Baby Crash: will we soon have a world without toddlers?

Nicole Delépine
*originally published 27 April 2023 (Lire en français)

Nicole Delépine is a hospital doctor, pediatrician and oncologist, and has been fighting for 40 years for better care for hospital patients. Internationally recognised for her knowledge on cancer, she has notably denounced the paradoxes of Gardasil, the vaccine against cervical cancer. She has just published Les Enfants sacrifiés du Covid (Fauves).

While 30% of French women of childbearing age do not want to have children in order to "save our blue planet", is humanity's future not already compromised by the decline in fertility over the past several decades? Add to that the effects of the Covid-19 gene-based injections and we can seriously cast doubt on the statistics predicting 10 billion human beings by 2050!

The decline in sperm concentration in humans has been known for many years and the recent synthesis by the academic reference journal Human Reproduction Update shows an even more vertiginous fall over the last forty years¹. Above all, it highlights the rapid decline in male fertility. This large-scale publication is based on hundreds of studies published on the subject and brings together data covering the period 1973-2018 available in more than fifty countries.

Thus, in 45 years, the average concentration of gametes in the sperm of the general male population has fallen from 101 million per milliliter (M/ml) to 49 M/ml, or half as much! In addition, as the French urologist Valentine Frydman points out, "20% of infertility is strictly of male origin". It is not surprising, just given this initial observation, that fertility is falling all over the world.

In France, nearly 3.3 million people, or about 1 in 6 couples, are directly affected by an infertility problem. A phenomenon that has been increasing for about twenty years according to professionals in the sector, such as Professor Jean-Marc Ayoubi.²

The canary in the coal mine

This rapid decline in male fertility does not only concern northern countries, but the entire world. The worst thing is that, far from slowing down to stabilize, the phenomenon is accelerating sharply.

"Including all data after 1973, the average rate of decline is 1.16% per year worldwide. This rate has more than doubled since the beginning of the 21st century, increasing to a decline of 2.64% per year over the period 2000-2018." An acceleration described as "alarming" by the authors of this study. “Our findings are like the canary in the coal mine,” Levine says. “We have a serious problem on our hands that, if left unchecked, could threaten the survival of humanity.” These trends also apply to countries in Africa and South America,³ which had never experienced such a phenomenon before.

Before 2020, other causes

Faced with unprecedented changes, such as the feminisation of fish, many studies have been undertaken by research units around the world.

Experts are discussing, pell-mell, possible factors. First individual causes linked to lifestyle (smoking, sedentary lifestyle, diet, overconsumption of medication, etc.), but also global causes, particularly environmental (pesticides and synthetic products, pollution, etc.).

All endocrine disruptors^4,5 which are contained in the smallest amount of our cosmetics or industrial foods are molecules that act directly on our hormonal system and which, due to their accumulation (the famous "cocktail effect") can cause various dysfunctions, such as ovarian insufficiency, defective spermatogenesis, miscarriages, pathological pregnancies, etc.

The situation changes with Covid

The arrival of Covid has reshuffled the cards a little. If the first coercive measures led some to evoke a probable baby boom in the following nine months, under the effect of the consolation of the duvet, clearly, it was not the case.

The collective depression induced by the succession of inoculated fears, repeated like a mantra by the power every hour of the day, is surely not unrelated to it. The terror of a potential nuclear war, of a global warming that makes people feel guilty (whose human role remains to be demonstrated), the well-organized shortages (no oil or mustard in France and the shelves are full in Italy), the explosion in the price of gasoline, the threat of power cuts: in short, the power spends its time threatening us with the worst... Add to that the dependence on screens, which increasingly replace human relationships. And you can easily understand why the much-heralded baby boom has not happened.

Did vaccination accelerate the decline?

In France, the INSEE confirms the collapse of the birth rate from the start of the pseudo-vaccination.

"In 2022, the birth rate is experiencing a historic drop, with figures never seen before. This trend, which began to emerge in June 2022, i.e. 9 months after vaccination rates of 85% were reached in the population, has worsened since August, i.e. after the third dose. For the moment, INSEE has not given any explanation for this worrying decline for the demographic future of the country
⁶."

Births were indeed falling again from March 2022, with slightly fewer births between March and July 2022 than between March and July 2020. In August 2022, however, there were slightly more births than in August 2020. But in September 2022, births started to fall again, with 4% fewer babies than in September 2020, when the evolution of births was not yet affected by the Covid-19 pandemic.

The decline intensified in October, with 6% fewer babies than in October 2020. Nearly 2,300 children were born every day in France in September 2017. There were only 2,100 in 2020, a few months after the very beginning of the Covid epidemic. There were only 2,000 of them in September 2022, 9 months after the transition to the 3rd dose... The phenomenon is very worrying...

In the rest of the world, is it the same game?

Australia also saw a 63% drop in births after the introduction of the Covid “vaccines.”^7,8 From October to November 2021, the number of births was down 21% compared to the 10-year average. The following month, from November to December, the number of births was down 63%.

“December was about nine months after the Covid vaccines were rolled out,” notes D. James of Life-SiteNews regarding this pivotal time of pregnancy.

Fertility specialist Dr. L. McLindon says he has seen a massive increase in miscarriages among his own patients after the introduction of the vaccines. Before Operation Warp Speed,⁹ the miscarriage rate among McLindon’s patients was 12 to 15%. Today, among his vaccinated patients, it has reached 74%.

Taiwan also saw a similar 23% drop in births after the launch of Operation Warp Speed.

In the United States, 3 unprecedented phenomena

According to Brighteon.TV, researchers N. Wolf et al. have identified a long list of negative outcomes associated with vaccines, beyond simple reproductive failure.

They include male fertility problems affecting sperm and prostate function, and female fertility. The Food and Drug Administration was even informed about this as early as April 1, 2021, with no response. Ultrasounds revealed abnormal inflammation and calcifications in fetuses about eight weeks after the injection, as well as penile abnormalities acknowledged by Pfizer in its internal documents. A current miscarriage rate of 87.5% has been revealed on VAERS¹⁰. The FOIA (Freedom of Information Administration)¹¹ reveals that Pfizer and regulatory agencies hid (or at least greatly understated) the real dangers of the Covid injection during pregnancy, while they were aware that it increased the risk of birth defects and infertility.

This fraud and deception is said to have caused at least 4,113 fetal deaths due to Covid-19 vaccination in the United States alone compared to 2,239 fetal deaths reported to VAERS in the 30 years preceding the Covid-19 injections…¹² Remember that VAERS only represents 1, 2 or 3% of real cases — due to non- or under-reporting. If we multiply the official figure by 40, which is the most commonly used under-reporting factor, this would probably be 140,000 fetal deaths¹³.

As for breast-feeding babies by vaccinated mothers, it could also increase the risk of perinatal mortality. “Transient low levels of vaccine mRNA have been detected in the serum of vaccinated mothers with occasional transfer into their breast milk.”¹⁴ Yet the FDA has known since at least 2015 that the gene products are excreted.¹⁵

Pfizer and the agencies also knew that the limited animal study showed a significant risk to the developing fetus, but they actively chose to suppress this information from public records.

This information was revealed through a US Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the Government Department of Health by the Australian government’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

So correlation, causation, or mere coincidence?

Of course, early interpretations were dismissed as “conspiracy theories”—as if these corrupt classes could really be blindly trusted. A more detailed analysis of the data unfortunately seems to support the idea of ​​the causal role of gene injections in the decline in the birth rate in the injected countries and particularly in Switzerland.

“First of all, we observe that the sharp decline in the number of live births occurs precisely nine months after the opening of vaccination to all people aged 20 to 49.” Then, by comparing between regions, “we see that there is a correlation between the decline in births and vaccination coverage. In eastern Switzerland (vaccination coverage: 49.7%), births have declined by 8.6% compared to 18% in Zurich (vaccination coverage: 63.9%)¹⁶.”

A Swiss lawyer is also calling for the definitive suspension of this gene injection in view of the notorious damage to children¹⁷.

So what now?

The role of pseudo-Covid vaccination in the decline in birth rates and neonatal mortality seems to be statistically demonstrated through this analysis, an analysis which cannot be exhaustive in this short article. However, an analysis of data on birth rates in European countries shows a significant drop (up to 19%) in live births among 18-49 year olds nine months after the start of Covid vaccinations, particularly in countries with high vaccination rates.

As a pediatrician, allow me to be particularly concerned. We must stop all these injections as soon as possible, not only those against Covid, but also those for measles, flu or cancer that are based on mRNA technology.

 

References

1 « Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of samples collected globally in the 20th and 21st centuries » | Human Reproduc-tion Update | Oxford Academic (oup.com). 

2 Head of the gynecology and reproductive medicine department at Foch Hospital, Suresnes.

3 L’Échelle de Jacob : Le Monde : « Le déclin de la fertilité est mondial et s’accélère » (echelledejacob.blogspot.com).

4 Chemical molecules having a structural relationship with hormones and modifying hormonal activity, particularly that of steroids (estrogens, androgens). In particular pesticides: fertilizers and weedkillers with high cumulative power, insecticides, dioxins, plastics including bisphenol A and phthalates, PCBs, parabens, phenoxyethanol, glycol ether in cosmetics; heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury in fish; vapors from varnishes, paints, hydrocarbons, indoor sprays, candles, etc.

5 The REACH program and the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) are responsible for listing and classifying the 150,000 chemical molecules according to their CMR hazard: carcinogenic, mutagenic and toxic to reproduction; mandatory labeling, imperative to read the labels.
Perturbateur endocrinien et fertilité — Quel danger pour la grossesse (guide-de-l-infertilite.fr). 

6 https://lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/2022/12/02/urgent-linsee-confirme-leffondrement-de-la-natalite-depuis-le-debut-de-la-vaccination/ 

7 Australia sees 63% drop in births after Covid ‘vaccines’ introduced – what will the government’s excuse be? – GAULLIST REINFORMATION PAGE. THE MEDIA ARE MANIPULATING AND LYING TO US, LET’S SORTING THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAINS (anna-bellas.com) November 18, 2022 by bellinaanne

8 https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-11-17-australia-63-percent-drop-births-covid-vaccines.html 

9 Operation Warp Speed ​​is the name of a vast program set up by the Trump administration to deliver and administer the Covid-19 vaccine across the United States. By extension, this operation was applied in many Western countries. 

10 Charts available on https://docteur.nicoledelepine.fr

11 https://www.foia.gov/about.html

12 According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database, as of April 22, 2022 :
https://expose-news.com/2022/07/19/foia-pfizer-hid-dangers-covid-vaccination-pregnancy/

13 https://t.me/brigadesantigraphene
https://dailyclout.io/miscarriages-in-covid-19-vaccinated-mothers-as-reported-in-vaers/
https://vk.com/xochipelli
DailyClout (https://dailyclout.io/miscarriages-in-covid-19-vaccinated-mothers-as-reported-in-vaers/)

14 STOPPONS LES INJECTIONS A ARNm : ils s’excrètent, même dans le lait maternel — Docteur Nicole Delépine (nicoledelepine.fr).

15 « Design and analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products Guidance for Industry », US Food and Drug Administration, August 2015.

16 See the graphs in the reference document: 66-page document entitled « Geburtenrückgang in den Schweizer Kantonen » [Decline in birth rate in Swiss cantons] published on August 13, 2022.2.

17 « UK Government quietly confirms COVID Vaccinated Children are up to 137x more likely to die than Unvaccinated Children proving COVID Vaccination is causing significant numbers of deaths » The Expose (expose-news.com)

Source: https://association.ametist.org/la-baisse-de-la-natalite-tres-aggravee-avec-les-injections-geniques-anticovid-experimentales/

Outside the Spectrum of Acceptable Opinion

 

Kevin Ryan
July 6. 2024

Twenty years ago, I was fired for speaking out about lies related to the crimes of September 11^th, 2001. More recently, I lost a job for refusing to be injected with the experimental gene therapies being pushed for Covid. I’m not complaining as there were conscious decisions made in each case. But these incidents highlight the difficulty experienced by anyone who dares to recognize and challenge state crimes. Losing a job is just the beginning of that journey.

It’s one thing to not be able to work because you won’t go along with deceit and it’s another thing to live with people who willfully ignore state crimes. Even if you find a way to work, you have to interact with many others who avoid any thoughts that are out of their comfort zone. If you don’t just go along to get along, how can you interact and talk to others without it all being depressingly superficial?

With most people you can’t talk about “conspiracy theories” unless it’s just a joke. Ha—obviously rich and powerful people don’t engage in conspiracies! Instead, you can only talk to people about things like the weather or the price of tomatoes. But some say the weather is being controlled and that tomatoes are coated with poisons so don’t bring up those topics. And you can’t talk about politics in any form without realizing that your framework for discussion is strictly limited to “the spectrum of acceptable opinion” as Chomsky ironically put it.

I’m getting old though, so maybe it’s just me. Are younger people getting a clue earlier and learning to live with willful ignorance? It’s difficult to know since the term willful ignorance suggests keeping conscious thoughts hidden. Maybe willful oblivion—the lack of mindfulness that makes it easy to be scammed—is a better term. The Better Business Bureau did a study on the vulnerability of different age groups to scams. It found that “millennials and well-educated folks are more likely to be taken precisely because they think they’re too smart to be.” From that perspective things are not looking brighter in the near term.

I’ve noticed the problem with academics and others who think they are well-educated. They seem to have perfected a state of willful oblivion and, although egoism plays a part, it is a mindset based on unquestioning acceptance of a perceived consensus. The perceived consensus has to be established rapidly though, as with 9/11 and Covid, or these folks might dig into the details and question the next power-grabbing narrative. Just kidding, they will never question the narrative of the state when it matters.

Ideas about state crimes vary among others though. Varieties include more than just 9/11, Covid, weather control and tomato poisoning. I regularly hear about dozens of commonly held notions that suggest state crimes. Anyone you meet might have a touch of one or the other in their thoughts. Some of them are sure to be right in ways you don’t expect so it’s best to hear them out until it’s clear whether their arguments are logical or not.

It would be better if we could all agree on which state crimes are likely to be real, without the help of academia or any other institution beholden to the state. It’s an idea that I’ve written and spoken about recently—the need for a gauge upon which to measure new narratives for the possibility of state crime. The benefits would include better judgment around personal and social decisions, if not justice.  And it’s increasingly important to know when state crimes are occurring as power and geographical control are concentrating globally with each passing year.

In the interim, unless we’re ready to give up and let the whole shitshow play out, we need to talk and that’s hard when common ground is limited. It’s also hard if you feel betrayed by past experiences. Nonetheless we must try.

In my experience discussing state crimes I’ve had to be very careful about what I say, double checking my facts and being very precise in my wording. That’s because the crimes I’ve spoken about, if revealed, have the potential to bring down much of the corrupt system we live in. For that reason, the state has responded with characters who disrupt any questioning. Feel free to ask about weather control but mention anything about the fact that we don’t know who did 9/11 and you will be inundated with challenges to the minutiae and unsolicited comments about absurd things like Judy Wood’s “Star Wars beams in orbit.”

It’s not so bad anymore since the 9/11 crimes don’t have the emotional impact they once had and the state seems to have reassigned most of its disinformation specialists to other tasks. In fact, lately it’s become fashionable to talk about 9/11 in a limited way. Although I was a guest on shows with much larger audiences in years gone by, like NPR and Air America radio, more welcoming podcasts with reasonably large audiences have discussed the need for 9/11 truth in the last year or two. They typically want to focus the discussion on a sensational “hook” and sometimes later remove the episode from Youtube to avoid being banned. But still, there are more people willing to discuss the 9/11 crimes now that they appear to be more safely in the rearview mirror.

The Western empire is dying, no doubt to be replaced by another, but for many reasons it’s still important to talk about the need for 9/11 truth. The crimes of 9/11 led to the deaths of nearly five million people in the resulting “War on Terror” and established justification for mass surveillance, pre-emptive war, and torture. More importantly the acceptance of such blatant deception set a precedent for future state crimes. If we don’t call for truth now, the next deception will likely take away more than our jobs.

Source: https://digwithin.net/2024/07/06/outside-the-spectrum-of-acceptable-opinion/

Professor LINDZEN explains how the climate deception is rooted in hatred of ordinary workers

 

 

Professor Richard Lindzen recently spoke in Brussels, at the invitation of the Hungarian political think tank MCC, about the role of consensus in political movements claiming a scientific basis (as is the case nowadays with climate). Below is the full text of his speech. “Hopefully, we will awaken from this nightmare before it is too late.”

Richard S. Lindzen, Professor Emeritus, MIT  (Lire en français)
5 August 2024

In modern history there are several examples of political movements claiming a scientific basis. From immigration restriction and eugenics (in the US after WW1) to antisemitism and race ideology (in Hitler’s Germany) and communism and Lysenkoism (under Stalin). Each of these claimed a scientific consensus that allowed highly educated citizens, who were nonetheless ignorant of science, to have the anxieties associated with their ignorance alleviated. Since all scientists supposedly agreed, there was no need for them to understand the science. Indeed, ‘the science’ is the opposite of science itself. Science is a mode of inquiry rather than a source of authority. However, the success that science achieves has earned it a measure of authority in the public’s mind, and this is what politicians frequently envy and attempt to appropriate.

The exploitation of climate fits into the preceding pattern, and as with all its predecessors, science is, in fact, irrelevant. At best, it is a distraction which led many of us to focus on the numerous misrepresentations of science in what was purely a political movement.

The following focusses on the situation in the United States, though a similar dynamic occurred throughout the developed world, with meetings at the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation’s Bellagio Center and at Villach in the 1980’s playing an important role. Most of this talk will concern the origin of the obsession with decarbonization in the US. I will return briefly to the matter of the consensus at the end of this talk.

I would suggest that the obsession with decarbonization (i.e., Net Zero) had its roots in the reaction to the amazing post WW2 period when ordinary workers were able to own a house and a car. I was a student in the 50’s and early 60’s. The mockery of the poor taste and materialism of these so-called ordinary people was endemic. With the Vietnam War, things got amplified as the working class got drafted while students sought draft deferments. Students, during this period, were still a relative elite; the massive expansion of higher education was only beginning. Students justified their behavior by insisting that the Vietnam War was illegitimate while ignoring the obvious fact that Vietnamese people were fleeing south rather than north. It was fashionable to regard the US as evil and deserving of overthrow. Opposition often turned to violence with groups like the Weather Underground and SDS (Students for a Democratic Society). In 1968, I was teaching at the University of Chicago. We were spending the summer in Colorado, and we had a student taking care of our apartment. When we returned, we found a police car monitoring our apartment. The house-sitter had apparently turned our apartment into a crash pad for the SDS during the Democrat Party Convention. Our apartment was littered with their literature which included instructions for poisoning Chicago’s water supply. This period seemed to end with Nixon’s election, but we now know that this was just the beginning of the long march through the institutions: a march being conducted by avowed revolutionaries intent on destroying Western society. For the new revolutionaries, however, the enemy was not the capitalists, but, rather, the working middle class. The capitalists, they realized, could easily be bought off.

Currently, there is great emphasis on the march through the educational institutions: first the schools of education and then higher education in the humanities and the social sciences and now STEM. What is usually ignored is that the first institutions to be captured were professional societies. My wife attended a meeting of the Modern Language Association in the late 60’s, and it was already fully ‘woke.’

While there is currently a focus on the capture of education, DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, a movement emphasizing racial differences and encouraging conflict) was not the only goal of the march through the institutions. I think it would be a mistake to ignore the traditional focus of revolutionary movements on the means of production. The vehicle for this was the capture of the environmental movement. Prior to 1970, the focus of this movement was on things like whales, endangered species, landscape, clean air and water, and population. However, with the first Earth Day in April of 1970, the focus turned to the energy sector which, after all, is fundamental to all production, and relatedly, involves trillions of dollars.

As we will see, this last item was fundamental. This new focus was accompanied by the creation of new environmental organizations like Environmental Defense and the Natural Resources Defense Council. It was also accompanied by new governmental organizations like the EPA and the Department of Transportation. Once again, professional societies were easy pickings: the American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union, and even the honorary societies like the National Academy of Science, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, etc. The capture of the Royal Society in the UK was an obvious European example. There was a bit of floundering to begin with. The movement initially attempted to focus on global cooling due to the reflection of sunlight by sulfate aerosols emitted by coal fired generators. Afterall, there seemed to have been global cooling between the 1930’s and the 1970’s.

However, the cooling ended in the 1970’s. There was an additional effort to tie the sulfates to acid rain which was allegedly killing forests. This also turned out to be a dud. In the 70’s, attention turned to CO2 and its contribution to warming via the greenhouse effect. The attraction of controlling CO2 to political control freaks was obvious. It was the inevitable product of all burning of carbon based fuels. It was also the product of breathing. However, there was a problem: CO2 was a minor greenhouse gas compared to the naturally produced water vapor. Doubling CO2 would only lead to warming of less than 1 degree C. A paper in the early 70’s by Manabe and Wetherald came to the rescue. Using a highly unrealistic one-dimensional model of the atmosphere, they found that assuming (without any basis) that relative humidity remained constant as the atmosphere warmed, would provide a positive feedback that would amplify the impact of CO2 by a factor of 2. This violated Le Chatelier’s Principle that held that natural systems tended to oppose change, but to be fair, the principle was not something that had been rigorously proven. Positive feedbacks now became the stock in trade of all climate models which now were producing responses to doubling CO2 of 3 degrees C and even 4 degrees C rather than a paltry 1 degree C or less.

 

The enthusiasm of politicians became boundless. Virtue signaling elites promised to achieve net zero emissions within a decade or 2 or 3 with no idea of how to achieve this without destroying their society (and, with off-shore wind, killing marine mammals). Ordinary people, confronted with impossible demands on their own well-being, have not found warming of a few degrees to be very impressive since the warming projected was what everyone successfully negotiates every day. By contrast, most educated elites learned how to rationalize anything in order to please their professors – a skill that leaves them particularly vulnerable to propaganda. Few ordinary people, by contrast, contemplate retiring to the arctic rather than Florida. Excited politicians, confronted by this resistance, have frantically changed their story. Rather than emphasizing miniscule changes in their temperature metric (which, itself, is a false measure of climate), they now point to weather extremes which occur almost daily some place on earth, as proof not only of climate change but of climate change due to increasing CO2 (and now also to the even more negligible contributors to the greenhouse effect like methane and nitrous oxide) even though such extremes show no significant correlation with the emissions. From the political point of view, extremes provide convenient visuals that have more emotional impact than small temperature changes. The desperation of political figures often goes beyond this to claiming that climate change is an existential threat (associated with alleged ‘tipping points’) even though the official documents (for example, the Working Group 1 reports of the IPCC) produced to support climate concerns never come close to claiming this, and where there is no theoretical or observational basis for tipping points.

I should note that there was one exception to the focus on warming, and that was the ozone depletion issue. However, even this issue served a purpose. When Richard Benedick, the American negotiator of the Montreal Convention which banned Freon passed through MIT on his way back from Montreal, he gloated over his success, but assured us that we hadn’t seen anything yet; we should wait to see what they would do with CO2. In brief the ozone issue constituted a dry run for global warming. To be sure, the EPA’s activities still include conventional pollution control, but energy dominates.

Of course, the attraction of power is not the only thing motivating politicians. The ability to award trillions of dollars to reorient our energy sector means that there are recipients of these trillions of dollars, and these recipients must only share a few percent of these trillions of dollars to support the campaigns of these politicians for many election cycles and guarantee the support of these politicians for the policies associated with the reorientation.

That the claim of consensus was always propagandistic should be obvious, but the claim of consensus has its own interesting aspects. When global warming was first exposed to the American public in a Senate hearing in 1988, Newsweek Magazine had a cover showing the Earth on fire with the subtitle “All scientists agree.” This was at a time when there were only a handful of institutions dealing with climate and even these institutions were more concerned with understanding the present climate rather than the impact of CO2 on climate. Nonetheless, a few politicians (most notably Al Gore) were already making this their signature issue. And, when the Clinton-Gore administration won the election in 1992, there began a rapid increase by a factor of about 15 in funding related to climate. This, indeed, created a major increase in individuals claiming to work on climate, and who understood that the support demanded agreement with the alleged danger of CO2. Whenever, there was an announcement of something that needed to be found (i.e., the elimination of the medieval warm period, the attribution of change to CO2, etc.), there were, inevitably, so-called scientists who would claim to have found what was asked for (Ben Santer for attribution and Michael Mann for the elimination of the medieval warm period) and received remarkable rewards and recognition despite the absurd arguments. This did produce a consensus of sorts. It was not a consensus that we were facing an existential threat, but rather, as noted by Steven Koonin, that the projected increase in GDP by the end of the 21st century would be decreased from about 200% to 197% and even this prediction is an exaggeration – especially since it ignores the undeniable benefits of CO2.

So here we are, confronted with policies that destroy western economies, impoverish the working middle class, condemn billions of the world’s poorest to continued poverty and increased starvation, leave our children despairing over the alleged absence of a future, and will enrich the enemies of the West who are enjoying the spectacle of our suicide march, a march that the energy sector cowardly accepts, being too lazy to exert the modest effort needed to check what is being claimed. As Voltaire once noted, “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities”. Hopefully, we will awaken from this nightmare before it is too late.

You can also see the presentation by Lindzen in Brussels here (beginning at 09.59):

Source: https://clintel.org/those-who-can-make-you-believe-absurdities-can-make-you-commit-atrocities/

Potions against demons

 

 

Better to debunk superstition than profit from it, whilst simultaneously hastening the Reset.

 

Mike Yeadon
May 17, 2024

As you may know, I’ve developed a severe allergy to the proposition of “early treatment for covid19”.

I’m absolutely fine with early treatment for anything provided it’s rational. It’s the tag “for covid19” that I can’t tolerate. It’s much more than an academic argument about whether there was a new syndromic illness in some people, in the opinion of some physicians.

I think those promoting early treatments for covid19 have first to concede all the major points the perpetrators seek to nail in people’s minds.

Otherwise, their treatment paradigm doesn’t work. Is this what they want? Implied acceptance of:

-New disease.

-New virus.

-GOF research & leaks.

-Viruses as cause of acute respiratory illnesses.

Since there are no widely accepted clinical signs and symptoms differentiating “covid19” from the broad swathe of influenza-like illnesses, this whole business

-reinforces the utility of PCR as a reasonable diagnostic.

and

-unavoidably, reinforces the myth of contagiousness. 

These are all things I’m working hard to show people are just not true. They form most of the heart of the deception that will be used to destroy what’s left of our freedoms and all of our medical autonomy.

So I hope knowing this helps you understand why I have little patience for the concept. 

Do those promoting early treatment for covid19 really want to gift all those lies to the perpetrators? I so much don’t believe any rational person would want to do that I’m struggling to credit such a stance as being benign, because it doesn’t look that way to me.

If I was one of the perpetrators and I wanted to reinforce the deception, I’d have been highly motivated to prompt at least some physicians to do it. 

Influenza-like illnesses

The plus of “promoting early treatment of covid19” is the real possibility that certain acute respiratory illnesses respond to certain pharmaceutical treatments.

However, it would be both more precise and more correct to “promote early treatment for influenza-like illnesses”. (ILIs)

I don’t think this is a minor point of difference.

I confess that my first thought about the claims that drug X or Y “worked” in “covid19” was that what was being treated was a non specific ILI, a treatment paradigm previously unexplored. 

Clinical research into ILI has been a non-sexy area all my professional life, because it was considered a drug development graveyard (nothing works), beyond being the largest single source of revenue for oral antibiotics for suspected bacterial pneumonia. 

Best wishes 

Mike 

Nothing here will ever be behind any pay wall.

I have never accepted and will never accept any donations or payments for myself. Voluntary Paid Subscriptions all go to my admin, Tim West, to allow him to put in a lot of time both here and on my (only genuine) Telegram Channel.

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel

 

Source: https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/potions-against-demons

Neuralink’s First Patient is Learning French and Japanese Using “The Link” Brain Chip Interface

Chrissy Newton 

September 4, 2024

More than half a year after receiving the implant, Noland Arbaugh, the first Neuralink subject implanted with a brain interface chip, has been “hitting the books” mentally, dedicating three hours a day to learning French and Japanese.

On January 29, 2024, Arbaugh made history as the first person to receive Neuralink’s revolutionary brain implant, “The Link,” during clinical trials. The 30-year-old quadriplegic, who volunteered for the procedure, was paralyzed from the shoulders down following a diving accident. Since the implantation, the device has granted him what have been characterized as “cyborg” abilities, allowing him to control various technologies—which includes playing Mario Kart and Chess—using only his mind.

“The surgery was super easy,” Arbaugh said in a video he posted on X in March.

On August 29th, Arbaugh took to X again, sharing that, “In my free time, Eve (what I’ve named my Neuralink device) and I have been working towards improving myself in many different ways. Currently, I’m learning French and Japanese for roughly three hours a day using a few different resources.”

Arbaugh mentions that he undergoes daily sessions at Neuralink, working on tasks like controlling computer functions with his mind and improving handwriting through mental visualization. He’s also participating in experiments to enhance the technology for future users. Beyond his Neuralink work, Arbaugh is focused on self-improvement—relearning math, studying at Peterson Academy, reading extensively, and returning to creative writing. He’s hopeful about returning to school, possibly in neuroscience, and dreams of starting a charity, building a home for his parents, and becoming a stronger advocate for the community.

Despite some challenges, Arbaugh says he’s grateful for the overwhelming support and is excited for what’s ahead.

However, Neuralink has faced some unforeseen issues. Earlier this year, the company reported that Arbaugh experienced medical problems due to the developing technology. Some threads connecting the interface to his brain retracted. Neuralink quickly addressed this issue, recently stating that adjustments were made to Arbaugh’s chip algorithm, which resolved the problem.

Despite Elon Musk’s optimism, concerns persist about the technology’s reliability. The first human trial in September 2023 saw only partial success, with many electrodes failing to transmit signals correctly. Complications arose when the brain chip shifted from its original position, causing the detachment of most electrodes. Additionally, the company remains under scrutiny for both technical challenges and accusations of animal cruelty during its testing phase.

After what could be seen as a scary experience, Arbaugh jokingly—or perhaps chillingly—expressed his thoughts on X: “We’re waiting for FDA approval allowing me to control other physical machines such as a car, a drone, maybe a robot or two or 10,000. Something about making sure it’s safe…”

 

Chrissy Newton is a PR professional and founder of VOCAB Communications. She currently appears on The Discovery Channel and Max and hosts the Rebelliously Curious podcast, which can be found on The Debrief’s YouTube Channel on all audio podcast streaming platforms. Follow her on X: @ChrissyNewton and at chrissynewton.com.

Source: https://thedebrief.org/neuralinks-first-patient-is-learning-french-and-japanese-using-the-link-brain-chip-interface/

They Are Using Lab-Grown Human Brains That They Have Enslaved Called “Organoids” To Run Computers

 

Michael Snyder
June 23, 2024

When I first started researching this, I could hardly believe that it was true. A company in Switzerland known as “Final Spark” has constructed a bizarre hybrid biocomputer that combines lab-grown miniature human brains with conventional electronic circuits.  This approach saves an extraordinary amount of energy compared to normal computers, but there is a big problem.  The lab-grown miniature human brains keep wearing out and dying, and so scientists have to keep growing new ones to replace them.  Stem cells that are derived from human skin tissue are used to create the 16 spherical brain “organoids” that the system depends upon.  I realize that this sounds like something straight out of a really bad science fiction movie, but it is actually happening.

Scientists at Final Spark are calling their hybrid computer “the Neuroplatform”, and it is being reported that it only uses “a fraction of the energy required to power a traditional set up”…

Swiss tech startup FinalSpark is now selling access to biocomputers that combine up to four tiny lab-grown human brains with silicon chips.

This new bioprocessing platform, called the Neuroplatform, uses small versions of human brains to do computer work instead of silicon chips. The company says it can fit 16 of these mini-brains onto the Neuroplatform and use a fraction of the energy required to power a traditional set up.

The platform, currently adopted by nine institutions, integrates hardware, software and biology to construct a processing system that is energy-efficient and high-performing.

This “breakthrough” is being hailed as a way to save a gigantic amount of energy.

But what about the lab-grown human brains that are being enslaved to run the Neuroplatform?

Each of the 16 mini-brains is made up of approximately 10,000 living neurons, and they are kept alive by a “microfluidics system that supplies water and nutrients for the cells”…

Rather than merely integrating biological concepts into computing, FinalSpark’s online platform ‘taps’ into spherical clusters of lab-grown human brain cells called organoids. A total of 16 organoids are housed within four arrays that connect to eight electrodes each and a microfluidics system that supplies water and nutrients for the cells.

The approach, known as wetware computing, in this case harnesses researchers’ abilities to culture organoids in the lab, a fairly new technology that allows scientists to study what are essentially mini replicas of individual organs.

During their short lives, the mini-brains are literally trained to perform certain tasks using a reward and punishment system…

Researchers do this by training the organoids through a reward system. The organoids are rewarded with dopamine, the neurotransmitter responsible for pleasure (and addiction).

Meanwhile, as “punishment,” the organoids are exposed to chaotic stimuli, such as irregular electrical activity.

If the enslaved mini-brains do what they are supposed to do, they are rewarded with lots of pleasure.

If the enslaved mini-brains do not do what they are supposed to do, they are hit with lots of “irregular electrical activity”.

In other words, these miniature human brains are tortured until they learn to obey.

Reading that should literally make you sick.

What these scientists are doing is so incredibly evil.

Final Spark claims that the miniature human brains use “a million times less power than their silicon counterparts”…

Swiss technology firm Final Spark has successfully launched Neuroplatform, the world’s first bioprocessing platform where human brain organoids (lab-grown miniaturized versions of organs) perform computational tasks instead of silicon chips.

The first such facility hosts the processing prowess of 16 brain organoids, which the company claims uses a million times less power than their silicon counterparts.

Final Spark hopes that their new “technology” will become the primary energy source for the AI revolution.

Because at this point training AI models uses a colossal amount of conventional energy…

According to Final Spark’s estimates, training the popular large language model GPT-3 that powered ChatGPT in its initial days alone consumed 10 GWh of energy. This is a whopping 6,000 times more energy than an average European city consumes in an entire year.

Replacing silicon chips with bioprocessors could lead to drastic energy savings. Final Spark allows research labs to experience the power of biological processors on the Neuroplatform.

To a lot of people out there, this is going to sound really great.

Final Spark insists that the processor that it has created will use a million times less energy compared to a normal silicon chip.

There is just one enormous problem.

The mini-brains keep dying and must be regularly replaced.

At first they would die “in just a few hours”, but now they are apparently living for up to 100 days…

Final Spark faced many challenges in its early years since the organoids would die in just a few hours. The company has worked on this shortcoming and improved its MEA systems to ensure that organoids live for 100 days.

These “organoids” are literally worked to death.

They are hooked up to electrodes and worked until they can work no more…

Final Spark has made working these varied components possible through an innovative setup called Multi-Electrode Arrays (MEAs), where the three-dimensional masses of brain tissue are placed.

Each MEA has four brain organoids that interface with eight electrodes. These electrodes perform the dual role of stimulating the organoids and recording the data they process.

Data transfer is done through digital analog converters with a 16-bit resolution and a 30 kHz frequency. A microfluidic system provides life support for the MEAs, and cameras can monitor their overall operation.

Have you ever seen “The Matrix”?

I was reminded of that film as I researched all of this.

Just like in that movie, human energy powers the entire system.

And just like in that movie, those that power the system are enslaved.

The creators of “the Neuroplatform” insist that this is perfectly okay because the mini-brains are not sentient beings.

Whether that is true or not, what they are doing is still very wrong.

Creating miniature human brains and using them to power a computer may be a way to save a lot of energy, but it also perfectly illustrates how far our society has fallen.

We are crossing lines that should never be crossed, and eventually we will pay a very great price for the crimes that our scientists are committing.

Michael’s new book entitled “Chaos” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can subscribe to his Substack  newsletter at michaeltsnyder.substack.com.

Source: https://themostimportantnews.com/archives/they-are-using-lab-grown-human-brains-that-they-have-enslaved-called-organoids-to-run-computers

Vaccine passport to be introduced next week in Portugal

 

mpr21
28th August

From next week, Portugal will join four other European countries in a pilot test of the European Vaccine Passport. The document is a social control instrument that brings together everyone's vaccination data into a single medium.

The passport will be available in various formats, including printed cards, copies sent by mail and digital versions for mobile phones.

The Euvabeco project is already underway, which, for once, is not using Africa as a test field. The guinea pig this time is Portugal, along with Sweden, France, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Luxembourg and Poland. But, for the purposes of the experiment, only Latvia, Greece, Belgium, Germany and Portugal are participating.

What was supposed be temporary is becoming permanent. What was exceptional is becoming normal. What used to be intimate is now visible to everyone (literally).

This method of storing and sharing data, rather than relying solely on public health systems, was made possible by the Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN), which was developed for the European Union during the “covid” pandemic .

However, plans to create a vaccination passport, analogue or digital, were already underway before 2020, and even before the vaccines, as we explained in an entry published in 2021.

Now the GDHCN is in the hands of the World Health Organisation and therefore within reach of private companies and obscure foundations, although the situation is presented back-to-front. rather than a centralised database, it is described as a mere instrument for people to access their own data.

The trial in Europe is another step forward following the recent expansion of surveillance introduced by the of the IHR (International Health Regulations) reform. The latter facilitates recurrent lockdowns to impose mandatory vaccination as a way of ensuring a stable market for the pharmaceutical companies manufacturing the latest cutting edge vaccines.

One of Euvabeco’s plans is to impose a vaccine passport worldwide. These will appear in 2026 and extend the experiment beyond this pilot phase, thus reinforcing social control mechanisms under the pretext of public health.

In addition, Euvabeco plans to launch other innovative tools, including a clinical decision system that provides vaccination recommendations, a screening tool to identify “vulnerable populations,” an electronic product information leaflet (e-PIL) to allow the transfer of vaccines between countries without having to repackage them, and a modeling and forecasting tool to assess the impact of public health interventions.

 

Source: https://mpr21.info/los-pasaportes-de-vacunas-se-encargaron-antes-que-las-vacunas/