Jon Rappoport
November13th
When I discovered this study several years ago and wrote the
following extensive piece on it, the study was a bolt from the blue, a
complete devastating shocker.
It still is.
It is more than enough to topple the whole vaccine empire.
Honoring
the work of the study co-author, Dr. Antonietta Gatti, Catherine Austin
Fitts wrote, “Not long after the publication of this revolutionary
study, tax authorities raided and investigated Dr. Gatti’s and [her
husband] Dr. Montanari’s laboratory and private home—an all too usual
method of intimidation.”
THAT was the “scientific follow-up.”
In
a nutshell, Dr. Gatti’s 2017 study showed an incredible amount of
contamination, in a whole host of traditional vaccines. The
contamination was in the form of tiny nanoparticles, mostly metallic,
and obviously highly harmful and dangerous.
Before reading my
summary and analysis of that study—here is an updated communication from
Dr. Gatti I received a few days ago. It describes, in a stark and
disturbing fashion, what has been happening to her, her work, and her
laboratory. This is chilling:
“At the end of last year, our
laboratory no longer had the financial capacity to continue its
research. The proceeds from the few analyzes requested by private
individuals yielded enormously less than what the research cost us.
Then, there were two possibilities: close everything or set up a
foundation by giving away everything that belonged to us, hoping to find
some sponsors. After all, all initiatives, even the most bizarre, find
someone willing to contribute financially. Why not a foundation that
does fundamental research on health? So, we opted for the latter choice,
and the Nanodiagnostics Foundation was born.”
“But, after almost a
year, not a cent has arrived. In short, no company, no private citizen,
no institution is willing to contribute.”
“Many people continue
to demand results and ask questions to which they have no answers from
the institutions or their doctors, but, if it is a question of parting
from some money, the silence is absolute.”
“It is clear that our
work is a threat to billion-dollar businesses that are not exactly
clear, at least for most people. For this reason, the most absurd and
incredible slanders are invented to our detriment.
Not being able
to dispute our scientific results, there are those who publish, usually
anonymously, that we earn enormous sums of money, even giving the
impression that the Foundation belongs to us, when it should be known
that foundations do not belong to anyone, and no one can profit from
them. And this is when we have donated everything that belonged to us,
and we work for free.”
“Another tactic is trying to isolate and
discredit us with lies. What the University of Bologna did a few days
ago, the university where I graduated, then specialized and taught, is a
small example.”
“A few months ago, that university asked us if
we were willing to accept [a] student… who would prepare her graduation
thesis with us. We agreed and agreed with the student on how to proceed.
A few months passed, then, a couple of weeks ago, when the University
authorities realized that the student would work with us, they sent us a
message of a few lines in which they informed us that what we do (and
which I had taught at that university) was of no interest to them
(which, in a way, is true, although very far from the mission of the
University). Needless to say, my letter to the Rector asking for
explanations remained unanswered.”
“And it is also useless to say
how difficult it is to publish the results that we continue to obtain,
and which are not liked by those who financially maintain the medical
journals, on whose scientific nature I prefer not to comment. For twice
the Editor after the publication of an article (on vaccines and on SIDS)
asked to retreat [sic] them. Only the work of the Robert Kennedy Jr
lawyers stopped the request.”
“[Paper:] Novel chemical-physical autopsy investigation in sudden infant death and sudden intrauterine unexplained death syndromes” (click here)
“Just
for your information, in spite of all difficulties, we are now dealing
with very critical topics: spontaneously aborted babies, analysis of the
brains of infants who died in cots (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, aka
SIDS), analysis of what falls from the sky (e.g., recently hail never
seen before), food, etc. All this can only be fought with personal
discredit.”
“We haven’t had any visits from the regime for a long
time. For them it is enough to monitor our computers and phones. The
rest is done by ‘volunteers’. As for other scientists, no one deals with
our topics in full. It must be realized that doing so represents a risk
that is obviously preferable not to take.”
“As long as we can
manage, we will continue to work. If, however, no sponsor materializes
(idle chatter and empty promises are not only useless: they are a waste
of time,) we will have no other option than to declare defeat, a defeat
that belongs to the whole world and, above all, to the children who do
not deserve the fate they are suffering.”
“…I give some details of our Foundation Nanodiagnostics (click here)...”
IF YOU CAN, PLEASE DONATE TO Dr. Gatti’s vital work at the above website.
Here is my original article on Dr. Gatti’s vaccine-contamination study:
Dangerous nano-particles contaminating many vaccines: groundbreaking study
“The
Lung,” Second Edition: “Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to
subcellular structures…enabling their ready incorporation into
biological systems.”
A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional
vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very
troubling and previously unreported fact:
The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.
Many of the particles are metals.
We’re talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.
To
begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating
nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:
“The analyses carried out show that in all samples
checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign
bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body
reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality
control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our
hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is
probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial
processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines…”
Are the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the contamination is intentional?
“The
quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual
chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are
neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are
biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either
immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from
administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and
not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as
such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different
from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that
toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”
“After being
injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay
around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they can
also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess
what will be their final destination…As happens with all foreign bodies,
particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is
chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore,
the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can produce
organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune
system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that particles
the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact
with the DNA…”
“In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some
Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a
toxicity affecting the tissues…”
“Given the contaminations we
observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse effects after the
injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the
character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are
carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar
quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on
very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the
muscles…could heavily impair the muscle functionality…”
“We come
across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in
the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental
contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most
circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no
technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like
the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is
burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present
in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular
those meant for infants.”
This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.
Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.
Many
legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to mandate
vaccines and force them on the population. But these contaminating
nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would defend
the right of the State to inject them.
Here is another section
from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and compositions of the
nanoparticle contaminants are indicated. Take a deep breath and buckle
up:
“…further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized,
inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was
identified in all cases [all 44 vaccines], whose presence was not
declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product…”
“…single
particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (less than 100nm) and
aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron,
Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and
Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”
“…the particles are
surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples
analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix,
Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix
Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13,
Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”
“…particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).”
“…singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”
“Some
metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also
identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and
Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix,
Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or
Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron,
Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1)
were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while
Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The
investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological
substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As
soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a
nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The
nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not
biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized
as self by the body.”
“…examples of these nano-bio-interactions.
Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles
of Lead in Meningitec… of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel…)
and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix…Similar aggregates, though in
different situations (patients suffering from leukemia or
cryoglobulinemia), have already been described in literature.”
I’m
sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing
problems are “rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other
medical lies.
“I’d like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?”
Several vital questions demanding answers spring from the findings of this 2017 study:
Are some of these nanoparticles intentionally placed in vaccines?
Does
the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines INEVITABLY
lead to dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?
New
nano-technology is already being employed to create several
vaccines—supposedly “improving effectiveness.” In fact, the RNA COVID-19
vaccine are a nano-type. Does this manufacturing process carry with it
the unavoidable effect of unleashing a hurricane of nanoparticle
contaminants?
How many cases of childhood brain damage and autism can be laid at the door of nanoparticle contamination?
And
finally, where are these contaminated vaccines manufactured? The above
study did not attempt to discover this. It was outside the scope of the
research. It’s common knowledge that, for example, in the case of the
US, vaccines or their components, are, in many instances, not produced
domestically. Where does this put control of safety? In, say, China,
where there have been numerous pharmaceutical scandals connected to
contamination of products?
The vaccine establishment does not show
the slightest interest in answering any of these questions. They are
busy pretending the questions don’t exist.
Trusting the establishment would be suicidal.
-- Jon Rappoport
Nanoparticles contaminating vaccines
Source: https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/vaccine-study-to-bring-down-the-empire?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=806546&post_id=138817867&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=prj10&utm_medium=email
.png){kind=tracking}
.png%20(PNG%20Image%20600%20%C3%97%20388%20pixels).png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}
.png){kind=tracking}
