Story at a glance:
* Big Pharma and the mainstream media are largely owned by two asset management companies: BlackRock and Vanguard.
* Pharmaceutical companies are driving responses to COVID-19, all of which, so far, have endangered public health rather than optimizing it, and traditional media outlets have been complicit willing to spread their propaganda, an official false narrative. which leads the public astray and fosters fear based on lies.
* Vanguard and BlackRock are the two principal owners of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney, and News Corp, four of the six media companies that control more than 90% of the multi-country media landscape.
* BlackRock and Vanguard form a highly disguised monopoly that also owns several corporations. In total, they own 1,600 American companies, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $ 9.1 trillion. When you add the third-largest global owner, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all firms in the S&P 500 (Standard & Poor’s is considered the best proxy for large-cap US stocks.
* Vanguard is the largest shareholder in BlackRock. The Vanguard itself, on the other hand, has a unique structure that makes its ownership more difficult to discern, but many of the oldest and richest families in the world can be linked to Vanguard funds.
What do The New York Times and most other legacy outlets have in common with Big Pharma? Answer: They are largely owned by BlackRock and Vanguard Group, the two largest asset management firms in the world. Furthermore, it turns out that these two companies form a very low-key monopoly.
“The shares of the largest corporations in the world belong to the same institutional investors. They all own each other. This means that 'competing' brands, such as Coke and Pepsi, are not really competitors, at all, since their shares belong to the exact same investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks, and in some cases, governments.
“Smaller investors are owned by larger investors. They are owned by even larger investors. The visible top of this pyramid shows only two companies whose names we have seen often… They are Vanguard and BlackRock.
“The power of these two companies is beyond your imagination. Not only do they own a large portion of the shares of almost all large companies, but also the shares of investors in those companies. This gives them a complete monopoly. “A report by Bloomberg affirms that both companies in the year 2028 together will have investments in the amount of 20 billion dollars. That means they will own almost everything”.
Who are Vanguard?
The word "vanguard" means "the leading position in an army or fleet advancing into battle" and / or "the leading position in a trend or movement." Both are adequate descriptions of this global giant, owned by globalists pushing for a Great Reset, whose proposal is to compete against China using their same model in Western countries.
Interestingly, Vanguard is the largest shareholder in BlackRock as of March 2021. Vanguard itself, on the other hand, has a "unique" corporate structure that makes its ownership more difficult to discern. It is owned by its various funds, which in turn are owned by shareholders. Apart from these shareholders, it has no outside investors and is not listed on the stock market. As reported in the video further below:
Oxfam and Bloomberg reports say that 1% of the world together owns more money than the other 99%. Worse still, Oxfam says that 82% of all money earned in 2017 went to this 1%.
“In other words, these two investment firms, Vanguard and BlackRock, have a monopoly on every industry in the world and, in turn, belong to the richest families in the world, some of whom are royalty and have been very rich since then. before the Industrial Revolution ".
While it would take a long time to sift through all of Vanguard's funds to identify the individual shareholders, and therefore the owners of Vanguard, a quick look-see suggests Rothschild Investment Corp. and Edmond De Rothschild Holding are two such stakeholders.
The video also identifies the Italian Orsini family, the American Bush family, the British royal family, the du Pont family, the Morgans, Vanderbilts and Rockefellers, as owners of the Vanguard.
BlackRock / Vanguard are Big Pharma themselves
According to Simply Wall Street, as of February 2020, BlackRock and Vanguard were the two largest shareholders in GlaxoSmithKline, holding 7% and 3.5% of the shares, respectively. At Pfizer, the ownership is invested, with Vanguard being the largest investor and BlackRock the second largest shareholder.
Note that equity ownership ratios can change at any time, as companies buy and sell on a regular basis, so the percentages vary annually. The bottom line is that BlackRock and Vanguard, individually and combined, own enough stock at any given time that we can easily say they control both Big Pharma and centralised legacy media, and much more.
Why does this matter? It matters because drug companies are driving responses to COVID-19, all of which, so far, have endangered public health rather than optimizing it, and traditional media outlets have been complicit willing to spread their propaganda, a false official narrative that has, and still is, misleading the public and fostering fear based on lies.
To have any chance of correcting this, we must understand who the central actors are, where the damaging dictates are coming from, and why these false narratives are being created in the first place.
As noted in Global Justice Now's December 2020 report, “The Horrible History of Big Pharma,” we simply cannot allow pharmaceutical companies, “which have a long history of prioritising corporate profits over corporate health. people, ”continue to enforce COVID-19 responses.
In it, they review the shameful history of the world's top seven pharmaceutical companies that are now developing and manufacturing gene-based drugs and "vaccines" against COVID-19, while mainstream media has helped suppress information on older drugs. readily available that have been shown to be highly effective against infection.
BlackRock / Vanguard own the media
When it comes to The New York Times, in May 2021, BlackRock is the second largest shareholder with 7.43% of total shares, just behind The Vanguard Group, which owns the largest share (8.11%) .
In addition to The New York Times, Vanguard and BlackRock are also the two main owners of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney and News Corp, four of the six media companies that control more than 90% of the US media landscape.
It goes without saying that if you have control of so many media outlets, you can control elections, governments, leaders, etc. through carefully orchestrated and organised centralised propaganda disguised as journalism.
It is difficult to describe closely intertwined and circular relationships in a linear fashion. The world of corporate ownership is a labyrinthine one, where everyone seems to own everyone, to some degree.
However, the key take-home message is that two companies stand out above all others, and they are BlackRock and Vanguard. Together, they form a hidden monopoly over global asset holdings and, through their influence over our centralised media, have the power to manipulate and control much of the world's economy and events, and how the world sees it. everything.
Given that BlackRock announced in 2018 that it has “societal expectations” of the companies it invests in, its potential role as a lynchpin in the Great Reboot and “build back better” plan cannot be overlooked.
Add to this information showing that it "undermines competition by owning shares in competing companies" and "blurs the lines between private equity and government affairs by working closely with regulators," and it would be hard not to see how BlackRock / Vanguard and its globalist owners could facilitate the Great Reset and the so-called “green” revolution, both of which are part of the same scheme to transform countries to the Chinese model.
That claim will become even clearer once you realise that this duo's influence is not limited to Big Pharma and the media. Importantly, BlackRock also works closely with central banks around the world, including the United States Federal Reserve, which is a private, not a federal entity. It lends money to the central bank, acts as an advisor to the central bank, and develops the central bank software.
BlackRock / Vanguard also owns shares in a long list of other companies, including Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Alphabet Inc. As illustrated in the BlackRock and Vanguard owned network graph below, shown in the article. From 2017's "These Three Companies Own America" on The Conversation, it would be nearly impossible to list them all.
In total, BlackRock and Vanguard own about 1,600 US companies, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $ 9.1 trillion. When you add the third-largest global owner, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all S&P 500 firms.
Network of properties of BlackRock, Pharmaceuticals, Companies that manufacture weapons and the mass media along with the most used social networks and search engines. They are the ones who finance the World Economic Forum and its Great Reboot project and the UN 2030 Agenda, under the false name of “Sustainable Development”
BlackRock / Vanguard is linked to the globalist families on the website of the World Economic Forum (WEF) website and in the books published by its CEO, Klaus Schwab. As Lew Rockwell notes:
“Lynn Forester de Rothschild tries to make America a one-party country (like China). The UN wants to make sure, like Klaus Schwab, that in 2030, it wants the taxes of Western countries to be divided by the elite mega-corporations to create an entirely new society. For this project, the UN says we need a world government, that is, the UN itself. "
After reviewing all this information, it becomes clear that the COVID-19 pandemic was orchestrated to provoke this New World Order, the Great Reboot, and at the center of it all, the "heart" into which all global investment flows flow, we find BlackRock and Vanguard.
Monopoly: An Overview of the Great Reset (Tim Gielin, Thijs Aldenzee )
Transcript of the video:
As you are watching millions fall into poverty because of the Corona measures of the past year, even if the greatest economic crisis in history has not affected you yet, it will only be a matter of time until the rippling effects will hit you, as well.
This is not fear-mongering but is a harsh reality. I also think we might mitigate the damage and may even do better, provided we are informed correctly about our situation. This is why I would like to show you a few facts you can easily check facts that are of crucial importance.
Less than a handful of big corporations dominate every aspect of our lives. That may seem exaggerated but from the breakfast we eat to the mattress we sleep on and everything we wear and consume in between is largely dependent on these corporations.
Those are huge investment companies that determine the course of money flow. They are the main characters of the play that we are witnessing. I know your time is valuable, so I summarise the most important data.
How does it work?
THE FOOD INDUSTRY
Let’s take Pepsico as an example. It is the parent company of many soda companies and snack companies. The so-called competitive brands are from factories from a few corporations who monopolise the entire industry. In the packaged food industry, there are a few big companies, like Unilever, the Coca-Cola Company, Mondelez and Nestlé.
In the picture, you see that most brands in the food industry belong to one of these corporations. The big companies are on the stock market and have the big shareholders in the board of directors.
On sources like Yahoo Finance, we can see detailed company info, such as who the biggest shareholders actually are. Let’s take Pepsico again, as an example. We see about 72% of stock is owned by no less than 3,155 institutional investors. These are investment companies, investment funds, insurance companies, banks and in some cases, governments.
Who are the biggest institutional investors of Pepsico? As you can see, only 10 of the investors own together nearly one third of the stock. The top 10 of investors together amount to a value of $59 billion dollars but out of those ten, only three own more stock than the other seven. Let’s remember them and look up who owns the most stocks of the Coca-Cola Company, the biggest competitor of Pepsi.
The biggest lump of stock is again owned by institutional investors. Let’s look at the top 10 and start at the bottom six of them. Four of these institutional investors we also saw at the bottom six of Pepsico. These are Northern Trust, JPMorgan-Chase, Geode Capital Management and Wellington Management. Now, let’s look at the four biggest stock owners. They are BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street. These are the world’s biggest investment firms, so Pepsico and Coca-Cola are not competitors, at all.
The other big companies that own a myriad of brand names, like Unilever, Mondelez and Nestlé are from the same small group of investors. But it’s not only in the food industry that their names come up. Let’s find out on Wikipedia, which are the biggest tech companies.
Facebook is the owner of Whatsapp and Instagram. Together with Twitter, they form the most popular social media platforms. Alphabet is the parent of all Google companies, like YouTube and Gmail but they are also the biggest investor in Android, one of the two operating systems for nearly all smartphones and tablets. The other operating system is Apple’s IOS. If we add Microsoft, we see four companies making the software for nearly all computers, tablets and smartphones in the world.
Let’s see who are the biggest shareholders of these companies. Take Facebook: we see that 80% of the stock is owned by institutional investors. These are the same names that came up in the food industry; the same investors are in the top three. Next, is Twitter. It forms with Facebook and Instagram the top three. Surprisingly, this company is in the hands of the same investors, as well. We see them again, with Apple and even with their biggest competitor, Microsoft.
Also, if we look at other big companies in the tech industry that develop and make our computers, TVs, phones and home appliances, we see the same big investors, that together own the majority of the stock. It’s true for all industries. I’m not exaggerating.
THE TRAVEL INDUSTRY (AND ENERGY & MINING)
One last example, let’s book a holiday on a computer or smartphone. We search for a flight to a sunny country on Skyscanner or Expedia. Both are from the same small group of investors. We fly with one of the many airlines. Many of which are in the hands of the same investors and of governments, as is the case with Air France, KLM. The plane we board is, in most cases a Boeing or an Airbus, also owned by the same names. We book through Booking.com or AirBnB and when we arrive we go out for dinner and place a comment on Tripadvisor.
The same big investors show up in every aspect of our trip and their power is even bigger, because of the kerosene is from their oil companies or refineries. The steel from which the plane is made comes from their mining companies. This small group of investment firms and funds and banks are namely also the biggest investors in the industry that dig for raw materials.
Wikipedia shows that the biggest mining companies have the same big investors that we see everywhere. Also, the big agricultural businesses, on which the entire food industry depends; they own Bayer, the parent company of Monsanto, the biggest seed producer in the world but they are also the shareholders of the big textile industry. And even many popular fashion brands who make the clothing out of the cotton are owned by the same investors.
Whether we look at the world’s biggest solar panel companies or oil refineries, the stocks are in the hands of the same companies. They own the tobacco companies that produce all the popular tobacco brands but they also own all big pharmaceutical companies and the scientific institutions that produce medicine. They own the companies that produce our metals and also the entire car, plane and weapons industry, where a great deal of the metals and raw materials are used. The own the companies that build our electronics, they own the big warehouses and online markets and even the means of payments we use to buy their products.
To make this video as short as possible, I only showed you the tip of the iceberg. If you decide to research this with the sources I just showed you, then you will see that most popular insurance companies, banks, construction companies, telephone companies restaurant chains and cosmetics are owned by the same institutional investors we have just seen.
BLACKROCK & VANGUARD
These institutional investors are mainly investment firms banks and insurance companies. In turn, they, themselves are owned by shareholders and the most surprising thing is that they own each other’s stocks
Together, they form an immense network comparable to a pyramid. The smaller investors are owned by larger investors. Those are owned by even bigger investors. The visible top of this pyramid shows only two companies whose names we have often seen by now. They are Vanguard and BlackRock. The power of these two companies is beyond your imagination. Not only do they own a large part of the stocks of nearly all big companies but also the stocks of the investors in those companies. This gives them a complete monopoly.
A Bloomberg report states that both these companies in the year 2028, together will have investments in the amount of 20 trillion dollars. That means that they will own almost anything
Bloomberg calls BlackRock “The fourth branch of government”, because it’s the only private agency that closely works with the central banks. BlackRock lends money to the central bank but it’s also the advisor. It also develops the software the central bank uses. Many BlackRock employees were in the White House with Bush and Obama. Its CEO, Larry Fink can count on a warm welcome from leaders and politicians. Not so strange, if you know that he is the front man of the ruling company. But Larry Fink does not pull the strings, himself.
BlackRock, itself is also owned by shareholders. Who are those shareholders? We come to a strange conclusion. The biggest shareholder is Vanguard. But now he gets murky. Vanguard is a private company and we cannot see who the shareholders are. The elite who own Vanguard apparently do not like being in the spotlight but of course they cannot hide from who is willing to dig.
Reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg say that 1% of the world, together owns more money than the other 99%. Even worse, Oxfam says that 82% of all earned money in 2017 went to this 1%.
Forbes, the most famous business magazine says that in March 2020, there were 2,095 billionaires in the world. This means that Vanguard is owned by the richest families in the world. If we research their history, we see that they have always been the wealthiest. Some of them, even before the start of the Industrial Revolution, because their history is so interesting and extensive, I will make a sequel.
For now, I just want to say that these families of whom many are in royalty are the founders of our banking system and of every industry in the world, these families have never lost power but due to an increasing population, they had to hide behind firms, like Vanguard, which the stockholders are the private funds and non-profits of these families.
NGOs AND FOUNDATIONS AND THEIR OWNERSHIP OF BIG PHARMA
To clarify the picture, I have to explain briefly what non-profits actually are. These appear to be the link between companies, politics and media. This conceals the conflicts of interests a bit. Non-profits, also called “foundations” are dependent on donations they do not have to disclose who their donors are they can invest the money in the way they see fit and do not pay taxes as long as the profits are invested again in new projects. In this way, non-profits keep hundreds of billions of dollars among themselves according to the Australian government, non-profits are an ideal way of financing terrorists and of massive money-laundering.
The foundations and funds of the families that are the richest stay in the background as much as possible. For issues that get much attention, the foundation of philanthropists are used that are lower in rank but very rich.
I want to keep it short, so I will show you the three most important ones that connect all industries in the world. They are the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation of the controversial multi-billionaire, Soros and the Clinton Foundation. I will give you a very short introduction to show you their power.
According to the website of the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation is the biggest sponsor of the WHO. That was after Donald Trump quit USA financial support to the WHO in 2020. So the Gates Foundation is one of the most influential entities in everything that concerns our health. The Gates Foundation works closely with the biggest pharma companies, among which are Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Biontech and Bayer.
And we have just seen who their biggest shareholders are. Bill Gates was not a poor computer nerd who miraculously became very rich. He’s from a philanthropist’s family that works for the absolute elite. His Microsoft is owned by Vanguard, BlackRock and Berkshire Hathaway. But the Gates Foundation, after BlackRock and Vanguard is the biggest shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway. He was even the member of the board there.
We would need hours if we wanted to uncover everything in which Gates, the Open Society Foundation of Soros and the Clinton Foundation are involved. They form a bridge to the current situation, so I had to introduce them.
THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA
We need to start the next topic with a question. Someone like me, who never makes videos can, with an old laptop objectively show that only two companies hold a monopoly in all industries in the world. My question is, why is this never talked about in the media?
We can choose daily between all sorts of documentaries and TV programs but none of them cover this subject. Is it not interesting enough or are there other interests at play? Wikipedia, again gives us the answer. They say that about 90% of the international media is owned by nine media conglomerates. Whether we take the monopolist Netflix and Amazon Prime or enormous concerns that own many daughter companies, like Time-Warner, the Walt Disney Company, Comcast, Fox Corporation, Bertelsmann and Viacom, CBS, we see that the same names own stocks.
These corporations not only make all the programs, movies and documentaries but also own the channels on which those are broadcast. So, not only the industries but also the information is owned by the elite.
I will show you briefly how this works in the Netherlands. To start with, all the Dutch mainstream media are owned by three companies. The first one is De PersGroep [DPG Media], the parent company of the following brands (. Apart from the many newspapers and magazines, they also own Sanoma, the parent company of some of the big commercial Dutch channels. Many media outlets from abroad, like VTM are also owned by the De PersGroep.
The second one is Mediahuis, one of Europe’s biggest media concerns. In the Netherlands, Mediahuis owns the following brands. Until 2017, also Sky Radio and Radio Veronica were owned by Mediahuis, as were Radio 538 and radio 10.
And then there is Bertelsmann, which is one of the 9 biggest media firms. This company owns RTL, that owns 45 television stations and 32 radio stations in 11 countries. But Bertelsmann is also co-owner of the world’s biggest book publisher, Penguin Random House.
The stocks of these companies are owned by private funds of three families. Those are the Belgian Van Thillo family, the Belgian Leysen family and the German Bertelsmann-Mohn family. All three families sided with the Nazis in the War.
According to Wikipedia, for this reason, the Telegraaf, the Leysen newspaper was temporarily forbidden in the Netherlands after the war.
THE FAKE NEWS
To complete this overview, look at where the news comes from. The daily news of all these media outlets the diverse news media do not produce news. They use information and footage from the press agencies, .ANP and Reuters. These agencies are not independent. .ANP is owned by Talpa, John de Mol. Thomson-Reuters is owned by the powerful Canadian Thomson family.
The most important journalists and editors working for these agencies are members of a journalism agency, like the European Journalism Centre. These are one of the biggest European sponsors of media-related projects. They educate journalists, publish study books, provide training spaces and press agencies and work closely together with the big corporations, Google and Facebook.
For journalistic analysis and views, the big media use Project Syndicate. This is the most powerful organization in the field. Project Syndicate and organizations like I mentioned are together with the press agencies. The link between all worldwide media outlets when news anchors reap from their autocues [teleprompters], chances are that the text stems from one of these organizations. That is the reason that worldwide media shows synchronicity in their reporting.
And look at the European journalism center, itself. Again, the Gates Foundation and the Open Society Foundation. They are also heavily-sponsored by Facebook, Google, the Ministry of Education and Science and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Who sponsors the organization and press agencies that produce our news? With Project Syndicate, we see the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation and the European Journalism Centre. The organizations that bring the news get paid by non-profit organizations, of the same elite that also owns the entire media but also a part of taxpayers money is used to pay them.
In Belgium, there are protests regularly, since Mediahuis and De Persgroep receive millions of euros from the government, while many are abroad…
THE DANGER WE ARE IN NOW
Well, this was a lot to chew on and I tried to make it as short as I could. I only used examples that I thought were necessary to create a clear overview. This helps to better understand our current situation, that can shed new light on past events
There will be enough time to dive into the past, but now let’s talk about today but my goal is to inform you about the danger we are in now. The elite governs every aspect of our lives, also, the information we get and they depend on a coordination, cooperation to connect all industries in the world to serve their interests. This is done through the World Economic Forum, among others, a very important organization.
Every year in Davos, the CEOs of big corporations meet national leaders, politicians and other influential parties, like UNICEF and Greenpeace. On the supervisory board of the WEF is former Vice President, Al Gore, our own minister, Sigrid Kaag, Feike Sijbesma, Chairman of the Royal Dutch State Mines and the Commissioner of the Dutch bank, Christine Lagarde, the Chairwoman of the European Central Bank. Also, politician, Ferdinand Grapperhaus’ son works for the WEF.
Wikipedia says that the annual fee for members is 35,000 euros “but over half of our budget comes from partners who pay the cost for politicians who otherwise could not afford membership.”
According to critics, the WEF is for rich businesses to do business with other businesses or with politicians. For most members, the WEF would support personal gain instead of being a means to solve the world’s problems. Why would there be many world problems if the industry leaders, bankers and politicians from 1971 onwards have gathered every year to solve the world’s problems?
Isn’t it illogical, that after 50 years of meetings between environmentalists and the CEOs of the most polluting companies, nature is gradually doing worse, not better; that those critics are right, it’s clear, when we look at the main partners that together make up more than half of the budget of the WEF. Because these are BlackRock, the Open Society foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and many big companies, from which Vanguard and BlackRock own the stocks.
Chairman and founder of the WEF is Klaus Schwab, a Swiss professor and businessman. In his book, The Great Reset, he writes about the plans of his organization. The coronavirus is, according to him a great “opportunity” to reset our societies. He calls it “Build Back Better”. The slogan is now on the lips of all Globalist politicians in the world.
Our old society must switch to a new one, says Schwab. The people own nothing but work for the state to have their primary needs met. The WEF says it’s necessary for the consumption society the elite forced upon us is not sustainable anymore. Schwab says in his book that we will never return to the old normal and the WEF published a video recently to make clear that by 2030, we will own nothing but we will be happy.
THE GREAT RESET = THE NEW WORLD ORDER
You've probably heard of the New World Order. The media wants us to believe that this is a conspiracy theory, yet it has been talked about by leaders for decades. Not just George Bush Sr., Bill Clinton, and Nelson Mandela, but also world-famous philanthropists, such as Cecil Rhodes, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, and even George Soros.
The UN unveiled its controversial 2030 Agenda in 2015. It is almost identical to Klaus Schwab's Great Reset. The UN wants to make sure, as does Schwab, that in 2030, poverty, hunger, pollution and disease no longer plague the Earth.
Sounds nice, but wait until you read the small print. The plan is that Agenda 2030 to be paid for by us, the citizens. Just as they now ask us to give up our rights for public health, they will ask us to give up our wealth to battle poverty. These are not conspiracy theories. It's on their official website. It all comes down to this: the UN wants the taxes of Western countries to be divided by the elite mega-corporations to create a brand new society. The new infrastructure...because fossil fuels are gone by 2030.
For this project, the UN says that we need a world government, that is, the UN itself.
The UN agrees with Schwab that a 'pandemic' is a golden chance to accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030.
It is worrisome that the WEF and the UN openly admit that pandemics and other catastrophes can be used to reshape society. We must not think lightly about this and do thorough research.
On Friday October 18th 2019, months before the pandemic was announced, a gathering was held in the Pierre Hotel in New York City. It was a meeting for very important persons. Present were politicians, highly credited health experts and pharmacologists.The goal of the gathering was the simulation of a worldwide pandemic. Could be a coincidence, right? But as an example they used a coronavirus. The simulation covered how the virus would develop and how it could only be detained if people cooperated in industries, government and government agencies. Again, a New World Order to save us.
Is it surprising when i tell you that this gathering, Event 201, was organised by the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Johns Hopkins Institute?
This is no conspiracy theory. Look on the official website of Event 201.
At this point, you may not be surprised anymore that the Robert Koch Institute just like any other public institute, is closely connected to Gates' WHO and that it created a similar simulation in 2012
Just like in Event 201, they took a coronavirus as an example. In this simulation, the starting point was a food market in South-East Asia. A coronavirus would jump from an animal to a human. In this simulation, it takes some weeks for the Chinese to discover the virus. In this way, it can spread all over the world. A simulation is made of the next three years of lockdowns. Destroyed economies and the impact on society, riots and protests included. I won't go into the details. Look it up on the website of the German government.
Lastly, I would like to show you part of a talk of the virologist Marc Van Ranst which he held on January 22nd, 2019 in Chatham House. The Chatham House organisation is financed by the elite corporations and also by the Gates Foundation. This is an important non-profit in London where important figures gather to talk about the world's problems. The prize was given to Hillary Clinton, Melinda Gates and John Kerry. During the talk, our own Ab Osterhaus is in the front row. Van Ranst explains how he misled the people during the swine flu. He triggered fear by death numbers without context and media manipulation. He laughs as he tells how he made sure that the vaccines of the pharmaceutical companies he was working for then were accepted by many fearful people:
"Let me tell you about my experience as being the crisis manager of the flu commission for Belgium and highlighting the communication aspects there. And then you have one opportunity to do it right. Day 1 is so important. On day 1 you start your communication with the press, with the people, and you have to do it right. You have to go for one voice, one messgae. In Belgium, they chose to appoint a non-politician to do that. I have no party affiliations, and that makes things a little bit easier, because you're not attacked politicaly. Majority / minority: that doesn't come into play. And that was a huge advantage. The second advantage is that you can play in Brussels the complete naive guy and get a lot more done than you would otherwise be able to do.
You have to be omnipresent that first day or the first days, so that you attract the media attention. You make an agreement with them that you will tell them all that if they call you, you will pick up the phone. When you do that, you can profit from these early days to get complete carpet coverage of the field, and they're not going to search for alternative voices there. And if you do that, that makes things a lot easier.
And the you have to say, okay, well, we will have H1N1 deaths Of course, that would be unavoidable. I used Sir Donaldson's quote where he said that in the UK, by the peak of the epidemic, 40 people would die per day at the end of the summer. So, 62 million people in the UK at that time, 40 deaths a day. I worked it our for Belgium. That would be 7 deaths a day at the peak of the epidemic. I used that in the media. 7 Begian flu deaths per day at the peak of the epidemic would be realistic. That is true in every year...That is very very conservative. However, talking about fatalities is important because when you say that, people say "Wow! What do you mean? People die because of influenza?" And that was a necessary step to take. And then of course, a couple of days later, you had the first H1N1 deaths in the country and the scene was set and it was already talked about.
And then you had to pick who was going to be vaccinated first. Women and children first, whatever. I mean, the risk groups, they were important. And then I misued the fact that the top football soccer clubs in Belgium inappropriately and against all agreements vaccinated...they made their soccer players priority people. So I said "I can use that". Because if the population really believes that this vaccine is so desirable that even the soccer players would be dishonest to get their vaccine. I said "okay, I can play with that. So I made a big fuss about this. "This Van Ranst is raving mad!" But it worked."
We could talk for hours about the virus of which survival rate is 99.98 % and about the incomprehensible rules that destroy our society Millions of entrepeneurs are broke. Countless peoiple died in loneliness, in carehomes, separated from their families. This is no lie. But we know enough facts now to place the Corona rules in a much clearer perspective. The perspective of the elite.
Big Blackrock and big Vanguard do not benefit from borders, import taxes and real diversity. Only by means of fear and media manipulation can they contain this.
The elite is not going tp cure us from the diseases we got from their toxic foods or from the environmental pollution. If we did not get sick, the pharmaceutic industry would collapse. Nothing sells better than fear is the slogan of virologists like Van Ranst.
You're going to be surprised, like I was, that we have often been warned.
With this video, I reach out and hope to bridge the ever-growing gap between us.