domingo, 19 de setembro de 2021

Nicki Minaj was right and the experts were wrong



Steve Kirsch, TrialSiteNews

September 16, 2021

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite. This article is currently FREE to read and SHARE without paying.

Nicki Minaj made a tweet about a friend of her cousin who got vaccinated and had orchitis  (swelling of the testicles) afterwards.



Nicki was globally mocked for this tweet by COVID vaccine experts and the mainstream media from around the world. As far as I could tell, not a single medical expert supported her position. Nobody in a position of authority came to her rescue. Nobody. 

It turns out Nicki was absolutely right. And all the world’s authorities and medical experts were incorrect (aka FOS).

This is known as an “inconvenient truth.”

I posted the scientific evidence on Nicki’s Twitter feed: the VAERS results, the Fisher Exact tests. Twitter blocked my main tweet (with all the sub tweets) shortly after I posted it so no one would learn the truth.

So I decided to write this article for TrialSiteNews so that everyone can decide for themselves who to believe.

Misinformation and VAERS

But first, let’s get a few housekeeping issues out of the way about me and about the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the reporting system relied upon by the FDA and CDC to track adverse events.

I am not a medical expert. I am just an engineer from MIT who graduated in 1980 with a couple of degrees. I understand science, math, and statistics. I have no conflicts of interest. I have no history of giving out medical misinformation.

I’m also knowledgeable about the VAERS system. When you have an adverse event that you report to the V-SAFE application, you are directed to VAERS to report it. This doesn’t work so well if you are dead. This is why deaths are somewhat under-reported.

I’ve written articles showing that the VAERS data shows that over 150,000 deaths are due to the vaccine. But people dismiss that and cite the CDC disclaimer about VAERS. The CDC disclaimer gives people “permission” to ignore VAERS. The people who dismiss my arguments are not VAERS experts. 

I have 5 independent ways that arrive at the same number. Nobody has been able to supply a comparable analysis (with 6 different independent approaches) that all converge on a different number. They just claim my number is wrong. How can they know I’m wrong if they don’t have the “correct” analysis??

The CDC disclaimer is wrong on so many fronts. My favorite article on the lunacy of believing that CDC disclaimer is If Vaccine Adverse Events Tracking Systems Do Not Support Causal Inference, then “Pharmacovigilance” Does Not Exist.

To counter the CDC disclaimer, I offered to bet anyone $1M that there are over 20,000 deaths vs. under 500 deaths. I’d have bet a higher number, but nobody believes that even 20,000 deaths is remotely possible so 20,000 is sufficient to prove my point.

I discovered that nobody would bet me. Which tells us all that nobody in the world strongly believes that there are <500 deaths from the vaccine, because if they truly were confident of that, then this is a quick way to make $1M for a few hours of work. The CDC still says there are NO deaths caused by the vaccine. Just 500 deaths would stop the vaccine; it was around 50 deaths in 1976 when they halted the H1N1 vaccine nationwide.

Unfortunately, people think the CDC is correct in their VAERS disclaimer. So they attack me as being incorrect. The FDA dismisses my analysis with the hand-waving argument that they disagree with me and there is nothing further to discuss. This is precisely why they never see a safety signal in VAERS: the FDA and CDC will ignore any rational person who challenges their set of (incorrect) beliefs. 

It isn’t just me they won’t talk to; it is all of the VAERS experts, statisticians, doctors, and medical scientists that I confer with who all would love to challenge the false narrative. See the list at the end of this document

If you are looking for a safety signal and have found nothing, why aren’t the CDC and FDA interested in what we have to say?

How to find out who is telling you the truth on issues you don’t understand

One easy way to find the truth tellers is to see which side will put their money where their mouth is on important issues under discussion. 

Another way is a public debate. Truth tellers LOVE recorded public debates. Liars hate that and depend on censorship. Sound familiar? Censorship also takes the form of not running my op-eds, doing hit pieces on me, defaming me in Wikipedia, and making sure all reporters who support my position have their stories killed.

None of the “experts” who attack me will ever agree to a neutral public debate about this because they will be exposed as pushing an unsafe vaccine. There is no way they can explain all the evidence that is out there. The evidence is consistent with my hypothesis, not theirs. 

 Any open debate on vaccine safety would completely obliterate the narrative that the vaccines are safe and effective. That’s why the White House uses censorship as their weapon against people like me who are trying to tell the truth.

And just like they are unfairly attacking me, they are also unfairly attacking Nicki Minaj who did nothing more than tell the truth. They should all be ashamed of their behavior.

The “experts” all aligned to discredit Nicki

Here’s the Trinidad expert criticizing Nicki.

Here’s Sanjay Gupta laughing at Nicki Minaj:

Sanjay simply stated the vaccines don’t cause swollen testicles. That’s it. No evidence. Basically Sanjay is making this stuff up out of thin air. This is irresponsible medical journalism at its finest. Listen to him. He cites no evidence. He simply says the vaccines don’t cause this. That’s opposite to what the primary evidence (VAERS) says. Doesn’t seem to matter to him.

Fauci couldn’t resist commenting. He’s full of shit. “No evidence that it happens.” Are you kidding me? He’s a buffoon. He never even looked for the evidence that was in plain sight the entire time. This is how all this misinformation happens.
Here’s what I mean by hiding in “plain sight”… a web page summarizing all this that anyone can load:

It’s right there. There are line items for miscarriage, testicular pain/swelling. All the stuff Fauci said the vaccine didn’t cause… it’s all there in plain sight: miscarriages, menstrual disorders, testicular pain/swelling, erectile dysfunction, vaginal/uterine hemorrhage, etc.

Or there are articles like this one:

If Fauci really wants to stop the medical misinformation, all he has to do is stop talking. Simple. Effective. Problem solved.

Comedians chimed in their expertise in the vaccine field:

Trinidad officials said it was a wild goose chase.

Basically, these experts ignore all the negative data that doesn’t fit their agenda. And they gang up on anyone who has the courage to speak the truth to silence and ridicule them.

And Congress enables all this by doing absolutely nothing to stop the censorship.

All the evidence shows that all the experts were wrong and Nicki is right

Instead of people issuing opinions on whether vaccines cause orchitis or not, isn’t it time for us to look at the scientific data?

Did anyone produce any evidence that her cousin’s friend was lying? Nope.

That’s our first clue that she’s telling the truth. 

So I did a full investigation in VAERS and posted the result. But because it started heavily trending, Twitter censored it within hours of posting.

Here’s the first message. Nobody is allowed to see the sub-tweets… all censored.

Through censorship, Twitter is basically preventing the spread of legitimate scientific data so that NOBODY WILL EVER FIND OUT the truth. 

There was nothing misleading at all about the tweet. It was 100% factual. But you cannot argue with the Twitter censors. They are ALWAYS right and there is no appeal. 

Truth about the vaccine must be censored because if it wasn’t censored, they wouldn’t be able to get anyone to take it. Censorship is hugely important, especially on social media platforms. When you have a product that is so unsafe that anyone informed wouldn’t take it, you can’t do it without censorship help.

Suppressing the truth is bad enough, but then you are given a very biased statement that fails to point out that the drug company’s own studies  do not agree with these health officials.

Twitter never mentions that Pfizer’s own data shows that the vaccines kill more people than they save (18 vaccine group vs. 14 in placebo group). Why not give a balanced picture? Why are you giving expert opinions of experts who are wrong (and won’t debate the safety in a fair debate) rather than telling the world that the actual DATA from Pfizer doesn’t support the safety story?

In evidence based medicine, a double-blind randomized controlled trial data always out ranks expert opinion. But Twitter can’t figure that out. They probably never will.

Will any of these people ever apologize to Nicki? I doubt it. Because that would be an admission that 1) the vaccines caused an event that the FDA and CDC missed, and 2) it would expose all the world’s experts as giving out misinformation and 3) that Twitter was deliberately censoring truthful medical information. It’s not going to happen.

How could all the experts be wrong? Simple. They don’t check the data before they criticize people for making truthful statements. If you make any statement that is against the false narrative that the vaccines are safe and effective, you will get shot down, even when the facts don’t support it.

So, with that out the way, let’s get into the data.

An impossible anecdote

First we have a really interesting anecdote from one of my Twitter followers who saw my post. I just talked to him on the phone. It’s legit. There were 10 kids in the group:

So this is statistically IMPOSSIBLE (i.e., “highly unlikely to ever happen in your lifetime”) if the vaccines don’t cause this condition. I suspect this anecdote is not isolated. This is likely under-reported due to embarrassment. 

Does this really affect half of teenage boys? I don’t know. The URF of this symptom would be really high.. Much higher than the 41 we’ll use below.

At this point, we have two anecdotes from people we trust suggesting that this is real.

VAERS analysis confirms testicular swelling events are elevated after the COVID vaccines

Let’s see if we can also confirm in VAERS as that would really add a lot of weight to the argument that this wasn’t just a “coincidence.” And then we’ll talk about mechanisms of action confirmation for even more credibility.

It’s always nice when we use a large primary safety data source like VAERS. It will also show everyone just how under-reported VAERS is. Even if just one of those 10 kids was telling the truth, the under-reporting factor in VAERS for this condition is likely huge.

So now let’s dig into the data. We’ll use a VAERS under-reporting factor (URF) of 41 based on my previous work. This is very conservative. The article also discusses the propensity to report and that allows us to compare previous years with this year with a correction factor (we are not trying to get a super accurate answer but just get in the ballpark).

Now we run some VAERS comparative analysis between what gets reported in a typical year vs. this year.

The second analysis was over 10 years (all vaccines). 64/3.6 is a 17.7X higher incidence rate than for a typical vaccine side effect. That’s clearly an elevated condition.

If we multiply each event by the URF of 41, we can then do a test for statistical significance over 200M people and that easily passes:

VAERS analysis confirms orchitis events are elevated after the COVID vaccines

Now we do the same test for orchitis which is another name for the same class of symptoms:

So we have 20 / 1.3 = 15.3 X elevation so not that much different than we found earlier (17.7X).

Clearly both are elevated. Now we multiply by the URF of 41 (which is very conservative) and test for significance:

In short, so far, all the data we have shows Nicki was right and the experts were wrong.

VAERS analysis confirms erectile dysfunction events are elevated after the COVID vaccines

Here’s the search for COVID vaccines:

Here’s the search for 10 years worth of all previous vaccines:

So 171/1.8 = 95X

In other words, your chance of impotence is elevated by nearly 100X after the COVID vaccine vs other vaccines. We have all the Bradford-Hill criteria now satisfied for causality. In addition we can add dose dependency (97 dose 1 and 43 on dose 2) as shown below.

But 15% fewer people get the second dose, and the vast majority of the people who skip the second dose are those who either (1) had a bad reaction to the first dose or (2) saw their friends having a bad reaction and decided to skip it (the slide showing this is midway in the deck). So the number should be 15% lower on the second dose reports. It isn’t. So there is dose dependency here as well, likely that people after the second dose reacted so badly they didn’t come back for a second dose.

As for the test for significance, here it is:

So once again, all the experts were wrong. The effect is highly statistically significant.

Mechanism of action

Is there a plausible mechanism of action here that can be causing the swelling. 

Absolutely. Physicians are experiencing swelling in other parts of the body. Why would the testes be an exception? If you do a VAERS search for “swelling” you see that I’m right. It’s happening all over people’s bodies.

Here’s a plot of the biodistribution of the lipid nanoparticles that are used to deliver the mRNA instructions. Note that some organs are omitted so you can see the detail more clearly. 

Clearly the ovaries are having much more uptake than the testes.

So if we refer to the original Pfizer data, and look for the heart on page 16 and the testes on page 17.  We see comparable concentrations at 48 hours!

We know the vaccines injure kids’ hearts (myocarditis). Since it looks like we’re delivering similar amounts to the testes, it is plausible to believe that the testes might be damaged in a similar way due to the blood clots and inflammation that the spike protein causes. 

Finally, keep in mind that the spike protein is toxic and it is being delivered to every part of your body. Even if Wikipedia doesn’t agree with me, the scientific literature does. Here is a mix of papers and articles referencing papers on this:

  1. Be aware of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: There is more than meets the eye
  2. Toxicological insights of Spike fragments SARS-CoV-2 by exposure environment: A threat to aquatic health?
  3. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2 
  4. Pay no attention to the spike proteins behind the curtain
  5. Clearing up misinformation about the spike protein and COVID vaccines 

Attacks on this analysis

If you think I’m wrong and the vaccines cannot cause this symptom, I will make the same $1M bet. The terms would be similar to the term sheet I use for betting people on vaccine deaths (we’d substitute “vaccine causes testicular swelling” as the item to be decided upon).

So if you think Fauci is right, see my term sheet and have your attorney contact my attorney.

Attacks on this analysis like “VAERS is over-reported this year” or “there are 2 false report in VAERS” or “you are not a doctor” or anything else like that are all instantly defeatable by the bet. If you think any of your criticisms are valid, then why not take my money? If you are not willing to back your arguments with cash, that tells me you are not confident at all in your position and you are just trying to create FUD and waste my time. That’s counter-productive. The bet simply makes it crystal clear who is serious and who is not.

In short, none of the world experts who criticized Nicki will put their money where their mouth is. Instead, they will continue to spread misinformation and not be held accountable for it. 

Recently, I was in a debate with Honourable Fitzgerald Ethelbert Hinds, the Minister of National Security for Trinidad/Tobago on Power102fm radio. The radio station booted me off the zoom call when it was clear that Minister Hinds was losing badly. The comments from the Trinidad listeners were telling. None of them supported their own official. This is why nobody wants to debate me; because the public can see who is telling the truth when a liar and a truth teller get into a debate.


This sums things up pretty nicely:

Thank you Nicki Minaj for telling the truth and not backing down when you were unfairly attacked. 

I hope you will take a look at the vaccine information I’ve posted at and help people to become aware of it.

A note to the fact checkers

Before you fact check this article and spew out more misinformation doing so, why don’t you educate yourself on the facts first by at least reading the 600 pages of  material I prepared for you here so you will at least know something. 

Not that it will make any difference.

After this article is falsely fact checked, I’ll modify the article to respond to the fact check.

And the fact checkers will never debate me or bet me that they are right. They are faceless and nameless and operate in the shadows and don’t respond to corrections. 

If you want to fact check me, show yourself and debate me in a public forum. 

But they will never do this. They would lose. Badly. Just like Minister Hinds. That’s why they never dare show their names or faces. The evidence is not supportive.

A simple law could restore freedom of “true” speech

It would be great if there were a federal law enabling anyone to recover statutory damages of $50,000 anytime a large social media company blocked information that was factual (and not illegal). That’s a simple law. Wouldn’t it be great if truth would be protected in America?

This would REALLY fix the censorship problem in a heartbeat. 

A note about censorship

I’m also sure that all the social media companies will block any message or tweet that tries to reference this article. They do not want you to read this article. Because if you read this article, you will realize how they have been lying to you about the safety and side-effects of the vaccine from the very beginning.

Sadly, no one in Congress wants to ensure that “truth” is protected from censorship on the popular communication platforms.

We live in a new world today. I’ve never seen anything like this.



Nenhum comentário: