November 2, 2021
A game-changer study just published in the respected journal, Nature, revealed that the experimental COVID ‘vaccines’ have only temporary benefits, but worse yet, are long term threats to your life! It warns, anyone vaxxed who already has poor health is especially prone to dangers from cardiovascular mortality. [1]
The stark warning from this Nature study is that it:
“recommends additional caution when vaccinating people with pre-existing clinical conditions, including diabetes, electrolyte imbalances, renal dysfunction, and coagulation disorders.”
But don’t be complacent if you’re in rude health when you get the jab because these new results appear to suggest that even healthy people who take the vaccine may be unnecessarily exposing themselves to higher risk of developing diabetes.
A total of 11 healthy adult volunteers of both sexes, aged 24–47 years, with a BMI of 21.5–30.0 kg/m², were enrolled for the study. Adverse events were monitored daily during the first 7 days after each inoculation and then self-recorded by the participants on diary cards in the following weeks. Overall, adverse reactions were mild (grades 1 or 2) and transient (Supplementary Table S3).
The authors noted that the science and “The manner in which vaccination would mimic an infection has not been fully evaluated.”
The study confirmed that these ‘vaccines’ do not have long lasting benefit.
Antibodies production was not sustained over the long period and by the end of three months the vaccine had lost half of effectiveness, such that, “By day 90, IgG positivity also reduced to 50%, indicating antibody production did not sustain for a long time.”
The authors found:
“Testing results from cohort A demonstrated that prior to the 2nd inoculation 0 percent of the participants developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, but by day 28, which was 2 weeks post the 2nd inoculation, 100 percent of the participants were tested positive (Fig. 1b)”
The study adds:
“ PBMCs scRNA-seq results also indicated consistent reductions in CD8+ T cells and increases in monocyte contents, as well as enhanced NF-κB inflammatory signaling, which also mimicked responses after infection. Surprisingly, type I interferon responses, which had been linked to reduced damages after SARS-CoV-2 infection and milder symptoms, appeared to be reduced after vaccination, at least by 28 days post the 1st inoculation. This might suggest that in the short-term (1 month) after vaccination, a person’s immune system is in a non-privileged state, and may require more protection.”
Type 2 Diabetic Concerns
Perhaps the most worrying finding, especially for westerners eating an unhealthy high sugar diet, is the inordinate rise in blood sugar levels directly correlated to being injected with these experimental ‘vaccines.’
The study found:
“To our surprise, quite consistent increases in HbA1c levels were observed in healthy volunteers, regardless of whether they belonged to cohort A or B. By day 28 post the 1st inoculation, three out of 11 individuals reached the prediabetic range (Fig. 2c). By days 42 and 90, medium HbA1c levels appeared to revert back, yet were still significantly higher than those before vaccination. Previous work has demonstrated that diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood glucose levels are more prone to develop severe forms of COVID-1919. High blood glucose levels/glycolysis had been shown to promote SARS-CoV-2 replication in human monocytes via the production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and activation of HIF1A20, therefore presenting a disadvantageous feature.”
What is HbA1c?
HbA1c is what’s known as glycated haemoglobin. This is something that’s made when the glucose (sugar) in your body sticks to your red blood cells. Your body can’t use the sugar properly, so more of it sticks to your blood cells and builds up in your blood.
Risks from higher HbA1c
It is known among medical scientists that:
“High HbA1c levels can have many negative effects on your health, whether you have diabetes or not. People with high levels are at an increased risk of dementia, heart disease, kidney disease, mental health problems, fatigue, and bone loss. Scientists think HbA1c levels might also impact a person’s lifespan. Both above and below normal levels have been linked with increased mortality.”[2]
It doesn’t take a medical expert to grasp the significance of this; having these experimental jabs is now proven to likely increase your risk of a range of life-threatening diseases. So, choose to be a Big Pharma guinea pig at your peril!
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8546144/
[2] https://labs.selfdecode.com/blog/high-hemoglobin-a1c/
About John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
Source: https://principia-scientific.com/game-changer-new-study-covid-jabs-are-likely-life-shortening
7 comentários:
This is why one needs some sophistication to read the studies. Worse still, the people who’ve digested it for us, have consistently picked out the scary parts, and ignore the rest. Basically, the study was done with the Chinese whole kill virus vaccine, not the mRNA vaccines. The Chinese found out surprisingly that the vaccine does pretty much what the natural infection does. They found nothing the vaccine does which is any worse than the natural infection. So take your choice. The entire study was only a 90 day study and people are gone nearly back to baseline by the end of it. Had they run it out six months or a year and still found changes that would be concerning. But 90 days after vaccination or infection you still expect to see some things different. That does not mean that they are permanent, anymore than if you still have changes 90 days after your break a leg. As for the IgG levels dropping by 50% after three months, that is basically what they are supposed to do. If your antibody level stayed up to the same levels for the rest of your life as they are just after infection, the hundreds of infections in your life would turn your blood into syrup with antibodies. Instead, your body clearly lets the antibody levels fall somewhat, well your memory T cells remember how how to make them if needed again. If the article even hints that the effectiveness of the vaccine is affected by 50% anybody drop, it is quite wrong. The article itself states that the levels of neutralizing antibodies stayed well up by the end of the study, which again is only three months. The worst thing about the study, perhaps, is that it only looked at 11 people, and it compared people who are vaccinated with earlier selves who are not. But that is not the choice we make in life. The real choice we make in life is do you want to be vaccinated or do we want to have natural viral infection. If you think the small changes after three months from the vaccination or bad, you would be absolutely horrified by the real COVID-19.
Thanks for your comment, Steve. We certainly have fundamentally different ways of looking at this. To answer several of points, you say:
"..the people who’ve digested [the paper] for us, have consistently picked out the scary parts, and ignore the rest."
Well, cherry-picking data. That's never been done by our authorities when it comes to "Covid-19", has it? [sarcasm]. But tu quoque arguments aside, this latest item only adds to an already long list of terrible discoveries, such as:
726,000 CV-19 vaccine injuries that were reported to the US VAERS (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-cdc-covid-vaccine-injuries-deaths-fda-third-pfizer-shot/) by Sep, 2021, many of these extremely serious & leaving people maimed for life. This is in addition to some 20,000 deaths, which represents double the number of post-vaccine deaths from all vaccines combined since the year 1990. And in just 10 months!
( https://vaersanalysis.info/2021/10/01/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-9-24-2021/ )
Given that VAERS typically picks up as little as 1% of vaccine adverse events, we must consider the official figures to probably be a vast underestimation. This is also the conclusion of data analyst Steve Kirsch, who has calculated some 150,000 dead Americans due to the vaccines. ( https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Deaths.pdf )
In country after country, death rates have surged following Covid vaccination. A video demonstrates the graphics: ( https://odysee.com/@covidvaxinfo:9/c19_saviourordeath_aug2021_global_with_bonus:5 )
Vietnam is a classic example. The country did not start Covid vaccination until the summer of '21. Until that time, they had hardly any 'Covid' deaths. But since vaccinating, such deaths have skyrocketed. Similarly, in Taiwan, the deaths from the vaccine are officially recognised as greater in number than those attributed to 'Covid'. ( https://medicaltrend.org/2021/10/10/taiwan-death-from-covid-19-vaccination-exceeds-death-from-covid-19/ )
It is a similar picture in Israel, the first country to achieve an overwhelmingly vaccinated population. It now boasts the "highest infection rate in the world".
( https://swprs.org/israel-highest-infection-rate-in-the-world/ )
Dozens of countries banned or suspended AstraZeneca's vaccine, due to its blood-clotting effects.
(https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/04/09/world/astrazeneca-setbacks-continue/)
There has been an explosion of post-vax myocarditis and pericarditis in Western countries, particularly in younger recipients, with large numbers of associated fatalities.
( https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/ncov/epi/covid-19-myocarditis-pericarditis-vaccines-epi.pdf?sc_lang=en )
Moderna recalled millions of vaccine doses in Japan after stainless steel contaminants were found in them. Several people had died after receiving shots from the contaminated lots.
( https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/japan-finds-stainless-steel-particles-suspended-doses-moderna-vaccine-2021-09-01/ )
A battery of independent studies have revealed a whole series of undeclared ingredients in all of the principal Covid vaccines. One example was the presentation of a pathologist team at Reutlingen, that revealed unknown artefacts at varying scales in the vaccines. ( https://thetruthrevolution.net/german-pathologists-reveals-deadly-ingredients-in-covid-vaccines-autopsy-results/amp/ ) Now Pablo Campra Madrid at the University of Almeria has released a final report on the presence of graphene oxide in the lipid nanoparticles. He says that his results are conclusive on the presence of reduced graphene oxide in the vials that he examined. rGO inside the body can also trigger most of the effects attributed to "Covid". ( https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355684360_Deteccion_de_grafeno_en_vacunas_COVID19_por_espectroscopia_Micro-RAMAN )
And i could go on. That is only a relatively small sample of the havoc these things are wreaking.
Now, you also say:
"Basically, the study was done with the Chinese whole kill virus vaccine, not the mRNA vaccines."
But which "whole kill virus" would that be? Has this famous entity ever been purified in the same way that, for example, exosomes are purified? Inoculating something onto tissue culture along with antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid, etc. does not constitute "isolation", except by mutilating the sense of the word (which virologists routinely do).
Dozens of scientific & health institutions around the world have been asked for a sample of this thing, and invariably, they all come up empty-handed. This includes the CDC, Public Health Canada, Australia’s CSIRO and many others across the Western world. Most recently, the Spanish Ministry of Health received a request for a purified sample of the virus. Their formal answer was:
"The Ministry of Health does not have a SARS_CoV-2 culture for testing, and it does not have a registry of laboratories with culture and isolation capacity for testing."
https://laverdadofende.blog/2021/10/01/el-ministerio-de-sanidad-admite-no-tener-cultivos-del-virus-sars-cov-2-nota-de-prensa-biologos-por-la-verdad/
Even mainstream Spanish news clip has discussed this admission:
https://pateitv.com/watch/ministerio-de-sanidad-reconoce-que-ni-virus-aislado-ni-cultivos-ni-test-rt-pcr-v%C3%A1lido_2LnwK7xiQyaKMSM.html
So, if you can provide me with some evidence for CV-19 virus purification (not “isolation”) then we can at least start there.
Now, you also said:
"If you think the small changes after three months from the vaccination or bad, you would be absolutely horrified by the real COVID-19"
Well, as i highlighted above, hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed around the world are hardly some "small changes". But when it comes to the elusive virus, even if i were to take this idea of a new infectious pathogen at face value, the fact is that its reported pathogenicty was wildly overstated from the very start. In Italy for example, the Istituto Superiore di Sanità reported in May 2020 on the morbidity of coronavirus patients that:
The median age is 80.5 years (79.5 for men, 83.7 for women).
10% of the deceased was over 90 years old; 90% of the deceased was over 70 years old.
Only 0.8% of the deceased had no pre-existing chronic illnesses.
Now, this same ISS has revised its estimates of those who died from "Covid alone" downwards from over 130,000 to just under 4,000. ( https://dailysceptic.org/2021/11/03/italian-higher-institute-of-health-adjusts-number-of-deaths-due-to-covid-alone-since-february-2020-downwards-from-over-130000-to-under-4000/ )
But of course! Now that the mandatory vaccination agenda is firmly in place, the charade can be safely unmasked. But for those of us who were paying attention, the weak pathogenicity of this supposedly new microbe was abundantly obvious from the start. In February 2020, the WHO had predicted an IFR of 3.4%. But by the spring/summer of 2020, serological studies were indicating an average of about 0.2%.
For example:
On May 19th Dr John Ioannidis et al published their review of global cases, which found lethality ranging between 0.02% and 0.4%.
On May 4th Dr Hendrilk Streeck et al published a study done in Germany which found an infection fatality rate (IFR) of <0.36%.
Another study from Stanford University, published on April 30th and this time focusing on Santa Clara county, found an IFR of 0.17%
A study done in the Guilan province of Iran, published on May 1st, found an IFR of 0.12%.
On April 21st, theUniversity of Southern California (USC) published their study on the population of Los Angeles county, which found an IFR of <0.2%.
Now, the above observations are firmly based on an infectious paradigm for viruses which i reject. But even if i were to accept this model (as most physicians and scientists obviously do), there would stil hardly be any cause for alarm. It was patently obvious that most of the reported "Covid cases" from last year were simply influenza cases rebaptised. That is why the 45 million US flu cases of 2019 dropped to just 925(!) in 2020. Of course, there were attempts to retcon these figures as soon as people started to realise what was happening.
As for "Covid" deaths, that is another story. But here again, causation is obviously far different to what has been claimed. The hospitalised were being treated with protocols that were effectively homicidal, including treatment with the extremely dangerous remdesivir drug, which was instituted as a standard practice. Families were brought in to hospitals and pressured to sign DNR notices for their elderly relatives. To help facilitate this early die-off, in the spring of 2020, UK Health minister Hancock purchased two years worth of midazolam, all of which had been used up by October of that year. In addition to this, countless people died after being placed on respirators when their lung function was normal. To sum up, as Dr Mike Yeadon expressed it, most Covid-19 deaths were a direct result of the administration of midazolam or remdesivir, as well as inappropriate intubation.
Finally, you said:
"They found nothing the vaccine does which is any worse than the natural infection."
For all the reasons stated above, this is obviously not the case.
And those who have had the natural infection and are being coerced to be vaccinated? The changes were reversable in healthy people, but they may not be reversable in vulnerable people.
How should they be treating people with Covid 19? I have a family member who is a sister on CCU and she confirms people mostly unvaccinated are extremely ill, and there are mortalities. She says there are a lot of unvaccinated pregnant women that are very ill. Why would governments insist on vaccines when they know the statistics.
Hi Blouse. There's a lot to unpack here. Firstly, with respect to "Covid-19", this does not appear to be one condition or one syndrome. There are way too many effects that have been grouped under this label for there to be any single cause. Even the symptomology is not agreed upon. For example, some scientists see cytokine storms as part of "Covid" whereas others do not. At the beginning of this event, people brought in to hospitals in New York were suffering from haemolytic anaemia, and NOT from pneumonia-like or flu-type symptoms. That is, something was causing oxygen deprivation *at the level of the blood*, and not in the lungs. Since lung function was normal in these patients, putting them on ventilators was usually fatal. This, at least, was the testimony of Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell.
One thing we do know for sure is that the 12 countries with the highest "Covid" fatality rates in 2020 were all countries that had vaccinated about 50% of their senior populations the previous year. That gives us an indication as to what *might* be triggering an allegedly new condition, given that graphene oxide has been introduced into numerous flu vaccines in recent years:
See: https://yvymaraey.blogspot.com/2021/08/graphene-oxide-experimental-mrna.html
Re: "unvaccinated dying more". In fact, it is consistently the other way around. Recent data from the U.K. Office of National Statistics reveals people who have been double jabbed against COVID-19 are dying from all causes at a rate six times higher than the unvaccinated. Even after the ONS "corrected" what it said were errors in this data, the conclusion that vaccinated were dying at a higher rate than the unvaccinated was still maintained. See here:
https://www.independentsentinel.com/uk-vaccination-data-might-raise-some-eyebrows/
You can see this reflected an ExposE report here: Worldwide data on 188 countries proves the highest "Covid-19" case rates are in the most vaccinated countries:
https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/02/worldwide-data-proves-the-highest-covid-19-case-rates-are-in-the-most-vaccinated-countries/
Re: "How should they be treating people with Covid 19?"
It depends upon the specific condition. Remember, this is not one thing but rather a collection of illneses that we are looking at under a new heading. If the conclusions of Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid are correct, that Covid vaccines contain graphene oxide, then specific protocols have been put forward to remediate this intoxication. I'm not aware of clinical studies to back up the protocols for *eliminating* GO from the body, but overall, the protocol below seem to make sense at least as a mitigation. In particular, N-acetylcysteine is an important option, as it boosts intracellular glutathione. This is an especially positive thing as we are bombarded daily with an avalanche of industrial poisons. See here:
https://yvymaraey.blogspot.com/2021/09/graphene-oxide-detox-protocols-for.html
Postar um comentário