by small numbers of people.

13. They are in charge of recruiting people who are sceptical of the official version (doctors, academics, lawyers, journalists, etc.) and introduce them into previously created groups, to eclipse the messages they might give. Once inside the group, they must follow the guidelines of the spokesperson for the group. For example, Lawyers for the Truth or Journalists for the Truth.

 

                           The public gallery listening to the presenter's explanations.

14. They usually base their "investigations" on the very "papers" that are written by official sources, the very thing they are supposedly confronting.

15. They never do real analyses using scientific tools, because that would force them to manipulate the results, to hide what they have discovered. Instead of investigating, they prefer to say that "analysing vaccines is a waste of time"; “don't look into a microscope, because you won't be able to see anything” or “obtaining vaccines is very difficult”.

16. The works of those who DO analyse using RAMAN, optical or electronic microscopy or any technique that allows us to KNOW how to characterise the key components of the "vaccines", are ridiculed and attacked by this false dissidence, and attacked with very bizarre arguments. Most of these attacks are virulent and personal.

17. They use their titles to speak using the "argument of authority" given by themselves or the institution to which they belong, but not by "scientific principle of evidence".

18. They use official arguments – against which they ostensibly fight – to discredit serious and independent work. For example, relying on official "vaccine" prospectuses, whereas their undeclared components, which are being exposed, could bring down the entire operation. 

19. They make approaches to the discoveries made, and with this they manage to capture a certain number of honest people only to later discard that paradigm and return to other points. For example, they admit the existence of graphene, but argue that there is very little in "vaccines", or they acknowledge that those vaccinated emit MAC addresses, but then rule out graphene.

20. They boast of phrases like "we all have to be united" or "together we are stronger" precisely in order to infiltrate.

21. They focus on the damage but not on the real cause of it.

22. They make sure to denounce minor issues in order to minimise the impact of what is really hurting us the most. For example, denouncing masks, the loss of rights and freedoms or the ineffectiveness of the PCR test, while they cover up the introduction of the INTERFACE in the injections, which is the sought after objective in order to achieve transhumanism.

Magdalena: If this is the case, the average citizen has a very difficult situation. On the one hand, he is deceived by the system, and on the other, by those who he believes are seeking the truth. Do you have one last piece of advice to finish?

Ricardo: Identifying these “people” is vital to continue advancing and bringing the EVIDENCE to light in order to stop or prevent the operation. Controlled opposition is the first line of battle that the enemy sends into our ranks. There are people of good faith who have not learned to identify them and who "try to be on good terms with everyone", but this is, quite simply, impossible, because they are trusting and communing with traitors on a daily basis, without knowing it. They must choose to abandon any interest other than the Truth. There is no ground for half measures, given the seriousness of what we are exposing. We cannot allow the controlled opposition to continue trying to discredit the evidence, preventing it from coming to light and thus ensuring that the operation against humanity continues. That is, the end of the human era through transhumanism.

Source: https://www.alertadigital.com/2023/04/04/entrevista-al-bioestadistico-ricardo-delgado-fundador-y-director-de-la-quinta-columna-a-pesar-de-la-evidencia-lo-siguen-negando/

Translation: David Montoute